RE: [Mpls] Lake Street Access Project

2002-07-29 Thread David Brauer

Tim Bonham:

 I don't know anything about this Lake St/Hwy 35W project, or the
people
 involved (or even why anyone thinks we need to spend any tax money on
 changing it after all these years), but I did check out 1 item on this
--
 is Tom Johnson a lobbyist:
  From Minnesota Campaign Finance Board List of registered
lobbyists:
 http://www.cfboard.state.mn.us/lobby/lobbyist.html#J
 Johnson, Thomas, L  3400 City Center, 33 S 6th St
 Minneapolis, MN
  55402   (612)340-5432 #9462 Registered Pre-1996

This is Tom Johnson, an attorney at the Gray Plant Mooty law firm (and
former Hennepin County Attorney) NOT Tom Johnson of Access Project fame.
I know them both.

Although, come to think of it, I've never seen them in the same room

David Brauer
King Field

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] PANEL RECOMMENDS DOWNTOWN PARKING CHANGES

2002-07-29 Thread Russell Sasaoka

PANEL RECOMMENDS DOWNTOWN PARKING CHANGES
Responding to reports that up to half of downtown meters are occupied by nonpaying 
vehicles driven by people with disabilities, an advisory
committee has recommended major changes in the city's parking policies.
--

I think that they should make the changes...  although I believe that there are a 
number of vehicle owners that abuse those disability placards by parking with the 
placards when they are not really disabled.

I've seen some people that show no disabilities at all get in or out of cars with 
those placards showing, start their cars, remove the placards and then proceed to 
drive away.

I know that parking enforcement is limited in staffing and that there is not much that 
they could do, but it just steams me that there are people that are willing to take 
advantage of something like this...




Russell Sasaoka
Coon Rapids 
(Formerly of Loring Park)
Working in Minneapolis 
Get your free Web-based E-mail at http://www.startribune.com/stribmail
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] RE: Community Gardening and Parks

2002-07-29 Thread John Erwin


WOW!

Lots of interest in community gardening lately!  Just wanted to 'check
in' with everyone on this as I have been looking into community
gardening and how the Park Board can help since.  Some of you may
remember that I wrote an opinion piece supporting community gardens in
parks earlier this spring.  I am a Horticulture Prof at the U and, of
course, support gardening throughout the city!  It is Americans number 1
past time!

1)  Great turnout for the Critical Mass bike ride looking at Community
Gardens last Friday.  Must have been 50-75 bikers.  This group did a
great job organizing the tour and the party afterwards.

2)  Dean Zimmerman organized a meeting last week between his office,
MCDA, and myself (Park Board) to talk about this issue as well!  Both
Dean and I have had discussions about this issue with Paul Ostrow.  Paul
has a general interest in a 'greening' policy for the city.  The support
Of Dean Zimmerman, Paul Ostrow, Gary Schiff, and Lisa Goodman for
general greening of the city is terrific.  I am sure that others on City
Council are supportive as well.

3)  After having Minneapolis Park Board staff look through everything
they could find, I realize now that there is not a concrete Minneapolis
Park Board policy on community gardening!  The 'no edible' policy, that
has been in effect arose because of the previous use of herbicides in
parks.  In my mind, not allowing edibles alongside potential herbicide
application was a good policy.  Since herbicides are not used in most
neighborhood parks anymore, this issue is no longer valid.

4)  Therefore, I introduced a motion at the July 3 Minneapolis Park
Board meeting to direct staff to develop their recommendations for a new
community gardening policy in parks.  The new recommendations will come
forward out of the Operations and Environment Committee (Annie Young and
I are Chair and Vice-Chair, respectively).  The upshot is that I expect
that there will be a new policy in place for spring 2003 given there is
general support to make some changes across the Board.

The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board should be community gardeners
best friend.  It is my hope that the Board will eventually be
facilitating folks more in their efforts.  Some 'pie in the sky'
thoughts - what if people could schedule tillers through the MPRB during
the spring, what if there was a single list where MPRB staff could dump
compost or chips at specific sites rather than hauling stuff to dump
sites, what if MPRB facilitated land purchase through working out some
agreement to address the liability insurance issue?  I think some, if
not all of these are possible with time.

Both the affordable housing and the need for green space issues are
valid.  The city needs to develop more affordable housing, and existing
lots are a reasonable place to turn.  In addition, any additional
property tax revenue would be helpful to the entire city- including the
park system!  Having said this, I do believe that community gardens can
be a vital part of a community to provide green space, a gathering
place, and an asset to increase property values in a neighborhood.
Surely, we can work out a new city and park policy to promote both!

All of your interest is really appreciated!  Keep on pushing!

Sincerely,
John Erwin
City-Wide Park Board Commissioner




___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Public Protest asking Joe Biernat to Resign

2002-07-29 Thread Eva Young

I just got off the phone with Eve White from the Property Rights group
(PRAC).  She asked me to let you all know about a protest opportunity
coming up.  Are you outraged that Joe Biernat won't do the honorable thing
and resign?  Well share your outrage with City Hall.  

Assemble 10:45 at City Hall (by the Hubert Humphrey sign).  The protest
will start at 11:00 -- but it's nice for folks to get there a bit early.  

Tuesday July 30, 2002

Some of you expressed disappointment that this opportunity was not posted
here last time.  Well now, you've got your chance to make your voice heard.  

This protest is sponsored by PRAC, but if there are other organizations
that would like to co-sponsor this, contact Eve White at 612-275-1040.  

Eva


Eva
Eva Young
Near North
Minneapolis
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Mpls License Board

2002-07-29 Thread Craig Miller

Mr. Cox's e-paper states that the Mpls License Board ( the one that holds
license power over plumbers, electricians etc.) is going out of business.
Question for the list. Is this true? Will it take only the state issued
license to do work in the city? Or will it still require something from Mpls
City Hall?  Is there a city hall person who could fill us in?

Sounds to good to be true.  If it is true, get ready to have all of your
repair/installation bills to come down in price. This is a good first step
in removing some of the frustration that one feels when trying to get things
done in the city. This would be a big step for Minneapolis.


Craig Miller
Former Fultonite
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



RE: [Mpls] PANEL RECOMMENDS DOWNTOWN PARKING CHANGES

2002-07-29 Thread Anderson, Bruce

Not all disabilities are readily apparent.  I have a friend who's father had
a disability placard but did not show signs of a disability.  He had a heart
condition and could walk well, but not very far.

Bruce Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blaine

Russell Sasoka says...
I've seen some people that show no disabilities at all get in or out of cars
with those placards showing, start their cars, remove the placards and then
proceed to drive away.
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Public Protest asking Joe Biernat to Resign

2002-07-29 Thread Terrell Brown

-Original Message-
From: Eva Young

I just got off the phone with Eve White from the Property Rights group
(PRAC).  She asked me to let you all know about a protest opportunity
coming up.  Are you outraged that Joe Biernat won't do the honorable
thing
and resign?  Well share your outrage with City Hall.  

[Terrell] I'm not sure I see what's the problem here.  CM Herron, er
Biernet, got indicted for a variety of federal felonies.  The Strib
tells us that he confessed (in the cafeteria of the Hennepin Couty
Government Center of all places) but he doesn't want that information
to become public (apparently being on the front page of the paper
doesn't count).

Then he skips out on last weeks City Council meeting to go enjoy the
great outdoors with his family.  I suspect there are at least a few
people on this list who have skipped work on a nice summer day at one
point in their life.  In Joe's case there were 12 other Council Members
still around to make decisions on how to run the city.

So, Joe looks out on a nice Friday morning, decides it would be a nice
day to cut out of work and asks himself What would Brian do?  Guess
it was skip work.

Okay folks, lighten up, Joe may not be able to get out as often in a
couple of months.




Terrell Brown
Preparing to take some time off work and away from the Loring Park
neighborhood.
terrell at terrellbrown dot org


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] PANEL RECOMMENDS DOWNTOWN PARKING CHANGES

2002-07-29 Thread WizardMarks

Russell Sasaoka wrote:

PANEL RECOMMENDS DOWNTOWN PARKING CHANGES
Responding to reports that up to half of downtown meters are occupied by nonpaying 
vehicles driven by people with disabilities, an advisory
committee has recommended major changes in the city's parking policies.
--

I think that they should make the changes...  although I believe that there are a 
number of vehicle owners that abuse those disability placards by parking with the 
placards when they are not really disabled. I've seen some people that show no 
disabilities at all get in or out of cars with those placards showing, start their 
cars, remove the placards and then proceed to drive away.

Another case where ignorance is not bliss. I have a handicap placard 
which allows me to park free at any meter anywhere except in front of 
Great Clips on Lake St. To see me get out of my van and walk into a 
building, you would not know I'm handicapped.  Once I get inside the 
building, if it's close enough, I have to rest in order to begin 
breathing again. We are required to take the placards down when the car 
is in motion, so as not to obstruct our view and perhaps run over 
someone--very poor form and painful too. Actually, I don't feel that I 
have to wear signs to prove I'm disabled. I am not a poster child for 
COPD. On my bad days, or days when the air pollution is really funky, I 
carry an oxygen tank in a back pack and have canullas up my nose--this 
is about as much fun as sunburn. Think how you'd feel with hoses up yer 
noses.



I know that parking enforcement is limited in staffing and that there is not much 
that they could do, but it just steams me that there are people that are willing to 
take advantage of something like this...

On those rare events when I go downtown, it's usually to city hall or 
Henn. Co. Govt bldg. There used to be underground handicapped parking in 
the Govt Bldg (a.k.a. the toaster), but 9/11 had the effect of 
removing underground parking for the handicapped. I don't necessarily 
subscribe to the notion that someone disguised as a handicapped person 
is going to pull into the toaster with explosives and blow up the 
county, but there you are.
Further, with the building of the downtown termina (terminuses?) of 
light rail, the handicapped spots on both Fourth and Fifth St. have gone 
the way of the atlatl. They may be returned after the train is in place.
So count me as one of the people willing to take advantage of the few 
parking meters downtown. You can get as mad as you've a mind to, but 
you''ll have to spend the time to get glad again.
WizardMarks, Central

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] Lake Street Access Project

2002-07-29 Thread WizardMarks

Tim Bonham wrote:

 I don't know anything about this Lake St/Hwy 35W project, or the 
 people involved (or even why anyone thinks we need to spend any tax 
 money on changing it after all these years)

This is the I35W mitigation deal, as I understand it.
 From its inception, many people in South Minneapolis have believed that 
in building I35 we got shafted by the engineers.  (1) I 35 goes under 
the streets from all the way out in the burbs until it hits Lake Street, 
then it's above ground suddenly. Even though they dug a trench from 
downtown to Hwy. 62 to put 35 in originally, at Lake St. they declined 
to trench.

(2) At Lake St. one cannot get on 35 to go North or get off if 
travelling South bound. This has contributed a hefty amount of 
constraint which resulted (as part of red-lining) in the decline of Lake 
Street and parts of Nicollet Av. as commercial corridors. The taxes go 
away and the city disinvests in street cleaning, plowing, etc., etc. 
too. Then the economic engine falls apart.

 (3) The Northbound entrance to the freeways at Franklin and Fifth is 
 too crazy for words--going North on 35 or trying to get onto 94 two 
 blocks North of the entrance. MnDOT wants to correct that flaw, as do 
 we who use that entrance.

(4) As well as some bad engineering, poor design, and cheap materials 
that stretch of freeway also suffers from neglect by MnDOT, its owner. 
The sound baffles and bridge architecture must have been done by the guy 
who graduated at the bottom of his class or the guy who had no sense of 
style whatsoever.

It is controversial in that, like everything else, it takes a lot more 
money to correct mistakes than it does to do it right from the first and 
maintain it religiously. Of course, when talking freeways, you're 
already talking big bucks just to think about how to correct your mistakes.

Add to that that both MnDOT and Metro Transit want a bus station on the 
freeway bridge with elevators up to it from Lake St. Wells Fargo, Abbott 
Hospital, St. Mary's and some others would like, though are not 
determined to have, a flyover to 28th. St. for employees, suppliers, and 
customers. Also, we who live next to the freeway or around it, are 
really tired of looking at this shabby way we were treated and believe 
that the state should correct the mistakes, add the innovations, make it 
nice looking, and keep it that way until we run out of fossil fuels. 
Then we'll remodel to be filled with water and get boats if we haven't 
either blown ourselves up or poisoned ourselves extinct.

WizardMarks, Central


 ___
 Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
 Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
 http://e-democracy.org/mpls



___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] PANEL RECOMMENDS DOWNTOWN PARKING CHANGES

2002-07-29 Thread j c harmon

We shouldn't assume that because someone's not actively limping that they're 
not disabled. Heart disease, asthma, and arthritis to name a few, are 
disabilities for many, yet they may not look disabled to the ablebodied.
JHarmon
Cleveland



_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] PANEL RECOMMENDS DOWNTOWN PARKING CHANGES

2002-07-29 Thread Russell Sasaoka

Ok, I know I worded my response incorrectly, but you do have to admit there are people 
out there that do abuse the placards when they are not really handicapped.

The person that I did see abusing the placard had walked 2 blocks away from where that 
person worked and was using the placard just to get a convenient parking space.  I can 
understand if the need was real and you parked in front of the business or close to 
where you needed to go.  

As I should have mentioned in my last response, granted there are those that do have a 
true valid need for the placard, there are those who don't, that do abuse the right.  
It basically give those that do need to use it a bad name and spoils it for the rest, 
like anything else.




Russell Sasaoka
Coon Rapids 
(Formerly of Loring Park)
Working in Minneapolis 
Get your free Web-based E-mail at http://www.startribune.com/stribmail
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



RE: [Mpls] PANEL RECOMMENDS DOWNTOWN PARKING CHANGES

2002-07-29 Thread John Rocker

For the purpose of discussing parking regulations, I think we should
assume all those that have special parking privileges deserve it. 

Russell Sasaoka wrote, Responding to reports that up to half of
downtown meters are occupied by nonpaying vehicles driven by people with
disabilities, an advisory committee has recommended major changes in the
city's parking policies.

Does anyone know what the recommended changes are?


John Rocker
Calhoun


___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] changes to contractor ordinances

2002-07-29 Thread Casey, Julie A

The following is an overview of the contractor licenses in MPLS.


Residential Specialty Contractor.  These are residential building
contractors that are exempt from the State Contractor laws.  MPLS is still
requiring that all contractors working on homes with 1 to 4 units obtain
licenses.  To get this license, you must provide the city with a $10,000 per
year bond and liability insurance to $300,000.  This license allows
homeowners with workmanship and code problems to obtain satisfaction without
going to court.  

Commercial Cement and Masonry licenses are eliminated.

Building Wrecker.  Remain licenses as they were in the pass.

Heating, Ventiliation and AIr Conditioning and Steam and Hot Water
Installers remain licensed in MPLS.  New bonding levels of $10,000 and
liability insurance were added to these licenses.  

Plumbers and Gas Fitters remain lciensed in MPLS.  

Plasterer/Stucco commerical licenses are eliminated.  


Most licenses were not eliminated the structure of getting licensed was.  It
should be much easier to get a license.  

SIncerely,


Julie A. Casey, License Inspector
duties include contractor licenses and complaints.  
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] PANEL RECOMMENDS DOWNTOWN PARKING CHANGES

2002-07-29 Thread Andy Driscoll

I thank the posters for pointing out that COPD (Chronic Obstructive
Pulmonary Disease - emphysema, asthma, combinations of several) is
frequently not visible until we, yes, we, are forced to use oxygen tubes. We
are of the smokers' era, now paying for our addiction and a life of inhaling
tobacco smoke even before starting our own cigarette-smoking.

I'm among the fortunate who doesn't need an oxygen tank tethered to my nose,
but the day will come, and for the moment, long walks and stairs can be
killers. Especially in winter, when the air shuts down lungs like a slamming
door. We don't have wheelchairs. We don't use crutches. We don't even limp.

But we are disabled as any person who does. Thus the hanging sign in our
windows. I try not to use my sign when I clearly don't need to, but that
isn't the case for many disabled parkers.

Andy Driscoll
Saint Paul
--
Action may not always bring happiness, but there is no happiness without
action. - Benjamin Disraeli


 From: j c harmon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 11:58:38 -0500
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Mpls] PANEL RECOMMENDS DOWNTOWN PARKING CHANGES
 
 We shouldn't assume that because someone's not actively limping that they're
 not disabled. Heart disease, asthma, and arthritis to name a few, are
 disabilities for many, yet they may not look disabled to the ablebodied.
 JHarmon
 Cleveland
 
 
 
 _
 Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
 
 ___
 Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
 Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
 http://e-democracy.org/mpls
 

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] PANEL RECOMMENDS DOWNTOWN PARKING CHANGES

2002-07-29 Thread David Brauer

John Rockers asks, of the meter recommendations for those with disabilities:

 Does anyone know what the recommended changes are?
 
 
 John Rocker
 Calhoun

Please see: 
http://www.skywaynews.net/archives/index.inn?loc=detaildoc=/2002/July/19-31
53-news04.txt

If the link breaks, go to http://www.skywaynews.net, hit the archive link
and search for meters. It should be the first story that comes up.

David Brauer
King Field
Editor, Skyway News

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] parking placard

2002-07-29 Thread Annie Young

I have a disability placard.  Some days my knees hurt - some days they 
don't and I use my cane. but my actual placard is given for my asthma which 
I don't believe you would know I have unless you heard me wheezing somewhere.
Annie Young
citywide Park Commissioner



At 10:40 AM 7/29/02 -0500, Anderson, Bruce wrote:
Not all disabilities are readily apparent.  I have a friend who's father had
a disability placard but did not show signs of a disability.  He had a heart
condition and could walk well, but not very far.

Bruce Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blaine

Russell Sasoka says...
I've seen some people that show no disabilities at all get in or out of cars
with those placards showing, start their cars, remove the placards and then
proceed to drive away.
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls


___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Community Gardens

2002-07-29 Thread Annie Young

I also support new actions for the Park Board to help with Community 
Gardens.  I have served On CUE (Committee on Urban Environment) and on the 
NRP-ETC Committee of Phillips which has spent years on the community 
gardens topics.  The issue that raises it's ugly head no matter who you 
talk to is LIABILITY.
If people can figure that issue out we might be able to resolve this 
dilemma because I agree - everyone should have a garden if they so choose 
and we have lots of parkland that people assume we will take care of anyway 
so why not have a Green Spaces policy that covers a variety of settings.
This has been one of those 25 years in the making government policies - so 
wouldn't you say, it's about damned time? (kind of like bottle deposits 
on pop bottles)
Annie Young
citywide Park Commissioner

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



RE: [Mpls] Community Gardens

2002-07-29 Thread Michael Hohmann

Currently, if someone hurts themselves while walking, running, biking, skate
boarding, etc., or playing ball or soccer, hockey, etc. on MPRB lands, what
is the liability issue and insurance ramifications?  Don't kids/parents have
to sign liability waivers (for whatever they are worth- or not)?  How would
community gardens differ?

Michael Hohmann
Linden Hills

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Annie Young
 Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 2:57 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Mpls] Community Gardens


 I also support new actions for the Park Board to help with Community
 Gardens.  I have served On CUE (Committee on Urban Environment)
 and on the
 NRP-ETC Committee of Phillips which has spent years on the community
 gardens topics.  The issue that raises it's ugly head no matter who you
 talk to is LIABILITY.
 If people can figure that issue out we might be able to resolve this
 dilemma...
snip
 Annie Young
 citywide Park Commissioner
 snip

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Parking Meter Management Plan

2002-07-29 Thread John Rocker

Thanks to David Brauer and the city's web site, I've now read the
proposed Parking Meter Management Plan
(http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/council/2002-meetings/20020726/docs/16_
Parking_Meter_Mgmt_Plan.pdf).

I think continuing to let people with disabilities park for free but
enforcing the meter's actual time limit is the best solution to this
part of the parking problem (unless a person can demonstrate that there
are no other viable parking options in close proximity to work -- in
which case they could park all day). The plan currently proposes
allowing up to 4 hours of parking at a one- or two-hour meter, but that
seems almost as easy to get around as the current regulation. 

What seems to be missing altogether from the plan is any effort to
increase the number of on-street spaces in downtown's core.
Councilmember Lisa Goodman once posted to Mpls Issues that the city has
tried to identify new parking spaces and I have no reason to doubt her,
but I wonder if the city shouldn't take a fresh look at it and make
adding spaces a priority as part of this meter management plan.

I'm always struck by the high percentage of downtown curb space where
you CAN'T park. Loading zones (approved by the council and paid for by
property owners or businesses) eat up at least 1/2-block of curb space
on most blocks of the Avenues and there are virtually no meters on 4th
through 10th Streets between Hennepin and 5th Avenue (in part because
of all the garage entrances).

As part of the city's cost/benefit analysis of this plan, I'd like to
see:
1. if it makes sense to eliminate some loading zones and replace them
with metered parking; and
2. if there are streets currently with little or no parking (6th, 8th,
10th) where non-rush hour parking could be added along both sides of the
street.

There are obvious trade-offs to these suggestions, but I think more
on-street parking makes for a more livable downtown (added convenience
for visitors, buffer for pedestrians, etc.) and that is more important
than moving traffic as quickly as possible or encountering the
occasional double-parked delivery truck.

Just a thought.

John Rocker
Calhoun



___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



RE: [Mpls] Parking Meter Management Plan

2002-07-29 Thread Russell Sasaoka

I would agree to this idea, however with all the construction going on in the downtown 
area, adding more spaces is not really a viable suggestion, nor are the conditions of 
the roads.

If there were available street space, then I can see this idea working, another 
suggestion would be to open up parking in the parking lots and allow the handicap park 
for free, but it would have to be agreed upon by the lot management and building 
owners.

Wasn't there something in the new handicap access laws about this, I could be way off 
the mark to begin with...

 Begin Included Message 

Thanks to David Brauer and the city's web site, I've now read the
proposed Parking Meter Management Plan
(http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/council/2002-meetings/20020726/docs/16_
Parking_Meter_Mgmt_Plan.pdf).

I think continuing to let people with disabilities park for free but
enforcing the meter's actual time limit is the best solution to this
part of the parking problem (unless a person can demonstrate that there
are no other viable parking options in close proximity to work -- in
which case they could park all day). The plan currently proposes
allowing up to 4 hours of parking at a one- or two-hour meter, but that
seems almost as easy to get around as the current regulation. 

What seems to be missing altogether from the plan is any effort to
increase the number of on-street spaces in downtown's core.
Councilmember Lisa Goodman once posted to Mpls Issues that the city has
tried to identify new parking spaces and I have no reason to doubt her,
but I wonder if the city shouldn't take a fresh look at it and make
adding spaces a priority as part of this meter management plan.

I'm always struck by the high percentage of downtown curb space where
you CAN'T park. Loading zones (approved by the council and paid for by
property owners or businesses) eat up at least 1/2-block of curb space
on most blocks of the Avenues and there are virtually no meters on 4th
through 10th Streets between Hennepin and 5th Avenue (in part because
of all the garage entrances).

As part of the city's cost/benefit analysis of this plan, I'd like to
see:
1. if it makes sense to eliminate some loading zones and replace them
with metered parking; and
2. if there are streets currently with little or no parking (6th, 8th,
10th) where non-rush hour parking could be added along both sides of the
street.

There are obvious trade-offs to these suggestions, but I think more
on-street parking makes for a more livable downtown (added convenience
for visitors, buffer for pedestrians, etc.) and that is more important
than moving traffic as quickly as possible or encountering the
occasional double-parked delivery truck.

Just a thought.

John Rocker
Calhoun



___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls


 End Included Message 




Russell Sasaoka
Coon Rapids 
(Formerly of Loring Park)
Working in Minneapolis 
Get your free Web-based E-mail at http://www.startribune.com/stribmail
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Re: PANEL RECOMMENDS DOWNTOWN PARKING CHANGES

2002-07-29 Thread Tim Bonham


I think continuing to let people with disabilities park for free . . .
 I'm not trying to attack people with disabled parking permits (my 
mother had one after her knee replacement surgery, and needed it), but just 
WHY do they need to park for free?  (Or, to be more accurate, why should 
their parking be subsidized by the rest of us taxpayers?)
 I expect someone will say that they should be subsidized because 
of the economic hardship they face because of their disability.
 But in this downtown area, we have all kinds of welfare clients 
going to see their case workers, we have people without jobs going to the 
unemployment office, etc.  Remember that we are talking about people with 
disabled stickers using the meters to park all day long while they are at 
their jobs.  Shouldn't unemployed people, without any job at all, get free 
parking too?
 Or maybe everybody should pay for their parking, equally.  Provide 
economic assistance to disabled parkers some other way (deduction on state 
income tax, maybe), if we feel that is needed.

Tim Bonham, Ward 12, Standish-Ericsson




___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Panel recommends downtown parking changes

2002-07-29 Thread Victoria Heller

Everyone's disabled in one way or another - and don't forget that the
boomers are getting older and older.

The social security administration includes drug addicts and alcoholics.
What about the overweight?

So let's just charge the tourists for parking!

Then there won't be enough money to pay the parking ramp debts, so the
operators will default on the bonds, and we can all pay another $1,000 per
year in property taxes.

Great idea!


Vicky Heller
North Oaks
Mpls property owner and taxpayer

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] CM Biernat and Council ethics

2002-07-29 Thread Svattheriver

The city council has the authority to remove an unethical colleague with 
cause. ( The processes is in the city charter, Chapter 4, section 4).
There is a notice of charges, a chance to respond, notification, and a trial 
mechanism with the power to compel the attendance of witnesses.
I can understand that it would be easier to wait for Biernat to resign or the 
legal case to be more resolved. I also think that newspaper reports by 
themselves are not sufficient cause for removal.

It seems to me that the council does have a responsibility and reasonable 
cause to ask him directly about his conduct in matters related to the current 
legal charges.
Is the council being prudent by not mucking up the legal case? Are they 
concerned about the cost? Are they concerned that they would be sued?
I guess my question to other list members:
Should the council be using the designated city charter provisions for 
removal of elected officers? Why? or Why not? 
And is there any more information on how the alleged confession got 
accidentally released?

Thanks, Scott Vreeland, Seward
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Habitat for Humanity vs. Park Board spending

2002-07-29 Thread Richard K. Anderson

After riding my bicycle 540 miles and raising $3100 for Habitat for Humanity
a week ago I was thinking about how much money the Park Board wants to spend
to build its' own house. The MPRB plans to spend about $4 Million to give
itself a new home on the riverfront. For $46,500 Habitat for Humanity can
build a home for a family!
$4 Million would build how many homes?
A plan to spend $1.2 Million to renovate the shelter building in Loring
Park would build how many homes?
Give me a break! The MPRB has lived on it's own fat for too many years. I
love the park system and Citizens for a Loring Park Community (CLPC) gave
the MPRB $1.3 Million in NRP funds to fix up Loring Park but enough is
enough. We need to get real where our priorities are and housing is way more
important than spending money on a shelter building that has little use for
the Loring neighborhood.
Richard Anderson
Loring park

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls