Re: [uf-discuss] Rel-tag issues, i can't create my own tagspace!

2007-02-11 Thread Ben Buchanan

--- sorry if i came across as elitist, but that is my opinion. rel-tag
is about tags, not how to setup tag spaces. I think it is a much
better approach is to NOT change the spec to correspond with broken
implementations.
To encourage adoption, i would suggest (and many have) add to the wiki
alternatives and ways to work around the limitations of servers and
software. One of the biggest complains is with IIS. (i had a look on
the wiki and it is burried) But there is software that can be
installed on Windows to allow for the creation of Tagspaces.


I think this highlights the problem. In a perfect world, people will
be motivated enough to follow standards. But in the real world, we're
asking people to go to their organisation's server admins with hey
guys you have to install stuff on the servers for a purpose you don't
know or care about because some spec requires we change our file
structure.

It makes it harder to sell the concept and if it comes down to
something like standards compliance (eg. xhtml validation) vs. uf
compliance, advocates will drop ufs for the larger goal.

So while purity of uf standards is nice, rel-tag is restrictive in
terms of URL requirements and this clashes with real world
considerations like human nature :) So even if the decision is to
stick with the standard, the uf movement had better accept that it
will be that much harder to advocate for its adoption. So the support
documentation had better be seriously hot.

The wiki does need to expand on the material that's there and (as I
mentioned elsewhere) the standards themselves could expand on the
*reasons* behind the requirements they set.  I've always found people
are more receptive to fixing issues when they can understand the
reason. When things seem arbitrary, people tend to dig their heels in
far more.

Just some thoughts anyway.

cheers,

Ben

--
--- http://weblog.200ok.com.au/
--- The future has arrived; it's just not
--- evenly distributed. - William Gibson
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Rel-tag issues, i can't create my own tagspace!

2007-02-11 Thread Kevin Marks


On Feb 8, 2007, at 7:10 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:


In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian
Suda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes


--- i agree with all of this, and that is why microformats do not
force you to use your own tagspace. There are plenty of sites that  
can

easily be used as tagspaces[1]


There's also an implicit assumption that publishers (who don't have
their own tag spaces) are (or should be) willing to litter their pages
with links to third party websites.

I've yet to see any justification for that assumption.


The several million existing users of rel-tag are sufficient  
justification for me.
If your second party website (the blog hosting service) is not  
sufficient eg wordpress, blogger or livejournal), and you can't find  
a third party tagspace who represents your tag's definition, I am a  
little stumped. What is the actual objection here?


You could put rel=tag nofollow on them if it is SEO linkjuice related.
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Rel-tag issues, i can't create my own tagspace!

2007-02-11 Thread Ryan Cannon
On Feb 11, 2007, at 10:14 PM, microformats-discuss- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



What is the actual objection here?

You could put rel=tag nofollow on them if it is SEO linkjuice  
related.


What about usability linkjuice? I don't want my users to drift off to a
third-party site, and I don't want them presented with a huge array of
clickable options. I simply want a machine-consumable, human-readable
list of tags.

My best option here is something along the lines of:

a href=http://tagspace.com/tag; onclick=javascript:return false;  
style=color:inherit !important; font-style: inherit !important; [add  
ever-increasing list of span-level element stylings set to inherit ! 
important]tag/a


The URL requirement for rel-tag is elegant, but it's in no way humans- 
first.


This is disturbing not because of it's relation to tagging blog posts  
in blogging software (which is a simple use of it) but the fact that  
it's becoming a common means of labeling across microformats: it's  
optional for categories in hCard, required for categories in hAtom,  
required for skills in hResume (absurd!), and required for keywords  
in hReview.


Rel-tag is becoming a de-facto standard for any type of taxonomy data  
in microformats. As the number and complexity of microformats  
increases, this is going to become a problem for implementors.



--
Ryan Cannon

Interactive Developer
MSI Student, School of Information
University of Michigan
http://RyanCannon.com

___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Rel-tag issues, i can't create my own tagspace!

2007-02-08 Thread James Craig

Brian Suda wrote:


I would love to have my host have the latest, greatest version of PHP
technology. If they don't i don't go complain to PHP and ask them to
back-port functionality to an earlier version. I buck it up and either
move hosts, pay for the better service or co-locate my own box. It is
silly to think that it is a problem with the specification.


Quoting from About Microformats: Designed for humans first and  
machines second, microformats are a set of simple, open data formats  
built upon existing and widely adopted standards. This also implies  
they should be easy to implement. Co-locating your own box and  
rocking mod_rewrite can hardly be considered easy implementation of a  
simple data format.



while i understand a given server setup might have limitations,
that's not a microformats problem, that is your problem.


Your taking the elitist way out. I believe it's a microformats  
problem to encourage adoption and to figure out a standard that will  
work for the most people. Which is better? A massive dissemination of  
usable tag metadata, or a smaller subset of tag metadata with pretty  
URLs?


James

PS. Nice change of the subject line.

___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Rel-tag issues, i can't create my own tagspace!

2007-02-08 Thread Brian Suda

On 2/8/07, James Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Quoting from About Microformats: Designed for humans first and
machines second, microformats are a set of simple, open data formats
built upon existing and widely adopted standards. This also implies
they should be easy to implement. Co-locating your own box and
rocking mod_rewrite can hardly be considered easy implementation of a
simple data format.


--- i agree with all of this, and that is why microformats do not
force you to use your own tagspace. There are plenty of sites that can
easily be used as tagspaces[1]. You don't have to co-locate or rock
mod_rewrite, but then you can't use that as an excuse when the
alternative is to link to ANY tagspace. It is likely that most sites
will WANT to create their own tagspace so we should certainly document
problems and offer alternatives. But server setup is orthagonal to
microformats.


Your taking the elitist way out. I believe it's a microformats
problem to encourage adoption and to figure out a standard that will
work for the most people. Which is better? A massive dissemination of
usable tag metadata, or a smaller subset of tag metadata with pretty
URLs?


--- sorry if i came across as elitist, but that is my opinion. rel-tag
is about tags, not how to setup tag spaces. I think it is a much
better approach is to NOT change the spec to correspond with broken
implementations.

To encourage adoption, i would suggest (and many have) add to the wiki
alternatives and ways to work around the limitations of servers and
software. One of the biggest complains is with IIS. (i had a look on
the wiki and it is burried) But there is software that can be
installed on Windows to allow for the creation of Tagspaces.

More information on actually implementing a tag space would be
helpful. I wrote a tagging system on our intranet and we run IIS. So I
had to install URLrewrite (ISAPI) to create the URI /tag/tagname. We
horrible Microsoft people aren't as lucky to have Mod Rewrite.

Many of these should be pulled out onto a wiki page, so next time when
folks say My server doesn't allow tagspaces we can point them to the
wiki page, with alternatives, fixes, suggestions, etc.

-brian

[1] - http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-tag-spaces

--
brian suda
http://suda.co.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Rel-tag issues, i can't create my own tagspace!

2007-02-08 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian
Suda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

--- i agree with all of this, and that is why microformats do not
force you to use your own tagspace. There are plenty of sites that can
easily be used as tagspaces[1]

There's also an implicit assumption that publishers (who don't have
their own tag spaces) are (or should be) willing to litter their pages
with links to third party websites.

I've yet to see any justification for that assumption.

-- 
Andy Mabbett
 http://www.pigsonthewing.org.uk/uFsig/

Welcome to the 36-day week!
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss