[Mpls] Boulevard development loses committee vote

2002-09-20 Thread List Manager

The southwest Minneapolis project has been seen as a way to increase
affordable housing in a less-affordable part of the city, but a city
council committee decided a subsidy was too rich on a 3-2 vote. The
developer said the subsidy - $542,000 for 15 subsidized units - was in
the middle range of city proposals.

Robert Lilligren and Dean Zimmermann voted yes; Paul Ostrow, Lisa
Goodman, Scott Benson voted no.

http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/3243590.html

David Brauer
List manager

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] Primary election roundup: Gray loses in State Auditor primary

2002-09-20 Thread Susan Maricle

--- Shawn Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] provided this link:
 Primary election roundup: Gray 
 loses in State Auditor primary

http://www.skywaynews.net/display/inn_news/news03.txt
 
sm:
I plan on writing in Gregory Gray's name on the ballot
come November. Anyone else? 

Susan Maricle
Bruno, MN
formerly of Folwell

__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC  Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Nicollet/Lake Task Force meeting last night

2002-09-20 Thread BOlson9572

I attended the meeting with, Tom Johnson, Jon Wertjes and others...here's the 
thing...we still, I believe have a option that is never mentioned by 
anyone...NO CHANGE.. after listening to the same stuff last night I have 
heard for years..The only part of the plan I agree with is the housing 
developement/grocery store(CUB) and of course opening Nicollet Avenue. 
However, I'd really like to know who's doing what and to whom and how much is 
it going to cost our neighborhood with no cost to the suberbs.
I vote NO CHANGE.
Becky Olson
Whittier
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] Boulevard development loses committee vote

2002-09-20 Thread Craig Miller

List;

Thanks to Listmember S. Brandt for writing the story. Thanks to David to
linking the strib story. The housing development in question was to receive
542K for 15 units.

Equals $36,130 per unit subsidy.  Not the cost, but grab bag money.

The project is being subsidized in other fashions.

Housing tax credits are as good as cash if not better. Sometimes they get
you investors with limited knowledge of real estate, thus minimum
interference for the managing entity.

Deferred loans are great also.  It allows you to pile up net revenue with
out paying debt. Picture not having to pay your house loan for a couple of
years. You could do something stupid and spend the cash, or you can stick it
in the bank at a fixed rate for the pre-determined time. You make serious
interest money on the taxpayers dime.

'other assistance from the MCDA'.   I wonder what that amounts to.

$36,130 plus X is what the subsidy amounts to.  Is there county,MHFA (State)
or other agencies involved.  Not a bad deal when you start adding it all up.

3 cheers for the three who said no. One hiss for the private sector landlord
who said yes.
I also hope that the private sector developer who pursued this passes the
word to the rest of their sistren and brethren. Mpls isn't such a cheap/easy
date anymore.

Craig Miller
Man with a conscious who could never start a non-profit.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Former Fultonite



- Original Message -
From: List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mpls list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:42 AM
Subject: [Mpls] Boulevard development loses committee vote


 The southwest Minneapolis project has been seen as a way to increase
 affordable housing in a less-affordable part of the city, but a city
 council committee decided a subsidy was too rich on a 3-2 vote. The
 developer said the subsidy - $542,000 for 15 subsidized units - was in
 the middle range of city proposals.

 Robert Lilligren and Dean Zimmermann voted yes; Paul Ostrow, Lisa
 Goodman, Scott Benson voted no.

 http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/3243590.html

 David Brauer
 List manager

 ___
 Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
 Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
 http://e-democracy.org/mpls


___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



RE: [Mpls] Boulevard development loses committee vote

2002-09-20 Thread mel



-Original Message-
From:   Craig Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, September 20, 2002 7:17 AM
To: Mpls list
Subject:Re: [Mpls] Boulevard development loses committee vote


Craig Miller is correct.
Mpls needs to stop giving money away for 
development, the marketplace works best if left alone.

Subsidizing developers causes everyones rent and taxes to increase.
This in turn makes more apartments and homes unaffordable.  

The cost to the taxpayer for an debt of $36,130 at 7% payable over
25 years is $255.36 per month. Another example why rents are high in Mpls. 

Mel Gregerson
South Mpls
For Profit Affordable Housing Provider and unpaid tax collector.


List;

Thanks to Listmember S. Brandt for writing the story. Thanks to David to
linking the strib story. The housing development in question was to receive
542K for 15 units.

Equals $36,130 per unit subsidy.  Not the cost, but grab bag money.

The project is being subsidized in other fashions.

Housing tax credits are as good as cash if not better. Sometimes they get
you investors with limited knowledge of real estate, thus minimum
interference for the managing entity.

Deferred loans are great also.  It allows you to pile up net revenue with
out paying debt. Picture not having to pay your house loan for a couple of
years. You could do something stupid and spend the cash, or you can stick it
in the bank at a fixed rate for the pre-determined time. You make serious
interest money on the taxpayers dime.

'other assistance from the MCDA'.   I wonder what that amounts to.

$36,130 plus X is what the subsidy amounts to.  Is there county,MHFA (State)
or other agencies involved.  Not a bad deal when you start adding it all up.

3 cheers for the three who said no. One hiss for the private sector landlord
who said yes.
I also hope that the private sector developer who pursued this passes the
word to the rest of their sistren and brethren. Mpls isn't such a cheap/easy
date anymore.

Craig Miller
Man with a conscious who could never start a non-profit.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Former Fultonite



- Original Message -
From: List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mpls list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:42 AM
Subject: [Mpls] Boulevard development loses committee vote


 The southwest Minneapolis project has been seen as a way to increase
 affordable housing in a less-affordable part of the city, but a city
 council committee decided a subsidy was too rich on a 3-2 vote. The
 developer said the subsidy - $542,000 for 15 subsidized units - was in
 the middle range of city proposals.

 Robert Lilligren and Dean Zimmermann voted yes; Paul Ostrow, Lisa
 Goodman, Scott Benson voted no.

 http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/3243590.html

 David Brauer
 List manager

 ___
 Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
 Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
 http://e-democracy.org/mpls


___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] Boulevard development loses committee vote

2002-09-20 Thread KarenCollier
The whole problem from the very beginning with this project is that the developer did not have funds to invest. Although the project was admirable, a developer cannot expect to only have public subsidy just for the sake of affordable housing. I had hoped that the developer would have been able to find the necessary funds for their portion of the investment, but obviously that did not happen. I guess it's a good lesson for people to learn.

Karen Collier
Linden Hills


Re: [Mpls] Nicollet/Lake Task Force meeting last night - a new sales job

2002-09-20 Thread Barbara Lickness
I too attended the meeting last night Becky. I left because I heard the same information Tuesday night at the Whittier Alliance Transportation and Land Use Committee. I went to hear what Sherman Associates was reporting.
I believed the Whittier Alliance had taken votes on this issue and that these presentations were repetitive. I was very confused as to why the Transportation and Land Use Committee was entertaining this issue again when the vote had already been taken two months ago. However, what I discovered is that the Transportation and Land Use Committee took votes on two motions regarding this area. The committee is in full support of re-opening Nicollet Avenue and in turning 1st Av. into a two way between 28th and the mall. A second motion opposes the off-ramps at Lake and 35W and the widening of Lake Street. The motion did go on to the Whittier Alliance Board, however, they decided to postpone the vote for one month. The following month the board again took no action. There was no motion to table according to the minutes.They simply stated the boarddecided not to vote on it. Notsure what's up with that.  
It appears to me that the Phillips Partnership, MnDot,the county and the city public works department are working very hard to tie the re-opening of Nicollet and other traffic management issues directly to the off-ramps at 35W and the widening of Lake Street.In fact, it is now being sold as onebig package. And you are right, not once in their presentations did they inform anyone that one of the options is to say NO! In fact, the presentation last night gave the inference that this was a done deal and they are moving ahead with the current project. The time-line included beginning construction dates etc. However, there was no date for when this group might go back to the legislature to talk about getting the project funded. The last time I checked, the price tag was about $150 million. 
In listening to Loren Bruggeman from Sherman and Associates, it appears that they are now on board with the widening of Lake Street. They reported at the meeting that there had been some land swap. The Nicollet Lake development project was given additional land on the North end of the project in exchange for the 20 feet they would be losing on the Lake Street side.
Becky, since you are one of the officers of the Whittier Alliance Board, perhaps you can share with us why the Whittier Alliance has not taken any action on the Trans.  Land Use Committee motion at the board level for two consecutive board meetings? 
Not that what the Whittier Alliance decides really matters. The neighborhood has been ignored before. What else is new? This has opened all kinds of new questions for me now. If the off-ramp project and the bigger, badder Lake street has been tied with an ambilical cord to the re-opening of Nicollet at Lake and the traffic calming measures on 1st Av., will those two projects be scrapped if the ramps and street widening don't happen? Perhaps one of our councilmembers can provide us with some information on this. 
I do not believe these projects should be tied to one another. I do believe they can be done independly of one another.I just wonder if the politics has now put them together in an effort to strengthen the off-ramp and lane widening projects. Anyone out there who knows what's going on?
Opposing the off-ramp and street widening project is starting to feel like a David and Goliaththing. 
Barb Lickness/Whittier 



"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world.  Indeed,it's the only thing that ever has." -- Margaret MeadDo you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!

[Mpls] Running for country commissioner

2002-09-20 Thread WizardMarks

Since Ed Felien got worried that I had developed ESP and could see 
what's in his mind, I'll explain my reasoning for the comment that 
Felien has got to know.
If running for county commissioner these are things to take into 
consideration:
Biggest block of voters are senior citizens.
*McLaughlin, as incumbent, can point to a list of things he's done that 
brought home the bacon--the Greenway, Hennepin Works on Lake St. (which 
makes life more doable for constituents who need county services), LRT 
funding, etc. etc.
*Felien calls himself radical, which is not something the voters are 
necessarily all that thrilled about as I read them, whereas McLaughlin 
portrays himself as left of center but not that far left. I don't 
believe radical plays that well with the bulk of voters.
*When Felien was on the Mpls. City Council he made a right botch of 
things and wound up in court with criminal charges along with Zollie 
Green. Seniors remember that as do some of the rest of us. For me, it's 
not a positive memory.
*Even in the hotbed of South Minneapolis, the Greens have not, as yet, 
pulled that many voters.
*Felien has run for office as a DFLer and lost at the convention level a 
few times. (He ran against Herron the first time Herron ran. He ran 
against Sayles Belton even earlier than that.) He begins to take on the 
aura of perpetual candidate like Dick Franzen.
And finally, (sorry Ed), McLaughlin is handsome.

If one is running for office, those are things to take into 
consideration. I can't believe Felien is so out in the ozone that he 
never thought about this stuff.

WizardMarks, Central

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] RE: Mpls digest, Vol 1 #1039 - 19 msgs

2002-09-20 Thread Ray Marshall


From: Shawn Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:51:17 -0500
Subject: [Mpls] Lori Sturdevant: Gray's defeat is a discouraging note for
DFL


Nevertheless, it is with trepidation
that one looks back at the drubbing of
DFL endorsee Gregory Gray by Carol Johnson
for the DFL state auditor nomination in
last week's primary. That is because
most plausible explanations of that
outcome reflect unfavorably on the
Minnesota electorate.
Shawn Lewis, Field Neighborhood


I wonder what is meant by plausible explanations here?  Are the voters
accused of being racist?
One such plausible explanation is the last name Johnson.  You might ask
Congressman Martin OLAV Sabo about this one.  I heard that he ran once
without the Olav name and almost lost.  He believed it was because the
voters thought he was not only un-Scandinavian, but also that he probably
was Slavic or some other such minority.
Ray Marshall, Minnehaha




___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] RE: Mpls digest, Vol 1 #1039 - 19 msgs

2002-09-20 Thread Michael Atherton

Ray Marshall wrote:

 I wonder what is meant by plausible explanations here?  Are the voters
 accused of being racist?
 One such plausible explanation is the last name Johnson.  You might ask
 Congressman Martin OLAV Sabo about this one.  I heard that he ran once
 without the Olav name and almost lost.  He believed it was because the
 voters thought he was not only un-Scandinavian, but also that he probably
 was Slavic or some other such minority.

Your plausible explanation is an example of a racist one...right?

Michael Atherton
Prospect Park

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] response to Wizard Marks

2002-09-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Wizard: you deliberately and with malice defame my character.  I never
wound up in court with criminal charges along with Zollie Green.  That is
a deliberate lie.  It fits the legal definition of slander.  I do not wish
to pursue charges against you.  However, I demand that you apologize to me
and to my supporters for the poison you have spread.
Ed Felien, Powderhorn


___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Crash at 36th and Grand

2002-09-20 Thread ken avidor

Chicken Little didn't have photographic evidence that the sky was
falling.

My photos  prove that there is a serious and persistent threat to life
on the streets and sidewalks of Minneapolis.

If there was a rabid dog running down the street the police would shoot
it. If a man was wielding a machete on the streetwell we know what
happened to him...but speeding cars and red light runners are allowed to
crash, kill , maim and terrorize us.

The first step is for the  City Government take responsibility for the
safety of our most vulnerable of bicyclists and walkerschildren.
Stop making excuses- if Hennepin County won't allow traffic calming,
take the streets back form the county. If the County won't let us take
them back, let's secede from the County.

Unsafe streets affect neighborhoods in many ways...this from
www.livingstreets.org.uk:

  In many places, streets have become dirty, dangerous, full of litter
and graffiti and dominated by speeding traffic.  As a result, walking is
in decline; children can’t play outside or walk to school; neighbours no
longer talk to each other; older people don’t go out after dark and
people are reluctant to spend time outside due to fear of crime.

Young couples move into my neighborhood, have kids and move to a cul de
sac in the 'burbs when their kids begin to walk. Guess why!

We could pump a billion dollars of NRP money into a community , but if
parents are too afraid to let their kids out of the house, it's a waste
of money.

If we spend $150 million into a highway project that widens streets and
dumps more dangerous cars into the neighborhoods, we expect more people
to use Minneapolis as a temporary stop.

Instead of accepting this urban sacrifice zone where the billboards
say We Buy Ugly Homes (do they have those billboards in Wayzata?)
let's have a little self respect and demand from our well paid city
officials, at the very least - safe streets for our kids.


Ken Avidor
36th and Grand


___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] RE: Mpls digest, Vol 1 #1039 - 19 msgs

2002-09-20 Thread David Wilson

How can this be a racist explanation?  I've heard Ray Marshall's Sabo
story from several people who are trustworthy.  This is one of the axioms
of Minnesota(and Minneapolis) politics:  use a Scandanavian name if you
have one.  If not, find some shirt-tailed relative and incorporate it.

Current example:  Awata Johnson

David Wilson
Loring Park



On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Michael Atherton wrote:

 Ray Marshall wrote:

  I wonder what is meant by plausible explanations here?  Are the voters
  accused of being racist?
  One such plausible explanation is the last name Johnson.  You might ask
  Congressman Martin OLAV Sabo about this one.  I heard that he ran once
  without the Olav name and almost lost.  He believed it was because the
  voters thought he was not only un-Scandinavian, but also that he probably
  was Slavic or some other such minority.

 Your plausible explanation is an example of a racist one...right?

 Michael Atherton
 Prospect Park

 ___
 Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
 Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
 http://e-democracy.org/mpls


___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] RE: Mpls digest, Vol 1 #1039 - 19 msgs

2002-09-20 Thread Michael Atherton

David Wilson wrote:

 How can this be a racist explanation?  I've heard Ray Marshall's Sabo
 story from several people who are trustworthy.  This is one of the axioms
 of Minnesota(and Minneapolis) politics:  use a Scandanavian name if you
 have one.  If not, find some shirt-tailed relative and incorporate it.

Given that racial categories are fuzzy at best, it might be possible
to define a racial category of Scandinavian; Scandinavians do, supposedly have
distinct physical characteristics from people say in Asia or Italy for that matter.
Choosing to vote for someone because their ancestors come from a distinct
geographical area would be a racist act from my perspective.

Michael Atherton
Prospect Park

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Decorum

2002-09-20 Thread List Manager

Members, we've had a resurgence of personal attacks and demands for
satisfaction lately...

To help me maintain a constructive list, please don't respond to a personal
attack - email me and I'll warn or expel the poster. Responding in kind just
keeps this stuff going and alienates more members and hurts the list.

Again, if you have something to say or demand of a specific member - email
them DIRECTLY, not the whole list!

I do take action - I've expelled 2 members recently. So those of you who
still don't get it, might get it in a different way.

A toxic list is not a list that will last long.

Stick to the issues and we'll deal with the attacks off list.

David Brauer
List manager


___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] Posting

2002-09-20 Thread Jordan Kushner



While I appreciate Peter McLaughlin's information 
about his work, he fails to respond to the criticisms raised by his 
opponent. The willingness to respond to legitimate questions iswhat 
makes the difference between issuing PR statements and showing true 
accountability to voters.In the hope of starting a genuine dialogue, 
Ipose the following questions for commissioner McLaughlin:

1) Why have you appeared to consistently support 
public funding for a private sports stadium?

2) What was your role in the decision to have 
Highway 55 fly over Lake Streetwhile causing a much larger delay in 
the traffic lights at that intersection? 

3) Why did you sign your names as one of the 
co-authors of an op-ed piece in the Star Tribune on March 27, 2001, in which you 
appeared to denounce the Minnesota Attorney General's investigation of Allina 
Health System's unethical practices?

4) How do you justify your consistent 
pastsupport for the Highway 55 reroute near the Mississippi river which 
was destructive to the environment, the community, Native American culture, and 
has actually led to more rather than less traffic?

5) How do you compare or distinguish your political 
agenda from your allies in the city of Mineapolis' DFL leadership whowere 
defeated in last year's elections?

Thank you in advance for taking the time to 
respond.

Jordan Kushner
Powderhorn



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 4:23 
  PM
  Subject: [Mpls] Posting
  David, Please post. I have often commented on how 
  difficult it is to catch the attention of the voters when you are runningfor 
  County Commissioner. My hat is off to the issues list and those of you who 
  participate in it for paying attention and providing the opportunity to 
  present information. Thank you to those of you who have written words of 
  support. Please excuse the length of this posting, but I have been 
  busy, have gotten a lot done and have a lot more that I want to accomplish. 
  During the time I have been privileged to serve on theHennepin County 
  Board of Commissioners, we have accomplished remarkable things. In 1992, 
  no one gave Light Rail Transit much of a chance, and yet, at the end of 
  2001, the HiawathaLine was more than 30% completed! During the past few years, 
  I have helped bring, for the first time,significant Hennepin County resources 
  to the fight for affordable housing. In 2002 alone, the Hennepin 
  County Affordable Housing Incentive Fund will provide $4 million 
  for projects throughout the county,adding to the hundreds of units we have 
  already helped create in the last two years. And the Midtown Greenway 
  has gone from an abandoned trench to a multi-use trail that will soon be 
  built to Hiawatha Avenue, and in the years to come, all the way across the 
  Mississippi River. As hard as we have worked and as much as we 
  haveaccomplished, there are challenges that remain. I am excited about 
  the work ahead and the opportunities that wehave to make Hennepin an even 
  better county in which to live and work. AFFORDABLE HOUSING: 
  During the past three years, Hennepin County has dedicated millions of 
  dollars to developing affordable housing. But the County alone cannot 
  spend enough to solve the problem,and we must be creative in our efforts. I am 
  working with local and state veterans and housing organizations to secure 
  State bonding money for the Fort Snelling Veterans Housing Project –218 
  units of efficiency housing. We have used County bonding to turn over 1000 new 
  market rate units into critically needed affordable units. I also 
  authored a resolution providing funding to support development of a land 
  trust for affordable housing in Minneapolis. And County Sentence 
  toService crews (men and women) are rehabilitating boarded properties and 
  getting them back into productive use. These are the kinds of creative, 
  effective projects I will continue to fight for on the County Board. 
  ENVIRONMENT: The picture on global warming is clear 
  and frightening. I am doing all I can to make Hennepin Countya partner 
  in reducing dangerous emissions and an innovator in new and greener forms of 
  energy. With my leadership,Hennepin County’s capital plan calls for 
  investing in a large gas turbine atHennepin County Medical Center and in 
  gas turbines and experimentalfuel cells at the County 
  Home School, making us less dependent oncoal- and nuclear-fueled electricity. 
  Hennepin County has also distributed thousand of below-cost compostbins 
  to reduce solid waste volumes. And, perhaps most new and old all at once, I am 
  working on the development of a Community Energy Coop in the Phillips 
  Neighborhood. If successful, this would be the first urbanelectric coop 
  in Minnesota and the first new coop statewide since the late1930’s. The 
  coop would organize consumers to more effectively 

[Mpls] County Commissioner Race

2002-09-20 Thread Erik Riese

Greetings!

I just have to weigh in on this race because the discussion has taken
such a nasty turn. It seems Wizard Marks has some negative feelings for
Eddie Felien. This should not dominate our discussion of this important
race. Hennepin County Commissioners are arguably the most powerful and
least recognized elected leaders in the State. This small group of seven
oversees a budget that is second only to the State's in size and scoop.
To paraphrase Steve Marchese, we need less heat and more light on this race.

Running in the race for the 4th district seat (which covers all of the
new 2nd, 9th and 12th wards; most of the 8th; half of  11 and parts of
ward 1, 3 6 and 7.) are two of the most honorable men I have ever met. 

Peter is a clear speaking, friendly, hard working leader. He has
excellent staff and many great ideas to serve his constituents in the
county. 
Ed is blunt talking, articulate, thoughtful, hard working leader. He has
excellent staff and many great ideas to inform the residents of the
South side and the greater metro area. 

Jordan Kushner's recent post points up the difficulty of this debate.
While Peter has the DFL machine behind it, there are many in the
district who feel that their positions are not represented by
McLaughlin. Consequently, Ed felt compelled to run. Folks in my part of
Minneapolis (the granola eaters) worry that the voters living on the
banks of the Mississippi River, around the Lakes and along Minnehaha
Creek are getting better representation than the voters living along
Lake Street, Bloomington, Cedar, Franklin and Chicago Avenues. 

We want to hear a civilized debate of the issues. I want to hear Peter
respond to the issues Jordan raised. I know all about the work Peter has
done that he is proud of. The true test of politician is when they can
acurately and honestly describe what they did when it didn't really turn
out right. Let's hear what Ed and Peter will do on issues where there
are ligitimate dissagreements (as Eva pointed out) that transcend
right/left labels like the stadium and a county wide tax for it. 

Despite my long friendship and association with both these candidates I
am still undecided is this critical and usually undercovered race.

-- 
In cooperation,
Erik Riese

Seward:
a great place to live, work, learn, and play! 

(612) 724-3217 home
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Re: Boulevard development loses committee vote

2002-09-20 Thread Paul Lohman

With regard to the MCDA Operating
Committee’s decision yesterday to deny funding yesterday I have a couple
of thoughts. Those who have posted on this subject so far seem to
be of a mind stated by Mel Gregerson when he said “Mpls needs to stop
giving money away for development, the marketplace works best if left
alone.” 
I think that statement is a bit absurd. The fact of the matter is
that the “marketplace” is not being left alone, never has, and in a big
way and for good reason. It doesn't work the way the majority of
people would like to see it work. Hence government steps in in a
multitude of ways to effect the changes that we - the voters - decide are
needed. 
Affordable housing is one of those areas. Yes, government has
failed in some previous attempts to deal with this issue, but there has
never been any doubt in my mind that thoughtful and committed people are
struggling with this tough issue. We still have problems of
availability, affordability and concentration. And that’s where
government (all of us) needs to step in and find solutions.

OK, my two thoughts: First of all if Lyndale West Partners
(developers of the Boulevard) can still pull off this development in
spite of the fact that they have been denied TIF funding, then the
decision yesterday is to be applauded. Since they are a private,
for profit developer, I have no idea as to whether or not they can still
make this work. My hope is that they can
My second point is that if on the other hand the decision of the
Operating Committee yesterday (assuming that it is upheld by the full
board on September
27th)
is the last nail in the coffin for this project then I have great
concerns about whether or not affordable housing projects will ever be
possible in SW Minneapolis. 
The Boulevard Project has been held up as a model for how the city of
Minneapolis wants to deal with issues of increased density, affordable
housing and de-concentration of low-income housing. 
We have all heard the rhetoric: “We have a severe housing
crisis; Everyone has to do their part, Smart growth; Mixed income
housing throughout the city and the region; Build housing in
commercial corridors, Mixed used projects.” If this is all
just a bunch of blow from our elected officials then I wish they would
just stand up and say so. Tell us that the numbers will only work
in poorer neighborhoods and then we will all understand why low-income
housing is once again being concentrated in the city’s poorer
neighborhoods. 
That the subsidy for this project in Lynnhurst might be higher than in
other neighborhoods should be obvious. Both land costs and taxes
are higher in Lynnhurst than elsewhere. But based upon land costs
and tax rates, there should be a sliding scale for these subsidies
. What the MCDA Operating Committee needs to do is figure out what
is reasonable in that regard. Otherwise the present scenario simply
becomes an excuse and one more covert tool for keeping “those” people out
of certain neighborhoods. 
Paul Lohman
Lynnhurst

Paul Lohman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Mpls] Jim Graham, I'm crossing you off the Christmas list

2002-09-20 Thread JIM GRAHAM

Eddie whether you get paid per copy or per ad the higher your circulation
the larger the income generated by your publication. And I congratulate you
on it, and yes business does fit in such a narrow spectrum.

As to issues, I am glad I motivated you to put them on the List. And I
might add you do a very good job and make very compelling arguments.

As to the fringe, Eddie where did you get the idea that saying someone is on
the fringe is marginalizing that person? Have you ever thought that the word
Leadership implies being on the leading fringe of something. The great
mentally unwashed in the middle need reasons to vote for such leadership
though.
As to the system working for my community, yes the system works very hard
for my neighborhood.  It works very hard to screw it as much as possible,
and to keep it a fertile spot for running the great industry of poverty. The
poverty business is good in our neighborhood and any effort to disrupt the
County supported business is very much frowned on by the system.  Do you
realize the City could set up 60 or 70 small businesses with a million
dollars each with the subsidy of  the Target fiasco. If you gave each
$100,000 as start up funds it would create 600 to 700 new small businesses.
I do believe we would have gotten a lot more real livable wage jobs and
future tax benefits from such an option than what we are receiving from
Target.

As to garbage, as you might remember Ray Peterson, myself, and a whole lot
of other neighborhood people fought that fight before it became fashionable,
and long before the Green Institute. We did not win the fight, but we
certainly kept the County Hoard at bay until the rest of the people thought
it was cool enough to join.

Eddie, do you really believe I mind offending rich people and people in the
suburbs? I have no problem taking on the rich people, or the RICH
non-profits who victimize our City communities.  The rich non-profits seek
to pave us over, not with concrete, but with poverty. Rich non-profits let
nothing get in the way of their exploitation of poor people. Keeping people
in poverty is in the rich non-profit's interest, and the County assists them
as much as possible. They and their rich developer friends buy County and
City politicians as a regular course of doing business.

Though I respect your position on the stadium. Let's look at it from a
different perspective. How about having the people buy the Twins as a
publicly held corporation and then help that entity to build a stadium.  If
a little community like Green Bay can own one why not Minneapolis. I like
the idea of the little fan owning a part of the team. I could support a deal
to build a stadium for a whole lot of common people and not some millionaire
who threatens to move the team if the ransom isn't paid.

So Eddie, even though I might support Peter, I like what you are saying and
hope you keep saying it. If it doesn't bring Peter around maybe you will get
elected. Though Peter may be good looking, you have more experience being
old.  A lot of us, (Other than Wizard), really don't vote because someone is
cute, so don't let the cute factor bother you. Besides to some you may be
just as cute as Peter, and I think RT is definitely the winner of the cute
race, but he is Mayor so don't worry about him either.

Yes Eddie, I will agree to keep an open mind and I'll treat all your ideas
as worthy of
 consideration, without prejudice.  I'll judge them on their merits.
But I would not even think of voting for you unless you agree to at least
attempt to be on the leading fringe of issues.

Jim Graham,
Ventura Village - the fringe of Downtown Minneapolis


___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] Crash at 36th and Grand

2002-09-20 Thread Ghost

I agree with Ken about having better expectations for Mpls than 
accepting crime, dirty streets, and an inferiority complex for our 
housing and other amenities, but I have to disagree about traffic 
calming.

We have all sorts of traffic calming set up in Minneapolis now.  All 
it does is make commutes inconvenient  frustrating, and get drivers 
more riled up when they keep running into closed off or rerouted 
streets.  We are already the Land of 10,000 Stop Lights.  Some of the 
poster children for truly dumb traffic calming measures are the reroute 
onto Nicollet off Lake Street, the maze of changing one-ways off 
Franklin between Lyndale  Blaisdell, and the blocked off s-curve 
streets between Nicollet  Lyndale, in the mid-30s.  While I can't 
condone drivers gunning it out of frustration with traffic jams  
unexpected turnoffs  lights timed for a stop every block or two during 
rush hour, I also think the frustration is very understandable.

We live in the inner city.  That's a dense population, with many 
workplaces/entertainment venues that people commute to from outside the 
city as well.  That means that there will be traffic, and lots of it.  
The city's job is to make the heavy flow of traffic efficient while 
keeping streets safe through enforcement.  You do not put in speed 
bumps everywhere or close off a street every few blocks to prevent cars 
from zipping through at 45 mph on a 30 mph street - you make a point of 
enforcing the law so that people will think twice before driving like 
bozos.  Let's face it - in most areas of Mpls, drivers can flagrantly 
ignore the traffic laws and the cops will watch  do nothing.  (Unless 
the scofflaw is on a bicycle.)

We don't need Minneapolis to become the Land of 10,000 Cul-de-Sacs.  If 
people want an area where traffic is as laid back and sparse as in the 
suburbs, then I guess the suburbs are their best place to live.  My 
neighborhood has a lot of traffic, and it has a lot of kids who play 
outside.  I walk and I bike in my neighborhood, which is right at Lake 
Street and other main arteries, and I'm not afraid to do it.  So do 
lots of other people, with and without kids.  I'm really tired of the 
argument that to make the inner city a good place to live, we have to 
turn it into the suburbs for the kids.  Go to any borough in New 
York, or neighborhoods in Chicago or Boston or D.C. or many other large 
cities, and you'll see far less traffic calming than here, and plenty 
of children, elders, business people, bikers, etc. all sharing the 
streets.

Let's demand the important things - better policing, police 
accountability, quality city services in ALL neighborhoods, etc.  But 
let's remember that along with some down sides like heavier traffic, 
many of us choose to live in the city for all the good reasons the 
suburbs can never offer - like multicultural neighborhoods, exciting 
places to go, unique housing, and central location.

Roxana Orrell
Central


On Friday, September 20, 2002, at 11:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Message: 5
 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:01:45 -0500
 From: ken avidor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Organization: avidor studios
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Mpls] Crash at 36th and Grand


 The first step is for the  City Government take responsibility for the
 safety of our most vulnerable of bicyclists and walkerschildren.
 Stop making excuses- if Hennepin County won't allow traffic calming,
 take the streets back form the county. If the County won't let us take
 them back, let's secede from the County.

   In many places, streets have become dirty, dangerous, full of litter
 and graffiti and dominated by speeding traffic.  As a result, walking 
 is
 in decline; children canít play outside or walk to school; neighbours 
 no
 longer talk to each other; older people donít go out after dark and
 people are reluctant to spend time outside due to fear of crime.

 Young couples move into my neighborhood, have kids and move to a cul de
 sac in the 'burbs when their kids begin to walk. Guess why!

 We could pump a billion dollars of NRP money into a community , but if
 parents are too afraid to let their kids out of the house, it's a waste
 of money.

 If we spend $150 million into a highway project that widens streets and
 dumps more dangerous cars into the neighborhoods, we expect more people
 to use Minneapolis as a temporary stop.

 Instead of accepting this urban sacrifice zone where the billboards
 say We Buy Ugly Homes (do they have those billboards in Wayzata?)
 let's have a little self respect and demand from our well paid city
 officials, at the very least - safe streets for our kids.

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] City Council (Biernat and Boulevard threads)

2002-09-20 Thread phaedrus

Notes from the MCDA committee meeting are below, but
first, regarding due process.

Here is a theoretical scenario - I am NOT suggesting
that this is in any way representative of the current
situation, just explaining why I feel due process is
important:

. . . contrived scenario . . .
Someday, in the future, we have a City Council member
who is a thorn in the side of some group, so this
group decides to sink the CM politically. They decide
on a crime to accuse the CM of and find someone who is
willing to make an allegation - either for personal
reasons or for payment. They then get an agent who is
in their pocket to interview the CM. Several of our
intelligence agencies have done a great deal of
research into using manipulation, coercion, and drugs
to put someone in a suggestible or controllable state
and they use these techniques to secure a false
confession. If this is not viable, the agent simply
forges the confession and leaks it to the press.

From the public perspective, getting our information
primarily from the press, this would not be very
distinguishable from the current situation, and the
group will have won (whether or not the CM is
convicted, they're pretty much done politically unless
they can prove the conspiracy). Part of the reason we
have due process is that executive agents do not
always act ethically.
. . . end contrived scenario . . .

Now, again, I am NOT in any way suggesting that this
is the case with CM Biernat. Our judicial system is
not perfect, but the protections provided by due
process do need to be maintained (or improved). While
the scenario was contrived, I am pretty sure that each
specific aspect has been used at different times in
this country for various ends.

Now to look at the current situation. Because of my
concerns about due process, I am not in support of
asking the mayor to demand the resignation of CM
Biernat. However, I do feel that it is appropriate to
suggest to the CM that he should resign.

There has been a call for people from Biernat's ward
to speak out. Due to redistricting, I have recently
found myself to be in that ward (barely).

Here's a proposed letter:

- - -
Council Member Biernat,

While we, your constituents, will not know the truth
of your innocence or guilt until the proceedings are
done, you are obviously aware of what actually
happened.

IF you are guilty of the crimes you are accused of, we
will demand accountability and consequence. We will
also demand criminal and civil accounting for the fact
that you have lied to us about your actions.

IF you are guilty of the crimes you are accused of,
expect suit for the following:

* Repayment of all wages, with interest, you have
earned as a city council member from the time you were
indicted and did not step down.

* Damages from any businesses these actions adversely
affected

* Additional civil and punitive damages.

As a member of the community you represent, be aware
that if you are proven to be guilty, I will fully
support any suits against you for these reasons.

If you are not guilty of these crimes, I would still
ask that you voluntarily suspend yourself from the
City Council and cooperate fully with the
investigation and proceedings so that this situation
may be cleared up as quickly as possible.
- - -

Now, on to the MCDA committee meeting last night.

I had not heard of the Boulevard project until I
attended the committee meeting yesterday.

I had not intended to go on list with this, but based
on some of the discussion I have read, there are a few
details I think should be pointed out. A lot of what I
have to say is vague as I wasn't taking notes and
didn't realize that this issue was a big deal, so if
anyone can confirm or deny what I'm saying, that'd be
good.

I do not have the information or expertise to form an
opinion either way whether this project should get TIF
financing.

I believe that the decision in front of the committee
was not whether or not to approve TIF, but to approve
$5,000 to do certain tests (details anyone?) to see if
the property and development proposal was eligable for
TIF. I am not certain if it was the city, the agency,
or the developers who would be responsible to pay the
$5,000, but the agency would be required to do the
study.

So I don't think that Lilligren and Zimmerman were
voting to approve TIF, they were voting to approve
further steps to see if the development was eligable
for TIF.

I believe that it is also significant to note that
Zimmerman had made a motion (seconded by Lilligren) to
postpone the vote so that there would be enough time
to review all the materials presented. The other three
committee members voted not to postpone.

It seemed like the developer did not make a great case
for themselves. They provided two documents - one was
a three page summary which was lacking in detail while
the other was a tome of data that would take the
committee members a very long time to read. They did
not have ready answers for several specific 

RE: [Mpls] Re: Boulevard development loses committee vote

2002-09-20 Thread John Rocker

The MCDA Operating Committee was absolutely right to deny tax-increment
financing for the Boulevard project because the 15 affordable units are
already being subsidized with low income housing tax credits and other
funds. In essence, the developer is seeking TIF to subsidize the market
rate (apartments and retail) portion of the development and the city
can't afford to do that.  The project may offer good urban design and
three-bedroom units; those are excellent reasons to approve the site
plan - but not to finance the project.

More importantly, the Boulevard project is a small prototype for the
pending mixed-use development at Nicollet  Lake, where - in the name of
affordable housing and good urban design - the city will be asked to
provide a lot of TIF. The city needs to establish some clear guidelines
now regarding public subsidies. Mixed-use developments with affordable
housing can get built without TIF; the city just needs some new ground
rules. 

John Rocker
Calhoun




___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] joe has got to go

2002-09-20 Thread brian monroe
I ran against Joe last election. One thing I wanted to do was add a recall amendment to the City Charter. Currently there isn't. At this point I can't imagine Joe hanging on much longer. Some theorize he is holding on until the new districts would take effect. If he resigned today the old district would be used. They think he wants to pass the torch to another DFL insider and if he can hold on long enough to use the new ward she can run. Others say it's as simple as he likes the paycheck. Regardless of his motivation, the court has rejected his many motions, so whether through removal or resignation he will soon be gone.   Brian Monroe  still in Phillips  looking NEP.s. Paul Zerby (second ward council) did say he should resign. Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


[Mpls] Affordable Housing, Write-in

2002-09-20 Thread Jim Mork

David Brauer:” The southwest Minneapolis project
has been seen as a way to increase affordable
housing in a less-affordable part of the city,
but a city council committee decided a subsidy
was too rich on a 3-2 vote. The developer said
the subsidy - $542,000 for 15 subsidized units -
was in the middle range of city proposals. “

Any special virtue in locating affordable housing
in less-affordable areas?  Seems to me that it
might reduce property tax collections.  Don’t we
have deteriorated locations that are paying
little or no tax that could be replaced with
something that could pay a LITTLE tax?  Between
the River Road and 46th Avenue, there is housing
development that is replacing an abandoned gas
station and a very old revival house. This is my
idea of a good redevelopment.

Susan Maricle:  “I plan on writing in Gregory
Gray's name on the ballot come November. Anyone
else? “

I won’t vote for a candidate because of skin
color.  I’d have to hear that he’s a better
candidate than what’s available.

“Given that racial categories are fuzzy at best,
it might be possible to define a racial category
of Scandinavian; Scandinavians do, supposedly
have distinct physical characteristics from
people say in Asia or Italy for that matter.
Choosing to vote for someone because their
ancestors come from a distinct geographical area
would be a racist act from my perspective. 

Michael Atherton Prospect Park “

I consider it an extremely INTELLIGENT act.  And
I base that on the fact that our state, when
ruled by Scandinavians, lacked some of the
“amenities” we now prize like topless nightclubs,
lotteries, legal card gambling, etc.  Ever since
we broadened our toleration, we’ve suffered a
slow deterioration.  A bunch of non-serious
voters gave Jesse Ventura a plurality with what
seem to me obvious deleterious results.

So I’m not willing to be tolerant anymore.  Only
Scandinavians have the stiff spine and sang froid
to resist all these temptations.

Paul Lohmann: “Affordable housing is one of those
areas. Yes, government has failed in some
previous attempts to deal with this issue, but
there has never been any doubt in my mind that
thoughtful and committed people are struggling
with this tough issue. “

Paul, is it POSSIBLE that government played a
role in the failure to build affordable housing? 
Do the various rules that government imposes to
build in Minneapolis convince builders to build
somewhere else?  What is the trend in the
construction of affordable housing and how does
it correlate with enactment of new ordinances?

And what’s the deal with a certain number of
“unrelated” tenants living in a building?  Is
that a way to protect the franchise of multi-unit
housing?  I mean, would the old-fashioned
room-and-board arrangement be illegal now? And
what is the over-riding interest of society in
keeping unrelated people from sharing a roof?

“I ran against Joe last election
Brian Monroe 
still in Phillips 
looking NE “

Can anybody anywhere in the city run for office
in some other part of the city?









=
Jim Mork
Cooper Neighborhood

Vote Wellstone!  One of the few people in 
Washington who'll stick  his neck out for BOTH
 the stockholders (combatting management fraud) 
AND the working people.

__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC  Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] bike issues

2002-09-20 Thread Garwood, Robin

Mark Snyder wrote:

I remember specifically when the St. Paul officer handed me my ticket, he
said that I should be careful to watch my speed in that area because
residents had been complaining enough about speeders to make it a high
priority for the St. Paul police.

This raises an important question.  Is the MPD as responsive as their
counterparts across the river?  Having lived in both cities and interacted
with the cops in both, I'd have to say no.  This points to another question:
why not?

Tim Bonham wrote:

Automobiles  their drivers pay the majority of the costs for our
transportation 'system', so it's built mainly for their needs.

As a bicyclist, I pay for others' reliance on automobiles every single day.
Does the gas tax pay for filling potholes?  How about installing and
maintaining traffic signals?  Paying cops to clean up after traffic
accidents like the one near Ken's house, or just to pull over the sorts of
people who cause them?  Or treating the people without health insurance who,
when injured in car accidents, are brought to HCMC and saved at taxpayer
expense?

No, no, no, and no.  I'm being taxed for these functions of government,
through property and sales taxes.  I'm paying for services whose necessity
I did not create.  (Though I may, at some point in the future, be forced to
use them.  Perhaps the next time somebody opens their door into me as I bike
past.  No, wait.  I have health insurance.  I'll have to cover the
deductible on my broken bones myself.)

But hey, that's part of living in a modern society and I accept it.  I
understand that we help one another, and that maybe less than 100% of my tax
dollar will come directly back to me.  All we bicyclists are asking for -
whether we're talking set-aside lanes, trails, or streets - is fair and
equal treatment, and maybe to recoup some of the investment we've made in
y'all's nasty habit.

And for even raising this issue, we hear a response like Tim's.  How much
better an example of the tyranny of the majority could one hope for?  Seems
to me his quote is off.  Rather than them that pays the gold write the
rules, we should admit it comes down to them that's GOT the gold (or
sufficient numbers to bully...) write the rules.

Tim also ignores the secondary purpose of taxation.  If there are two
individuals who both expect local infrastructure to support their habits,
but one dabbles in hideously destructive behaviors(think drug use or
automobile driving) and the other prefers behaviors which not only have a
positive impact on the individual in question, but the larger society (think
education or bicycling)... who do you tax and who do you subsidize?  What if
the former places far greater strains (even per capita) on the
infrastructure in question?  Don't we have a responsibility to discourage
destructive behavior with any method available to us?

Or think of it in a free market sense.  Automobile drivers are not being
forced to pay for the true costs of their choices.  They're forcing others
to pick up their tab.  We will never make adequate progress on getting
people out of their cars as long as this is true.  


Robin Garwood
Seward

P.S.  Hey, it's payday!  Looks like I've spent $1,789.98 so far this year on
health care insurance.  How much of that money (or of the 50% of their
income HMOs actually spend on healthcare, but that's a different discussion)
enabled the dirty car habit of my neighbors?  Take into account the cost of
ERs, asthma, emphysema, cancer, and the lack of exercise which fuels
obesity, heart disease... starts to feel like quite a bit.  I wonder - could
Minneapolis ever build enough bike lanes to reimburse me for all the money
I've shelled out to keep motorists in their cars?
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Boulevard development loses committee vote

2002-09-20 Thread Victoria Heller

Here's a different way of looking at public subsidies for housing.

Can anyone produce evidence that shows that these subsidies ACTUALLY REDUCE
the amount of rent that the developer charges?

In the case of Seven Corners apartments ($20 million plus in subsidies) the
rents (for studio apartment) were $630, compared to $525 across the street
at my building (indoor pool, private balconies, no subsidies.)

In the case of Riverside Plaza, the rents were actually HIGHER than market
rent (studios $650) - but no one noticed because the Federal government paid
most of it.

Were all of the subsidized riverfront developments sold and rented at below
market rates?  Not the ones that I know about.

It seems to me that, in an effort to help those in need, we're giving all
the money to the wrong party - the developer who ends up with a
multi-million dollar asset (at no cost to himself.)

First, decide WHO you are trying to help.  Then, decide HOW MUCH you are
willing to subsidize on their behalf.  $10,000 per family?  $20,000?
$100,000.  How much for an able bodied person who would rather drink than
work?

For example:  A 4 person family might need an extra $300 each month to pay
rent in the apartment of their choice (there are lots of them available.)
It makes no sense to give Mr. X $2 million to build an apartment that the
family may or may not have access to.  How do we know WHO will be living in
the 10 or 15 subsidized units for the next 10, 20, 30 years?

Investors (as opposed to developers) would be eager to build houses and
apartments IF they knew that they could attract buyers/renters who could
actually afford to buy/rent at market rates.

More jobs at higher wages would have the same effect.

Lots of developers have become multi-millionaires by helping the poor.

Vicky Heller
North Oaks

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Minneapolis urban environment cable program - October edition

2002-09-20 Thread Haugen, Elizabeth

Tune in to On CUE and explore our urban environment, taped on location-this
month in green, sunny North Mississippi Regional Park. Sponsored by the
Minneapolis Committee on Urban Environment (CUE), the program looks at the
diverse people, issues, trends and physical elements that influence-and are
affected by-our built and natural surroundings.

This month, On CUE host Phill Lindsay's guests discuss partnerships between
neighborhoods and the park district, between cities, and within the
political dimension of working with the urban environment.

Please click on the following link to read the entire news release.
http://www.mcda.org/whats_new/Newsreleases/oncue_oct02.htm

Elizabeth Haugen, Communications Specialist
Minneapolis Community Development Agency
105 5th Ave. S., Suite 375
Minneapolis MN  55401-2534
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(612) 673-5121
www.mcda.org

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] Write-in

2002-09-20 Thread Eric Mitchell

Jim Mork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
“Given that racial categories are fuzzy at best,it might be possible to define a racial categoryof Scandinavian; Scandinavians do, supposedlyhave distinct physical characteristics frompeople say in Asia or Italy for that matter.Choosing to vote for someone because theirancestors come from a distinct geographical areawould be a racist act from my perspective. Michael Atherton Prospect Park “I consider it an extremely INTELLIGENT act. AndI base that on the fact that our state, whenruled by Scandinavians, lacked some of the“amenities” we now prize like topless nightclubs,lotteries, legal card gambling, etc. Ever sincewe broadened our toleration, we’ve suffered aslow deterioration. A bunch of non-seriousvoters gave Jesse Ventura a plurality with whatseem to me obvious deleterious results.EM:
Funny, since Scandanavians were in charge when the state legalized all of the above. From watching the news ( I swear), I know Scandinavians actually own a couple of the topless nightclubs.
I know, you were just kiddding. 

Eric Mitchell
Maple GroveDo you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!

[Mpls] Mayor's Ethics Task Force Presents Report to City Council

2002-09-20 Thread Sether, Laura S

Mayor Rybak's Ethics Task Force presented their report in a City Council Study Session 
this morning in the Council Chambers.

Ellen Trout, chair of the task force, said, These recommendations will bring 
Minneapolis's code in line with the best practices of other cities that have done a 
comprehensive review of their ethics codes.

The Task Force recommended a new Code of Ethics including new or revised policies on 
conflicts of interest, post-city employment, financial disclosure, nepotism and ethics 
enforcement mechanisms. These recommendations include:

*   Require elected officials and top political appointees to abstain from 
participating in decisions on matters where they have a conflict of interest.
*   Prohibit officials from accepting employment for one year with companies they 
negotiated public contracts with while in city employment. 
*   Expand financial disclosure for elected officials, top political appointees 
and their spouses.
*   Establish a nepotism policy to prevent people from being able to supervise 
their close relatives.
*   Establish an Ethical Practices Board to resolve complaints against 
high-ranking officials.

The overall product was well received, with Council Member Paul Zerby describing the 
recommended code as a quantum leap forward over the existing code. 

The complete proposed code and a chart describing the major differences between the 
existing code and the suggested revised code can be found on the City's website at: 
http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/mayor/priorities/ethics/index.asp#TopOfPage.
.  
Laura Sether
Office of Mayor Rybak
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] Mayor's Ethics Task Force Presents Report to CityCouncil

2002-09-20 Thread Andy Driscoll

I cannot tell you how great this is. Now, maybe someone will get St. Paul to
do the same thing. I tried for ten years as charter commissioner, and all I
got was, Let the county prosecute, defeating the very notion of an ethics
code. Congratulations.

Andy Driscoll
Saint Paul
--
He who knows the precepts by heart, but fails to practice them,
Is like unto one who lights a lamp and then shuts his eyes. --Nagarjuna

 From: Sether, Laura S [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 17:00:42 -0500
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Mpls] Mayor's Ethics Task Force Presents Report to City Council
 
 Mayor Rybak's Ethics Task Force presented their report in a City Council Study
 Session this morning in the Council Chambers.
 
 Ellen Trout, chair of the task force, said, These recommendations will bring
 Minneapolis's code in line with the best practices of other cities that have
 done a comprehensive review of their ethics codes.
 
 The Task Force recommended a new Code of Ethics including new or revised
 policies on conflicts of interest, post-city employment, financial disclosure,
 nepotism and ethics enforcement mechanisms. These recommendations include:
 
 * Require elected officials and top political appointees to abstain from
 participating in decisions on matters where they have a conflict of interest.
 * Prohibit officials from accepting employment for one year with companies
 they negotiated public contracts with while in city employment.
 * Expand financial disclosure for elected officials, top political appointees
 and their spouses.
 * Establish a nepotism policy to prevent people from being able to supervise
 their close relatives.
 * Establish an Ethical Practices Board to resolve complaints against
 high-ranking officials.
 
 The overall product was well received, with Council Member Paul Zerby
 describing the recommended code as a quantum leap forward over the existing
 code. 
 
 The complete proposed code and a chart describing the major differences
 between the existing code and the suggested revised code can be found on the
 City's website at:
 http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/mayor/priorities/ethics/index.asp#TopOfPage.
 .  
 Laura Sether
 Office of Mayor Rybak
 ___
 Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
 Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
 http://e-democracy.org/mpls
 

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Stadium Opponents - Read This!

2002-09-20 Thread scamp41rr

 Carl Pohlad, Minnesota's Richest Man, must be licking his chops now.  With
the Twins in the playoffs, he may feel that he is closer than ever to
securing public money to build himself a new stadium.  He will be able to
increase the value of the franchize by hundreds of millions of dollars, and
then walk away with the profits!

If you feel that it is appalling that we would even consider a $300 million
corporate welfare giveaway to Minnesota's Richest Man, then you have an
opportunity to do something about it this weekend.  Remember, even a shift
of one vote on the Hennepin County Board could derail this scheme!

Ed Felien, the Green/Labor endorsed candidate for Hennepin County
Commissioner, kicks off the general election campaign with phone banks this
weekend.

WHEN:  Saturday, September 21, 10:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M.; and  Sunday,
September 22 from 1:00 P.M. to 5:30 P.M.

WHERE:   Mode Transportation, 3032 Minnehaha Avenue South.  Just south of
Lake Street, across from the Resources of the Americas.

Join us as we get the word out to voters about the major issues in this
campaign, like McLaughlin's continuing support for $300 million of corporate
welfare for the richest man in Minnesota.  We will be educating voters about
Ed's progressive agenda, and ensuring that the public knows there are
significant differences in priorities between the two candidates!

Ed wants to bring a set of new priorities to the Hennepin County Board.  He
supports more responsive social services, a clean environment, property tax
fairness, and campaign finance reform.

Please drop by Mode during any of the above hours.  Even a hour of your time
can make a critical difference!

For more information, please call Gene Martinez at 612-387-4474.

Gene Martinez
Minnehaha, Ward 12


___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



RE: [Mpls] Boulevard development loses committee vote

2002-09-20 Thread John Rocker








Victoria Heller asked, Can anyone produce evidence that shows
that these subsidies ACTUALLY REDUCE the amount of rent that the developer
charges? 



Rents at tax credit developments are restricted, usually for 30 years.
HUD sets the maximum allowable rents each year based on 1) the area's median
income; 2) the income restriction of the units (i.e., 30% of area median income
(AMI)); and 3) the number of bedrooms. Because the maximum allowable rents are
based on the countys or regions median income, the allowable
rents sometimes exceed the achievable market rents in a neighborhood. Therefore
most lenders and state housing finance agencies require that projects be
underwritten at rents at least 10% below comparable market rate rents.



With apologies to those without HTML email or receiving the digest
version of this, the 2002 maximum allowable tax credit gross rents (including
all utilities) in Minneapolis are:




 
  
  
   

Bedrooms


60% AMI


50% AMI


40% AMI


30% AMI

   
   

Studio 


$
805 


$
671 


$
537 


$
403 

   
   

1 Bedroom 



863 



719 



575 



431 

   
   

2 Bedroom 



1,035 



862 



690 



517 

   
   

3 Bedroom 



1,196 



996 



797 



598 

   
   

4 Bedroom 



1,335 



1,112 



890 



667 

   
   

5 Bedroom 



1,472 



1,226 



981 



736 

   
  
  
  The 2002 maximum income levels vary by household size and are as
  follows:
  
  
   

% AMI


1-person 


2-person 


3-person 


4-person 


5-person 

   
   

60%


$32,220 


$36,840 


$41,400 


$46,020 


$49,680 

   
   

50%


$26,850 


$30,700 


$34,500 


$38,350 


$41,400 

   
   

40%


$21,480 


$24,560 


$27,600 


$30,680 


$33,120 

   
   

45%


$24,165 


$27,630 


$31,050 


$34,515 


$37,260 

   
   

30%


$16,110 


$18,420 


$20,700 


$23,010 


$24,840 

   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  John
   Rocker
  Calhoun
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 













Re: [Mpls] Boulevard development loses committee vote

2002-09-20 Thread Victoria Heller



If I am reading Mr. Rocker's charts correctly, I could receive several 
million dollars in subsidies, and then rent one of my studio apartments to 
someone who makes $32,220 for $805 per month.

That's a hefty rent! Why again would we subsidize this project?

It seems like the renter is getting the shaft - and the taxpayers 
too!

Vicky Heller
North Oaks


Re: [Mpls] response to Wizard Marks

2002-09-20 Thread Fredric Markus

I was around when Zollie Green got nailed, to use an indelicate term,
and even as out to lunch as I was in those long ago days, I think I'd
remember if Ed Felien, whom I had known previously as a fellow free
school teacher, had come to such a bad end. 

I'm glad Ed is running for Peter's job because I think that Ed makes
some sound points. I wasn't in favor of the original domed stadium and I
still don't like the idea of shoveling the public's money into private
corporate pockets. I think Peter has many redeeming qualities but
nothing is forever and just as Lou DeMars had to move on - and Jackie
Cherryhomes - maybe the time has come for some harder-edged advocacy for
the core constituencies in the county commissioner district just to my
east.

Ed gets preachy sometimes - remember Tim Campbell's more pontifical
moments? - but Ed's long years of involvement in South Minneapolis are
worth more respectful comment than any offhand comparison to Dick
Franson's quixotic humors. I appreciate Ed's publications for the
exposure they give to young writers, the venues they provide for new
entrepreneurs, and the sense of community they reinforce for a large
part of our city. I'm glad the Greens have taken up Ed's banner because
frankly the political grass is a bit greener on my political party's
side of the fence and Ed has long since earned his stripes in the
progressive community.

Fred Markus, Horn Terrace, Ward Ten 

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] More Biernat-related subpeonas at City Hall

2002-09-20 Thread List Manager

http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/3316959.html

David Brauer
List manager

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] Re: Boulevard development/$$$ Tossing at the Creek

2002-09-20 Thread PennBroKeith

In a message dated 9/20/02 10:22:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 But based upon land costs and tax 
  rates, there should be a sliding scale for these subsidies.  What the MCDA 
  Operating Committee needs to do is figure out what is reasonable in that 
  regard. Otherwise the present scenario simply becomes an excuse and one 
  more covert tool for keeping those people out of certain neighborhoods.
  
Our City is a high density, well connected grid; at least compared to a 
fourth tier suburb. People living anywhere in the city can go to a job, lake, 
park, retail outlet, church, bar, sex shop, or bagel shop, etc., with 
relative ease. With, or without, a car. 

Market forces have deemed South Lyndale a desirable and expensive place to 
reside.
Why should tax $$$ lavishly subsidize a poorer family to live at Lyndale and 
the creek? Unlike Wayzata it is not a social exchange to allow burger 
flippers to be near their grills, or even firemen to be near their ladders. 
You can get there from here; rather easily.

This money tossing seems like subsidized socialist engineering; and for what? 
And this is not about putting a halfway house for recovering pedophiles over 
there. Nor about a halfway house for junkies, alcoholics, emerging felons 
(from prison), etc., because there is a reasonable argument against the 
current packing and stacking extant exclusively in the hood.

I am not that old but I recall taking a ride with my Mommy, Daddy and Sister 
to look at the neighborhoods where the richer folks lived. In the Twin Cities 
posh is really not that far away from hood. And we are all about the same 
distance to all amenities, except safe streets and maybe decent schools (I am 
no expert there!). 

It is easy for most anyone to realize and acknowledge that racial segregation 
is wrong. I am not convinced that one should not start out in a starter 
neighborhood, in a starter home. As large, or as shmancy, as one can afford 
is OK, too. But giving people money, big money, to live by the creek, cause 
it is expensive for other people, seems ludicrous.

Safe, clean streets; throughout the city- Buy it. Good schools with students 
learning; throughout the City- Buy it. Transit; Ditto. 

With these items in place the only subsidy might be a token to get on the 
bus; and we subsidize that weather a poor person gets aboard or not. 

Keith ReitmanNearNorth
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Feds deliver another subpoena to Minneapolis leaders

2002-09-20 Thread Shawn Lewis

Feds deliver another subpoena to Minneapolis leaders
Rochelle Olson 
Star Tribune 
  
Published Sep 21, 2002 

Just two weeks before the start of 
Minneapolis City Council Member 
Joe Biernat's federal corruption trial, 
the U.S. attorney's office has subpoenaed 
more records from the city.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark D. Larsen 
told the Minneapolis Community Development 
Agency (MCDA) to deliver records relating 
to Biernat; his wife, Sheila Biernat; 
his mother, Sophie Biernat; a codefendant, 
former Plumbers Local 15 business manager 
Thomas J. Martin; and several addresses 
with connections to those individuals.

http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/3316959.html

Shawn Lewis, Field Neighborhood


-- 
__
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



RE: [Mpls] Re: Boulevard development loses committee vote

2002-09-20 Thread mel



-Original Message-
From:   mel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, September 20, 2002 11:24 PM
To: 'Paul Lohman'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [Mpls] Re: Boulevard development loses committee vote



-Original Message-
From:   Paul Lohman [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, September 20, 2002 12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[Mpls] Re: Boulevard development loses committee vote
 
With regard to the MCDA Operating Committee's decision yesterday to deny 
funding yesterday I have a couple of thoughts.  Those who have posted on 
this subject so far seem to be of a mind stated by Mel Gregerson when he 
said Mpls needs to stop giving money away for development, the marketplace 
works best if left alone.

I think that statement is a bit absurd.  The fact of the matter is that the 
marketplace is not being left alone, never has, and in a big way and for 
good reason.  It doesn't work the way the majority of people would like to 
see it work.  Hence government steps in in a multitude of ways to effect 
the changes that we - the voters - decide are needed.

Mel,s Reply   
Sorry, I don't call tearing down everything poor people can afford
to live in Help.
Sorry, I don't call enriching non-profit developers or for-profit developers
$120,000 to $255,000 to build $60,000 apartments Help
Sorry, but I call it waste.
Let them spend their own money or borrow from the banks, just like the rest of us do.
There are many For-profit Housing Providers who rent for $595 a Month rent or less. 
$595  wouldn't pay the interest on their  $120,000 apartment.
Please read the Sunday Paper to view how many apartments are listed for under $600.
A good way to become Housing educated.   
Subsidizing  Developers to build Just increases the rent we must ask.
Waste hurts both taxpayers and non taxpayers.  
Mel Gregerson CAPS
South Mpls.
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



RE: [Mpls] Re: Boulevard development loses committee vote

2002-09-20 Thread mel



-Original Message-
From:   Paul Lohman [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, September 20, 2002 12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[Mpls] Re: Boulevard development loses committee vote
 
With regard to the MCDA Operating Committee's decision yesterday to deny 
funding yesterday I have a couple of thoughts.  Those who have posted on 
this subject so far seem to be of a mind stated by Mel Gregerson when he 
said Mpls needs to stop giving money away for development, the marketplace 
works best if left alone.

I think that statement is a bit absurd.  The fact of the matter is that the 
marketplace is not being left alone, never has, and in a big way and for 
good reason.  It doesn't work the way the majority of people would like to 
see it work.  Hence government steps in in a multitude of ways to effect 
the changes that we - the voters - decide are needed.

Mel,s Reply   
Sorry, I don't call tearing down everything poor people can afford
to live in Help.
Sorry, I don't call enriching non-profit developers or for-profit developers
$120,000 to $255,000 to build $60,000 apartments Help
Sorry, but I call it waste.
Let them spend their own money or borrow from the banks, just like the rest of us do.
There are many For-profit Housing Providers who rent for $595 a Month rent or less. 
$595  wouldn't pay the interest on their  $120,000 apartment.
Please read the Sunday Paper to view how many apartments are listed for under $600.
A good way to become Housing educated.   
Subsidizing  Developers to build Just increases the rent we must ask.
Waste hurts both taxpayers and non taxpayers.  
Mel Gregerson CAPS
South Mpls.
___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls