Re: Looking for a co-maintainer for Sys::SigAction

2022-04-15 Thread Neil Bowers
Hi Lincoln,

I've come to the conclusion that I don't have the interest, to continue to 
maintain Sys::SigAction.

There are several things you could do.

There are 19 distributions that use Sys::SigAction – you could contact the 
authors of those to see if any of those would like to adopt it, or help.

You could give co-maint to the special pseudo-user NEEDHELP. When you do that, 
MetaCPAN will display a banner when people look at the module. See, for example 
https://metacpan.org/pod/X11::Muralis

Similarly, you could give co-maint to ADOPTME, or even transfer first-come to 
it. This results in a slightly different message: 
https://metacpan.org/pod/WebAPI::DBIC

If you don’t plan to ever do any more work on the module, ADOPTME is more 
appropriate. It’s a more established mechanism, and there are people who look 
for modules to adopt.

Think up a bunch of ways to improve the distribution, and add them all as RT 
tickets. Then write a blog post saying you’re looking for someone to adopt it, 
and that there’s a ready-made list of things to work on. Would be good for the 
test coverage to be high before doing this. If it isn’t, add that to the list 
;-)

Cheers,
Neil


Looking for a co-maintainer for Sys::SigAction

2022-03-11 Thread Lincoln A Baxter
Hello Perl Module authors, and Pause Admins,

I've come to the conclusion that I don't have the interest, to continue
to maintain Sys::SigAction. (https://metacpan.org/pod/Sys::SigAction). 

SigAction as been incredibly stable for years, with the exception of of
the fact that perl 5.31.6 and beyond broke it for the cygwin platform.
 The tests ran fine on cygwin before that release.  I would probably
try to identify the test that fails on cygwin, and then mask it off
with a warning of what is not working on that platform.  The are three
open issues. 

There was one pull request that I received, that I belatedly merged
into my github repository for sys::sigaction.   This
is https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=123637.  I will
produce a new release that includes this patch.  And then close this
issue.    There are other two issues.

I am no longer programming in perl (though I still love the language).
 I wish to give this module to someone more interested in maintaining
it.  This module has been included in Debian for years now.  And while
I have no idea how widely it is used, there are 6 people following it.
It would be nice if someone would in interested in at least
contributing to it's maintenance.  I'd be happy to work with that
person to transfer knowledge and review updates.

Any takers?

Lincoln