[meteorite-list] Photos of Czech tektite meeting in October 2013

2013-12-10 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi list

I'm not so often on this list now, but I thought you might be interested in 
photos from the official opening of the Moldavite Museum in Cesky Krumlov, 
Southern Bohemia, Czech Republic on 19 October 2013. The museum is well worth a 
visit!

See here: http://www.tektites.co.uk/muzeumvlatvinu.html

Best Regards, Aubrey
http://www.tektites.co.uk/

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteor in UK

2013-05-10 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Meteor seen in UK

See links:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22460642

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/video-large-green-fireball-meteor-seen-shooting-across-sky-above-england-and-wales-8608807.html
  
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD: BARWELL Meteorite for sale from original finder + documents - well worth a look

2013-04-19 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi List
 
Presented is a very rare opportunity to obtain two exceptionally well preserved 
pieces of the historic British BARWELL meteorite (fell on Christmas Eve, 1965). 
What makes this even more special is that these pieces have been in the hands 
of the finder (a former Keeper of Geology at the Leicester Museum) for over 47 
years! The pieces therefore come with a story and documentation.
 
Well worth a look, even if not buying:
 
http://www.tektiteshop.co.uk/
 
I have set up this webpage for a friend of a friend and you will be dealing 
directly with the lady who found the specimens. You can direct any enquires or 
offers directly to Jean Ferguson (ferguson814 'at' btinternet 'dot' com) - 
please don't reply to list or me. She is very open to serious offers, but will 
obviously wait a short while to consider her options. She is motivated to sell 
so please do not hesitate in putting in an offer as this valuable material is 
difficult to price - I'm pretty certain that another such offering is unlikely 
to appear any time soon!
 
Regards, Aubrey Whymark
on behalf of Jean Ferguson

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Publishing advice for Tektite book

2012-08-28 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi 

I am seeking advice on how to go about publishing a tektite book. The book is 
practically complete now (after a very long time). It’s 420 pages, 6x9 inch, 
black and white with numerous pictures and diagrams. I have a few issues in 
that I would like to maintain copyright. I want to avoid major reformatting and 
rewriting as I have limited time. I want to keep the price affordable (I’m not 
in it for the money and I don’t want Elsevier charging $30 a page). I don’t 
have time to sell it myself. I want to avoid ebooks - hardback books are so 
much nicer, but may consider putting it online at a later date. I want to get 
the book out a.s.a.p. as I think there is some interesting material within, 
plus I have other projects to move on to. It's certainly a step up from the 
website, which I haven't updated for a while - more to come soon I hope though.

I don’t have any significant money constraints so I may just self publish and 
print say 500 copies. I could do this either in the Philippines, UK or US. 
Philippines is probably easiest for me, but then the problem of distribution. I 
know about 3 people who’d buy a copy in Manila and I’ll probably give them a 
free copy! Possibly if I get cheaper printing in Manila it may offset postal 
charges. US has some great publishing sites, but I don’t live there, then again 
lots of meteorite collectors do! I’m sure some of you guys have experience and 
maybe can point me in a sensible direction here.

My email address is aub...@tektites.co.uk I'll apologise in advance if I don't 
get back to you straight away as I'll be travelling in the next few days.

Regards, Aubrey
http://www.tektites.co.uk/  
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Darryl Futrell (+) (also, question about Futrell Collection)

2012-08-28 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

This is the Museum most of Darryl's tektites went to 
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc2010/pdf/5366.pdf via The Tektite Source.

A few pieces went to the Corning Museum of Glass (including the largest 
splashform in the world at the time - now 3rd largest). You can find these 
online.

Some were sold via the meteorite exchange. Labels here: 
http://www.tektites.co.uk/tektite-labels.html

Regards, Aubrey


- Original Message -
From: Michael Blood mlbl...@cox.net
To: Phil Morgan roxfromsp...@gmail.com; Met. Michael Gilmer 
meteoritem...@gmail.com
Cc: Meteorite List meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Tuesday, 14 August 2012, 14:43
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Darryl Futrell (+) (also, question about Futrell 
Collection)

Hi Phil, Michael  all,
        Paul may want to correct me, but I believe he and Jim purchased
Darryl's entire collection in the later part of the 1990s, which served to
launch the formation of THE METEORITE EXCHANGE. Paul and Jim
Were very generous in their sales of Darryl's tektites, as they have always
Been in every business interaction as long as I have known them. I doubt
You could find a single person with whom they have done business that
Would not say the same thing. These are the people who offer free
advertizing meteorite classified ads to everyone and who publish
METEORITE TIMES - again, free of charge.
        Darryl was at most of their Tektite Parties and I am fortunate to
have a couple of nice photos from what was likely the last one he attended
In the year 2000. 
        (Note also the quality of digital photography twelve years ago)

http://michaelbloodmeteorites.com/DarrylFutrell.html

        Thanks to Paul and Jim for such great memories on top of everything
Else they have given.
        Hope you all enjoy the photos, Michael

On 8/13/12 1:48 PM, Phil Morgan roxfromsp...@gmail.com wrote:

 Mike,
 I believe his collection went to a museum but Norm (tektitesource)
 doesn't name it on his site.
 see here: http://www.tektitesource.com/Futrell%20Collection.html for details.
 
 Jim and Paul (http://www.meteorites-for-sale.com/) have had some
 Futrell pieces in the past but haven't checked lately.
 
 Darryl was certainly a passionate and interesting man.  I was never
 able to meet him but corresponded with him a bit and he was kind
 enough to send me a corrected copy of his Rock  Gem articles with
 lots of hand-written notes and additional photos.
 
 Regards,
 Phil
 
 
 On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:07 PM, MikeG meteoritem...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Gang,
 
 I echo the sentiments in the original post.  I never met the man, but
 I have heard much about him.  I am curious.  What happened to his
 collection after his passing?
 
 And, did he ever paint labels onto his specimens?  I am selling a
 collection for a friend, and it has some superb-quality tektites in
 it.  Some of the tektites have painted labels on them, and we cannot
 identify the label.  It would be great if these were Futrell
 specimens, but that is probably just wishful thinking.
 
 Lastly, does anyone have a link to a hi-res photo of his famous
 tektite lamp?  I have a low-res version, but I love to see something
 hi-res that really shows the detail.
 
 Best regards,
 
 MikeG
 
 --
 -
 Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com/
 Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
 Twitter - http://twitter.com/GalacticStone
 RSS - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
 -
 
 On 8/13/12, Daniel rainte...@aol.com wrote:
 I wish I could have met him!
 
 
 
 Daniel S.
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Aug 13, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Bernd V. Pauli bernd.pa...@paulinet.de
 wrote:
 
 Gone but still not forgotten!
 
 Bernd
 
 
 __
 
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 __
 
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 __
 
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 __
 
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list

Re: [meteorite-list] Steves unproven tektite theory by Steve lol!

2012-02-27 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Are you sure these are flow lines? U-grooves are most definitely etched. These 
might be internal flow, varying slightly in chemistry, that have been etched. I 
have never seen flow lines on any tektite other than australites and javaites 
i.e. ablated forms.
 
Aubrey
 
- Original Message -
From: Steve Dunklee steve.dunk...@yahoo.com
To: Aubrey Whymark tinbi...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: 
Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2012, 4:33
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Steves unproven tektite theory by Steve lol!

Flow lines on a teardrop covering u grooves made during flight
cheers
Steve


o.co.uk wrote:

 From: Aubrey Whymark tinbi...@yahoo.co.uk
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Steves unproven tektite theory by Steve lol!
 To: Meteorite list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Monday, February 27, 2012, 4:35 AM
 Hi John and list
  
 I only check this list every week or so! I'm real busy with
 work and also writing my tektite book. It is very well
 progressed now - so hopefully soon, but the longer it takes
 the better it gets (I hope)! I said 2011, now 2012 (end of)!
 I have some very interesting new interpretations coming
 forward regarding the role of plastic deformation in almost
 ALL tektites. Check out my abstract for the LPI conference.
 http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2012/pdf/1045.pdf
  
 Regards, Aubrey
  
  
  
  
 - Original Message -
 From: John.L.Cabassi j...@cabassi.net
 To: 'Aubrey Whymark' tinbi...@yahoo.co.uk
 Cc: 
 Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012, 5:25
 Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Steves unproven tektite theory
 by Steve lol!
 
 G'Day Aubrey
 Thank you. I've been watching this thread develop. I wanted
 to jump in
 but I wanted to see what further information people were
 willing to
 offer up. And I said to Kat, it's amazing that Aubrey hasn't
 jumped in
 and I just got home and logged in and sure enough, you're up
 close and
 personal.
 
 
 Cheers,
 John
 
 John Cabassi - Johnno
 IMCA #2125
 www.MeteoriteJunction.com
 MeteoriteHQ.Com  (still under construction)
 Twitter: @meteoritejohnno
 http://facebook.com/MeteoriteJohnno
 
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
 [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com]
 On Behalf Of Aubrey
 Whymark
 Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 6:21 PM
 To: Meteorite list
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Steves unproven tektite theory
 by Steve
 lol!
 
 
 Hi
  
 The etching is genuine. The statement that 'if etching was
 terrestrial
 then the whole surface would be etched' is incorrect.You
 have to
 remember that different surfaces have been exposed to
 different
 conditions. Some surfaces simply have no stresses and lines
 of weakness
 for chemical attack to occur and if it does occur then it is
 more even
 on these surfaces. The posterior smooth surface, which was
 not exposed
 to re-entry heating, generally survives very well. The
 spalled areas or
 bald areas again have no lines of weakness and often avoid
 etching. The
 anterior surface which suffered re-entry heating and then
 rapid cooling
 has many lines of weakness and is readily attacked. If you
 take the
 stretch tektites then the exterior surface was cooled,
 re-heated and
 then rapidily cooled. The interior stretch part was exposed
 late on -
 either due to impact breakage or more likely thermal
 breakage when the
 tektite had lost its inherited cosmic velocity and shock 
 wave and then
 rapidly cooled. This exposed stretch surface simply cooled.
 The two
 surfaces are very different in terms of thermal history and
 weaknesses,
 hence one is heavily etched and the other lightly or not
 etched.
  
 If you don't believe that pitting can form by natural
 etching then study
 ancient soda glass. Islamic glass jeton is great as it can
 be accurately
 dated. This material, sometimes over 1000 years old will
 sometimes show
 pitting. Soda glass is a lot lower in quality compared with
 tektite
 glass and so the process of etching is quicker.
  
 Etching is genuine, but is not random - this is the key
 point. It
 attacks cracks and weaknesses caused as the tektite cooled
 then
 re-entered the atmosphere.
  
 If you want to study etching then start with moldavites and
 then work
 towards the more recent Australasian tektites. Etching is a
 tricky
 subject btw. Etching is, strictly speaking, alkaline attack
 that targets
 the silica network. This usually creates v-grooves. Leaching
 is the acid
 attack which is more common as tektites usually occur
 reworked in porous
 and permeable gravels exposed to meteoric waters. Acid
 attack targets
 the alkaline component in the glass. The acid attack usually
 results in
 rounded pitting and u-grooves. The two processes can also
 act in
 parallel if conditions are right. The geological and
 reworking history
 of an individual specimen is often complex and, combined
 with abrasion
 from transportation, can result in a diversity of sculpture
 and
 morphologies. I know that etching is genuine, but I still
 wondered

Re: [meteorite-list] Steves unproven tektite theory by Steve lol!

2012-02-26 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi
 
The etching is genuine. The statement that 'if etching was terrestrial then the 
whole surface would be etched' is incorrect.You have to remember that different 
surfaces have been exposed to different conditions. Some surfaces simply have 
no stresses and lines of weakness for chemical attack to occur and if it does 
occur then it is more even on these surfaces. The posterior smooth surface, 
which was not exposed to re-entry heating, generally survives very well. The 
spalled areas or bald areas again have no lines of weakness and often avoid 
etching. The anterior surface which suffered re-entry heating and then rapid 
cooling has many lines of weakness and is readily attacked. If you take the 
stretch tektites then the exterior surface was cooled, re-heated and then 
rapidily cooled. The interior stretch part was exposed late on - either due to 
impact breakage or more likely thermal breakage when the tektite had lost its 
inherited cosmic velocity and shock
 wave and then rapidly cooled. This exposed stretch surface simply cooled. The 
two surfaces are very different in terms of thermal history and weaknesses, 
hence one is heavily etched and the other lightly or not etched.
 
If you don't believe that pitting can form by natural etching then study 
ancient soda glass. Islamic glass jeton is great as it can be accurately dated. 
This material, sometimes over 1000 years old will sometimes show pitting. Soda 
glass is a lot lower in quality compared with tektite glass and so the process 
of etching is quicker.
 
Etching is genuine, but is not random - this is the key point. It attacks 
cracks and weaknesses caused as the tektite cooled then re-entered the 
atmosphere.
 
If you want to study etching then start with moldavites and then work towards 
the more recent Australasian tektites. Etching is a tricky subject btw. Etching 
is, strictly speaking, alkaline attack that targets the silica network. This 
usually creates v-grooves. Leaching is the acid attack which is more common as 
tektites usually occur reworked in porous and permeable gravels exposed to 
meteoric waters. Acid attack targets the alkaline component in the glass. The 
acid attack usually results in rounded pitting and u-grooves. The two processes 
can also act in parallel if conditions are right. The geological and reworking 
history of an individual specimen is often complex and, combined with abrasion 
from transportation, can result in a diversity of sculpture and morphologies.
I know that etching is genuine, but I still wondered if some of the anterior 
sculpture on indochinites was original. I don't think it is.
Another way to study etching is to collect half a ton of different tektites 
with various stages of sculpture. Your wife will be happy with that suggestion.
 
Also, tektites are glass, quenched very quickly - no crystals or crystallites 
here!
 
Regards, Aubrey Whymark

From: Daniel rainte...@aol.com
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com 
Sent: Saturday, 25 February 2012, 19:26
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Steves unproven tektite theory by Steve lol!

Hi Carl, 

I don't agree with everything about this theory, I just thought it was 
interesting. There all still a lot of unknowns when it comes to tektites. 

Are you a tektite collector?

Best Regards,
Daniel Sutherland



On Feb 25, 2012, at 9:45 AM, cdtuc...@cox.net wrote:

 Daniel, Steve,
 All due respect to this theory. 
 I'd like to hear more  about this theory because he says;
 Theories about chemical etching and spalling as the major creators of 
 surface sculpturing have been proven unlikely.
 He does not explain this statement. How has this been proven unlikely? 
 If his theory is true. How do you explain all of the glass rocks found that 
 have the same surface features as tektites but, have been ruled out as 
 tektites based largely on the amount of H2O within them?
 Arizonaites( Saffordites) ?, Columbianites?, etc. 
 
 Carl
 meteoritemax
 
 --
 Cheers
 
  Daniel rainte...@aol.com wrote: 
 Hi all,
 
 Take a look at this website.
 
 http://www.edamgaard.dk/Copy%20of%20VietnamTektites%20edj.htm
 
 
 Cheers,
 Daniel Sutherland 
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Feb 24, 2012, at 11:19 PM, Dan Wray daniel_w...@comcast.net wrote:
 
 Steve,
 
 I am a tektite collector and I agree with you about the so called etching. 
 If you look at broken fragments of hollow tektites the inside surface is 
 smooth and the outside textured.  You can also see this on stretched 
 specimens, the stretched area is smooth.  This so called etching is bogus.
 
 Dan Wray
 - Original Message - From: Steve Dunklee steve.dunk...@yahoo.com
 To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 1:41 PM
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Steves unproven tektite theory by Steve lol!
 
 
 
 I believe the features on most tektites are produced during formation and 
 not by etching. As the molten material reaches the upper atmosphere they 
 reach a verry cold environment with low

Re: [meteorite-list] Bediasites agree with Steve's unproven tektite theory

2012-02-26 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

I like your last paragraph Brian - I think this is closer to the truth. Tektite 
glass doesn't survive 35 million years unless it is in rather special 
preservational conditions. The U-grooved specimens likely sat around for a few 
hundreds of thousands of years in an acidic (rainwater) environment which 
etched them. Had they remained in this environment they would be gone by now. 
Instead they were incorporated into a sediment that, for whatever reason, 
preserved them. I'm not familiar with the Manning Fm and Jackson Fm. Low 
permeability would preserve specimens. Also if there was only acid leaching 
then the alkaline ions are removed and then the remaining silica acts as a 
barrier and the process stops (Adams, 1984). Similarly if there is only 
alkaline attack in a closed environment then waters become saturated in silica 
and the etching essentiallys stops. One wonders whether the rock was saturated 
in silica, suppressing the leaching rate to zero?

As Brian mentioned it's also noteworthy that some bediasites also show 
pyramidal v-grooving, which is caused by alkaline etching attacking the silica 
network. Some show the classic u-grooving like the philippinites. The 
u-grooving and navels are chemically enhanced cracks formed when the tektite 
cooled rapidly and spalled in the latter stages of re-entry. I have 
philippinites that show paper-thin cracks, narrow u-grooves and thick u-grooves 
- every stage. 

Regards, Aubrey Whymark
www.tektites.co.uk



- Original Message -
From: Steve Dunklee steve.dunk...@yahoo.com
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com; brian burrer brim...@gmail.com
Cc: 
Sent: Saturday, 25 February 2012, 2:04
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Bediasites agree with Steve's unproven tektite 
theory

Imagine? outgasing causes a spike to form on the surface of a tektite as it 
cools 5 miles up. then as it falls the spike breaks off to form a ring at its 
base. half ring or u groove ect.
cheers Steve

--- On Fri, 2/24/12, brian burrer brim...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: brian burrer brim...@gmail.com
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Bediasites agree with Steve's unproven tektite 
 theory
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Friday, February 24, 2012, 9:49 PM
 Hi list,
 
 Bediasites are well known for, among other things, these two
 traits:
 
 1.Most Bediasites show ample evidence of abrasive transport
 and minor
 to severe smoothing of the surface.
 
 2.Bediasites are found in/on the basal portion of the
 Manning unit of
 the Jackson formation in Texas.  They are almost never
 encountered
 off formation.  The age of volcanic ash later/higher
 in the Manning
 is about one million years after Bediasite formation so the
 tektites
 were placed there rather soon after the event.
 
 The age of deposition of the Bediasites in the Manning would
 be about
 thirty five million years ago.  Despite the passing of
 an immense
 amount of time etching has failed to significantly alter the
 surfaces
 of the tektites.  U-grooves, V-grooves and navels all
 exist on stones
 with different amounts of ancient abrasion only slightly
 muting some
 and almost obliterating others.  If they were in an
 environment
 conducive to etching after burial Bediasites should all be
 similar to
 the Besednice hedgehog Moldavites.  The evidence
 suggests that little
 etching has occurred on most Bediasites after transport.
 
 These things taken together suggest that surface sculpture
 on
 Bediasites was a pre-existing condtion and was not developed
 by later
 etching.
 
 There is one small problem with this; the tektites did get
 some amount
 of time (less than one million years) to etch prior to their
 addition
 to the basal Manning sediments.  While it is possible
 they were
 heavily etched in their earliest years and then abrasively
 transported, it is certain they did not etch significantly
 once
 buried.
 
 
 
 Happy hunting,
 Brian
 __
 
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Steves unproven tektite theory by Steve lol!

2012-02-26 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi John and list
 
I only check this list every week or so! I'm real busy with work and also 
writing my tektite book. It is very well progressed now - so hopefully soon, 
but the longer it takes the better it gets (I hope)! I said 2011, now 2012 (end 
of)! I have some very interesting new interpretations coming forward regarding 
the role of plastic deformation in almost ALL tektites. Check out my abstract 
for the LPI conference. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2012/pdf/1045.pdf
 
Regards, Aubrey
 
 
 
 
- Original Message -
From: John.L.Cabassi j...@cabassi.net
To: 'Aubrey Whymark' tinbi...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: 
Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012, 5:25
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Steves unproven tektite theory by Steve lol!

G'Day Aubrey
Thank you. I've been watching this thread develop. I wanted to jump in
but I wanted to see what further information people were willing to
offer up. And I said to Kat, it's amazing that Aubrey hasn't jumped in
and I just got home and logged in and sure enough, you're up close and
personal.


Cheers,
John

John Cabassi - Johnno
IMCA #2125
www.MeteoriteJunction.com
MeteoriteHQ.Com  (still under construction)
Twitter: @meteoritejohnno
http://facebook.com/MeteoriteJohnno





-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Aubrey
Whymark
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 6:21 PM
To: Meteorite list
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Steves unproven tektite theory by Steve
lol!


Hi
 
The etching is genuine. The statement that 'if etching was terrestrial
then the whole surface would be etched' is incorrect.You have to
remember that different surfaces have been exposed to different
conditions. Some surfaces simply have no stresses and lines of weakness
for chemical attack to occur and if it does occur then it is more even
on these surfaces. The posterior smooth surface, which was not exposed
to re-entry heating, generally survives very well. The spalled areas or
bald areas again have no lines of weakness and often avoid etching. The
anterior surface which suffered re-entry heating and then rapid cooling
has many lines of weakness and is readily attacked. If you take the
stretch tektites then the exterior surface was cooled, re-heated and
then rapidily cooled. The interior stretch part was exposed late on -
either due to impact breakage or more likely thermal breakage when the
tektite had lost its inherited cosmic velocity and shock  wave and then
rapidly cooled. This exposed stretch surface simply cooled. The two
surfaces are very different in terms of thermal history and weaknesses,
hence one is heavily etched and the other lightly or not etched.
 
If you don't believe that pitting can form by natural etching then study
ancient soda glass. Islamic glass jeton is great as it can be accurately
dated. This material, sometimes over 1000 years old will sometimes show
pitting. Soda glass is a lot lower in quality compared with tektite
glass and so the process of etching is quicker.
 
Etching is genuine, but is not random - this is the key point. It
attacks cracks and weaknesses caused as the tektite cooled then
re-entered the atmosphere.
 
If you want to study etching then start with moldavites and then work
towards the more recent Australasian tektites. Etching is a tricky
subject btw. Etching is, strictly speaking, alkaline attack that targets
the silica network. This usually creates v-grooves. Leaching is the acid
attack which is more common as tektites usually occur reworked in porous
and permeable gravels exposed to meteoric waters. Acid attack targets
the alkaline component in the glass. The acid attack usually results in
rounded pitting and u-grooves. The two processes can also act in
parallel if conditions are right. The geological and reworking history
of an individual specimen is often complex and, combined with abrasion
from transportation, can result in a diversity of sculpture and
morphologies. I know that etching is genuine, but I still wondered if
some of the anterior sculpture on indochinites was original. I don't
think it is. Another way to study etching is to collect half a ton of
different tektites with various stages of sculpture. Your wife will be
happy with that suggestion.
 
Also, tektites are glass, quenched very quickly - no crystals or
crystallites here!
 
Regards, Aubrey Whymark

From: Daniel rainte...@aol.com
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com 
Sent: Saturday, 25 February 2012, 19:26
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Steves unproven tektite theory by Steve
lol!

Hi Carl, 

I don't agree with everything about this theory, I just thought it was
interesting. There all still a lot of unknowns when it comes to
tektites. 

Are you a tektite collector?

Best Regards,
Daniel Sutherland



On Feb 25, 2012, at 9:45 AM, cdtuc...@cox.net wrote:

 Daniel, Steve,
 All due respect to this theory.
 I'd like to hear more  about this theory because he says;
 Theories about

[meteorite-list] Darryl Futrell the Beyer 'Monster' Philippinite

2011-08-08 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi List

I am trying to trace the history of the Beyer 'Monster' philippinite (1,070g). 
I know that some of you knew Darryl and therefore may have discussed this with 
him.

Does anyone on the list know how Darryl acquired this specimen (it originally 
belonged to Beyer)? Did anyone else own it inbetween? Also what were the 
circumstances of the donation of this specimen to the Corning Museum of Glass? 
I believe the donation was made in year 2000. Does anyone have 'the animal' - I 
assume this was acquired at the same time. 

Thanks, Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New type of fake moldavite coming soon?

2011-08-01 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

I have to say that is a nice looking fake moldavite and as a piece of artwork I 
want one! I can see how one could be fooled by it though and it is dangerous. 
Simply the size and very flat shape with square edges give it away as being a 
fake though. One can see that if this fake was refined it could become tricky 
to distinguish fakes from the genuine article.

I have a fakes page at http://www.tektites.co.uk/fake-frauds.html, but not 
updated for a while. Also check out Milan's known fake from China - This is a 
very similar piece and I bet this came from the same place - again too large 
and flat. See page http://www.tektites.co.uk/european-tektite-forum-2011.html 
and then go to the powerpoint presentation 'Milan Trnka's Collection Part 2 of 
3' and look at slide 126. You'll also see what genuine large moldavites look 
like in this powerpoint presentation.

I would be interested to find out how this was made. Looks like a piece of 
bottle glass that has been carved. The radiating pattern is not natural and 
therefore HF would not bring this out. 

I think before buying anything of value you have to know your subject area well 
and I always recommend buying from the source (or a known reliable 
dealer/collector).

Regards, Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk


  From: veom...@gmail.com
  Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:15:01 -0500
  To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  Subject: [meteorite-list] New type of fake moldavite
 coming soon?
  
  My buddy Justin at The-Vug just put out a new article
 on
  Fakeminerals.com about a new type of fake moldavite
 that has been
  recently spotted in China:
  
  http://www.fakeminerals.com/?p=146
  
  I'm not sure if this is the material people are
 already familiar with,
  or if it is indeed a new type, but it's impressive
 looking.
  
  - Yinan
  __
  Visit the Archives at 
  http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
     
 
       
   
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] AD: Special: Truly baffling sensational Howardite - NWA 6709 - absolutely stunning and very fresh.

2011-07-21 Thread Aubrey Whymark

Hi

The rainbow colour looks like oil to me. Maybe someone has used oil or WD40 to 
clean it. I sometimes encounter 'rainbow' tektites and the guys want extra 
because of it - in reality it is due to oil contamination, probably from the 
mining operations.

Regards, Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk



--- On Thu, 21/7/11, Martin Altmann altm...@meteorite-martin.de wrote:

 From: Martin Altmann altm...@meteorite-martin.de
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] AD: Special: Truly baffling  sensational 
 Howardite - NWA 6709 - absolutely stunning and very fresh.
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Thursday, 21 July, 2011, 0:33
 Hi Mike,
 
 no worries, neither we understood it like that.
 
 Of course, if one looks to the photos, the first idea,
 which comes to one's
 mind is: oil.
 No idea, what causes this effect, maybe the composition.
 Also that strange
 tint the cut faces reveal.
 
 And especially worrying is the variety of the odd
 inclusions. I mean
 normally we all get already excited, whenever we find a
 carbonaceous
 fragment in a howardite,
 but what that stone has all for strange clasts - that is
 really not normal
 anymore.
 
 Since 1999 Stefan is in Morocco and since then we certainly
 had quite a
 bunch of materials in our hands,
 but such a weird polymict one - extremely unusual.
 
 And it seems that many collectors feel the same, if after
 such a short time
 now only three slices are left.
 
 Now all of the smaller ones are gone, sorry for that. But
 we have still a
 slice left, which we could subdivide into small partslices,
 if desired - but
 for that one has really to raise his finger.
 
 For the moment!
 Martin
 
 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
 [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com]
 Im Auftrag von Galactic
 Stone  Ironworks
 Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2011 00:48
 An: Chladnis Heirs
 Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] AD: Special: Truly baffling
  sensational
 Howardite - NWA 6709 - absolutely stunning and very fresh.
 
 Hi Martin,
 
 I didn't mean to impeach the meteorite, I was just
 curious.
 
 This is indeed a mystery.  Have any scientists offered
 or agreed to
 look at it?  Perhaps hit the rainbow area with the
 microprobe or SEM?
 
 Aesthetically speaking, it's gorgeous and looks like Mother
 of Pearl.  :)
 
 Best regards,
 
 MikeG
 
 -- 
 
 -
 Galactic Stone  Ironworks - Meteorites  Amber
 (Michael Gilmer)
 
 Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
 Facebook - http://tinyurl.com/42h79my
 News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
 Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
 EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564
 
 -
 
 On 7/20/11, Chladnis Heirs n...@chladnis-heirs.com
 wrote:
  No, it's natural!
 
  Martin
 
 
  -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
  Von: Galactic Stone  Ironworks [mailto:meteoritem...@gmail.com]
  Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Juli 2011 23:24
  An: Chladnis Heirs
  Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] AD: Special: Truly
 baffling  sensational
  Howardite - NWA 6709 - absolutely stunning and very
 fresh.
 
  Wow!  That is one of the most beautiful
 howardites I have ever seen.
  Nice find.  :)
 
  The rainbox coloration is very odd.  Was the
 stone cleaned at any time?
 
  Best regards,
 
  MikeG
 
 
 
  -
  Galactic Stone  Ironworks - Meteorites 
 Amber (Michael Gilmer)
 
  Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
  Facebook - http://tinyurl.com/42h79my
  News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
  Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
  EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564
 
 
  -
 
  On 7/20/11, Chladnis Heirs n...@chladnis-heirs.com
 wrote:
  Dear meteorite community,
 
  with this Special we have to introduce to you an
 enormous oddity.
  It is about a HED-meteorite of a kind, which we
 hadn't ever seen before
 in
  our careers before.
 
  It came in two stones, one of them was covered
 with a lush fusion crust,
  wonderfully structured by thick and oriented
 flowlines.
  And in some parts, that very crust displayed a
 gloss and a shine,
  iridescent
  in all colours of the rainbow;
  an effect, reminding almost to bismuth!
 
  Please take a look to the photos, where we tried
 to captured the effect:
  http://www.chladnis-heirs.com/new-meteorites/nwa6709.html
 
 
  The interior was no less a riddle for us.
  The distribution and sizes of the various
 fragments and clasts were
 unlike
  we had seen in any polymict HED before.
  A variety of clasts is of a kind, like we never
 had recovered in any
 Vesta
  meteorite. Please 

[meteorite-list] Very Large (Philippine) Tektites

2011-06-29 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

I am compiling a list of the largest Philippine tektites. If you have a large 
(over 900g) Philippinite then please let me know. Also please let me know the 
details (dates, localities, story, history) and indicate if I can publish the 
data. Also interested in data on particularly large tektites from anywhere else 
in the world for the website!


This is my list so far:
Weight  Locality   Find DateCurrent Owner

1,195.00g‡   Talusan, Paracale, Bicol   05 Feb 2011   Aubrey Whymark, 
Philippines

1,070.54g  Bicol   Before Apr 1937   Corning Museum of Glass, N.Y., USA

Under 1,020g*   Coco Grove, Paracale, Bicol   Aug-Dec 1938   Not known

1,018.40g*   Paracale, Bicol   Old Collection   Aubrey Whymark, Philippines

1,009g   Paracale, BicolUnknown   Dieter Heinlein, Germany

991.7gAssume BicolPre-2007Formerly Futrell, ?Lehman, USA

986gAssume BicolPre-2007Prof. Zelimir Gabelica (in 2007)

970.2g†Assume BicolPre-2011Milan Trnka, Czech Republic

967g†Assume BicolPre-2007Prof. Zelimir Gabelica (in 2007)

966.85gAgusan, Bicol18 Jun 2011Aubrey Whymark, Philippines

924.9gBicolPre-2008Guido von Berg, Spain/Germany

ABOVE: A table of known Philippinites over 900g in weight. Almost certainly 
more exist. ‡ Not yet formally weighed. * Strong chance that these are the same 
specimen but not provable. † Probably the same specimen.

Also please see my webpage at http://www.tektites.co.uk/largest_tektites.html


Thanks in advance, 

Aubrey Whymark
aub...@tektites.co.uk
www.tektites.co.uk
 
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Named minor planets

2011-06-29 Thread Aubrey Whymark
12753 Povenmire (1993 HE) is a main-belt asteroid discovered on April 18, 1993 
by C. S. Shoemaker and E. M. Shoemaker at Palomar Observatory (after Hal 
Povenmire)

--- On Wed, 29/6/11, lebof...@lpl.arizona.edu lebof...@lpl.arizona.edu wrote:

 From: lebof...@lpl.arizona.edu lebof...@lpl.arizona.edu
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Named minor planets
 To: Dieter Heinlein dieter-heinl...@t-online.de
 Cc: Meteorite List meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Wednesday, 29 June, 2011, 15:40
 I am aware of two pairings where a
 husband and wife both have asteroids
 named in their honor. In one case, the wife is on the list
 but the other
 is in astronomy (Richard should have known this):
 
 118945 Rikhill
 164215 Doloreshill
 
 and in the other case, the husband and the wife both have
 asteroids but
 due to their science education (the husband is on the
 list):
 
 3439 Lebofsky
 5052 Nancyruth
 
 Larry
 
  There's another asteroid, that should be added to the
 list:
 
  (6371)   Heinlein     
    (after Dieter Heinlein)
 
  Best regards
 
  Dieter
  German Firebal Network
  www.dlr.de/feuerkugelnetz
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Marco Langbroek marco.langbr...@wanadoo.nl
  To: Meteorite List meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 11:08 AM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Named minor planets
 
 
  Any idea how many and who?
 
 
  Chris Spratt
 
  To make a small start:
 
  (163800) Richardnorton  (after O. Richard
 Norton (deceased))
  (73491)  Robmatson      (after
 Rob Matson)
  (7392)   Kowalski   
    (after Richard Kowalski)
  (2925)   Beatty     
    (after Kelly Beatty)
  (6524)   Baalke     
    (after Ron Baalke)
  (4789)   Sprattia   
    (after Chris Spratt)
  (183294) Langbroek      (after me =
 Marco Langbroek)
 
  But there must be more.
 
  - Marco
 
  
  Dr Marco (183294) Langbroek
 
  http://www.marcolangbroek.nl
  http://asteroids.marcolangbroek.nl
  -
  __
  Visit the Archives at
  http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  __
  Visit the Archives at
  http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
 
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] European Tektite Forum 2011 Updated Photos

2011-06-13 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

As promised I have updated and annotated the photos from the European tektite 
forum. You can view or download.

The photo slide shows include:

Moldavite Field Trip
Milan Trnka's amazing collection
Czech National Museum tektites
Czech National Museum meteorites

all at http://www.tektites.co.uk/european-tektite-forum-2011.html

Regards,

Aubrey Whymark
www.tektites.co.uk
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] European Tektite Forum 2011 - Moldavite find rate

2011-04-25 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

Re: Find rate of Moldavites

Well we were taken to the best spot! Milan has GPS coordinates of probably 
thousands of finds all plotted on Google Earth. An amazing database. Searching 
on the field I personally found 2 smallish specimens in maybe a couple of 
hours. Others found more. I guess maybe 30 mins per small Moldavite (1 hr for 
me). We went to another Moldavite location though and we all came up with 
nothing despite the gravels being evident in the soil and other collectors 
being around.

With regards the illegal mining operation the chap had been digging a few hours 
and I think he said he had found nothing. The previous day he had a matchbox 
full of say 10 smallish pieces. Then again a weeks work of another guy revealed 
a bag that maybe weighed a kilo I am guessing from another locality. It was 
very much luck of the draw - some days were bad, other days you would find a 
specimen worth hundreds or maybe, if very lucky, worth thousands of dollars.

The big difference between mining and picking from the field was that the 
unchipped large fragments are found by mining - chipped smaller pieces are 
found on the field.

One thing I can say - it takes a lot of effort to find even bad Moldavites and 
I will never again complain at paying a few hundred dollars for a Moldavite - 
it's cheap compared with the work put in!

Regards, Aubrey





--- On Mon, 25/4/11, Meteorite Mania! meteoritema...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Meteorite Mania! meteoritema...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] European Tektite Forum 2011 Photos
 To: Aubrey Whymark tinbi...@yahoo.co.uk, 
 meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Monday, 25 April, 2011, 19:52
 Aubrey,
 
 Thanks for sharing the pictures, I look forward to the
 updates with
 captions.  What is the average number of hours
 searching before one
 will find any moldavite?
 
 Thanks Milan for showing your treasures, what a fantastic
 collection;
 I would be willing to bet that is the finest moldavite and
 tektite
 collection in the world.  Thanks for letting us get a
 glimpse.
 
 All the best,
 
 Ty
 Meteorite Mania
 
 
 
 On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Aubrey Whymark tinbi...@yahoo.co.uk
 wrote:
  Hi
 
  We had a great time at the European Tektite Forum 2011
 in Brno, Czech Republic, hosted by Milan Trnka.
 
  I have uploaded a load of unedited photos onto my site
 at http://www.tektites.co.uk/european-tektite-forum-2011.html
 
  I hope to edit the photos and add annotations and
 descriptions in the next 2-3 months so do check back!
 
  Regards, Aubrey
  www.tektites.co.uk
 
  __
  Visit the Archives at 
  http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] European Tektite Forum 2011 Photos

2011-04-24 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

We had a great time at the European Tektite Forum 2011 in Brno, Czech Republic, 
hosted by Milan Trnka.

I have uploaded a load of unedited photos onto my site at 
http://www.tektites.co.uk/european-tektite-forum-2011.html

I hope to edit the photos and add annotations and descriptions in the next 2-3 
months so do check back!

Regards, Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Very Interesting Photo- Tektite Related

2011-03-25 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

Interesting, but I don't think this supports any tektite formation theories. 
Tektites were either plastically deformed when proximal, spalled when medial or 
ablated and then often spalled when distal.

Rain drops are, however, very informative about proximal tektites, which 
basically follow the same formation method with two big difference: Tektites 
cool and 'freeze' in transient morphologies and the tektite 'liquid' is of 
different viscosity (continually becoming more viscous as temperature drops). 
These transient tektite morphologies comprise discs and teardrops. Rain drops 
are spherical - when larger they become concavo-convex discs and then cascade 
into smaller spheres. If only the early tektite researchers had studied 
proximal tektites and not distal forms - their conclusions on the aerodynamics 
would have to be that tektites either formed on the Earth or that the moon has 
a significant atmosphere (or that tektites arrived from the moon in a huge 
molten blob which was disrupted during re-entry - but that's getting desperate).

Ice cubes give an insight to tektite formation - they cool from the outside-in 
thus giving a radial pattern internally. Tektites also cool from the outside-in 
and have a radial internal structure with bubble complexes often trapped in the 
centre. 

Hail stones grow from the inside out and so have a concentric structure unlike 
tektites. These hailstones pictured are weird - they look like hailstones that 
have had icicles grow on them. They form in a totally different way to 
tektites, but interesting nonetheless. Tektites do not grow - they distort, 
spall (explosively fragment and lose mass) or ablate (lose mass by material 
melting and flowing from the specimen) during re-entry.

Found an interesting paper on these lobed hailstones here:
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/1520-0469%281970%29027%3C0667%3ALSOH%3E2.0.CO%3B2

Regards, Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk



--- On Thu, 24/3/11, Mike Groetz mpg4...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Mike Groetz mpg4...@gmail.com
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Very Interesting Photo- Tektite Related
 To: Meteorite List meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Thursday, 24 March, 2011, 12:17
 List-
    Check out this ice hail photo. It really substantiates
 the theories
 behind tektite formation.
 
 http://www.coasttocoastam.com/photo/category/photo-of-the-day
 
   Have a good day.
 
 Mike
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Tektite Presentation

2011-02-21 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

For those interested in tektites, then you might be interested to view the 
powerpoint presentation of my recent lecture on tektites. Check out 'What's 
New?' on www.tektites.co.uk.

http://www.tektites.co.uk/whats-new.html

Regards,

Aubrey Whymark


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Tektite Presentation

2011-02-21 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi Norm and list

I started out thinking that Splashforms formed by contact with the ground, but 
this is not possible because of the bald spots. The bald spots, as you know, 
formed by spalling - so why just the anterior margin if the tektite splatted on 
the ground - bald spots should be all over. Secondly the shape of some of the 
tektites does not make sense. Take the Hershey's Kiss example. These should not 
exist as in longer teardrops the stable orientation is not vertical. In fact 
the only way these morphologies could form is if they formed within the 
atmosphere whilst the tektite still had inherited cosmic velocity and was still 
probably travelling up. Another point - large discs - the anterior depression, 
which I call a sump, is usually not central. This is consistent with 
atmospheric production. There is no doubt in my mind, whatsoever, that 
Indochinites formed within the atmosphere - some during the upward phase, some 
in the downwards journey. Indochinites never
 truely left the atmosphere. 

The 'vertibrae' tektites are real rare and might just be freaks (like really 
rarely we come across Philippinites that appear to have two anteriors. The 
blunt area on an asymmetrical dumbbell is caused by late stage spalling (same 
as a bald spot). I guess the 'vertibrea' may form in the same way - maybe one 
end spalls, this changes the balance of the specimen leading to the other end 
spalling.
 
Interesting what you say about Australites and certainly worth more thought. I 
don't believe any wind tunnel experiment has, however, truely replicated 
tektite formation in terms of true velocity of 8-11 km/sec. Might be wrong - 
will read up again. You do need the ablation first though to explain why distal 
Australite cores are bulbous, whereas more proximal australites are often less 
bulbous and then Philippinites are typically shield-like. Clearly the ablation 
stage protects the tektite somewhat in carrying the heat away. Personally I am 
always interested why almost all Australites are oriented whereas Philippinites 
are most commonly oriented, but unoriented specimens are not uncommon. I guess 
it's simply due to distance travelled, with a much greater time for Australites 
to find a stable orientation.

Back to Philippinites - most are spherical. Teardrops are very very very rare. 
When you find them though, they are very interesting. A few show subtle 
distortion suggestive of atmospheric deformation, presumably on the way up. I 
even have two 'stretch' Philippinites. Sure they are on the website somewhere - 
http://www.tektites.co.uk/stretch.html. These are not like the classic 
Indochinite stretchforms, but clearly show stretching where two parts of the 
tektite are more solid than another as evidenced by stretched vs round bubbles. 
This deformation, again must have occurred on the way-up. Come to the biggest 
Philippinites 10cm diameter +. These normally show some degree of spalling and 
are off-spherical, but take the primary surface and they were spherical bodies. 
Even the largest Philippinites entered with a solid exterior, exactly as one 
would expect from cooling experiments. So the vast majority of Philippinites 
probably formed in 'space' as oppose to
 within the 'atmosphere', but a few may have been distorted in the upper 
reaches of the atmosphere as they exited. 

Regards, Aubrey


--- On Mon, 21/2/11, Norm Lehrman nlehr...@nvbell.net wrote:

 From: Norm Lehrman nlehr...@nvbell.net
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Tektite Presentation
 To: Aubrey Whymark tinbi...@yahoo.co.uk
 Date: Monday, 21 February, 2011, 14:52
 Aubrey,
 
 Good stuff!  There are are a few things I will need to
 think about.  You've 
 offered some truly fresh ideas.
 
 For example, I've always assumed that the splatting of
 advanced splashforms 
 was the result of impact with the ground, whereas you do it
 with air resistance. 
 Could be right, but I'll need to sleep on it a bit.  One
 observation that has me 
 stumped may bear on the question:  Hershey's Kisses and
 their 
 shorter-remnant-tailed splatforms almost always show
 flow-banding that reflects 
 a differential twist between the tail and the main body. 
 This means that 
 something retarded the spin of one part or the other.  I
 have been thinking that 
 a spinning body splatting onto the ground would be abruptly
 anchored while the 
 tail carries on for another half-twist or so.  Would
 friction with a compressed 
 air cushion achieve the same?  Maybe...  Also, I have
 always struggled with the 
 fact that the splatted basal surface never molds itself
 around a pebble or piece 
 of vegetative matter.  Not once in hundreds of thousands
 of specimens I have 
 handled.  I have a few that look like they formed over
 another tektite---but if 
 so, we should occasionally find a couple welded together. 
 Your version of 
 splatting against compressed air solves that problem. On
 the other hand, I have 
 lots of what I call vertibrae, dumbells

[meteorite-list] World record 1,250g tektite from Philippines??

2011-02-15 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

Still seeking the new owner of a possible world record breaking tektite which 
came to light on 07 February 2011 in Paracale, Philippines. Very keen to know 
the true weight as the weight given by dealers here can be highly misleading. 
Certainly in the 900g to 1,250g range though and the weight estimate could well 
be realistic. You can let me know anonymously if you like - off-list. For the 
record the heaviest Philippinite is 1,070.54g and the heaviest of all tektites 
(excluding Muong Nong-type layered impactites) is either 1,070.54g (as above) 
or possibly a 1,200g Indochinite (shape is right, but might be a rolled/water 
worn Muong Nong-type).

Also, I will be giving a presentation on tektites at Rizal Technological 
University on Boni Avenue in Mandaluyong, Manila, Philippines. It will be in 
the new building - Astronomy Centre at 9am (yes, very early) on Saturday 19th 
February. All welcome I am told.
 
Regards, Aubrey Whymark
www.tektites.co.uk
 
 




  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] World record 1, 250g tektite from Philippines??

2011-02-15 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

This size tektite is perfectly feasible from China, but it would have been a 
Muong Nong-type tektite, which I consider to be someway between tektites and 
impactites. It would not have been a true splashform.

If we take only true splashforms, ignore the incompletely melted and 
homogenised layered Muong Nong-types, then the largest tektites occur some 
1,750 km from the impact site. This is true of the Australasian impact and the 
Chesapeake impact. 

Why do the biggest tektites not occur closest to the impact? 
Well, the reasons are complex, but basically as you move closer to the impact 
site the energy levels decrease as the energy of impact is spread over a wider 
area. The melt sheet is not ejected into 'space' before being disrupted. So 
proximal tektites form at lower atmospheric levels - they interact with the 
atmosphere and cascade into smaller forms. The large blocks of semi-melted 
material comprising Muong Nong tektites form at even lower energy levels - 
insufficient to even fully melt them.

Back to the medial distance Philippinites. The melt sheet just about reached 
space before being disrupted into tektite bodies. (Rare Philippinites show some 
plastic deformation during their exit). The viscosity was low (as Philippinites 
are mainly spherical), but not as low as Australites (which encourages further 
break-up). A large sphere remains as a sphere and will not interact with the 
atmosphere to form a disc that cascades into smaller spheres.

Move from the Philippines to Australia and tektites become progressively 
smaller as expected. The temperature of the melt was higher and the viscosity 
even lower. Also distal tektites were ejected at a lower angle and although no 
plastic distortion is recorded (perhaps due to them being exceedingly hot and 
the low viscosity), some atmospheric interaction, due to the lower ejection 
angle may have resulted in an early cascading effect.

So 1,750 km or thereabouts from the impact site is perfect for ejection angle, 
viscosity and exiting the atmosphere. Perhaps this is the magic 30 degrees 
whereas Australites were maybe ejected at c. 15-20 degrees??

Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk



--- On Tue, 15/2/11, Yinan Wang veom...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Yinan Wang veom...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] World record 1, 250g tektite from Philippines??
 To: meteorite list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Tuesday, 15 February, 2011, 17:05
 Here's a big fish story for you all;
 
 About ten years ago I was visiting a mineral shop inside a
 park in
 china and they had a football (American football) shaped
 tektite
 slightly larger than a football. I was quite sure it was a
 tektite and
 not slag nor obsidian. Must've massed about 8-12 kilos. It
 was priced
 at the equivalent of $700 USD, but back then I didn't
 appreciate
 meteorites and tektites and thus I ignored it. Only
 recently did I
 realize the importance of it, oh well.
 
 -Yinan
 
 On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Aubrey Whymark tinbi...@yahoo.co.uk
 wrote:
  Hi
 
  Still seeking the new owner of a possible world record
 breaking tektite which came to light on 07 February 2011 in
 Paracale, Philippines. Very keen to know the true weight as
 the weight given by dealers here can be highly misleading.
 Certainly in the 900g to 1,250g range though and the weight
 estimate could well be realistic. You can let me know
 anonymously if you like - off-list. For the record the
 heaviest Philippinite is 1,070.54g and the heaviest of all
 tektites (excluding Muong Nong-type layered impactites) is
 either 1,070.54g (as above) or possibly a 1,200g Indochinite
 (shape is right, but might be a rolled/water worn Muong
 Nong-type).
 
  Also, I will be giving a presentation on tektites at
 Rizal Technological University on Boni Avenue in
 Mandaluyong, Manila, Philippines. It will be in the new
 building - Astronomy Centre at 9am (yes, very early) on
 Saturday 19th February. All welcome I am told.
 
  Regards, Aubrey Whymark
  www.tektites.co.uk
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  __
  Visit the Archives at 
  http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] World record 1, 250g tektite from Philippines??

2011-02-15 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Forgot to mention

What is the biggest feasible tektite?

Well, 1 kilos should not exist as at that size the inequal cooling of the glass 
should fragment the specimen. We do see this in the Philippines - fragments of 
true monsters! Always fragments of very large spheres probably a couple of 
kilos in size or more! So, the largest possible tektite - Well we have around 
1,070g, possibly slightly more. The largest will likely be a dumbbell - a 
double 1,070g sphere. So a dumbbell weighing 2 kilos or slightly more is a 
possibility. This will occur in the Philippines - chances of one being found is 
close to zero. You can count the 1 kilos on a hand and most Philippinites are 
spherical. Dumbbells are relatively rare. So maybe after we have found 100 or 
1,000 1 kilo spheres perhaps we'll chance upon a monster dumbbell!

Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk


--- On Wed, 16/2/11, Aubrey Whymark tinbi...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

 From: Aubrey Whymark tinbi...@yahoo.co.uk
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] World record 1, 250g tektite from Philippines??
 To: meteorite list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Wednesday, 16 February, 2011, 3:42
 Hi
 
 This size tektite is perfectly feasible from China, but it
 would have been a Muong Nong-type tektite, which I consider
 to be someway between tektites and impactites. It would not
 have been a true splashform.
 
 If we take only true splashforms, ignore the incompletely
 melted and homogenised layered Muong Nong-types, then the
 largest tektites occur some 1,750 km from the impact site.
 This is true of the Australasian impact and the Chesapeake
 impact. 
 
 Why do the biggest tektites not occur closest to the
 impact? 
 Well, the reasons are complex, but basically as you move
 closer to the impact site the energy levels decrease as the
 energy of impact is spread over a wider area. The melt sheet
 is not ejected into 'space' before being disrupted. So
 proximal tektites form at lower atmospheric levels - they
 interact with the atmosphere and cascade into smaller forms.
 The large blocks of semi-melted material comprising Muong
 Nong tektites form at even lower energy levels -
 insufficient to even fully melt them.
 
 Back to the medial distance Philippinites. The melt sheet
 just about reached space before being disrupted into tektite
 bodies. (Rare Philippinites show some plastic deformation
 during their exit). The viscosity was low (as Philippinites
 are mainly spherical), but not as low as Australites (which
 encourages further break-up). A large sphere remains as a
 sphere and will not interact with the atmosphere to form a
 disc that cascades into smaller spheres.
 
 Move from the Philippines to Australia and tektites become
 progressively smaller as expected. The temperature of the
 melt was higher and the viscosity even lower. Also distal
 tektites were ejected at a lower angle and although no
 plastic distortion is recorded (perhaps due to them being
 exceedingly hot and the low viscosity), some atmospheric
 interaction, due to the lower ejection angle may have
 resulted in an early cascading effect.
 
 So 1,750 km or thereabouts from the impact site is perfect
 for ejection angle, viscosity and exiting the atmosphere.
 Perhaps this is the magic 30 degrees whereas Australites
 were maybe ejected at c. 15-20 degrees??
 
 Aubrey
 www.tektites.co.uk
 
 
 
 --- On Tue, 15/2/11, Yinan Wang veom...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  From: Yinan Wang veom...@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] World record 1, 250g
 tektite from Philippines??
  To: meteorite list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  Date: Tuesday, 15 February, 2011, 17:05
  Here's a big fish story for you all;
  
  About ten years ago I was visiting a mineral shop
 inside a
  park in
  china and they had a football (American football)
 shaped
  tektite
  slightly larger than a football. I was quite sure it
 was a
  tektite and
  not slag nor obsidian. Must've massed about 8-12
 kilos. It
  was priced
  at the equivalent of $700 USD, but back then I didn't
  appreciate
  meteorites and tektites and thus I ignored it. Only
  recently did I
  realize the importance of it, oh well.
  
  -Yinan
  
  On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Aubrey Whymark tinbi...@yahoo.co.uk
  wrote:
   Hi
  
   Still seeking the new owner of a possible world
 record
  breaking tektite which came to light on 07 February
 2011 in
  Paracale, Philippines. Very keen to know the true
 weight as
  the weight given by dealers here can be highly
 misleading.
  Certainly in the 900g to 1,250g range though and the
 weight
  estimate could well be realistic. You can let me know
  anonymously if you like - off-list. For the record
 the
  heaviest Philippinite is 1,070.54g and the heaviest of
 all
  tektites (excluding Muong Nong-type layered
 impactites) is
  either 1,070.54g (as above) or possibly a 1,200g
 Indochinite
  (shape is right, but might be a rolled/water worn
 Muong
  Nong-type).
  
   Also, I will be giving a presentation on tektites

[meteorite-list] Very Large Philippine Tektite

2011-02-10 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi
 
A potentially record breaking tektite came to light on Monday 7th February from 
Paracale. If you are the person who bought this item from Red Balesa could you 
email me off-list. I am just after some measurement data as it would be a shame 
if this specimen is lost to science.

Thanks, Aubrey Whymark
www.tektites.co.uk


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Podcast on Impacts - Geol. Soc. London

2010-11-15 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

Follow the link for a podcast on Impacts. You'll also see links to other 
interesting meteorite-related topics.

http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/podcast9 

When German physicist Ernst Florens Chladni published a pamphlet in 1794 
arguing that meteorites had their origins in outer space, the idea was received 
with widespread mockery by the scientific community. Now, meteorites are 
recognised as an important astronomical process. But it has taken geologists a 
long time to acknowledge their significance to the history of the Earth - 
particularly as uniformitarianism overtook catastrophism as the prevailing 
theory of geologic change. 

Sarah talks to the Natural History Museum's Kieren Howard about the 
significance of meteorites to Earth - not only their impact on Earth's surface, 
but the effect they have on people. And we discuss the most famous meteorite to 
strike Earth - the Chicxulub impact. Long held responsible for the extinction 
of the dinosaurs, the Chixculub impact has been the focus of debate amongst 
scientists almost from the moment of its discovery. Sarah talks to a group of 
scientists who have been involved in a project to lay the debate to rest, once 
and for all.


Regards, Aubrey



  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Newly discovered Kamil Crater, Egypt

2010-09-28 Thread Aubrey Whymark
See these articles below - 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/8026237/Meteor-crater-found-on-Google-Earth-could-help-prepare-for-future-impacts.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1315568/Massive-meteor-crater-discovered-spotted-Google-Earth.html

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/329/5993/804

Regards, Aubrey


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] FW: Rock identification??

2010-09-15 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi Mark

Concrete would be my guess too. That being the case it should have a 
considerably lower specific gravity than a meteorite. I'm sure they won't mind 
if you dump it in water to test that! I recently had a guy see a new type of 
tektite fall from the sky. Amazingly it looked like a marble and even had 
yellow, red and blue frit on it. I had to tell the guy someone had probably 
thrown it at him

Aubrey

--- On Wed, 15/9/10, Mark Ford mark.f...@ssl.gb.com wrote:

 From: Mark Ford mark.f...@ssl.gb.com
 Subject: [meteorite-list] FW: Rock identification??
 To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Wednesday, 15 September, 2010, 13:51
 
 Hi,
 
 I was recently sent a rock, the accompanying story was that
 it landed near someone with high velocity and was warm/hot
 to the touch. (Normally this story rings alarm bells as
 meteorites are generally not known to be warm especially
 small ones), however upon looking at the rock, it appears to
 have chondrules (or chondrule like objects), but has no
 fusion crust. 
 
  Its about 27mm x 19mm, and is very slightly attracted to
 a strong magnet, (enough for the rock to move when a magnet
 is put next to it.
 
 I can't explain what i'm seeing, these chondrule like
 features are near perfect spherules!,  however I can't see
 any metal grains!
 
 Under mag there are numerous spherules, and other
 unidentifiable  inclusions, the matrix is a grey to light
 beige colour.
 
 Anyone care to take a stab at what this is?
 
 Pics at :  http://s911.photobucket.com/albums/ac315/meteoritemark/
 
 (Click the pics for a bigger view)
 
 
 Mark
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
 
 This email and any files transmitted with it are
 confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please
 notify us. Email i...@ssl.gb.com.
 You should not copy or use this email or attachment(s) for
 any purpose nor disclose their contents to any other person.
 
 
 GENERAL STATEMENT:
 
 Southern Scientific Ltd's computer systems may be monitored
 and communications carried on them recorded, to secure the
 effective operation of the system and for other lawful
 purposes.
 
 Registered address Rectory Farm Rd, Sompting, Lancing, W
 Sussex BN15 0DP. Company No 1800317
 
 
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Origin of Tektites

2010-09-12 Thread Aubrey Whymark

Mike

Artemevia papers have a lot on ejection angles. They conclude a 30 degree angle 
is optimum - so agreed - too oblique may not be good (although I suspect the 
Australasian event was more oblique than 30 degrees).

Regards, Aubrey


--- On Sat, 11/9/10, Michael Fowler mqfow...@mac.com wrote:

 From: Michael Fowler mqfow...@mac.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Origin of Tektites
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Cc: Michael Fowler mqfow...@mac.com
 Date: Saturday, 11 September, 2010, 16:27
 Aubrey,
 
 Keep working on your book, I'm sure there is a lot of
 interest in the subject, especially for a source takes all
 the best research out there and puts it together in a
 interesting and unified narrative.
 
 Question:
 
  Oblique impacts and those impacting silica rich
 sedimentary rock favor tektite production. Tektites are
 melted and distally ejected terrestrial rock. 
 
 
 I had not heard that Oblique impacts favor tektite
 production, in fact I thought that high velocity
 perpendicular impacts favored the vaporized ejecta plume
 reaching outside the earth's atmosphere.  Could you
 elaborate on the evidence favoring oblique impacts, or
 provide a link to any research on the topic?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Mike Fowler
 Chicago
 
  Hi 
  
  I'm not sure if I qualify as a tektite 'expert', but I
 have done a lot of private research. I am working on a book
 which is 2/3 complete - hopefully 2011, but I struggle to
 find the time with my work and new baby! 
  
  I have an extensive reference list on my website
 www.tektites.co.uk. This includes links to many freely
 downloadable papers. I've not updated the site recently so
 some material is out of date. Also I am working on an even
 more extensive reference list right now. 
  
  Since the 1970's there has been no doubt as to the
 origin of tektites. They are formed by an asteroid or comet
 impacting with the Earth. The tektites are formed in the
 very earliest stages of impact. Oblique impacts and those
 impacting silica rich sedimentary rock favor tektite
 production. Tektites are melted and distally ejected
 terrestrial rock. 
  
  North American tektites (Bediasites and Georgiaites)
 come from the Chesapeake Crater. 
  
  Moldavites come from the Ries crater, Germany 
  
  Ivory Coast tektites come from Bosumtwi Crater in
 Ghana. 
  
  Australasian tektites come from an undiscovered crater
 most likely in the Bay of Tonkin between Vietnam and China,
 perhaps closer to Vietnam. It will be discovered and there
 is no doubt in this. 
  
  Hope this helps, 
  
  Aubrey 
  www.tektites.co.uk 
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Origin of Tektites - Interesting Crater Idea (at bottom)

2010-09-12 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi Ted and list

Repectfully, I disagree with Prof. Wasson. To create tektites you need an 
impact with the ground. An Aerial blast will not eject a tektite 8000km down 
wind. The 10Be idea is wrong. Yes, the 10Be collects in silicates in the soil, 
but this soil is then transported and re-deposited. 10Be has a 1.36Ma half 
life, so with a fast deposition rate (130m/Ma in the Bay of Tonkin) you can 
have a sediment column a few hundred metres deep rich in 10Be - it's not just 
in the soil. 

There is a good paper by Ma P Aggrey K Tonzola C et al 2004 on Beryllium-10. 
This seems to point to a single crater in the Bay of Tonkin. When an asteroid 
impacts, the first formed tektites are derived from the very uppermost layers 
of sediment. They are ejected at the highest velocity and lowest angle. In the 
Australasian strewnfield these are the distal Australites. As the impact event 
proceeds, progressively deeper sediment is excavated and ejected as tektitic 
melt. The deeper (older) sediment has lower abundances of 10Be and will go on 
to form increasingly proximal tektites as the ejection velocity decreases and 
ejection angle increases. The last formed ‘tektites’ are the Muong Nong-type 
impactites. Average 10Be contents of Muong Nong-type impactites are ~1/3 and 
~1/2 those of Australian tektites and splash-form Indochinites, respectively 
(Aggrey et al., 1998). The abundance of 10Be can then be used to create a map 
of roughly equal con-centration
 levels, which increase with distance from the undiscovered crater. Ma et al. 
(2004) suggests the most probable source is a single crater in the Gulf of 
Tonkin at 107°E; 17°N. I personally would broadly agree, but place the crater 
closer to 106.5°E; 19°N.

I work in the oil industry as a wellsite geologist, but in the Middle East -not 
in Vietnam. I agree that nothing has been found, but I think there could be a 
few reasons. 
1) The Chinese/Vietnamese boundary is disputed.
2) Oil industry people are unlikely to be shouting about possible structures 
that have not been drilled (unless they never want to work again). (Chicxulub 
crater for example)
3) I don't know how much structural/magnetic/gravity anomoly data is available. 
It certainly doesn't appear to be available to the public. Within an oil 
company a large crater may not be recognised, may not be interpreted as a 
crater and may be a company secret. (Chicxulub for example - well drilled in 
1951 and found andesite, gravity data gathered in 1960, recognised as a crater 
in 1978, kept as company secret until 1981) 
4) Maybe a well has not been drilled in the correct place - directly over the 
crater.
5) If a well has been drilled close to the crater the tophole rocks (including 
impactites and breccias) may not have even been looked at. When I drill a well 
I usually start looking at the rock a couple of thousand feet down, sometimes 
5,000 ft down plus. Surrounding deposits will be in the top hundred or few 
hundred feet - the oil industry geologist will definitely not get a sample this 
shallow (even if they could). Also, will a wellsite geologist recognise impact 
products? - probably not - they are not trained to.
6) The sedimentation rates are high in the Bay of Tonkin - 3000 metres in the 
last 23 million years in some places(Pow-foong Fan, 1981) - so that could be 
+/- 100m in the last 803k. I'm sure I read somewhere 200-300 m of Quarternary 
deposits, but can't remember the source.
7) The Bay of Tonkin is shallow water - mainly under 50m depth. In the recent 
glacial and inter-glacial periods sea level went up and down. The crater could 
have been exposed and eroded, submerged and buried, perhaps numerous times. The 
dual process of erosion and high sedimentation rates could easily hide a crater.

I am concluding from my reading that there is one single large crater (43-50km 
size). It has to be in the Gulf of Tonkin - this is where the tektite 
distribution pattern fits best and where geochemical signatures point to. 
Hainan and NE Thailand are a mirror - the crater is in the middle of these two 
places.

I am also keeping a eye on Premier Oil's block 104/109-5 in Vietnam. See 
http://www.premier-oil.com/render.aspx?siteID=1navIDs=19,310,313,334

If there is anywhere I would put a crater then it is in this block. Maybe they 
know about a structure that we don't know about???

Regards, Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk



--- On Sat, 11/9/10, Ted Bunch tbe...@cableone.net wrote:

 From: Ted Bunch tbe...@cableone.net
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Origin of Tektites
 To: Aubrey Whymark tinbi...@yahoo.co.uk
 Date: Saturday, 11 September, 2010, 15:53
 Dear Aubrey - Very adventurous of you
 to attempt this project. I have one
 disagreement with your conclusions below. The area that
 surrounds Vietnam
 is a very extensive shallow continental shelf . From oil
 exploration data,
 there is no evidence of a gravity, magnetic, or structural
 anomaly. In
 addition, no crater-forming impactites, breccias, etc

Re: [meteorite-list] Tunkuska Tektites?

2010-09-11 Thread Aubrey Whymark

Yeah this is fraudlent. These are Indochinites.

Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk


--- On Sat, 11/9/10, Steve Dunklee steve.dunk...@yahoo.com wrote:

 From: Steve Dunklee steve.dunk...@yahoo.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Tunkuska Tektites?
 To: mlbl...@cox.net, meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Saturday, 11 September, 2010, 11:45
 looks like small indo china tektite .
 Clear skys .Steve
 
 On Thu Sep 9th, 2010 11:25 PM EDT Michael Blood wrote:
 
 Posted this (Below) earlier but if it went out to
 Others, it did not make it back to me
 
 
 Has anyone heard of the claims related to tektites
 Associated with the the Tunguska event?
 See these offerings on eBay:
 
 http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=180558454201ssPageName=A
 DME:B:SS:US:1123
 
 http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=180558453506ssPageName=A
 DME:B:SS:US:1123
 
         Anyone know who lives in
 Clearwater, FLA?
         Michael
 
 
 
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
 
       
 
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Origin of Tektites

2010-09-11 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

I'm not sure if I qualify as a tektite 'expert', but I have done a lot of 
private research. I am working on a book which is 2/3 complete - hopefully 
2011, but I struggle to find the time with my work and new baby!

I have an extensive reference list on my website www.tektites.co.uk. This 
includes links to many freely downloadable papers. I've not updated the site 
recently so some material is out of date. Also I am working on an even more 
extensive reference list right now.

Since the 1970's there has been no doubt as to the origin of tektites. They are 
formed by an asteroid or comet impacting with the Earth. The tektites are 
formed in the very earliest stages of impact. Oblique impacts and those 
impacting silica rich sedimentary rock favor tektite production. Tektites are 
melted and distally ejected terrestrial rock.

North American tektites (Bediasites and Georgiaites) come from the Chesapeake 
Crater.

Moldavites come from the Ries crater, Germany

Ivory Coast tektites come from Bosumtwi Crater in Ghana.

Australasian tektites come from an undiscovered crater most likely in the Bay 
of Tonkin between Vietnam and China, perhaps closer to Vietnam. It will be 
discovered and there is no doubt in this.

Hope this helps,

Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk

--- On Sat, 11/9/10, Steve Dunklee steve.dunk...@yahoo.com wrote:

 From: Steve Dunklee steve.dunk...@yahoo.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Origin of Tektites
 To: epmaj...@shaw.ca, meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Cc: rasc...@lists.rasc.ca, mia...@uquebec.ca
 Date: Saturday, 11 September, 2010, 11:25
 all i can say is there seems to be a
 great interest in tektites. Sterling?Can you stay sane
 enough to write the definitive book? Cheers Steve
 
 On Fri Sep 10th, 2010 1:06 AM EDT Ed Majden wrote:
 
     Are there any tektite experts on
 this list?  The formation of tektites has been a
 mystery to science.  Volcanic origin, Lunar ejecta,
 meteorite impact origin, explosive electrical discharge,
 etc.  The latter proposed by NASA experiments at an
 arc-jet facility.  What are the current theories on the
 formation of tektites.  Are there any papers on this
 that I could get my hands on?
 Thanks:
 Ed Majden
 Courtenay, B.C.
 Canada
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
 
       
 
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The Moon - One Titanic Tektite?

2010-04-13 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Mike and list

An interesting thought, but the moon is not made of glass so it would have to 
be one giant impact spherule!

Also it hasn't landed back on Earth yet! It can't be an -ite. It was pointed 
out to me that you have Meteorites and Meteors. But in the tektite world we 
only have Tektites, no Tekteors - just as well we haven't witnessed any genuine 
tektite falls (don't believe everything you read) or we wouldn't know what to 
call the falling body!

Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk



--- On Wed, 14/4/10, Galactic Stone  Ironworks meteoritem...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Galactic Stone  Ironworks meteoritem...@gmail.com
 Subject: [meteorite-list] The Moon - One Titanic Tektite?
 To: Meteorite List meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Wednesday, 14 April, 2010, 4:14
 Hi Listees,
 
 I don't know if this thought has ever come up before in
 this way, but
 
 Isn't the moon, by definition, one gigantic tektite since
 it was
 spalled off from the Earth during a catastrophic meteorite
 impact?
 
 If so, then every lunar meteorite is also a tektite.of
 sorts.
 
 Best regards,
 
 MikeG
 
 
 -- 
 
 Mike Gilmer - Galactic Stone  Ironworks Meteorites
 http://www.galactic-stone.com
 http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
 
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Tsunami alert (Report)

2010-02-28 Thread Aubrey Whymark


--- On Sat, 27/2/10, dean bessey deanbes...@yahoo.com wrote:
Nothing to report from the Philippines either after staying away from the beach 
all day! Better to be safe than sorry though.


 From: dean bessey deanbes...@yahoo.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Tsunami alert (Report)
 To:meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Saturday, 27 February, 2010, 23:36
 Well, hundreds of people here in
 Auckland camped out on a hill waiting for the tsunami. A
 dozen or so people refused to heed the warning and
 graciously stayed on the beach so that we could all have
 good video. A cruise ship was moved from the pier and
 anchored off in the harbour and all ferries in the city was
 canceled. Hundreds of yachts was out in what is a stunning
 beautiful summer day today.
 Unfortunately the tsunami was a bust and nobody on the
 beach got nominated for a darwin award. 
 We got 2 or 3 minutes of heavy waves in an otherwise
 beautiful calm day with the water like glass.
 See here the photo of the extent of the tsunami in
 Auckland. The calm was broken for a couple minutes and the
 waves never even went up the beach.
 http://www.meteoriteshop.com/pictures/tsunami.jpg 
   
 We did however have a really nice picnic in the park with
 my two kiddies. You can see the tsunami in the background in
 this photo behind my two kiddies who are sitting on a WW2
 gun.
 http://www.meteoriteshop.com/pictures/tsunami2.jpg
 Cheers
 DEAN
 
 
       
 
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] worlds biggest tektite in history -Not

2009-12-14 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

The biggest Muong Nong-type tektites appear to be in the Laos-NE Thailand 
border and in Hainan. For sure they are very proximal tektites/impactites. I 
think the microtektite distribution pattern is a better indicator though as 
it's going to be statistically more reliable. All the evidence points to the 
Gulf of Tonkin, between Vietnam and Hainan - probably closer to Vietnam. This 
is a shallow sea (but might not have been sea at the time of impact, not that 
it would make a lot of difference). A crater in the sea would explain why a 
43km +/- crater has not yet been found. In reality I bet this crater has been 
found on oil field seismic which should criss-cross the whole of this area. 
Maybe it hasn't been recognised, maybe the 'structure' has been kept secret 
because of it's possible economic value or maybe it lies in disputed 
Vietnamese-Chinese waters. I'm pretty sure it's out there though! I do wonder 
if any trace of rims would show up on bathymetric maps,
 but there has been a very large sediment input into this area in the last 
800,000 years and I would imagine it could easily bury the crater.

Interestingly the largest splashforms are found 2000 km away in the 
Philippines, not proximally in Indochina as one might first expect. Maybe this 
is because the Philippinite melt sheet was disrupted higher in the atmosphere 
meaning that philippinites were not immediately acted upon by significant 
atmospheric forces. The Indochinites probably formed at lower atmospheric 
levels that might aid breaking up of the largest of bodies. I'm sure there are 
a number of factors at play though. Same applies to the Chesapeake impact - the 
largest splashform tektites are 2000 km away in Texas.

Aubrey



--- On Sun, 13/12/09, Paul H. oxytropidoce...@cox.net wrote:

 From: Paul H. oxytropidoce...@cox.net
 Subject: [meteorite-list] worlds biggest tektite in history
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com 
 meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Sunday, 13 December, 2009, 17:38
 Phil Morgan wrote:
 
 For any interested in this topic, Aubrey Whymark has a
 nice page on
 large tektites here http://www.tektites.co.uk/largest_tektites.html .
 
 Has  anyone tried plotting the locations of the
 largest known tektites?
 
 It seems like, their distribution, especially of the Muong
 Nong-type 
 tektites, would provide some clues about the type and
 location of
 the impact that created them.
 
 Best Regrads,
 
 Paul H.
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] worlds biggest tektite in history

2009-12-13 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Thanks for the link Phil! I need to update the site a little actually, but it 
still makes good reading!

I was emailed about this tektite a couple of days before it was listed. I told 
him it was a Muong Nong, but he seems to want to compare it to splashforms. 
This is a good size Muong Nong-type, but nowhere near a world record breaker!

Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk


--- On Sat, 12/12/09, Phil Morgan roxfromsp...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Phil Morgan roxfromsp...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] worlds biggest tektite in history
 To: Jason Utas meteorite...@gmail.com
 Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Saturday, 12 December, 2009, 16:12
 For any interested in this topic,
 Aubrey Whymark has a nice page on
 large tektites here http://www.tektites.co.uk/largest_tektites.html.
 
 You owe it to yourself to have a look at the rest of his
 site as well.
  It's very comprehensive.
 
 FYI,
 Phil
 
 On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Jason Utas meteorite...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hello Steve, All,
  I've hear tell (and seen photos) of a Muong Nong
 layered tektite in
  the 40-50kg range in Thailand, but the asking price
 was around a
  dollar a gram.  They do come big, but they're rarely
 seen above about
  a kilo or so.
  Regards,
  Jason
 
  On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:11 AM, steve arnold
  stevenarnold60...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
  Good early morning list.Got to put in another 10
 hour day.Last of a 65 hour week.Hey I noticed on ebay
 someone is selling a 3.8 kilo tektite.I s it possible to be
 that big?I've seen them many hundreds of grams but not 7
 lbs. I s it really possible??
   Steve R. Arnold, Chicago!!
  __
  http://www.meteoritecentral.com
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
  __
  http://www.meteoritecentral.com
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Not OT-- set our journals free!

2009-12-13 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

I thought that anything paid for by the US taxpayer had to be public access - 
hence all the NASA articles available free.

Personally the standard $30 charge a paper disgusts me and serves to obstruct 
science. You used to be able to buy paper copies much cheaper - now they are 
online you would think they would be cheaper - but instead they are 10 times 
more expensive! $30 for one A4 page!?! I try and get my papers from 
geological/astronomical libraries or second hand books/journals. Buying digital 
copies would bankrupt me - and it annoys me because tax payers funded the 
research and these companies extort the profit. With the decline in print 
copies it won't be long before online purchase is the only option and then with 
these giants like Elsevier we will all suffer and private researchers will be 
no more. If Elsevier or other big publishers want to hold the copyright then 
they should pay for the ENTIRE research / Ph.D. - if they don't then the 
article should be publicly available if funded by the public. I hope there are 
new laws on copyright before scientific articles are
 only available to the very wealthy. No problems with a $10-15 charge to cover 
costs plus some profit, but these prices are crazy. I've complained, but I 
never get a reply! Maybe it is time that people refuse to publish with these 
guys and go with journals that offer free or cheap online access (but still 
peer reviewed) - at least people could then afford to read the article. Now 
there's an idea for a webpage!

Regards, Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk




--- On Sat, 12/12/09, Darren Garrison cyna...@charter.net wrote:

 From: Darren Garrison cyna...@charter.net
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Not OT-- set our journals free!
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Saturday, 12 December, 2009, 20:53
 We've all seen it-- some new paper
 (on meteorites or not) comes out from a
 publicly funded entity, paid by US taxpayers, but to read
 the paper, you must
 pay an obscene fee (such as $20 to have access to 1 article
 for 24 hours-- or
 some similar rate-- from _Science_.)
 
 Here's a chance to give TPTB a little feedback on that:
 
 http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2009/12/comment-on-acce.html
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Big Bang Origin Of The Moon (Tektite Related)

2009-10-28 Thread Aubrey Whymark
What a fruit loop. This theory has more holes in it than swiss cheese. Does he 
think the moon is made of cheese too? I stopped reading half way through.

Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk



--- On Thu, 29/10/09, Michael Groetz mpg4...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Michael Groetz mpg4...@gmail.com
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Big Bang Origin Of The Moon (Tektite Related)
 To: Meteorite List Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Thursday, 29 October, 2009, 0:04
 Big Bang Origin Of The Moon
 
 Explosive ejection from the Philippine Sea Plate
 
 
 http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/SC0910/S00066.htm
 
 
 Coleman speculates that the Philippine Sea
 Plate was once
 an enormous hole out of which the Moon exited, and left a
 strewen
 field, or trail, of previously unexplained glassy
 tektites...
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Dry Lakes in Australia

2009-10-15 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi Greg

They certainly look for Australite Tektites on the dry lakes in WA. Australites 
can be picked up, kept, sold, sold abroad. You can't touch the Meteorites in 
Australia though. If you find one then report it to the Museum. For this reason 
I doubt that people go out specifically looking for Meteorites as it would cost 
a lot for zero reward.

Regards,

Aubrey Whymark
www.tektites.co.uk



--- On Wed, 14/10/09, Greg Stanley stanleygr...@hotmail.com wrote:

 From: Greg Stanley stanleygr...@hotmail.com
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Dry Lakes in Australia
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Wednesday, 14 October, 2009, 10:41 PM
 
 List:
 
 The company I work for is doing a project in Australia and
 I'm coordinating the placement of some of our instruments. 
 As I looked at the map in GoogleEarth, I notice (what looks
 like dry lakes) throughout the country; does anyone look for
 meteorites on dry lakes in Australia?
 
 Greg S.
     
 
       
   
 _
 Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM
 protection.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Stretch Philippinite Tektites!

2009-09-08 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi List

Check out my images of two stretch tektites found in the Philippine:
http://www.tektites.co.uk/stretch.html (half way down)

There is an interesting story:
Des Leong of www.tektiteinc.com showed me the 66.1g specimen and asked if I 
thought it was a stretch tektite. I said 'no' as Philippinites re-entered as 
solid bodies (unlike Indochinites). It was a curio though with a stretched 
bubble area sandwiched between two circular bubble areas. 

Then today I was cataloging some tektites I bought in January 2009. In that lot 
I found a very similar specimen weighing 32.2g. It had a stretched bubble area 
sandwiched between two circular bubble areas (same as before). In this case, 
however, there was very clear twisting of the molten area. 

Not necessarily the classic stretch tektite, but nonetheless I've come round to 
the fact that stretched tektites can be found very very rarely in the 
Philippines - perhaps one per 100 or 150 kilos. I think these must have formed 
in the ejection phase though, as I'm certain that Philippinites re-entered as 
solid bodies (why? well even one kilo tektites show no distortion - In 
Indochina spheres sagged into donuts/tori. In the Philippines they stayed as 
spheres even in the biggest tektites that would have remained molten the 
longest).

Anyway, enjoy the images, I wanted to share them! 

Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk


  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Dry / dehumidifier cabinets

2009-08-23 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi List

I was in a photography shop here in Manila and saw some fantastic glass fronted 
dry cabinets ideal for meteorite collectors. I only keep tektites here in 
Manila so I don't need one! The prices were very reasonable ranging from about 
$150 for a small one to $300 for a larger one.

I saw two brands and you can view them here:

http://www.drycabinet.com.au/main.html

http://www.eurekadrytech.com/pro01.aspx

The first is Australian and the second Taiwanese so no idea if they are 
available outside of Australasia, but I hope they are! Maybe someone should 
stock them!

Regards, Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk









  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Book Titled: The history of meteoritics and keymeteorite collections

2009-08-20 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

You can get a good idea on Google Books 
http://books.google.com.ph/books?id=7SvtVoa1W-cCpg=PA123lpg=PA123dq=The+history+of+meteoritics+and+key+meteorite+collectionssource=blots=VYykBJ52ljsig=KDOt2h-3RuKbIxp7BIBc5dDHRUkhl=tlei=h_eNSvboKoGgkQXvm8C7Cgsa=Xoi=book_resultct=resultresnum=1#v=onepageq=f=false

Also reviews at 
http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/gsl/publications/bookshop/page1331.html

FYI the Geological Society often discounts the price very heavily for members 
and this is further reduced in the regular sales. For the book 'Tektites in the 
Geological Record: Showers from the Sky' the list price is GBP65, but I paid 
GBP25. I'm afraid I am not in UK, but in the Philippines, making ordering for 
others impractical, but maybe there are other members on the list.

Regards, Aubrey


--- On Thu, 20/8/09, Matt Morgan m...@mhmeteorites.com wrote:

 From: Matt Morgan m...@mhmeteorites.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Book Titled: The history of meteoritics and 
 keymeteorite collections
 To: Greg Stanley stanleygr...@hotmail.com, 
 meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com, 
 meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Thursday, 20 August, 2009, 10:14 PM
 I did one for Palaios last year:
 http://www.paleo.ku.edu/palaios/reviews2008.html.
 
 It is about halfway down the page in PDF format.
 
 Matt Morgan
 http://www.mhmeteorites.com
 --Original Message--
 From: Greg Stanley
 Sender: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Book Titled: The history of
 meteoritics and keymeteorite collections
 Sent: Aug 20, 2009 3:08 PM
 
 
 
 List:
 
 Does anyone have a review on the following book:
 
 The history of meteoritics and key meteorite collections:
 fireballs, falls and finds, By Gerald Joseph Home McCall, A.
 J. Bowden, Richard John Howarth
 
 I have just discovered it and it looks interesting, but
 expensive $190.00
 
 Thanks,
 
 Greg S.
 
 
 
 
 
 _
 Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you.
 http://www.bing.com/cashback?form=MSHYCBpubl=WLHMTAGcrea=TEXT_MSHYCB_BackToSchool_Cashback_BTSCashback_1x1
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
 Matt Morgan
 Mile High Meteorites
 http://www.mhmeteorites.com
 P.O. Box 151293
 Lakewood, CO 80215 USA
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Darryl Futrell huge Philippinite

2009-08-14 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi List

On the same link I posted earlier regarding the tektite lamp: 
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/JHsNghP_3Rcb0QbP9zHr_w?authkey=Gv1sRgCM6XzLrq76-GKQfeat=directlink

does anyone know what happened to the huge Beyer Philippinite weighing 1,065g 
(1,069g on Beyer's scales)? It'd be good to know where this one ended up. Large 
tektites are still coming out of Bikol but are very rare. In the last couple of 
years (to my knowledge) there have been a few over 700g, maybe 1 over 800g and 
none above this. Des and I frequently get reports of 1 kilo tektites but they 
always turn out to weigh much less. There may be a few more that are in the 
hands of other western/asian foreigners but again the weight is usually much 
exaggerated by the sellers who cannot afford scales.

The largest original tektite spheres always fragment (like the other two 
irregular specimens shown). Presumably they are thermodynamically unstable 
above 1 kilo. 

Regards, Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk





  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Darryl Futrell Tektite Lamp

2009-08-13 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi List

Unfortunately I never knew Darryl Futrell. I have, however, read many of his 
articles which I certainly find interesting even if I do not agree with the 
conclusions.

In an article titled 'The Lunar Origin of Tektites' in Rock  Gem Feb 1999 
there is a photo of a fantastic Tektite 'Tiffany' Style lamp. This was made by 
Dan Wright from natural un-cut thin splashform tektites from Thailand. See it 
here:

http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/JHsNghP_3Rcb0QbP9zHr_w?authkey=Gv1sRgCM6XzLrq76-GKQfeat=directlink
 

Does anyone know what happened to this lamp? Also are there any more in 
existence? It is a fantastic piece!

Regards, Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk


--- On Thu, 13/8/09, bernd.pa...@paulinet.de bernd.pa...@paulinet.de wrote:

 From: bernd.pa...@paulinet.de bernd.pa...@paulinet.de
 Subject: [meteorite-list] In memoriam Darryl Futrell - Gone but not forgotten
 To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Thursday, 13 August, 2009, 12:26 PM
 Dear List,
 
 Saturday, 21 July 2001, Darryl sent me these lines:
 
 Would you believe I have a letter from the Chinese Academy
 of Sciences
  in Beijing, from one of their top two tektite researchers,
 inviting me to go
  there and do tektite field work with them?
 
 Monday, 13 August 2001, Darryl passed away after a severe
 heart attack.
 
 Of course, he would have loved to accept this invitation,
 but, alas, in the
 same mail he also wrote:
 
 Six or more years ago, I would have gone, but now there's
 no way.
 
 
 Best wishes,
 
 Bernd
 
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Rob Elliott's Auction in the press

2009-06-03 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

Old news in the British and Irish Meteorite Society (sorry can't post
on that list for some reason).

New news in the Daily Mail - Rob Elliott is auctioning off his collection.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1190626/Meteorite.html

Regards, Aubrey
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Rob Elliott's Meteorite Auction in the press

2009-06-03 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

Old news in the British and Irish Meteorite Society (sorry can't post
on that list for some reason).

New news in the Daily Mail - Rob Elliott is auctioning off his collection.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1190626/Meteorite.html

Regards, Aubrey
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Dealers, Sellers: Please INSURE your shipments

2009-06-02 Thread Aubrey Whymark
I am always careful about declaring a meteorite - it makes it tempting
to steal. 'Mineral specimen for research' is accurate and yet far less
tempting to steal. Also I prefer not to declare the full value. When I
have stuff sent to the Philippines I like a low value as again it
reduces the risk of theft (although I have never experienced a
problem). The main problem I have is that if a high value is declared
then I have to pay import duties, and various other taxes and post
office expenses that basically convert a bargain ebay purchase into
very expense deal - almost to the point that it's not worth picking
up, due to the expense. I once bought $120 of tektites and then had to
pay $60 to the post office to get them!

Aubrey
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Request from Kenya on suspect rock

2009-05-30 Thread Aubrey Whymark
I agree with Mark

Clearly siliceous - looks like flint or chert. Definitely not a meteorite.

Aubrey
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Best institutional tektite collections?

2009-04-18 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi List

I started some museum pages on my website a while back, it would be
great to add to these museums if anyone has photos of tektite
collections. www.tektites.co.uk/museums

The British Museum of Natural History currently has a very poor
display, bar a few nice Ivory Coast tektites. I believe this may
improve in the future.

The French Natural History Museum sadly has no tektites on display,
despite the work by Lacroix.

I believe the Czech Natural History Museum has a good display, but I
have no more information.

In Australia I guess there are a number of excellent displays -
Certainly a good display is found in the Western Australian Museum.

In the US I have little information - if you have some info and photos
of tektite displays you can email me at aub...@tektites.co.uk for
inclusion in my webpage. I have learnt that Virgil Barnes donated his
collection to the Texas Memorial Museum

In the Philippines I believe there are no displays. There used to be
one at the Planetarium, but that was under renovation, and I believe
still is. No idea if tektites will be back on display there when it
opens again.

Regards, Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk


On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Phil Morgan roxfromsp...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello everyone,
 I was wondering where some of the better tektite collections are
 located and how much is on display.  I'm mostly interested in the US
 but feel free to include others.  Any suggestions?

 Thanks,
 Phil
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Velocity a meteorite hits the ground?

2009-04-09 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Thanks for all the replies!

Whilst I wasn't happy about being hit by hail stones, I'm pleased I
wasn't hit by a meteorite! Mind you, that would be a real hammer and
I'm sure the money would pay the medical expenses for a new hand!

Regards, Aubrey
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Velocity a meteorite hits the ground?

2009-04-08 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

I'm sure this is a very simple question. The other day I was caught in
a hail storm and was hit by 30-35mm diameter hail stones. One hit my
exposed hand and made a nasty bruise. At what speed were these hail
stones falling? By comparison, at roughly what speed do meteorites
fall assuming they have lost all of their cosmic velocity. I am
assuming it will be a little faster as meteorites are heavier and so
the drag will have less of an effect.

Thanks, Aubrey
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Tektites

2009-03-15 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

I just read Bill's post about Plain Text. So this is how you post to
the Meteorite List! I gave up trying to post ages ago as my posts
never got through! I thought it was because I didn't live in America!

Whats New? http://www.tektites.co.uk/whats-new.html

Recently I've written about the largest tektites in the world (I need
you help!), about Vietnam tektites and done some You Tube videos - my
first attempt!

Also check out my Indochinite and Philippinite formation pages!
http://www.tektites.co.uk/indochinites.html and
http://www.tektites.co.uk/philippinites.html

Loads of other tektite pages too!

Also I apologise in advance about any delay in replies. I'm in the
Persian Gulf on a satellite connection.

Thanks, Aubrey Whymark
www.tektites.co.uk
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Tektite internal structure and Andas plus Bediasites

2007-08-07 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi
   
  I've added some images to my website www.tektites.co.uk.
   
  I have some excellent images of Bediasites from Brian Burrer in Texas. Many 
thanks to Brian! http://www.tektites.co.uk/19.html
   
  Also I have some notes on Anda tektites and also on ice cubes and tektite 
internal structure http://www.tektites.co.uk/9.html and 
http://www.tektites.co.uk/37.html
   
  Also some attached navals on Philippinites, that I have mentioned previously.
  http://www.tektites.co.uk/8.html (at bottom).
   
  From tomorrow I am off email for a bit, but any feedback I will respond. 
Research is on hold for a few weeks whilst I work though!
   
  As always ideas are evolving, Enjoy!
   
  Regards, Aubrey

   
-
 Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for 
your freeaccount today.__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] TEKTITE SCULPTURE Anda, V-grooves and U-grooves

2007-07-28 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi
   
  I know this may be nothing new to folk who have been collecting tektites many 
years, but it is something that has fascinated me recently and may be of 
interest to some collectors.
   
  I have recently updated my website dedicated to tektites. It is an ongoing 
process as ideas and opinions evolve. I appreciate that other people may have 
different opinions. My recent updates include that on Anda sculpture and 
V-grooves www.tektites.co.uk/9 and on evolving ideas about gutters and navals 
on Philippinite biscuits www.tektites.co.uk/8. Many other pages have been 
modified, but as always time is a great constraint.
   
  Basically, I discuss Anda sculpture and V-grooves in Philippinites and 
Indochinites and conclude that it is almost certainly due to chemical etching 
and essentially no different to the patterns very well developed in Moldavites 
(from Besednice in particular) and also occurs in Bediasites and Australites. 
Is the internal radiating pattern a cooling product?
   
  I then return to naval formation on Philippinite biscuits. With 2 specimens 
that I aquired from Desmond Leong of www.tektiteinc.com it appears that my 
original ideas on naval formation and flight orientation were incorrect. As I 
said, ideas evolve and I won't stubbonly stick to things that don't work, hence 
the change in my website. In these specimens from Camarines Norte, Philippines, 
which are finely grooved like javanites, shell material is clearly seen 
attached to the naval. These photos are fascinating. This also leads to 
questions as to whether U-grooves of biscuits and breadcrusts have been 
enlarged by etching along pre-defined cracks. If this is the case, then why 
U-shaped and not V-shaped etching?
   
  Note that I may be out of town shortly so unable to reply to feedback.
   
  Many thanks and I hope you enjoy the site!
   
  Aubrey
  www.tektites.co.uk
   

   
-
 Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Tryit now.__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] London Clay ??Tektites

2007-05-28 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi
   
  Regarding the possible London Clay microtektites. I have just received some 
more data from the finder. It doesn't look good as I report below. I hope you 
appreciate that I am simply reporting information as I receive it and in hind 
sight maybe I should have held back a bit. These spherules were, however, 
reported in the very reputable Geologists' Association Magazine, and this is 
how I came to hear about them.
   
  These spherules were analysed in 1994 by Glan Izett of the USGS. The 
spherules did not contain any Radiogenic 40Ar and it was thus concluded that 
the spherules had zero geologic age. The Major element electron micro-probe 
analyses of the glass-like spherules gave the following results:
   
  SiO2  31.92 31.57 32.30
  Al2O316.00 15.74 15.96
  MgO   5.60 5.83  5.65
  FeO0.26 0.27  0.27
  CaO40.2240.2340.06
  Na2O  0.26  0.27 0.27
  K2O0.71  0.76  0.78
  MnO   0.85 0.92  0.93
  BaO0.07  0.10  0.05
  TiO2   0.61  0.65  0.63
  TOTAL   96.51 96.3796.89
   
  The high amount of CaO and SiO2 certainly does not favour tektite glass. It 
is interesting, however, that the proposed source crater (Silverpit Crater) 
would be within the Upper Cretaceous Chalk (around 96% CaCO3). 
   
  The collector of the spherules, Michael Daniels, states 'Those that are 
familiar with my site activities, the way I conduct my researches, from digging 
out the accumulations usually from foreshore exposures, then the method by 
which the pockets are rendered down here to acquire searchable residues, all 
would unquestionably confirm the veracity of my contentions concerning both the 
remarkable Naze biota, and the various unusual minerals, other items, not only 
the tektites, in my collection.'
   
  I am simply reporting the facts as I recieve them - I will leave you to draw 
your own conclusions on these data. Certainly the analyses are far from 
favourable and the zero geologic age will prove difficult to overcome. 
Personally I would like to visit the site to follow-up.
   
  Regards, Aubrey
 

   
-
 Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Tryit now.__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] More on London Clay Microtektites

2007-05-25 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi 
   
  Michael Daniels, who discovered the London Clay tektites has recently emailed 
me a little more information, which I'd like to pass on:
   
  When it comes to your correspondent's doubts, which they are fully entitled 
to submit,
  particularly suspicions raised about the possibility of contaminates, origins 
connected
  with fly-ash and power stations, volcanics, yes, they are all familiar 
observations con-
  cerning the particles.
   
  And, as before, I just make the suggestion that for those more doubtful, they 
come down
  here and I will gladly conduct them to the Naze when I shall be more than 
appreciative to
  hear their explanations as to where I may have, in my enthusiasm, become a 
little
  adventurous in my concept and having unquestioning belief in the antiquity of 
the little 
  glassy objects.  That might be for me an acid test, but actually I think when 
they have 
  better appreciation of the conditions prevailing at this lower London Clay 
locality, I think I
  can win over a few potential critics.
   
  Just to deal with a couple of questions raised by those who have written.
   
  I have today once more checked the particles and none show any magnetic 
properties.
  Some do have voids and there is a little evidence of impurities, but if that 
is confirmed
  then just might be tiny specs of dirt or plant debris. 
   
  As for their pristine state, no sign of them suffering any ablation.  Many of 
the fossil bird 
  bones that I have collected from the Walton site are in such a remarkable 
condition
  that I have had to be careful when comparing them with modern avian elements, 
so
  perfect are they that confusion over which is which could arise.  This is 
because once
  the relics came to rest on the sea bed and were fast covered with sediment, 
there they 
  remained down 55 (not 35!) million years until they were caused to emerge 
when I dug 
  up the pocket, composed mainly of plant material, in which they were lodged 
and so 
  reveal them once more to the light of day!
   
  The tektites have a high Ca content and this factor through those who expect 
them to
  show substantial silica in their make up.  But the people that found 
difficulty with such 
  a composition, in my view, simply had an inability in grasp that some things 
in heaven 
  and earth are literally beyond the powers of human understanding.
   
  Have a pleasant weekend
   
  Sincerely
   
  Michael
   
  Thanks for all the feedback, Aubrey (out of contact for a bit in the Middle 
East, so apologies if I don't reply)
   
  www.tektites.co.uk
  

 

   
-
 Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for 
your freeaccount today.__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] British Lower Eocene London Clay Tektites

2007-05-23 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi
   
  I just wanted to draw attention to these possible microtektites from the 
Lower Eocene London Clay in England. The finder, Michael Daniels, has very 
kindly provided a number of images and some notes.
   
  http://www.tektites.co.uk/13.html
   
  What do people think of these possible microtektites? Are they comparable 
with other microtektites found? Interestingly some of the microtektites seem to 
have extra 'spikey' features (see photos) - is this normal?
   
  Thanks, Aubrey
  www.tektites.co.uk
   
  P.S. out of contact from 26th May for a bit.


-
 Now you can scan emails quickly with a reading pane. Get the new Yahoo! Mail.__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Tektite Surface Question Anda

2007-04-30 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi
   
  Yes I have a few more ideas and intend to add to the website 
(www.tektites.co.uk) in a week or two when I return to the UK. Also check out 
my links page. I want to write more on the Anda sculpture (and V-grooves) and 
more on my belief that the impact site is in the Bay of Tonkin, where any 
depression would be very rapidly covered by deltaic sediments. This best fits 
the distribution of tektites, wheras Tonle Sap doesn't make so much sense. I'll 
do a bit on ejecta distribution patterns too. Also I am getting a better 
feeling for some of the sculpture on Indochinites so I'll be adding to that 
also.
   
  So, who paid $561 dollars for the moldavite-like Anda Indochinite slim 
teardrop on ebay? A truely unique specimen with some interesting implications 
on the chemical weathering argument. If you have this stone I would kill for an 
image. I have a similar, but poorer example. Contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  Also, have you seen the spinning tektites (sadly all sold) at 
http://www.meteorite.fr/en/forsale/tectite.htm - you don't need an explanation 
on how these formed! Amazing specimens.
   
  Regards, Aubrey
   
   
   
   
  

Moni Waiblinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Or read more info on this url from Aubrey Whymark

www.tektites.co.uk

Great reading material and images!

With best regards,
Moni

_
MSN is giving away a trip to Vegas to see Elton John.  Enter to win today. 
http://msnconcertcontest.com?icid-nceltontagline

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


   
-
 Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Tryit now.__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] +++ New Australasian Tektite Webpage! +++

2007-04-07 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi
   
  www.tektites.co.uk
   
  I'd like to present to you my new tektite webpage. The primary focus is on 
Australasian tektites, with a lot on Philippinites. In time I'll add more on 
Australites and Indochinites.
   
  It presents my current ideas, which I hope will evolve in the future so that 
some solid understanding of tektite morphologies and sculpture is developed, 
where it does not already exist. I think I have some interesting observations 
on sculpture and surface textures, particularly in Philippinites.
   
  I hope this website will demonstrate how fascinating and diverse tektites 
are. People often just have a poor Indochinite splashform in their collection 
and think that is that. There is so much more!!
   
  Regards, Aubrey


-
 What kind of emailer are you? Find out today - get a free analysis of your 
email personality. Take the quiz at the Yahoo! Mail Championship.__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD: RIZALITES FOR SALE or TRADE!!!

2007-03-06 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi list members,

Sorry for not posting this myself!  I'm having a lot of problems subscribing to 
the Met list. I have been a quiet reader of the list for over a year now!

I’ve got a bunch of Rizalites that I’m looking to trade for some Henbury, 
Mundrabilla, Camel Donga or Millbillillie specimens, you can see that I'm a 
patriotic Australian! I will also add cash to the trades if needed. I’m looking 
for 1000grams and above specimens. I will also sell my Rizalites if anyone is 
interested. Please visit my site or eBay offerings. Thanks all.

Regards,
Desmond
www.TektiteInc.com
eBay - http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZtektiteinc-dot-com

_

-
 Now you can scan emails quickly with a reading pane. Get the new Yahoo! Mail.__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD: RIZALITES FOR SALE or TRADE!!!

2007-03-06 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi list members,

Sorry for not posting this myself!  I'm having a lot of problems subscribing to 
the Met list. I have been a quiet reader of the list for over a year now!

I’ve got a bunch of Rizalites that I’m looking to trade for some Henbury, 
Mundrabilla, Camel Donga or Millbillillie specimens, you can see that I'm a 
patriotic Australian! I will also add cash to the trades if needed. I’m looking 
for 1000grams and above specimens. I will also sell my Rizalites if anyone is 
interested. Please visit my site or eBay offerings. Thanks 
all.

Regards,
Desmond
www.TektiteInc.com
eBay - http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZtektiteinc-dot-com

_

-
 All New Yahoo! Mail – Tired of unwanted email come-ons? Let our SpamGuard 
protect you.__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Australites/Philippinites - grooving - any info?

2007-02-05 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi list
   
  I wondered if there is anyone on the list who has collected a lot of 
australites and knows about the grooving on these tektites. What does it look 
like? Is it generally on the anterior side? Is it associated with particular 
shapes and not others? 
   
  I am really interested to understand how australite morphologies fit in with 
the classic lenticular and breadcrust philippinites, which have grooving on 
only one side. I was also fascinated by the recent emails on stretch tektites. 
   
  The more I look at philippinites, the more I think the U grooves are an 
original feature as oppose to chemical weathering. The U grooves occur on only 
one side and, when better developed, have a polygonal structure. I know this is 
usually explained as being the anterior side with flakes coming off due to 
thermal expansion/contraction, but I still wonder if that is the case. I wonder 
if these cracks developed (?perhaps as the tektite cooled) but the interior 
remained plastic. When this interior became solid, the solid would take up less 
space than the liquid. So, when it cooled totally did it 'suck' in at the 
grooves. I saw a similar thing when playing with solid and liquid wax. Are the 
grooves on one side then lost due to ablation, thus making the smooth side the 
anterior? Are these grooves in anyway similar to the starburst ray skin-splits 
featured on 'The Tektite Source' webpage? I understand this idea creates more 
problems, such as why do tektites from Vietnam area not
 show polygonal cracks like philippinites. I'm sure there is still much to be 
learnt, but if anyone knows answers I'm keen to learn.
   
  Thanks, Aubrey
   
   


-
 The all-new Yahoo! Mail goes wherever you go - free your email address from 
your Internet provider.__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Philippinites - shape formation ideas.

2006-11-06 Thread Aubrey Whymark

Hi Guys

TEKTITE PHILIPPINITE SHAPE FORMATION 

I have been purchasing a large number of philippinites here in Manila. These philippinites, I have been told by my supplier, come from Baguio. Baguio is in Central Luzon (the large northern island of the Philippines) and forms highland – with conifers growing in the cool climate. I visited this place and found no tektites (or anybody who knew what a tektite was). Here in Manila I am buying as much as I can. My supplier, who has collected for 20 years, has not got any new ones for 3 years now, and
 I think I have already got the best out of him. They are not that cheap and have pretty much used all my money up – so I’ll be selling a few at some point (probably in December).

My observations have led me to some conclusions that differ slightly from previous articles I found on the internet (although I have not checked my references in UK). Philippinites are characterised by their ‘u’ grooves. These ‘u’ grooves only tend to develop on one side and this is what I intend to discuss. Philippinites come in a variety of shapes including ‘breadcrust’ forms (which look like half-soccer balls), dumbbells and tear drops, the classic ‘5’ grooved ‘cores’ and spheres. Interestingly, on average, philippinites appear larger than I had imagined. My biggest is around 360g, with many around 50g.

Interesting articles on the internet are:
http://www.tektitesource.com/Bikolites.html
http://www.meteorite-times.com/Back_Links/2002/November/Tektite_of_Month.htm

My pictures (refer to with the following text) are in the BIMS homepage:
http://tech.ph.groups.yahoo.com/group/britishandirishmeteoritesociety/photos/browse/8c74?c= 

The observations made in ‘The Tektite Source’ were excellent and from what I’ve seen I fully agree with them. The observations made by Paul Harris in the meteorite times were also excellent, but I wish to argue about the anterior/posterior side. Polygonal cracks are commonly found in geology. The best example is in basaltic lavas such as the classic ‘Giants Causeway’ in Ireland. Polygonal cracks are caused by contraction due to cooling. The cool side of a tektite on re-entry is the posterior (in australites material solidifies on the posterior as it is cooler). My second piece of evidence is the Apollo re-entry craft (meteorites were studied for its design I believe). I note that on philippinites the smooth side is always shield-like. It is pretty similar in most specimens, but the
 grooved side is variably convex (and usually more convex than the smooth side). My third piece of evidence comes from the large specimen pictured. Unfortunately this did not come out well in the photo, so is not shown. On the ‘smooth’ side is an originally textured surface. But in one area it is smoothed off – a feature I have also observed on some indochinites from Thailand. It looks as if it landed on this surface whist still hot and slightly plastic. The ‘thud’ flattened an area and removed any pock-marking, which exists on the rest of the rounded surface.

So, large philippinites form ‘breadcrusts’ which kind of look like half-soccer balls. On these ‘breadcrusts’ a smooth shield-like anterior (facing direction of travel) surface forms. On the posterior (behind) the tektite cools faster, thus forming polygonal cooling contraction cracks. These polygonal areas can crack off in flight and can leave a smaller core of about 1-4cm in size, not to mention numerous ‘side’ pieces. These ‘cores’ often have a rounded polygonal outline. These smaller tektites may of course, already have just been small. They show the classic shield-like anterior and grooved posterior. The cracks on the posterior are the same as on larger specimens but only develop as typically 5 cracks on the edge with no interior polygon developed.

The ‘u’ grooves formed due to chemical weathering along lines of weakness – which are the cooling contraction cracks. The end result is spectacularly beautiful tektites, surpassed only by the australites.

I’m interested in any comment regarding this subject. Tektites have fascinated me for 15 years now.

Kind Regards,

AubreySend instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com __
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New Zealand: more 'meteorites' on their shelves....

2004-06-16 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Looks exactly like a marcasite/pyrite nodule. We get loads from the Cretaceous Lower Chalk in Southern England that look identical. They are also regularly confused with meteorites.

AubreyMarco Langbroek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every odd rock in New Zealand now starts to be a meteorite it seems. Here'sthe newest:http://times-age.co.nz/news2004/040616b.htmlNo likely meteorite if I look at this picture. Markasite nodule perhaps?- Marco--Marco LangbroekLeiden, the Netherlands52.15896 N, 4.48884 E (WGS 84)e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]website: http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroekweblog: http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek/iss_log.html--__Meteorite-list mailing list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
		 ALL-NEW 
Yahoo! Messenger - so many 
all-new ways to express yourself __
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Cutting lubricant/coolant and blades

2004-06-01 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi list,

I was looking for a suitable water soluble coolant for cutting meteorites with. Diacut sounds good but, so far as I can see, it is only available in America. Whilst I am am having some odd bits of equipment shipped over to the UK, I would imagine shipping a load of liquid may get expensive.

Does anyone know of a decent product available in the UK and a good lapidary dealer? I was wondering about theuse of automobile coolant additives instead. At the end of the day they contain corrosion inhibitors and water-coolant. I could mix it with distilled water and use them instead..maybe? I am not cutting anything rare or valuable and would, of course, give them alcohol baths and heat treatments afterwards. (with alcohol baths I have found that leaving them in excess of 2-3 days may result in break up of weathered meteorites - any comment?)

As regards blades, Iunderstand from previous emailsthat Dean uses Pro Slicer diamond blades for cutting Chondrites (correct me if I am wrong). Are CBN blades better for Chondrites due to the metal content? - I understand they would be essential for irons as diamond blades are not good on metals. I will, however, be concentrating on Chondrites.

Any help would be appreciated. I am a hobbyist keen to cut a few specimens myself.

Thanks in advance,

Aubrey Whymark

		  
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends 
today! Download Messenger Now__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites / Mining Claims

2004-03-01 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi

Have a read of Norton's Rocks From Space (2nd Ed) p.251 on the Old Woman Meteorite.

I'm sure that you can hunt for meteorites but neither youself or the owner of the mining claim owns the meteorite. This is because meteorites are not a 'locatable mineral'. If the meteorite was found on public land the United States Government is the legal owner. If on private land I assume the land owner is the legal owner.

The Old Woman meteorite is now at the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) California Desert Information Center in Barstow. The finders recieved nothing.

I wonder if the same ruling would have been applied if Barringer had been successful in locating a large meteorite below Meteor Crater, Arizona. Maybe it's a size thing.


Aubrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi List,

I would like to know if you are allowed to hunt for meteorites on mining claims.If one is 

found, who owns the meteorite, The finder or the claim owner? 

Thanks,.

Sonny
		  
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends 
today! Download Messenger Now

Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 1933

2004-01-30 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Armoured chondrules are when the chondrule is surrounded by a thin rim of metal. They probably form due to impact shock melting.

AubreyAnita Westlake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:






Love the "Solar System Stew" description. By the way, what do you mean by "armoured"?
Anita
---Original Message---


From: Jeff Kuyken
Date: Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:34:09 AM
To: Meteorite List
Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA 1933

G'day folks,

I just received a slice of NWA 1933 from Mike Farmer today. I strongly recommend taking a look at the pics.This isone of the; if not THE BEST, ordinary chondrites I have ever seen! It seems like no two chondrules are the same andheaps ofthem are armoured. Under magnification you can see inclusions within inclusions (achondritic clasts?)and the colours are pretty spectacular! All in all, it's like a solidified primordial Solar System stew!

Cheers,

Jeff KuykenI.M.C.A. #3085www.meteorites.com.auwww.meteoritesaustralia.com








 IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click HereBT 
Yahoo! Broadband - Free modem offer, sign up online today and save £80

[meteorite-list] Preventing rust

2004-01-28 Thread Aubrey Whymark

Hi 

I had a problem a while back with a couple of ordinary chondrites rusting. I followed the advise offered on Meteorites Australia and would like to recommend the process to other people.

http://www.meteoritesaustralia.com/oddsends/ironrust.html

After polishing the specimens using distilled water I simply got an old jam jar, filled it with methylated spirit, added about a table spoon of caustic soda (both available from DIY stores), added the meteorite and left it for about 10 days. This process has, so far, made the specimens much more stable. When carrying out this process be sure to wear disposable gloves. Skin and caustic soda don't mix too well.

AubreyBT 
Yahoo! Broadband - Free modem offer, sign up online today and save £80

[meteorite-list] Look on the Moon for the first evidence of life on Earth?

2004-01-28 Thread Aubrey Whymark



From a previous email:"Our research shows the structures found in the NASA meteorite were more than likely made by bacteria present on Mars four billion years ago - before life even started on Earth."
Discussion:
We don't have the rocks on Earth to accurately say when life started because of recycling due to plate tectonics. The oldest rock is 4.03 Ga old. The ancient rocks we are left with have been through a lot and are often highly metamorphosed. See the following link for ages of the oldest Earth rock: http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/geotime/age.html
The oldestbacterial fossils on Earthare 3.5 billion years old but probably originated before that. The rocks are often so metamorphosed that any fossil traces will be destroyed. The isotope ratios between Carbon-12 and Carbon-13, however,indicate life was present as much as 3.85Ga ago (although this has been questioned). Then, tiny zircon crystalsreworked into younger rocks, but dating back to 4.3Ga to 4.4Ga, suggest possibilities life may be even older. They indicate the possibility of oceans and environments in which microbial life could emerge - 4.3 billion to 4.4 billion years ago.
As the ancient rocks on Earthare either not available due to plate tectonics or highly metamorphosed it has been suggested that the best place to look for life on Earth may be on the moon. Ancient terrestrial rock would have made it to the moon relatively unaltered. See the following very interesting article.
http://www.nature.com/nsu/021028/021028-13.html
AubreyBT 
Yahoo! Broadband - Free modem offer, sign up online today and save £80

Re: [meteorite-list] xenolith vs. polymict breccia?

2004-01-25 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Walter Branch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi

Yes the term xenolith would apply to the individual clast. It is a term used to describe something foreign or exotic that really shoulnd't be there. If the clast was the same as the matrix I would hesitate to use it but if it were different then it seems like a good term.

Igneous rocks can certainly have xenolithic clasts of other igneous rocks, sedimentary rocks and metemorphic rocks. As an intrusion forces its way through country rock it will often pick up such clasts. If individual crystals are picked up which do not belong to that melt, but to another, these are termed xenocrysts. I would struggle to envisage chondrites being caught up in an igneous melt on an asteroid though. This would surely imply only partial melting of the body. If the two were found together it would surely be in a breccia and the chondritic component wouldn't be encased in the igneous component.

A rubble pile could certainly have igneous clasts such as eucritic fragments in an LL body for instance.

Aubrey



Hi Aubry,

Thanks very much for your comments.

Yes, I was considering rocks with a matrix. I must admit, I had not thought of rocks without a matrix - clast supported vs. matrix supported. That is a very interesting distinction.Now I have yet another term with which I can try to impress my wife (not an easy thing to do after 17 years of marriage:-)

Would the term xenolith apply to the individual clasts in a polymict breccia? Could an igneous rock have axenolithic clast of non-igneous material or could a sedimentary (e.g., rubble pile) type host have an igneous clast, thus making bothpolymict breccias? 

I suppose given enough collisions among asteroids, any combination is possible (e.g., chondritic monomict breccia's with exoctic igneous clasts).

Perhaps in descriptions of meteorites the terms polymict
xenolithic breccia and monomict xenolithic breccia
should be used as oppose to just xenolithic breccia
which to me does not distinguish whether the clasts are
the same or not. It merely says that at least some of the
clasts are different to the matrix.

Yes, as you have described it, this makes sense.

Aubry (and everyone)

I have received an email from a recently former list member who reports that there is a paper which describes formal guidelines on the description xenolithic inclusions in meteorites:

Binns R.A. (1968) Cognate xenoliths in chondritic meteorites: Examples in Mezö-Madaras and Ghubara (GCA 32, 299-317).

Hope this helps.
Thanks again for your comments.

-Walter

--www.branchmeteorites.com

- Original Message - 
From: Aubrey Whymark 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] xenolith vs. polymict breccia?

Hi 

Sorry for the length of this reply. Got carried away! Go to bottom 3 paragraphs for summary.

You are right.A polymict breccia descibes a sedimentary rock made up of angluar clasts of different rock whilst a monomict breccia refers to a sedimentary rock made up of angular clasts of the same rock. A brecciacan be clast supported (the clasts are touching) or matrix supported (clasts are not touching). If clast supported, a matrix may or may not be present.

The term xenolith refers to a foreign rock or clast incorporated into another rock. Traditionally I would tend to only use this term when refering to igneous rocks but it could be used for exotic clasts in sedimentary rocks (and chondrites). Ghubara is an example,being classified as a xenolithic chondrite. If using the term xenolith you are probably implying a matrix is present. The matrix is local, in the case of chondrites, and the xenolith not local - it came from elsewhere. If you were to apply the term xenolith to a matrix free polymict breccia the xenolith would simply have to be the less abundant type of clast. This is not satisfactory as just because it is less abundant does not neccessarily make it the 'foreign' bit.

This is my understanding of rock names:

Angular clast of same composition, no matrix = monomict clast 
supported breccia

Angular clasts of different composition, no matrix = polymict clast supported breccia

Angular clasts of same composition with matrix also of same composition = monomict clast or matrix supported breccia

Angular clasts of same composition in a matrix of different composition = monomict clast or matrix supported brecciaor xenolithic chondrite.

Angular clasts of different compositions in a matrix = polymict clast or matrix supported breccia or xenolithic chondrite ( but if the matrix is the same as some of the clasts the term xenolith would only apply to the different composition clasts)

So, to summarise, in my opinion a monomict or polymict breccia can be the same thing as a xenolithic chondrite. Xenolithic simply implies some or all the clasts are different to the matrix of the rock. The terms polymict and monomict do not consider the matrix.

Perhaps

Re: [meteorite-list] xenolith vs. polymict breccia?

2004-01-24 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Hi 

Sorry for the length of this reply. Got carried away! Go to bottom 3 paragraphs for summary.

You are right.A polymict breccia descibes a sedimentary rock made up of angluar clasts of different rock whilst a monomict breccia refers to a sedimentary rock made up of angular clasts of the same rock. A brecciacan be clast supported (the clasts are touching) or matrix supported (clasts are not touching). If clast supported, a matrix may or may not be present.

The term xenolith refers to a foreign rock or clast incorporated into another rock. Traditionally I would tend to only use this term when refering to igneous rocks but it could be used for exotic clasts in sedimentary rocks (and chondrites). Ghubara is an example,being classified as a xenolithic chondrite. If using the term xenolith you are probably implying a matrix is present. The matrix is local, in the case of chondrites, and the xenolith not local - it came from elsewhere. If you were to apply the term xenolith to a matrix free polymict breccia the xenolith would simply have to be the less abundant type of clast. This is not satisfactory as just because it is less abundant does not neccessarily make it the 'foreign' bit.

This is my understanding of rock names:

Angular clast of same composition, no matrix = monomict clast 
supported breccia

Angular clasts of different composition, no matrix = polymict clast supported breccia

Angular clasts of same composition with matrix also of same composition = monomict clast or matrix supported breccia

Angular clasts of same composition in a matrix of different composition = monomict clast or matrix supported brecciaor xenolithic chondrite.

Angular clasts of different compositions in a matrix = polymict clast or matrix supported breccia or xenolithic chondrite ( but if the matrix is the same as some of the clasts the term xenolith would only apply to the different composition clasts)

So, to summarise, in my opinion a monomict or polymict breccia can be the same thing as a xenolithic chondrite. Xenolithic simply implies some or all the clasts are different to the matrix of the rock. The terms polymict and monomict do not consider the matrix.

Perhaps in descriptions of meteorites the terms polymict xenolithic breccia and monomict xenolithic breccia should be used as oppose to just xenolithic breccia which to me does not distinguish whether the clasts are the same or not. It merely says that at least some of the clasts are different to the matrix.

Does anyone know of some formal guidelines on the description of meteorites? There must be some somewhere which give the formal definition of a xenolithic chondrite.

Regards,

Aubrey


Walter Branch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




Hello Everyone,

What is the difference between a xenolith and a polymict breccia?

Is it that the xenolithic host is igneous, whereas the polymict breccia is sedimentary?

-Walter
--www.branchmeteorites.com  
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends 
today! Download Messenger Now