[meteorite-list] Solar System in Perspective

2006-08-18 Thread Pete Pete

Apologies, if this link was posted previously.

Some nice, high resolution graphics and a video fly-by, relative to the 
on-going debate/discussion...


http://www.iau2006.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0601/iau0601_release.html
http://www.iau2006.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0601/iau0601_release.html

Cheers,
Pete

_
Play Q6 for your chance to WIN great prizes.  
http://q6trivia.imagine-live.com/enca/landing


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Solar System in Perspective

2006-08-18 Thread Darren Garrison
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:36:14 -0400, you wrote:

Apologies, if this link was posted previously.

Some nice, high resolution graphics and a video fly-by, relative to the 
on-going debate/discussion...

http://www.iau2006.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0601/iau0601_release.html

Thanks for supplying these.  I've seen thumbnail sized copies of them included
in news stories before and did a little digging looking for the full images, but
wasn't successful.  This image kind of confuses me, though:

http://www.iau2006.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0601/screen/iau0601c.jpg

It shows 2003 EL61 as highly distorted in shape, but shows it as a planet
candidate, but by their own proposal it wouldn't be concidered a planet if it
had that non-hydrostatic equilibrium shape.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Solar System in Perspective

2006-08-18 Thread Larry Lebofsky
I think EL 61 rotates fairly rapidly and it is thought that this shape was 
frozen in when it was formed. This is where the actual defining of a planet 
gets a little fuzzy and where I start having problems with, if not the 
definition, how do you determine what is and what is not a planet.

The definition is not perfect, but this and how it is implemented are things 
that can be worked out.

Larry

Quoting Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:36:14 -0400, you wrote:
 
 Apologies, if this link was posted previously.
 
 Some nice, high resolution graphics and a video fly-by, relative to the 
 on-going debate/discussion...
 
 http://www.iau2006.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0601/iau0601_release.html
 
 Thanks for supplying these.  I've seen thumbnail sized copies of them
 included
 in news stories before and did a little digging looking for the full images,
 but
 wasn't successful.  This image kind of confuses me, though:
 
 http://www.iau2006.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0601/screen/iau0601c.jpg
 
 It shows 2003 EL61 as highly distorted in shape, but shows it as a planet
 candidate, but by their own proposal it wouldn't be concidered a planet if
 it
 had that non-hydrostatic equilibrium shape.
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


-- 
Dr. Larry A. Lebofsky
Senior Research Scientist
Co-editor, Meteorite  If you give a man a fish,   
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory   you feed him for a day.
1541 East University   If you teach a man to fish,
University of Arizonayou feed him for a lifetime.
Tucson, AZ 85721-0063 ~Chinese Proverb
Phone:  520-621-6947
FAX:520-621-8364
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Solar System in Perspective

2006-08-18 Thread Sterling K. Webb

Hi, Pete,


   I second those thanks!

   These are new pages for the IAU site. They weren't
there in the wee morning hours before last when I was trying
to find a mention of Proposal V on the website -- there weren't
NONE!

   About 2003EL61, Darren. Despite the iceball myth about
KBO's, 2003EL61 is SOLID ROCK. The density is way too high
to be anything else. It doesn't even seem to have any superficial
surface volatiles. It don't snow on Santa. Isn't that a CW
song?

   But with a four hour rotation, er, axial revolution, period, this
massive object is far from round. I haven't (can't) calculate the
degree of strain in the body of the planet, but it must stupendous!

   Big question is: is it frozen in and dating from its formation,
or is it a dynamic distortion. I don't know the shear modulus, or
modulus of rigidity, of 2003EL61 or any planet, and I doubt that
anybody does...

   Santa is in the Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_EL61
   Here's a big image, er, artist's conception:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2003EL61art.jpg

   In fact, the Wikipedia has very good entries on all
the KBO crowd...


Sterling K. Webb
-
- Original Message - 
From: Pete Pete [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 2:36 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Solar System in Perspective



Apologies, if this link was posted previously.

Some nice, high resolution graphics and a video fly-by, relative to the 
on-going debate/discussion...


http://www.iau2006.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0601/iau0601_release.html
http://www.iau2006.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0601/iau0601_release.html

Cheers,
Pete

_
Play Q6 for your chance to WIN great prizes.  
http://q6trivia.imagine-live.com/enca/landing


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list