RE: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8
I wasn't just surprised, I was confused. I was looking all over for the apache package! I've only had a brief dabble into 8.0, but will have to consider it if and when our apache servers start to get any heavier load. My last attempt at Apache 2.0 ended in disaster regardless of whether I used an RPM or compiled it myself, so hopefully version 8.0 does what I haven't managed yet. Thanks for the information. - John Airey, BSc (Jt Hons), CNA, RHCE Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute of the Blind, Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU, Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Theories of evolution are like buses - there'll be another one along in a minute > -Original Message- > From: Nadav Har'El [mailto:nyh@;math.technion.ac.il] > Sent: 28 October 2002 10:26 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8 > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "RE: > mod_ssl-2.0.40-8": > > the "apache" package name disappears and is called "httpd" > instead. I guess > > they are synchronising the names of the packages to match > the daemon names, > > although I haven't yet checked to see if "bind" has become "named". > > No, it hasn't, and remind "bind" (bind-9.2.1-9). > > I think they wanted a different name when they switched from > Apache 1 to > Apache 2. > By the way, considering Apache 2's site is "http://httpd.apache.org/";, > I guess the choice of name "httpd" could be understood. But I was also > quite suprised when I first saw this name in Redhat 8. > > -- > Nadav Har'El| Monday, Oct 28 > 2002, 22 Heshvan 5763 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |- > Phone: +972-53-245868, ICQ 13349191 |Long periods of drought > are always > http://nadav.harel.org.il |followed by rain. > __ > Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] > - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "RE: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8": > the "apache" package name disappears and is called "httpd" instead. I guess > they are synchronising the names of the packages to match the daemon names, > although I haven't yet checked to see if "bind" has become "named". No, it hasn't, and remind "bind" (bind-9.2.1-9). I think they wanted a different name when they switched from Apache 1 to Apache 2. By the way, considering Apache 2's site is "http://httpd.apache.org/";, I guess the choice of name "httpd" could be understood. But I was also quite suprised when I first saw this name in Redhat 8. -- Nadav Har'El| Monday, Oct 28 2002, 22 Heshvan 5763 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- Phone: +972-53-245868, ICQ 13349191 |Long periods of drought are always http://nadav.harel.org.il |followed by rain. __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8
You'll find the source RPM on the source CD for Red Hat 8.0. Install it as any normal package (eg rpm -ivh), and you'll find the spec file that built the binary in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS. As Geoff points out, it is unusual that Red Hat 8.0 uses a separate package name, but Red Hat have been doing this since version 7.0. With version 8.0, the "apache" package name disappears and is called "httpd" instead. I guess they are synchronising the names of the packages to match the daemon names, although I haven't yet checked to see if "bind" has become "named". - John Airey, BSc (Jt Hons), CNA, RHCE Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute of the Blind, Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU, Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Theories of evolution are like buses - there'll be another one along in a minute > -Original Message- > From: Mike Pacheco [mailto:mike@;fwdsystems.com] > Sent: 25 October 2002 18:30 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8 > > > Hi All, > > Been on the mod_ssl site from top to bottom and I can not > find mod_ssl for > apache 2.0.40 - I do a custom install of RedHat 8.0 - pick > httpd and mod_ssl > and then query the installed packages after it finishes and I > test apache > with ssl successfully and I get: > > rpm -q mod_ssl = mod_ssl-2.0.40-8 > > I would like to get my hands on the source for this version > of mod_ssl for > some custom install options but I can not seem to find it. > Can somebody > please point me in the right direction? > > Thanks > > Mike Pacheco > > __ > Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] > - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8
On Friday 25 Oct 2002 2:01 pm, I wrote: > Anyway, if you get the Apache2 source code, (a tarball from the horse's > mouth mouth, or via source RPMs from Redhat or elsewhere), then you ^^^ I am reminded from time to time that perhaps "vi" might not, after all, be as appropriate for quickly-blurted emails as it is for coding ... with this slight slip of the fingers I make an already silly reference utterly incomprehensible. Apologies, I meant "a tarball from apache.org". Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8
Hi, On Friday 25 Oct 2002 1:30 pm, Mike Pacheco wrote: > Hi All, > > Been on the mod_ssl site from top to bottom and I can not find mod_ssl > for apache 2.0.40 - I do a custom install of RedHat 8.0 - pick httpd > and mod_ssl and then query the installed packages after it finishes and > I test apache with ssl successfully and I get: > > rpm -q mod_ssl = mod_ssl-2.0.40-8 > > I would like to get my hands on the source for this version of mod_ssl > for some custom install options but I can not seem to find it. Can > somebody please point me in the right direction? It's bundled in the source code for Apache2 now. BTW: that's strange naming for the rpm if it's as you say and Redhat have split the Apache2 modules out. "apache-mod_ssl" would have made more sense for the ssl support IMHO. Anyway, if you get the Apache2 source code, (a tarball from the horse's mouth mouth, or via source RPMs from Redhat or elsewhere), then you should find the ssl module sitting in the source. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
