Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1576: There seems to be a way to show elevation profiles
Hi, I use the standard Garmin types for contour lines, 0x20, 0x21 and 0x22 I created the contour lines with Srtm2Osm, split srtm.osm data with the same tile area bounds as my map. Now I have two img's of the same area, one with osm data, one with contour lines. E.g. 10010001.img and 10010101.img The contour tile is transparent so I can see the contours on top of the map in Mapsource. Is it possible to merge those two layers into one tile and still keep the routing? How can I merge the two 10010001.osm with 10010101.osm or 10010001.img with 10010101.img? Will it be possible to show the elevation profile with this approach? Cheers, Minko Ronny Klier wrote: This will not work. I got the same problem in different versions of MapSource. May be there should be an explicit warning in show-profiles option help. If I make one mapset with only contour lines, I see an emtpy profile. This works fine for me (in 6.15.11). Did you use the standard Garmin types for elevation(0x20-0x21)? ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
[mkgmap-dev] Disable multipolygon processing
Hi, Is there a way of disabling the multipolygon processing completely? I generate a routing layer that has no areas nor does it care about relations, so it would be nice if I could disable multipolygon processing to make things quicker. -- Charlie ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] access restrictions and routing
Hello Torsten,
highway=* mkgmap_routing=foot {set motor_vehicle=no} [0x09 road_class=1
road=speed=1 resolution 22]
motor_vehicle is not understood by mkgmap - how about:
{set access=no; set foot=yes}
Cheers,
Mark
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] access restrictions and routing
Mark Burton schrieb am 20.02.2010 14:02:
motor_vehicle is not understood by mkgmap - how about:
{set access=no; set foot=yes}
Ah, that does the trick. Thanks!
Gruss
Torsten
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] heed the through_route relation when adjusting turn headings
On Feb 12, 2010, at 12:46, Mark Burton wrote: Is through route documented in the OSM Wiki? I was unable to find any information on this. Not yet, but it should be. I was rather hoping that some kind person would add a page to the Wiki describing it. So about adding this to the Wiki: is there any other information about the through_route relation type, except what has appeared in this mailing list? Is the node with role junction now obsolete, or simply optional? Cheers. ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] heed the through_route relation when adjusting turn headings
Hi Clinton, On Feb 12, 2010, at 12:46, Mark Burton wrote: Is through route documented in the OSM Wiki? I was unable to find any information on this. Not yet, but it should be. I was rather hoping that some kind person would add a page to the Wiki describing it. So about adding this to the Wiki: is there any other information about the through_route relation type, except what has appeared in this mailing list? No, I discussed it with a few people on the OSM IRC channel but other than that, I believe our mailing list knows as much about it as anyone. Is the node with role junction now obsolete, or simply optional? The node is required but it doesn't have to have a role. The requirements are that the relation has two members that are ways that meet at the specified node. None of them need to have roles. It was originally suggested that the node had role junction but I don't see why that is required. Cheers, Mark ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1576: There seems to be a way to show elevation profiles
With some detours, I finally got the elevation profile working in my mapset ;-) I dont know if it now worked because I also installed Garmin Basecamp. First, I had all map tiles and contour img's in one mapset. They are still there, but now I created another tdb index file with mkgmap on all contour img's from the same mapset, with the options: --overview-mapname: contours_nl --show-profiles=1 --tdbfile I stored the contours_nl.tdb file and contours_nl.img overview map in the same directory, and installed it in Mapsource. The result is that I see the contours on top of the map (with routing), and I can choose to switch to the bare contour mapset without all osm data. In this mapset I can see now the elevation profile :-) On the GPS (tested a Etrex and Dakota) I can now switch the contours on and off, but routing doesn't show the elevation profile. You can download and view some images of my custom maps on my website: http://sites.google.com/site/openfietsmap ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] motor_vehicle
Hello Mark, motor_vehicle is not understood by mkgmap Actually, why not? If my memory serves right, mkgmap understands motorcar and motorcycle (and maps them to the same access bit), but why not motor_vehicle? For example in my understanding, tractors are covered by motor_vehicle but not motorcar or motorcycle. The road sign for banning motor vehicles does ban tractors too. Best regards, Marko ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] motor_vehicle
Hello Mark, motor_vehicle is not understood by mkgmap Actually, why not? If my memory serves right, mkgmap understands motorcar and motorcycle (and maps them to the same access bit), but why not motor_vehicle? For example in my understanding, tractors are covered by motor_vehicle but not motorcar or motorcycle. The road sign for banning motor vehicles does ban tractors too. Best regards, Marko ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1576: There seems to be a way to show elevation profiles
Am 20.02.2010 11:06, schrieb Minko: Hi, I use the standard Garmin types for contour lines, 0x20, 0x21 and 0x22 I created the contour lines with Srtm2Osm, split srtm.osm data with the same tile area bounds as my map. Now I have two img's of the same area, one with osm data, one with contour lines. E.g. 10010001.img and 10010101.img The contour tile is transparent so I can see the contours on top of the map in Mapsource. Is it possible to merge those two layers into one tile and still keep the routing? How can I merge the two 10010001.osm with 10010101.osm or 10010001.img with 10010101.img? I use osmosis to merge srtm data with osm: java -jar osmosis.jar --rx srtm.osm --rx 63240001.osm --merge --wx combined.osm Will it be possible to show the elevation profile with this approach? Cheers, Minko Ronny Klier wrote: This will not work. I got the same problem in different versions of MapSource. May be there should be an explicit warning in show-profiles option help. If I make one mapset with only contour lines, I see an emtpy profile. This works fine for me (in 6.15.11). Did you use the standard Garmin types for elevation(0x20-0x21)? ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
[mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1581: Move leisure=sports_centre below sport=*
Version 1581 was commited by marko on 2010-02-20 21:35:50 + (Sat, 20 Feb 2010) Move leisure=sports_centre below sport=* so that it will only be used when no matching sport=* is specified. ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] motor_vehicle
Hi Marko, motor_vehicle is not understood by mkgmap Actually, why not? If my memory serves right, mkgmap understands motorcar and motorcycle (and maps them to the same access bit), but why not motor_vehicle? For example in my understanding, tractors are covered by motor_vehicle but not motorcar or motorcycle. The road sign for banning motor vehicles does ban tractors too. Well, no good reason, actually. It's just never been done. Consider it an omission. Cheers, Mark ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
[mkgmap-dev] Please help: --generate-sea: No coastline
Hi! I am relatively new to mkgmap but I searched the archive and found no answers. So I try to find help in this mailing list. I know that generate-sea is still buggy but I cannot achieve any blue sea. I try to generate a routable map of the Canary Islands. With the mkgmap version 1580 I do not even get the coast lines. With 1484 I got blue islands on yellow sea. Can there be any interaction between style-files and the generate-sea option? I used these style files: http://dev.openstreetmap.de/aio/styles/styles.tar.bz2 The latest splitter.jar. and the needed files from this tarball I copied into the directory, where I then ran this script: -- wget http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.6/map?bbox=-18.55,27.29,-12.82,29.89 -O canarias.osm mkdir tiles cp splitter.jar tiles cd tiles $JAVA_BINDIR/java -Xmx2000M -jar splitter.jar --mapid=63240347 --max-nodes=100 ../canarias.osm cd .. mkdir gbasemap; mkdir gaddr; mkdir gboundary cp mkgmap.jar gbasemap; cp mkgmap.jar gaddr; cp mkgmap.jar gboundary; cp -r addresslayer_style gaddr cp -r boundary_style gboundary cp -r masterstyle gbasemap cp -r addr.TYP gaddr cp -r boundary.TYP gboundary cp -r master.TYP gbasemap cd gbasemap $JAVA_BINDIR/java -Xmx2000M -jar mkgmap.jar --max-jobs --style-file=masterstyle --description='Openstreetmap' --country-name=spain --country-abbr=ES --family-id=4 --product-id=45 --series-name='OSM-AllInOne-ES-bmap' --family-name=OSM --area-name=EU --latin1 --mapname=63240345 --draw-priority=10 --add-pois-to-areas --make-all-cycleways --link-pois-to-ways --remove-short-arcs --net --route --ignore-osm-bounds --generate-sea='polygons' --gmapsupp ../tiles/*.osm.gz master.TYP cd .. cd gaddr $JAVA_BINDIR/java -Xmx2000M -jar mkgmap.jar --max-jobs --style-file=addresslayer_style --description='Adressen' --country-name=spain --country-abbr=ES --family-id=5 --product-id=40 --series-name='OSM-AllInOne-ES-Addr' --family-name=ADRESSEN --area-name=EU --latin1 --mapname=63241345 --draw-priority=20 --no-poi-address --no-sorted-roads --add-pois-to-areas --transparent --gmapsupp ../tiles/*.osm.gz addr.TYP cd .. cd gboundary $JAVA_BINDIR/java -Xmx2000M -jar mkgmap.jar --max-jobs --style-file=boundary_style --description='Boundary_Layer' --country-name=spain --country-abbr=ES --family-id=6 --product-id=30 --series-name='OSM-AllInOne-ES-boundary' --family-name=boundary --area-name=EU --latin1 --mapname=63240625 --draw-priority=21 --no-poi-address --no-sorted-roads --transparent --gmapsupp ../tiles/*.osm.gz boundary.TYP cd .. ./gmt -jo gmapsupp.img gbasemap/gmapsupp.img gaddr/gmapsupp.img gboundary/gmapsupp.img - Are there any additional options I should try to get at least a buggy sea? Thanks a lot in advance, Dani ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
