Re: [meteorite-list] Asteroid the size of 33 armadillos - yes, you read that correctly

2023-03-28 Thread Ed Deckert via Meteorite-list
The unit of measurement originally used in the planetary sciences was
coconuts.  However, the question of whether or not coconuts were migratory
had come up.  Due to the potential for migratory interference caused by
swallows, and the argument over whether or not European or African swallows
were actually the culprit, it was decided that armadillos were far less
controversial, and thus replaced the coconut standard by a unanimous vote...

-Original Message-
From: Meteorite-list  On Behalf
Of Michael Gilmer via Meteorite-list
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 10:44 AM
To: Meteorite List 
Subject: [meteorite-list] Asteroid the size of 33 armadillos - yes, you read
that correctly

Apparently, armadillos are valid units of measurement in the planetary
sciences.

I wonder how many armadillos would represent an extinction-level event?

Link - https://m.jpost.com/science/article-735473
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Asteroid the size of 33 armadillos - yes, you read that correctly

2023-03-28 Thread John Lutzon via Meteorite-list


   Ah ha, as only Armadillos can transmit Leprosy to humans, maybe that 
explains the cause of
  meteorite leprosy  Caliche.   {:>)

JL
.---  .-..  ---  ..-  -

- Original Message - 
From: "Matthias Bärmann via Meteorite-list" 

To: "Michael Gilmer" ; "Meteorite List" 

Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Asteroid the size of 33 armadillos - yes, you 
read that correctly



Michael - depends on how hungry they are after their voyage through
space and time.

Am 28.03.2023 um 16:43 schrieb Michael Gilmer via Meteorite-list:
> Apparently, armadillos are valid units of measurement in the planetary 
> sciences.
>
> I wonder how many armadillos would represent an extinction-level event?
>
> Link - https://m.jpost.com/science/article-735473
> __
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Asteroid the size of 33 armadillos - yes, you read that correctly

2023-03-28 Thread Matthias Bärmann via Meteorite-list



Michael - depends on how hungry they are after their voyage through
space and time.

Am 28.03.2023 um 16:43 schrieb Michael Gilmer via Meteorite-list:

Apparently, armadillos are valid units of measurement in the planetary sciences.

I wonder how many armadillos would represent an extinction-level event?

Link - https://m.jpost.com/science/article-735473
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Asteroid the size of 33 armadillos - yes, you read that correctly

2023-03-28 Thread Michael Gilmer via Meteorite-list
Apparently, armadillos are valid units of measurement in the planetary sciences.

I wonder how many armadillos would represent an extinction-level event?

Link - https://m.jpost.com/science/article-735473
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Most confirmed falls in a year?

2023-03-28 Thread Finbarr Connolly via Meteorite-list
>
> 2005 : ZERO (one, if you count "Montney" Canada, which was recovered,
> not classified)


2005 was the first year without an official fall since 1888, and before
that, since 1832.

Finbarr.

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 4:21 PM Michael Gilmer 
wrote:

> Interesting and informative responses. Like Mr. Lyon said, I would
> think the modern world would provide for increased detection and
> recovery rates. But Rob makes some very good points about the
> outdoor-culture of the world in the 1930's compared to now. Light
> pollution is also a factor for visual detection.
>
> So, 1933 is the reigning champion. We have come relatively close a
> couple of times, and I would expect that record will be broken in the
> coming yearsor will it stand for 100 years or more?
>
> For those keeping track, the number of classified/confirmed falls
> since the year 2000 :
>
> 2023 : zero, but four are pending.
> 2022 : 5 (six if you count "Junction City" GA which is still a pending
> classification)
> 2021 : 8
> 2020 : 13
> 2019 : 8
> 2018 : 14
> 2017 : 8
> 2016 : 12
> 2015 : 9
> 2014 : 7
> 2013 : 8
> 2012 : 10
> 2011 : 7
> 2010 : 7
> 2009 : 8
> 2008 : 11
> 2007 : 9
> 2006 : 6
> 2005 : ZERO (one, if you count "Montney" Canada, which was recovered,
> not classified)
> 2004 : 7
> 2003 : 9
> 2002 : 9
> 2001 : 5
> 2000 : 4
>
> 184 total classified falls since Jan 01, 2000.
>
> Average of 8 per year between 2000 and 2022.
>
> There have been 9 years with above average falls during that time.
>
> Source : Meteoritical Bulletin and the Galactic Stone "Recent Falls" page.
>
>
>
> On 3/20/23, Matson, Rob D. [US-US] via Meteorite-list
>  wrote:
> > Hi Mark – in 1933, people spent more time outdoors than they do today
> (and,
> > probably less important, they enjoyed much darker night skies). I expect
> > that the annual rate of meteorite-producing falls has remained about
> > constant over the last century, with year-to-year variations consistent
> with
> > Poisson statistics.
> >
> > With improved technology (weather satellites, all-sky cameras, dashcams,
> > ring cameras, Doppler radar, etc.), the odds of successful recovery of a
> > given witnessed fall improves, but that factor may not be enough to
> counter
> > the (likely) decrease in witnessed events (particularly daytime events).
> > Remember that bolides with the greatest chance of producing rocks on the
> > ground fall between local noon and midnight – from meteoroids that are
> > “catching” up to the earth from behind and thus have slower average entry
> > velocities than those occurring between midnight and noon. In the 1930s,
> a
> > greater fraction of the population were outdoors from 8 am to 8 pm – a
> > 12-hour time window when 64% of meteorite falls occur (based on Met.
> > Bulletin data from 1860-2017). Of course, there are a lot more people in
> > 2023 than in 1933, but most of those outdoors during the day are likely
> > driving or staring at their phones (or both).   --Rob
> >
> > From: Meteorite-list  On
> Behalf
> > Of Mark Lyon via Meteorite-list
> > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023 7:29 AM
> > To: Frank Cressy 
> > Cc: Finbarr Connolly ; Meteorite List
> > 
> > Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [meteorite-list] Most confirmed falls in a year?
> >
> > That's surprising that there would be a record in 1933.  I figured new
> > technology, rising populations, and an increase in meteorite hunters
> would
> > mean that there were more witnessed falls more recently than 90 years
> ago.
> > Have the number of witnessed falls per year tended to be significantly
> > higher more recently or has it stayed about the same?
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 6:52 AM Frank Cressy via Meteorite-list
> >  meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>>
> > wrote:
> > In addition to the 17 witnessed falls worldwide for 1933, that year also
> had
> > two others that are possible falls, Elton, Texas and Willard (b) New
> > Mexico.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Frank
> >
> > On Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 03:45:48 PM PDT, Finbarr Connolly via
> > Meteorite-list
> >  meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > 1933 has the record with 17. 1949 had 13 and 1950, 76 and 98 all with 12.
> >
> > Finbarr.
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 9:20 PM Michael Gilmer via Meteorite-list
> >  meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>>
> > wrote:
> > Hi Listees,
> >
> > I was recently wondering, what year has the most confirmed witnessed
> falls?
> >
> > I have been closely following falls since the year 2000, and according
> > to my records we have a few contenders in recent years. I am thinking
> > one of these must be the most.
> >
> > 2018 has 15 falls, but two of them are not official (HaH 346, aka
> > Ghadamis, was classified as a find) and a fall over Pakistan was not
> > recovered or recorded. This leaves 14 classified falls in a 12 month
> > period :
> >
> > Jan 05, 2018 - Matarka (L6 chondrite) : Morocco
> > Jan 16, 2018 - Hamburg (H4 chondrite) : Michigan USA
> > Feb 16, 2018 - Ablaketka (H5 chondrite) : 

[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2023-03-28 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Tuesday, Mar 28 2023 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Udei Station

Contributed by: Paul Swartz

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/28/2023
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list