Re: [MP3 ENCODER] ABR 320?
Frank Klemm wrote: 560 kbps result in distortions. 551 kbps is the last without heavy artefacts. -- Could you explain why 560kbs would produce more distorsion than 320kbs ? Pierre -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] ABR 320?
:: would it be possible to encode an mp3 at ABR 320 using frames larger :: than 320 kbps? :: e.g. 440kbps , 560kbps :: 560 kbps result in distortions. 551 kbps is the last without heavy artefacts. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Frank Klemm eMail | [EMAIL PROTECTED] home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone | +49 (3641) 64-2721home: +49 (3641) 390545 sMail | R.-Breitscheid-Str. 43, 07747 Jena, Germany -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
[MP3 ENCODER] ABR 320?
would it be possible to encode an mp3 at ABR 320 using frames larger than 320 kbps? e.g. 440kbps , 560kbps -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] ABR 320?
MoiN On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:03:14AM +0100, Estrunfus Maleficus wrote: would it be possible to encode an mp3 at ABR 320 using frames larger than 320 kbps? e.g. 440kbps , 560kbps There are no audio frames larger than 320kbps in MPEG standard. The only way to create larger frames is to use freeformat. Ingo -- I am the "ILOVEGNU" signature virus. Just copy me to your signature. This email was infected under the terms of the GNU General Public License. -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
