Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay [LA Disclaimer]

2011-08-22 Thread Robert Verish
Mike, Doug, and All,

The recent post by Michael Mulgrew is accurate.

The MetSoc only recognizes the name Los Angeles.

The recent post by Doug Dawn raises a valid question.

I made a rookie mistake 13 years ago and I've been paying for it ever since.

Lesson to all rookies:  don't make rookie mistakes!  
No, seriously, it's okay to self-assign pet-names and even field ID numbers to 
your meteorites, but DON'T self-assign 001 to 00n numbers, or try to mimic 
NomCom formally-approved meteorite names.  Especially when it is based on 
pre-classification self-pairings.



-
[meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay
    Michael Mulgrew   mikestang at gmail.com
       
    Sat Aug 20 17:25:50 EDT 2011
Previous message: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay
Next message: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay
      

Doug,
I asked Bob Verish about this a few months ago.  The MetBul does not
show number designations, it recognizes two stones that make up the
TKW for the Los Angeles meteorite.  The 001 and 002 designations were
internal to Mr. Verish for his own record keeping, but I believe he
said (and I hope he'll chime in and correct me if I am mistaken) he
used them publically a few times and without realizing it the number
designation spread.

-Michael in so. Cal.

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:13 PM, MexicoDoug mexicodoug at aim.com wrote:

 ...

 Finally, can someone say why those incredible US 
Martians: LA001 and LA002 got numbers if they are considered paired? 
 Bob?  There's no LA003 through LA00n that I'm aware of ... Can a slice 
of one be distingueshed from another?  Are there other examples of 
unique / closed numbering?  What ever happened to the protocol of (a), 
(b), (c), ...

 Kindest wishes
 Doug
    
Previous message: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay
Next message: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay



__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay

2011-08-21 Thread Jason Utas
Hello All,
Greg is correct; unless the meteorites have been found in a demarcated
dense collection area, they should not receive separate names.  The
Nomenclature Committee's policies regarding serial naming are rather
clear -- and since the stones are apparently paired, I believe
Franconia is the perfect analogy.  Per existing regulations, these
stones should not receive new names.

If I am to understand correctly, someone of questionable integrity was
involved with the recovery of the third stone.

Since you failed to answer my question in private, Diero, I'll ask you
here -- is that correct?

Regards,
Jason



On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Greg Stanley stanleygr...@hotmail.com wrote:
 I would think each would be called Cat Mountain, if they are all classified 
 the same as the first one and were found in the same area, suggesting a 
 strewn field.  There are no Franconia 002 or Gold Basin 002.  I guess the 
 'name' of a meteorite is one of a single stone or the strewn field.

 My few grams worth.

 Congratulations to all the finders of the new stones and to Count on getting 
 the classification done.  I also look forward to Rubin's article.

 Greg S


 Sent from my iPhone

 On Aug 20, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Michael Mulgrew mikest...@gmail.com wrote:

 Doug,

 I asked Bob Verish about this a few months ago.  The MetBul does not
 show number designations, it recognizes two stones that make up the
 TKW for the Los Angeles meteorite.  The 001 and 002 designations were
 internal to Mr. Verish for his own record keeping, but I believe he
 said (and I hope he'll chime in and correct me if I am mistaken) he
 used them publically a few times and without realizing it the number
 designation spread.

 -Michael in so. Cal.

 On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:13 PM, MexicoDoug mexicod...@aim.com wrote:

 ...



 Finally, can someone say why those incredible US Martians: LA001 and LA002 
 got numbers if they are considered paired?  Bob?  There's no LA003 through 
 LA00n that I'm aware of ... Can a slice of one be distingueshed from 
 another?  Are there other examples of unique / closed numbering?  What ever 
 happened to the protocol of (a), (b), (c), ...

 Kindest wishes
 Doug
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay

2011-08-20 Thread Regine Petersen
Hi Sonny and list,

can someone clarify some things for me? I find it a bit confusing, so excuse me 
if I ask obvious questions. These are the facts as far as I have understood 
them:

Apart from the first Cat Mountain find there was Snyder Hill, which was not 
part of the same fall and only found while looking for further Cat Mountain 
pieces. There was another small Cat Mountain found by Robert Haag which didn't 
get classified. Now hunters were searching the Snyder Hill site and found two 
more Cat Mountains which are now sold on ebay. 

Who found the rocks, Count Deiro or the hunters who have also found the Snyder 
Hill piece? Who is selling them? And why was the third rock which was found 
designated 001? The second one hasn't been classified, but wouldn't the 
original find get the first number?

Pretty amazing finds :-)
Regine




--- wahlpe...@aol.com wahlpe...@aol.com schrieb am Fr, 19.8.2011:

 Von: wahlpe...@aol.com wahlpe...@aol.com
 Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay
 An: cdtuc...@cox.net, meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Datum: Freitag, 19. August, 2011 16:29 Uhr
 Hi Carl,
 
 These are truly amazing finds. This is a great example to
 everyone that if one meteorite is found return and check for
 more pieces. Who knows, you may find something from a
 different fall.  The number one key is to spend time in
 the field and to have fun!
 
 Sonny
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: cdtucson cdtuc...@cox.net
 To: meteorite-list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com;
 wahlperry wahlpe...@aol.com
 Sent: Fri, Aug 19, 2011 3:00 am
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay
 
 
 Sonny,This is interesting because the seller and finder are
 also the original finders of Snyder Hill back in 1995. They
 also found a pecan sized cat MT I was never aware of that
 Bob Haag never got added to the official record.I also had
 no idea they were the finders of this new Cat MT find until
 now but, I actually took them to the Cat MT strewnfield back
 in 1995 and I was with them when they originally found
 Snyder Hill.It was interesting because Mike Holden and
 Jerome Johnson  found the first half of Snyder Hill and
 the very next day Dave found the other half on the opposite
 side of the hill. It seems it had struck the hill and each
 half went it's own direction. They were later reunited and
 they fit perfectly back together.Bob Haag has said it a
 million times. Go back and search where meteorites have
 been found before. It worked again. I talked to Dave
 tonight for the first time since 1995 and he told me he had
 not ever been back since his first find until this past
 March when he found this latest Cat MT. 001. This story has
 another interesting twist to it. Back then everyone was
 worried about ownership. For this reason everyone was afraid
 to mention find locations. There was no Met-list to ask
 questions. Only rumors. Long story short  the true find
 location of Snyder Hill was eventually correctly documented
 and named appropriately. Tonight Dave said he went back to
 the hill because that is the only place he had ever found a
 meteorite and low and behold he found another of the holy
 grail of all impact melt breccias. A new Cat MT itself. He
 says he sold it  to Ruben for a pile of money and some
 nice meteorites were thrown in on the deal. So, looks like
 Dave finds meteorites every time he hunts. Even if they were
 16 years apart. Great job Dave.Carl--     
                
                
                
        Democracy is two wolves and
 a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a
 well-armed lamb contesting the vote.     wahlpe...@aol.com
 wrote:  Hi List,  Cat Mountain for sale on
 Ebay.  
 http://cgi.ebay.com/Cat-Mountian-meteorite-001-/330599015532?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item4cf93ca46c
   
 __ Visit the
 Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list__Visit
 the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.htmlMeteorite-list
 mailing 
 listMeteorite-list@meteoritecentral.comhttp://six.pairlist.net/mailman/li
 stinfo/meteorite-list
  __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay

2011-08-20 Thread Ruben Garcia
Sorry, the correct weight for Cat Mountain 2 was around 168 grams
before a small cut was made and 164.5 after.

here it is
http://s1090.photobucket.com/albums/i361/Airmuseum1/Meteorite%20Finds/



On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Ruben Garcia mrmeteor...@gmail.com wrote:
 Oops, I forgot to say that the original Cat Mountain was named Cat
 Mountain. The second stone, the size of a pecan - if there is one  -
 was never classified. So it has no number. My half stone 61.03 grams
 from the 107 total stone weight is Cat Mountain 1 and the 168 gram
 Stone is Cat Mountain 2



 On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Regine Petersen fips_br...@yahoo.de wrote:
 Hi Sonny and list,

 can someone clarify some things for me? I find it a bit confusing, so excuse 
 me if I ask obvious questions. These are the facts as far as I have 
 understood them:

 Apart from the first Cat Mountain find there was Snyder Hill, which was not 
 part of the same fall and only found while looking for further Cat Mountain 
 pieces. There was another small Cat Mountain found by Robert Haag which 
 didn't get classified. Now hunters were searching the Snyder Hill site and 
 found two more Cat Mountains which are now sold on ebay.

 Who found the rocks, Count Deiro or the hunters who have also found the 
 Snyder Hill piece? Who is selling them? And why was the third rock which was 
 found designated 001? The second one hasn't been classified, but wouldn't 
 the original find get the first number?

 Pretty amazing finds :-)
 Regine




 --- wahlpe...@aol.com wahlpe...@aol.com schrieb am Fr, 19.8.2011:

 Von: wahlpe...@aol.com wahlpe...@aol.com
 Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay
 An: cdtuc...@cox.net, meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Datum: Freitag, 19. August, 2011 16:29 Uhr
 Hi Carl,

 These are truly amazing finds. This is a great example to
 everyone that if one meteorite is found return and check for
 more pieces. Who knows, you may find something from a
 different fall.  The number one key is to spend time in
 the field and to have fun!

 Sonny


 -Original Message-
 From: cdtucson cdtuc...@cox.net
 To: meteorite-list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com;
 wahlperry wahlpe...@aol.com
 Sent: Fri, Aug 19, 2011 3:00 am
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay


 Sonny,This is interesting because the seller and finder are
 also the original finders of Snyder Hill back in 1995. They
 also found a pecan sized cat MT I was never aware of that
 Bob Haag never got added to the official record.I also had
 no idea they were the finders of this new Cat MT find until
 now but, I actually took them to the Cat MT strewnfield back
 in 1995 and I was with them when they originally found
 Snyder Hill.It was interesting because Mike Holden and
 Jerome Johnson  found the first half of Snyder Hill and
 the very next day Dave found the other half on the opposite
 side of the hill. It seems it had struck the hill and each
 half went it's own direction. They were later reunited and
 they fit perfectly back together.Bob Haag has said it a
 million times. Go back and search where meteorites have
 been found before. It worked again. I talked to Dave
 tonight for the first time since 1995 and he told me he had
 not ever been back since his first find until this past
 March when he found this latest Cat MT. 001. This story has
 another interesting twist to it. Back then everyone was
 worried about ownership. For this reason everyone was afraid
 to mention find locations. There was no Met-list to ask
 questions. Only rumors. Long story short  the true find
 location of Snyder Hill was eventually correctly documented
 and named appropriately. Tonight Dave said he went back to
 the hill because that is the only place he had ever found a
 meteorite and low and behold he found another of the holy
 grail of all impact melt breccias. A new Cat MT itself. He
 says he sold it  to Ruben for a pile of money and some
 nice meteorites were thrown in on the deal. So, looks like
 Dave finds meteorites every time he hunts. Even if they were
 16 years apart. Great job Dave.Carl--



        Democracy is two wolves and
 a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a
 well-armed lamb contesting the vote.     wahlpe...@aol.com
 wrote:  Hi List,  Cat Mountain for sale on
 Ebay.  
 http://cgi.ebay.com/Cat-Mountian-meteorite-001-/330599015532?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item4cf93ca46c
   
 __ Visit the
 Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list__Visit
 the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.htmlMeteorite-list
 mailing 
 listMeteorite-list@meteoritecentral.comhttp://six.pairlist.net/mailman/li
 stinfo/meteorite-list
  __
 Visit

Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay

2011-08-20 Thread Regine Petersen
I see. Since there is no NWA or SaU without a number and the Cat Mountain area 
is not a vast desert either the numbers don't seem to make sense to me. But in 
the end I might care about it as much as the rocks do...

Cheers, R.


--- cdtuc...@cox.net cdtuc...@cox.net schrieb am Sa, 20.8.2011:

 Von: cdtuc...@cox.net cdtuc...@cox.net
 Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay
 An: Regine Petersen fips_br...@yahoo.de, 
 meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com, wahlpe...@aol.com
 Datum: Samstag, 20. August, 2011 16:02 Uhr
 Regine,
 To be clear. I will answer your questions in ALL CAPS
 below  after each question.
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
  
 
  Regine Petersen fips_br...@yahoo.de
 wrote: 
  Hi Sonny and list,
 
 can someone clarify some things for me? I find it a bit
 confusing, so excuse me if I ask obvious questions. These
 are the facts as far as I have understood them:
 
 Apart from the first Cat Mountain find there was Snyder
 Hill, which was not part of the same fall and only found
 while looking for further Cat Mountain pieces.
  
 THIS IS CORRECT. IT HAS NOT BEEN LINKED TO CAT MT BUT, THEY
 ARE THE SAME CLASSIFICATION OF L5 WHICH IN AND OF ITSELF
 SEEMS A BIT COINCIDENTAL. ALTHOUGH THEY LOOK NOTHING ALIKE.
 
 There was another small Cat Mountain found by Robert Haag
 which didn't get classified. 
 
 TECHNICALLY IT WAS A PECAN SIZED PIECE FOUND DURING THE
 SEARCH BACK IN 1995 AND  ALSO FOUND BY THE SAME GROUP
 THAT FOUND SNYDER HILL BUT WAS IMMEDIATELY SOLD TO ROBERT
 HAAG.
 AND HE NEVER DID GET IT CLASSIFIED.
 
 Now hunters were searching the Snyder Hill site and found
 two more Cat Mountains which are now sold on eBay.
  
 NO. TWO MORE PIECES HAVE BEEN FOUND BUT ONLY PART OF ONE OF
 THEM HAS BEEN SOLD ON EBAY TO RUBEN. THE PIECE SOLD ON EBAY
 TO RUBEN  WEIGHED 61 GRAMS AND WAS PART OF THE RECENT
 107 GRAM FIND. THE OTHER 170 GRAM FIND REMAINS AVAILABLE FOR
 SALE BY COUNT DEIRO.
 
 Who found the rocks, Count Deiro or the hunters who have
 also found the Snyder Hill piece?
  
 THE COUNT IS NOT SAYING WHO FOUND THE SECOND ONE BUT THE
 FIRST WAS FOUND BY THE SAME FELLOW (DAVE JOHNSON) WHO FOUND
 THE SNYDER HILL AND THE ONE SOLD TO ROBERT HAAG..
 
  Who is selling them? And why was the third rock which was
 found designated 001? 
 THE SECOND ROCK WAS THE ONE DESIGNATED 001 AND THE THIRD
 ONE WHICH IS STILL BEING OFFERED BY THE COUNT IS 002. IT
 WEIGHS 164.5 GRAMS
 
 The second one hasn't been classified, but wouldn't the
 original find get the first number?
 
 NO. THE ORIGINAL FIND GETS THE NAME. TECHNICALLY THE
 FOLLOWING FINDS GET THE SAME NAME WITH SEQUENTIAL NUMBERS
 AFTER THE NAME BUT THIS IS THE CONFUSING PART. I THOUGHT
 THEY ONLY GOT DIFFERENT NUMBERS IF THEY WERE FOUND TO BE A
 DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATION. THE REASON I AM CONFUSED IS THAT
 SNYDER HILL SEEMS LIKE IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN CALLED CAT MT.
 001 AS IT WAS FOUND IN THE CAT MT STREWNFIELD BUT IT GOT A
 SEPARATE NAME. 
 SO, MY QUESTION IS ; WHICH IS THE CORRECT WAY TO NAME THESE
 NOW FIVE METEORITES? THERE IS CAT MT THE ORIGINAL AND 
 MAIN MASS. AND THREE OTHER RELATED ROCKS ONE PECAN SIZE ROCK
 SOLD TO HAAG. ONE 107 GRAM ROCK PART OF WHICH WAS SOLD TO
 RUBEN AND THE LAST ONE OF 170 GRAMS THE COUNT IS SELLING
 164.5 GRAMS OF NOW. AND THERE IS SNYDER HILL.. 
 IS THERE A TRUE OFFICIAL WAY TO DO THIS? 
 CARL
 
 Pretty amazing finds :-)
 Regine
 
 
 
 
 --- wahlpe...@aol.com
 wahlpe...@aol.com
 schrieb am Fr, 19.8.2011:
 
  Von: wahlpe...@aol.com
 wahlpe...@aol.com
  Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay
  An: cdtuc...@cox.net,
 meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  Datum: Freitag, 19. August, 2011 16:29 Uhr
  Hi Carl,
  
  These are truly amazing finds. This is a great example
 to
  everyone that if one meteorite is found return and
 check for
  more pieces. Who knows, you may find something from a
  different fall.  The number one key is to spend time
 in
  the field and to have fun!
  
  Sonny
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: cdtucson cdtuc...@cox.net
  To: meteorite-list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com;
  wahlperry wahlpe...@aol.com
  Sent: Fri, Aug 19, 2011 3:00 am
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay
  
  
  Sonny,This is interesting because the seller and
 finder are
  also the original finders of Snyder Hill back in 1995.
 They
  also found a pecan sized cat MT I was never aware of
 that
  Bob Haag never got added to the official record.I also
 had
  no idea they were the finders of this new Cat MT find
 until
  now but, I actually took them to the Cat MT
 strewnfield back
  in 1995 and I was with them when they originally
 found
  Snyder Hill.It was interesting because Mike Holden
 and
  Jerome Johnson  found the first half of Snyder Hill
 and
  the very next day Dave found the other half on the
 opposite
  side of the hill. It seems it had struck the hill and
 each
  half went it's own direction. They were later reunited
 and
  they fit perfectly back together.Bob Haag has said it
 a
  million

Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay

2011-08-20 Thread Ruben Garcia
Hi Regine,

As the new owner of a 61.3 gram Cat Mountain half stone - and after
spending two days hunting the area - I am writing an article about it.
I have talked to the finder and to Count - no they are not the same
person. The short version is this - as I'm saving the long version for
an article.

It was found by the guys that found the Snider hill meteorite. They
went back after many years to spend time together as they had not seen
each other in a while. They found the 107 gram stone in March 2011
within minutes of arriving. They contacted some noticeable
hunter/collectors who dismissed the stone as slag. Eventually they
contacted Count who after studying the stone orchestrated the
classification via Ted Bunch and for his efforts earned about 20% of
the stone.

The 164 grams stone was found earlier this month, Aug 2 2011. From
what I am told there are only 3 stones authenticated and 2 were done
this year. The Largest and first Cat Mountain (2.7 kilo) was found in
1981 but not identified/ classified until 1992.  My 61.3 gram specimen
is what was left from the 107 gram after Count and NAU got their
share.

The 164 gram stone was found by a hunter and given to Count to sell.
He is currently
taking offers.

Count can correct me if I'm wrong - but to me this is the way it all
fits together.


On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Regine Petersen fips_br...@yahoo.de wrote:
 Hi Sonny and list,

 can someone clarify some things for me? I find it a bit confusing, so excuse 
 me if I ask obvious questions. These are the facts as far as I have 
 understood them:

 Apart from the first Cat Mountain find there was Snyder Hill, which was not 
 part of the same fall and only found while looking for further Cat Mountain 
 pieces. There was another small Cat Mountain found by Robert Haag which 
 didn't get classified. Now hunters were searching the Snyder Hill site and 
 found two more Cat Mountains which are now sold on ebay.

 Who found the rocks, Count Deiro or the hunters who have also found the 
 Snyder Hill piece? Who is selling them? And why was the third rock which was 
 found designated 001? The second one hasn't been classified, but wouldn't the 
 original find get the first number?

 Pretty amazing finds :-)
 Regine




 --- wahlpe...@aol.com wahlpe...@aol.com schrieb am Fr, 19.8.2011:

 Von: wahlpe...@aol.com wahlpe...@aol.com
 Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay
 An: cdtuc...@cox.net, meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Datum: Freitag, 19. August, 2011 16:29 Uhr
 Hi Carl,

 These are truly amazing finds. This is a great example to
 everyone that if one meteorite is found return and check for
 more pieces. Who knows, you may find something from a
 different fall.  The number one key is to spend time in
 the field and to have fun!

 Sonny


 -Original Message-
 From: cdtucson cdtuc...@cox.net
 To: meteorite-list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com;
 wahlperry wahlpe...@aol.com
 Sent: Fri, Aug 19, 2011 3:00 am
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay


 Sonny,This is interesting because the seller and finder are
 also the original finders of Snyder Hill back in 1995. They
 also found a pecan sized cat MT I was never aware of that
 Bob Haag never got added to the official record.I also had
 no idea they were the finders of this new Cat MT find until
 now but, I actually took them to the Cat MT strewnfield back
 in 1995 and I was with them when they originally found
 Snyder Hill.It was interesting because Mike Holden and
 Jerome Johnson  found the first half of Snyder Hill and
 the very next day Dave found the other half on the opposite
 side of the hill. It seems it had struck the hill and each
 half went it's own direction. They were later reunited and
 they fit perfectly back together.Bob Haag has said it a
 million times. Go back and search where meteorites have
 been found before. It worked again. I talked to Dave
 tonight for the first time since 1995 and he told me he had
 not ever been back since his first find until this past
 March when he found this latest Cat MT. 001. This story has
 another interesting twist to it. Back then everyone was
 worried about ownership. For this reason everyone was afraid
 to mention find locations. There was no Met-list to ask
 questions. Only rumors. Long story short  the true find
 location of Snyder Hill was eventually correctly documented
 and named appropriately. Tonight Dave said he went back to
 the hill because that is the only place he had ever found a
 meteorite and low and behold he found another of the holy
 grail of all impact melt breccias. A new Cat MT itself. He
 says he sold it  to Ruben for a pile of money and some
 nice meteorites were thrown in on the deal. So, looks like
 Dave finds meteorites every time he hunts. Even if they were
 16 years apart. Great job Dave.Carl--



        Democracy is two wolves and
 a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a
 well-armed lamb contesting the vote.     wahlpe

Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay

2011-08-20 Thread Ruben Garcia
Oops, I forgot to say that the original Cat Mountain was named Cat
Mountain. The second stone, the size of a pecan - if there is one  -
was never classified. So it has no number. My half stone 61.03 grams
from the 107 total stone weight is Cat Mountain 1 and the 168 gram
Stone is Cat Mountain 2



On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Regine Petersen fips_br...@yahoo.de wrote:
 Hi Sonny and list,

 can someone clarify some things for me? I find it a bit confusing, so excuse 
 me if I ask obvious questions. These are the facts as far as I have 
 understood them:

 Apart from the first Cat Mountain find there was Snyder Hill, which was not 
 part of the same fall and only found while looking for further Cat Mountain 
 pieces. There was another small Cat Mountain found by Robert Haag which 
 didn't get classified. Now hunters were searching the Snyder Hill site and 
 found two more Cat Mountains which are now sold on ebay.

 Who found the rocks, Count Deiro or the hunters who have also found the 
 Snyder Hill piece? Who is selling them? And why was the third rock which was 
 found designated 001? The second one hasn't been classified, but wouldn't the 
 original find get the first number?

 Pretty amazing finds :-)
 Regine




 --- wahlpe...@aol.com wahlpe...@aol.com schrieb am Fr, 19.8.2011:

 Von: wahlpe...@aol.com wahlpe...@aol.com
 Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay
 An: cdtuc...@cox.net, meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Datum: Freitag, 19. August, 2011 16:29 Uhr
 Hi Carl,

 These are truly amazing finds. This is a great example to
 everyone that if one meteorite is found return and check for
 more pieces. Who knows, you may find something from a
 different fall.  The number one key is to spend time in
 the field and to have fun!

 Sonny


 -Original Message-
 From: cdtucson cdtuc...@cox.net
 To: meteorite-list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com;
 wahlperry wahlpe...@aol.com
 Sent: Fri, Aug 19, 2011 3:00 am
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay


 Sonny,This is interesting because the seller and finder are
 also the original finders of Snyder Hill back in 1995. They
 also found a pecan sized cat MT I was never aware of that
 Bob Haag never got added to the official record.I also had
 no idea they were the finders of this new Cat MT find until
 now but, I actually took them to the Cat MT strewnfield back
 in 1995 and I was with them when they originally found
 Snyder Hill.It was interesting because Mike Holden and
 Jerome Johnson  found the first half of Snyder Hill and
 the very next day Dave found the other half on the opposite
 side of the hill. It seems it had struck the hill and each
 half went it's own direction. They were later reunited and
 they fit perfectly back together.Bob Haag has said it a
 million times. Go back and search where meteorites have
 been found before. It worked again. I talked to Dave
 tonight for the first time since 1995 and he told me he had
 not ever been back since his first find until this past
 March when he found this latest Cat MT. 001. This story has
 another interesting twist to it. Back then everyone was
 worried about ownership. For this reason everyone was afraid
 to mention find locations. There was no Met-list to ask
 questions. Only rumors. Long story short  the true find
 location of Snyder Hill was eventually correctly documented
 and named appropriately. Tonight Dave said he went back to
 the hill because that is the only place he had ever found a
 meteorite and low and behold he found another of the holy
 grail of all impact melt breccias. A new Cat MT itself. He
 says he sold it  to Ruben for a pile of money and some
 nice meteorites were thrown in on the deal. So, looks like
 Dave finds meteorites every time he hunts. Even if they were
 16 years apart. Great job Dave.Carl--



        Democracy is two wolves and
 a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a
 well-armed lamb contesting the vote.     wahlpe...@aol.com
 wrote:  Hi List,  Cat Mountain for sale on
 Ebay.  
 http://cgi.ebay.com/Cat-Mountian-meteorite-001-/330599015532?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item4cf93ca46c
   
 __ Visit the
 Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list__Visit
 the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.htmlMeteorite-list
 mailing 
 listMeteorite-list@meteoritecentral.comhttp://six.pairlist.net/mailman/li
 stinfo/meteorite-list
  __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http

Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay

2011-08-20 Thread cdtucson
Regine,
To be clear. I will answer your questions in ALL CAPS below  after each 
question.





  

 

 Regine Petersen fips_br...@yahoo.de wrote: 
 Hi Sonny and list,

can someone clarify some things for me? I find it a bit confusing, so excuse me 
if I ask obvious questions. These are the facts as far as I have understood 
them:

Apart from the first Cat Mountain find there was Snyder Hill, which was not 
part of the same fall and only found while looking for further Cat Mountain 
pieces.
 
THIS IS CORRECT. IT HAS NOT BEEN LINKED TO CAT MT BUT, THEY ARE THE SAME 
CLASSIFICATION OF L5 WHICH IN AND OF ITSELF SEEMS A BIT COINCIDENTAL. ALTHOUGH 
THEY LOOK NOTHING ALIKE.

There was another small Cat Mountain found by Robert Haag which didn't get 
classified. 

TECHNICALLY IT WAS A PECAN SIZED PIECE FOUND DURING THE SEARCH BACK IN 1995 AND 
 ALSO FOUND BY THE SAME GROUP THAT FOUND SNYDER HILL BUT WAS IMMEDIATELY SOLD 
TO ROBERT HAAG.
AND HE NEVER DID GET IT CLASSIFIED.

Now hunters were searching the Snyder Hill site and found two more Cat 
Mountains which are now sold on eBay.
 
NO. TWO MORE PIECES HAVE BEEN FOUND BUT ONLY PART OF ONE OF THEM HAS BEEN SOLD 
ON EBAY TO RUBEN. THE PIECE SOLD ON EBAY TO RUBEN  WEIGHED 61 GRAMS AND WAS 
PART OF THE RECENT 107 GRAM FIND. THE OTHER 170 GRAM FIND REMAINS AVAILABLE FOR 
SALE BY COUNT DEIRO.

Who found the rocks, Count Deiro or the hunters who have also found the Snyder 
Hill piece?
 
THE COUNT IS NOT SAYING WHO FOUND THE SECOND ONE BUT THE FIRST WAS FOUND BY THE 
SAME FELLOW (DAVE JOHNSON) WHO FOUND THE SNYDER HILL AND THE ONE SOLD TO ROBERT 
HAAG..

 Who is selling them? And why was the third rock which was found designated 
001? 
THE SECOND ROCK WAS THE ONE DESIGNATED 001 AND THE THIRD ONE WHICH IS STILL 
BEING OFFERED BY THE COUNT IS 002. IT WEIGHS 164.5 GRAMS

The second one hasn't been classified, but wouldn't the original find get the 
first number?

NO. THE ORIGINAL FIND GETS THE NAME. TECHNICALLY THE FOLLOWING FINDS GET THE 
SAME NAME WITH SEQUENTIAL NUMBERS AFTER THE NAME BUT THIS IS THE CONFUSING 
PART. I THOUGHT THEY ONLY GOT DIFFERENT NUMBERS IF THEY WERE FOUND TO BE A 
DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATION. THE REASON I AM CONFUSED IS THAT SNYDER HILL SEEMS 
LIKE IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN CALLED CAT MT. 001 AS IT WAS FOUND IN THE CAT MT 
STREWNFIELD BUT IT GOT A SEPARATE NAME. 
SO, MY QUESTION IS ; WHICH IS THE CORRECT WAY TO NAME THESE NOW FIVE 
METEORITES? THERE IS CAT MT THE ORIGINAL AND  MAIN MASS. AND THREE OTHER 
RELATED ROCKS ONE PECAN SIZE ROCK SOLD TO HAAG. ONE 107 GRAM ROCK PART OF WHICH 
WAS SOLD TO RUBEN AND THE LAST ONE OF 170 GRAMS THE COUNT IS SELLING 164.5 
GRAMS OF NOW. AND THERE IS SNYDER HILL.. 
IS THERE A TRUE OFFICIAL WAY TO DO THIS? 
CARL

Pretty amazing finds :-)
Regine




--- wahlpe...@aol.com wahlpe...@aol.com schrieb am Fr, 19.8.2011:

 Von: wahlpe...@aol.com wahlpe...@aol.com
 Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay
 An: cdtuc...@cox.net, meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Datum: Freitag, 19. August, 2011 16:29 Uhr
 Hi Carl,
 
 These are truly amazing finds. This is a great example to
 everyone that if one meteorite is found return and check for
 more pieces. Who knows, you may find something from a
 different fall.  The number one key is to spend time in
 the field and to have fun!
 
 Sonny
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: cdtucson cdtuc...@cox.net
 To: meteorite-list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com;
 wahlperry wahlpe...@aol.com
 Sent: Fri, Aug 19, 2011 3:00 am
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay
 
 
 Sonny,This is interesting because the seller and finder are
 also the original finders of Snyder Hill back in 1995. They
 also found a pecan sized cat MT I was never aware of that
 Bob Haag never got added to the official record.I also had
 no idea they were the finders of this new Cat MT find until
 now but, I actually took them to the Cat MT strewnfield back
 in 1995 and I was with them when they originally found
 Snyder Hill.It was interesting because Mike Holden and
 Jerome Johnson  found the first half of Snyder Hill and
 the very next day Dave found the other half on the opposite
 side of the hill. It seems it had struck the hill and each
 half went it's own direction. They were later reunited and
 they fit perfectly back together.Bob Haag has said it a
 million times. Go back and search where meteorites have
 been found before. It worked again. I talked to Dave
 tonight for the first time since 1995 and he told me he had
 not ever been back since his first find until this past
 March when he found this latest Cat MT. 001. This story has
 another interesting twist to it. Back then everyone was
 worried about ownership. For this reason everyone was afraid
 to mention find locations. There was no Met-list to ask
 questions. Only rumors. Long story short  the true find
 location of Snyder Hill was eventually correctly documented
 and named appropriately. Tonight Dave said he went back to
 the hill

Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay

2011-08-20 Thread MexicoDoug
Thank you Carl for that clear explanation, actually I was in the corner 
on this one with Regine - couldn't follow any of this unambiguously 
until now, but simply though I'd wait until it was properly aged for 
public consumption to ask.  Way to go Ruben!  Carl, Your question about 
Bob Haag's pecan-sized piece you already answered yourself - if it 
hasn't been classified and it is not obviously paired to Cat Mountain 
by reasonable cause, then it is simply an unclassified stone believed 
to be a meteorite - so it would get no number unless it were submitted 
with the same batch containing the numbers - logically they would all 
be provisional numbers until a decision is made whether to 'officially' 
keep numbers or not.


I think Rob or someone else may have asked this (I wondered at the time 
as well), never saw the answer - but what is this 001 and 002 business 
- has NomCom decided that this is now a dense desert?  Sounds like it, 
and given Carl's answers, rightly so  but none of this was clear to 
me until Carl made this post.


Finally, can someone say why those incredible US Martians: LA001 and 
LA002 got numbers if they are considered paired?  Bob?  There's no 
LA003 through LA00n that I'm aware of ... Can a slice of one be 
distingueshed from another?  Are there other examples of unique / 
closed numbering?  What ever happened to the protocol of (a), (b), (c), 
...


Kindest wishes
Doug


-Original Message-
From: Regine Petersen fips_br...@yahoo.de
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com; wahlpe...@aol.com; 
cdtuc...@cox.net

Sent: Sat, Aug 20, 2011 11:54 am
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay


I see. Since there is no NWA or SaU without a number and the Cat 
Mountain area
is not a vast desert either the numbers don't seem to make sense to me. 
But in

the end I might care about it as much as the rocks do...

Cheers, R.


--- cdtuc...@cox.net cdtuc...@cox.net schrieb am Sa, 20.8.2011:


Von: cdtuc...@cox.net cdtuc...@cox.net
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay
An: Regine Petersen fips_br...@yahoo.de, 

meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com,
wahlpe...@aol.com

Datum: Samstag, 20. August, 2011 16:02 Uhr
Regine,
To be clear. I will answer your questions in ALL CAPS
below  after each question.





 



 Regine Petersen fips_br...@yahoo.de
wrote:
 Hi Sonny and list,

can someone clarify some things for me? I find it a bit
confusing, so excuse me if I ask obvious questions. These
are the facts as far as I have understood them:

Apart from the first Cat Mountain find there was Snyder
Hill, which was not part of the same fall and only found
while looking for further Cat Mountain pieces.

THIS IS CORRECT. IT HAS NOT BEEN LINKED TO CAT MT BUT, THEY
ARE THE SAME CLASSIFICATION OF L5 WHICH IN AND OF ITSELF
SEEMS A BIT COINCIDENTAL. ALTHOUGH THEY LOOK NOTHING ALIKE.

There was another small Cat Mountain found by Robert Haag
which didn't get classified.

TECHNICALLY IT WAS A PECAN SIZED PIECE FOUND DURING THE
SEARCH BACK IN 1995 AND  ALSO FOUND BY THE SAME GROUP
THAT FOUND SNYDER HILL BUT WAS IMMEDIATELY SOLD TO ROBERT
HAAG.
AND HE NEVER DID GET IT CLASSIFIED.

Now hunters were searching the Snyder Hill site and found
two more Cat Mountains which are now sold on eBay.

NO. TWO MORE PIECES HAVE BEEN FOUND BUT ONLY PART OF ONE OF
THEM HAS BEEN SOLD ON EBAY TO RUBEN. THE PIECE SOLD ON EBAY
TO RUBEN  WEIGHED 61 GRAMS AND WAS PART OF THE RECENT
107 GRAM FIND. THE OTHER 170 GRAM FIND REMAINS AVAILABLE FOR
SALE BY COUNT DEIRO.

Who found the rocks, Count Deiro or the hunters who have
also found the Snyder Hill piece?

THE COUNT IS NOT SAYING WHO FOUND THE SECOND ONE BUT THE
FIRST WAS FOUND BY THE SAME FELLOW (DAVE JOHNSON) WHO FOUND
THE SNYDER HILL AND THE ONE SOLD TO ROBERT HAAG..

 Who is selling them? And why was the third rock which was
found designated 001?
THE SECOND ROCK WAS THE ONE DESIGNATED 001 AND THE THIRD
ONE WHICH IS STILL BEING OFFERED BY THE COUNT IS 002. IT
WEIGHS 164.5 GRAMS

The second one hasn't been classified, but wouldn't the
original find get the first number?

NO. THE ORIGINAL FIND GETS THE NAME. TECHNICALLY THE
FOLLOWING FINDS GET THE SAME NAME WITH SEQUENTIAL NUMBERS
AFTER THE NAME BUT THIS IS THE CONFUSING PART. I THOUGHT
THEY ONLY GOT DIFFERENT NUMBERS IF THEY WERE FOUND TO BE A
DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATION. THE REASON I AM CONFUSED IS THAT
SNYDER HILL SEEMS LIKE IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN CALLED CAT MT.
001 AS IT WAS FOUND IN THE CAT MT STREWNFIELD BUT IT GOT A
SEPARATE NAME.
SO, MY QUESTION IS ; WHICH IS THE CORRECT WAY TO NAME THESE
NOW FIVE METEORITES? THERE IS CAT MT THE ORIGINAL AND 
MAIN MASS. AND THREE OTHER RELATED ROCKS ONE PECAN SIZE ROCK
SOLD TO HAAG. ONE 107 GRAM ROCK PART OF WHICH WAS SOLD TO
RUBEN AND THE LAST ONE OF 170 GRAMS THE COUNT IS SELLING
164.5 GRAMS OF NOW. AND THERE IS SNYDER HILL..
IS THERE A TRUE OFFICIAL WAY TO DO THIS?
CARL

Pretty amazing finds :-)
Regine




--- wahlpe...@aol.com
wahlpe...@aol.com
schrieb am Fr

Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay

2011-08-20 Thread Michael Bross

a Cat wouldn't find its kitten here/there...
just kidding...
(a saying in French meaning: a messy or complicated situation or place)


All the best
Michael B.




From: Ruben Garcia
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 6:40 PM
To: Regine Petersen
Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com ; wahlpe...@aol.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay


Sorry, the correct weight for Cat Mountain 2 was around 168 grams
before a small cut was made and 164.5 after.

here it is
http://s1090.photobucket.com/albums/i361/Airmuseum1/Meteorite%20Finds/



On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Ruben Garcia mrmeteor...@gmail.com wrote:

Oops, I forgot to say that the original Cat Mountain was named Cat
Mountain. The second stone, the size of a pecan - if there is one  -
was never classified. So it has no number. My half stone 61.03 grams
from the 107 total stone weight is Cat Mountain 1 and the 168 gram
Stone is Cat Mountain 2



On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Regine Petersen fips_br...@yahoo.de 
wrote:

Hi Sonny and list,

can someone clarify some things for me? I find it a bit confusing, so 
excuse me if I ask obvious questions. These are the facts as far as I 
have understood them:


Apart from the first Cat Mountain find there was Snyder Hill, which was 
not part of the same fall and only found while looking for further Cat 
Mountain pieces. There was another small Cat Mountain found by Robert 
Haag which didn't get classified. Now hunters were searching the Snyder 
Hill site and found two more Cat Mountains which are now sold on ebay.


Who found the rocks, Count Deiro or the hunters who have also found the 
Snyder Hill piece? Who is selling them? And why was the third rock which 
was found designated 001? The second one hasn't been classified, but 
wouldn't the original find get the first number?


Pretty amazing finds :-)
Regine



__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay

2011-08-20 Thread Michael Mulgrew
Doug,

I asked Bob Verish about this a few months ago.  The MetBul does not
show number designations, it recognizes two stones that make up the
TKW for the Los Angeles meteorite.  The 001 and 002 designations were
internal to Mr. Verish for his own record keeping, but I believe he
said (and I hope he'll chime in and correct me if I am mistaken) he
used them publically a few times and without realizing it the number
designation spread.

-Michael in so. Cal.

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:13 PM, MexicoDoug mexicod...@aim.com wrote:

 ...



 Finally, can someone say why those incredible US Martians: LA001 and LA002 
 got numbers if they are considered paired?  Bob?  There's no LA003 through 
 LA00n that I'm aware of ... Can a slice of one be distingueshed from another? 
  Are there other examples of unique / closed numbering?  What ever happened 
 to the protocol of (a), (b), (c), ...

 Kindest wishes
 Doug
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on EBay

2011-08-20 Thread Greg Stanley
I would think each would be called Cat Mountain, if they are all classified the 
same as the first one and were found in the same area, suggesting a strewn 
field.  There are no Franconia 002 or Gold Basin 002.  I guess the 'name' of a 
meteorite is one of a single stone or the strewn field.

My few grams worth.

Congratulations to all the finders of the new stones and to Count on getting 
the classification done.  I also look forward to Rubin's article.

Greg S


Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 20, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Michael Mulgrew mikest...@gmail.com wrote:

 Doug,
 
 I asked Bob Verish about this a few months ago.  The MetBul does not
 show number designations, it recognizes two stones that make up the
 TKW for the Los Angeles meteorite.  The 001 and 002 designations were
 internal to Mr. Verish for his own record keeping, but I believe he
 said (and I hope he'll chime in and correct me if I am mistaken) he
 used them publically a few times and without realizing it the number
 designation spread.
 
 -Michael in so. Cal.
 
 On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:13 PM, MexicoDoug mexicod...@aim.com wrote:
 
 ...
 
 
 
 Finally, can someone say why those incredible US Martians: LA001 and LA002 
 got numbers if they are considered paired?  Bob?  There's no LA003 through 
 LA00n that I'm aware of ... Can a slice of one be distingueshed from 
 another?  Are there other examples of unique / closed numbering?  What ever 
 happened to the protocol of (a), (b), (c), ...
 
 Kindest wishes
 Doug
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay

2011-08-19 Thread cdtucson
Sonny,
This is interesting because the seller and finder are also the original finders 
of Snyder Hill back in 1995. They also found a pecan sized cat MT I was never 
aware of that Bob Haag never got added to the official record.
I also had no idea they were the finders of this new Cat MT find until now but, 
I actually took them to the Cat MT strewnfield back in 1995 and I was with them 
when they originally found Snyder Hill.
It was interesting because Mike Holden and Jerome Johnson  found the first half 
of Snyder Hill and the very next day Dave found the other half on the opposite 
side of the hill. It seems it had struck the hill and each half went it's own 
direction. They were later reunited and they fit perfectly back together.
Bob Haag has said it a million times. Go back and search where meteorites have 
been found before. 
It worked again. I talked to Dave tonight for the first time since 1995 and he 
told me he had not ever been back since his first find until this past March 
when he found this latest Cat MT. 001. 
This story has another interesting twist to it. 
Back then everyone was worried about ownership. For this reason everyone was 
afraid to mention find locations. There was no Met-list to ask questions. Only 
rumors. Long story short  the true find location of Snyder Hill was eventually 
correctly documented and named appropriately. 
Tonight Dave said he went back to the hill because that is the only place he 
had ever found a meteorite and low and behold he found another of the holy 
grail of all impact melt breccias. A new Cat MT itself. He says he sold it  to 
Ruben for a pile of money and some nice meteorites were thrown in on the deal. 
So, looks like Dave finds meteorites every time he hunts. Even if they were 16 
years apart. 
Great job Dave.
Carl
--




 
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty 
is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. 





  

 

 wahlpe...@aol.com wrote: 
 Hi List,
 
 Cat Mountain for sale on Ebay.
 
 http://cgi.ebay.com/Cat-Mountian-meteorite-001-/330599015532?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item4cf93ca46c
 
 
 
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay

2011-08-19 Thread wahlperry

Hi Carl,

These are truly amazing finds. This is a great example to everyone that 
if one meteorite is found return and check for more pieces. Who knows, 
you may find something from a different fall.  The number one key is to 
spend time in the field and to have fun!


Sonny


-Original Message-
From: cdtucson cdtuc...@cox.net
To: meteorite-list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com; wahlperry 
wahlpe...@aol.com

Sent: Fri, Aug 19, 2011 3:00 am
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay


Sonny,This is interesting because the seller and finder are also the 
original finders of Snyder Hill back in 1995. They also found a pecan 
sized cat MT I was never aware of that Bob Haag never got added to the 
official record.I also had no idea they were the finders of this new 
Cat MT find until now but, I actually took them to the Cat MT 
strewnfield back in 1995 and I was with them when they originally found 
Snyder Hill.It was interesting because Mike Holden and Jerome Johnson  
found the first half of Snyder Hill and the very next day Dave found 
the other half on the opposite side of the hill. It seems it had struck 
the hill and each half went it's own direction. They were later 
reunited and they fit perfectly back together.Bob Haag has said it a 
million times. Go back and search where meteorites have been found 
before. It worked again. I talked to Dave tonight for the first time 
since 1995 and he told me he had not ever been back since his first 
find until this past March when he found this latest Cat MT. 001. This 
story has another interesting twist to it. Back then everyone was 
worried about ownership. For this reason everyone was afraid to mention 
find locations. There was no Met-list to ask questions. Only rumors. 
Long story short  the true find location of Snyder Hill was eventually 
correctly documented and named appropriately. Tonight Dave said he went 
back to the hill because that is the only place he had ever found a 
meteorite and low and behold he found another of the holy grail of all 
impact melt breccias. A new Cat MT itself. He says he sold it  to Ruben 
for a pile of money and some nice meteorites were thrown in on the 
deal. So, looks like Dave finds meteorites every time he hunts. Even if 
they were 16 years apart. Great job Dave.Carl-- 
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb 
voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well-armed lamb 
contesting the vote. wahlpe...@aol.com wrote:  Hi List,  
Cat Mountain for sale on Ebay.  
http://cgi.ebay.com/Cat-Mountian-meteorite-001-/330599015532?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item4cf93ca46c 
   __ Visit the 
Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html 
Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com 
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list__Visit 
the Archives at 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.htmlMeteorite-list 
mailing 
listMeteorite-list@meteoritecentral.comhttp://six.pairlist.net/mailman/li

stinfo/meteorite-list
 
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Cat Mountain on Ebay

2011-08-18 Thread wahlperry
Hi List,

Cat Mountain for sale on Ebay.

http://cgi.ebay.com/Cat-Mountian-meteorite-001-/330599015532?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item4cf93ca46c



__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list