Re: James Keenan's other modules (was: Re: CGI::Simple)

[Andy Armstrong]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12 Jan 2007, at 10:16, David Landgren wrote:
Do we wait until someone else manifests a need to dust off one of  
them to hand over maintenance? Or do we forget about it until next  
time? If it's worth it, then I would volunteer.


Actually I was thinking of volunteering for the whole lot of them -  
but then decided that they're probably not that valuable to anyone.


I was also wondering whether - given that backpan exists so people  
can always find them if they really want them - there shouldn't be a  
mechanism for removing modules that are unloved and unused.


- --
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFp2e0woknRJZQnCERAquJAJ4hKkNHZKS3u3JnhRbcPd9k7xUm9wCfaKfK
M8tnMc8hzZxL8BlEEyAMtVg=
=k1gg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: James Keenan's other modules (was: Re: CGI::Simple)

[Andy Lester]

On Jan 12, 2007, at 4:49 AM, Andy Armstrong wrote:

I was also wondering whether - given that backpan exists so people  
can always find them if they really want them - there shouldn't be  
a mechanism for removing modules that are unloved and unused.


How in the world could you determine either unloved or unused?  And  
unupdated certainly doesn't mean that they're not valuable.


--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance