Fw: Founder's Quote Daily

2009-05-13 Thread Fred B. Ellison





#yiv1687386127 table{font-family:Georgia, Times New Roman, 
serif;color:#33;}#yiv1687386127 a, #yiv1687386127 a:link, #yiv1687386127 
a:visited{color:#271A11;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1687386127 a:active, 
#yiv1687386127 a:hover{color:#271A11;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1687386127 
h1, #yiv1687386127 h2, #yiv1687386127 h3, #yiv1687386127 h4, #yiv1687386127 
h5{color:#271A11;margin:0;}








Freedom had been hunted round the globe; reason was considered as rebellion; 
and the slavery of fear had made men afraid to think. But such is the 
irresistible nature of truth, that all it asks, and all it wants, is the 
liberty of appearing.
--Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1791


 

 
  


  
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
This is a Free Speech forum. The owner of this list assumes no responsibility 
for the intellectual or emotional maturity of its members.  If you do not like 
what is being said here, filter it to trash, ignore it or leave.  If you leave, 
learn how to do this for yourself.  If you do not, you will be here forever.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



The Party of Colin Powell

2009-05-13 Thread Fred B. Ellison
The Party of Colin Powell
by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
May 13, 2009
http://www.jeffjacoby.com/5575/the-party-of-colin-powell
 
A PROMINENT SUPPORTER of Barack Obama told a Washington audience last week that 
the Republican Party is in deep trouble and getting smaller and smaller 
because its views are not in sync with those of mainstream Americans. 
Republicans would do better without the nastiness of Rush Limbaugh or the 
very polarizing Sarah Palin, the speaker said, and they would do well to 
realize that their philosophy of lower taxes and limited government has put 
them out of step with their fellow citizens.
 
Americans do want to pay taxes for services, he told his audience. Americans 
are looking for more government in their life, not less.
 
There is nothing particularly unusual about Democrats deprecating conservatism 
or endorsing big government, but these comments didn't come from a Democrat. 
The speaker was Colin Powell, who claims to be a Republican.
 
There are times when party loyalty asks too much, JFK once said, but for Powell 
there rarely seems to be a time when it doesn't. Though he owes every lofty 
position he has held -- national security advisor, four-star general, chairman 
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, secretary of state -- to Republican presidents, 
Republicans perpetually appear to rub him the wrong way: especially the 
conservative Republicans who constitute the party's base.
This is not the first time Powell has urged the GOP to become more liberal. 
There is nothing wrong with having socially conservative views, he said 
during a televised interview in December, but Republicans must begin appealing 
to Hispanics, to blacks, to Asians . . . and not just try to influence them by 
Republican principles and dogma. He complained that Republicans had moved 
further to the right -- something he also complained about last October, when 
he went on Meet the Press to endorse the presidential candidacy of the most 
liberal member of the US Senate.
 
Nor is this the first time Powell has denounced Limbaugh.
 
Can we continue to listen to Rush Limbaugh? he asked on CNN a few weeks after 
throwing his support to Obama. Is this really the kind of party that we want 
to be, when these kinds of spokespersons seem to appeal to our lesser instincts 
rather than our better instincts?
 
I wonder if Powell has ever actually listened to Limbaugh. Some years back, the 
liberal Washington Post columnist William Raspberry wrote a piece in which he 
compared Limbaugh to the racist politicians he remembered from his Mississippi 
youth. He accused him of demagoguery and of trafficking in the raw meat of 
bigotry.
 
Eleven days later, Raspberry took it back.
 
Rush, I'm sorry, he wrote. He admitted that he had written the first column 
without ever having tuned in to Limbaugh's program, and that his opinions 
about him had come largely from other people. But when readers challenged him 
to listen to Limbaugh for a while and make up his own mind, he had done so -- 
and now regretted having so unfairly maligned the man. Limbaugh might be 
smart-alecky, a master of ridicule who loved to rattle liberal cages. But 
as Raspberry had to admit, he was certainly no hater or bigot.
 
Perhaps if Powell spent less time reflexively deriding the country's most 
popular conservatives and more time listening to their message, he might admit 
something similar.
But probably not. Powell's antipathy to the GOP's Reaganite roots has gone 
beyond the point of reason and reflection. What kind of Republican, after all, 
preaches that Americans do want to pay taxes for services and are looking 
for more government in their life, not less? (The opposite is true: In a 
nationwide poll last month, 62 percent of respondents said they prefer a 
government that offers fewer services and lower taxes; only 28 percent 
preferred more services and higher taxes.) What kind of Republican calls John 
McCain my beloved friend and acknowledges that he would be a good president 
-- then turns around and endorses the most liberal Democrat ever nominated for 
president?
 
Republicans these days are in the midst of a debate over how best to rebuild 
their party, and there are honest differences over what Republicanism should 
mean.But there are also limits. Powell may sincerely believe that embracing 
bigger government, higher taxes, and Barack Obama is the formula for success, 
but most Republicans don't. Most Democrats, on the other hand, do. If party 
loyalty asks too much, maybe it's time for Powell to switch.
 
(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)



Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to 
take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic 
purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and 
sacrifice for that freedom. - John F. Kennedy

Extremism in defense of liberty 

Fw: HB 361 Real ID PASSES SENATE IN A LANDSLIDE!

2009-05-13 Thread Fred B. Ellison

Thank you to everyone who supported this effort.
 
Fred

--- On Wed, 5/13/09, D L Wells deb.we...@campaignforliberty.com wrote:

From: D L Wells deb.we...@campaignforliberty.com
Subject: HB 361 Real ID PASSES SENATE IN A LANDSLIDE!
To: 
Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 6:05 PM



We did it!  All of our calls, emails and visits paid off!  

NO REAL ID IN MISSOURI!  

YAY!!!

Thank you, thank you!

Thank you to Jim Guest for standing up for us!



  
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
This is a Free Speech forum. The owner of this list assumes no responsibility 
for the intellectual or emotional maturity of its members.  If you do not like 
what is being said here, filter it to trash, ignore it or leave.  If you leave, 
learn how to do this for yourself.  If you do not, you will be here forever.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---