Re: [MP3 ENCODER] winamp quality
How about increasing the buffer size to about 4 seconds? From: Pierre Hugonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] winamp quality Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 15:52:43 +0200 Dave Brown wrote: I've found Winamp sounds pretty bad if you enable MMX decoding. I suggest just sticking with Pentium/Pentium2 decode doesn't seem to affect cpu utilisation. It doesn't improve a lot... It seems in fact that the problem I observe is related to the process priority. Under Windows NT4, it works better (but still not perfect) if I assign a high priority to the WinAmp process. Pierre -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ ) Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
[MP3 ENCODER] winamp quality
Hello, I use WinAmp (2.62) to play my mp3 files encoded by lame (3.70), and I find it rather bad. The mp3 files are not faulty, since they sound good with the Windows Media Player. But Windows Media Player doesn't have playlists, so I'd like to use WinAmp anyway: are there some particular settings that could improve the decoding ? Thanks, Pierre -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] winamp quality
Hello, I use WinAmp (2.62) to play my mp3 files encoded by lame (3.70), and I find it rather bad. The mp3 files are not faulty, since they sound good with the Windows Media Player. But Windows Media Player doesn't have playlists, so I'd like to use WinAmp anyway: are there some particular settings that could improve the decoding ? what's wrong w/ winamp's mp3 decoding? i think it is pretty much compliant with FhG spec. Dmitry -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] winamp quality
Hi, Pierre: PH I use WinAmp (2.62) to play my mp3 files PH encoded by lame (3.70), and I find it rather PH bad ... are there some particular settings PH that could improve the decoding ? The easiest and fastest thing to try, IMHO, is to use in_mp3.dll from 2.22 version of WinAMP, which is based on Fraunhofer's decoding engine. One can download it from Dmitry Kutsanov's site: http://www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/in_mp3.zip Personally, I like it better then original Nitrane decoder. Greetings, -E. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
AW: [MP3 ENCODER] winamp quality
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Dmitry Boldyrev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: Freitag, 28. April 2000 11:44 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] winamp quality Hello, I use WinAmp (2.62) to play my mp3 files encoded by lame (3.70), and I find it rather bad. The mp3 files are not faulty, since they sound good with the Windows Media Player. But Windows Media Player doesn't have playlists, so I'd like to use WinAmp anyway: are there some particular settings that could improve the decoding ? what's wrong w/ winamp's mp3 decoding? i think it is pretty much compliant with FhG spec. Dmitry Hello, (for a friend) i installed winamp 2.6x on a Win98 System (no winamp installed before on the system). LAME VBR-MP3 sounds very bad. On my own WIN NT system (serveral winamp versions are installed before), the same mp3-files sounds good. Does anyone have an idea??? Anselm -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ ) -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] winamp quality
Dmitry Boldyrev wrote: what's wrong w/ winamp's mp3 decoding? i think it is pretty much compliant with FhG spec. Some problems like 'stop go' : some very short interruptions during play (even when winamp is the only running application) Pierre -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] winamp quality
"E. Zann" wrote: The easiest and fastest thing to try, IMHO, is to use in_mp3.dll from 2.22 version of WinAMP, which is based on Fraunhofer's decoding engine. One can download it from Dmitry Kutsanov's site: http://www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/in_mp3.zip Personally, I like it better then original Nitrane decoder. ...similar problem with this version in in_mp3.dll -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] winamp quality
I've found Winamp sounds pretty bad if you enable MMX decoding. I suggest just sticking with Pentium/Pentium2 decode doesn't seem to affect cpu utilisation. - Original Message - From: "Pierre Hugonnet" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 9:31 AM Subject: [MP3 ENCODER] winamp quality Hello, I use WinAmp (2.62) to play my mp3 files encoded by lame (3.70), and I find it rather bad. The mp3 files are not faulty, since they sound good with the Windows Media Player. But Windows Media Player doesn't have playlists, so I'd like to use WinAmp anyway: are there some particular settings that could improve the decoding ? Thanks, Pierre -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ ) -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
