Fw: Re: [Mpls] Some specific strategies the Tyesha Edwards Peace Project

2003-03-08 Thread Shawn Lewis
 
 
Note: forwarded message attached.

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:41:09 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Some specific strategies the Tyesha Edwards Peace Project


-- 
___
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

Meet Singles
http://corp.mail.com/lavalife

---BeginMessage---
What do you think of the project?
Zack
---End Message---


[Mpls] Do Black Community Leaders Really Want Change?

2003-03-08 Thread Shawn Lewis
Article emailed to me directly
from Pauline Thomas

Community Collaborative March 6, 2003
Spokesman-Recorder EDITORIAL
By: Pauline Thomas

Do Black Community Leaders Really Want Change?


I think we can all agree that the black community has
simply suffered too much police misconduct.  I have
been on the front lines trying to get the City of
Minneapolis to make systemic change in its Police
Department.

Back in mid August a small group of us met with US
government officials about police misconduct.  We
looked at our options, and decided to request federal
mediation.  The Department Of Justice (DOJ) said they
needed an issues letter to be able to talk to the City
about possible mediation.  Prior to this, no one had
actually asked the DOJ to mediate in Minneapolis.  We
sent our request at noon on 8/22/02, just hours before
the riot in the Jordan neighborhood.

Federal Mediator Pat Glenn showed up right away, and
despite the City's alleged concern over the riot, she
tried for months to get Minneapolis to agree to
federal mediation.

Some black leaders came out against federal mediation.
Spike Moss publicly opposed federal mediation 
(StarTribune 8/25/02).

However, we continued to lobby the City Council
through a coalition of communities of color, called
Federal Mediation Now.  Finally, the City Council was
primed to vote on 11/22/02.  To help the Council vote
for mediation, the DOJ wanted a community team
organized, but no one stepped forward except for
Federal Mediation Now.

With advice from the DOJ on how it was done in
other cities, we organized a public community meeting.
We personally invited the NAACP and the Urban League.
But as we all know democracies are run by those who
show up, and the NAACP did not come.  It is important
that people know that the various communities of color
each selected their own representatives, and that is
how the (CNT) was born.

It was at that meeting that the black community voiced
that the Urban League was too dependent on city
funding to be able to fight for systemic change.

Clarence Hightower stated publicly, Clearly, the
Urban League should be at the table, but if not, the
mediation should still go

forward (Pioneer Press:  12/20/02).   But then he
demanded that the Ministerial Alliance get an
additional 9 seats on the Community Negotiating Team
(CNT).  We strenuously object to the Chief forcing his
picks to the table.  We are not interested in a sham
mediation process.

The DOJ protocols do not allow cities to pick who sits
on the community team.  The CNT chose to keep the
identities of the team confidential, so that the City
would vote on the concept of federal mediation, not
whether it liked certain individuals that sat on the
team.

When the Council voted on November 22, the CNT was
ready to go.  We met with the On 12/3/02, the DOJ
requested a confidential meeting  to plan for
mediation, which was scheduled to start 12/10.  Chief
Olson was the only non-CNT member who knew its
location. Spike Moss busted in, demanding to know who
was on the CNT.  Within a couple of days, Chief Olson
refused to attend the December 10 mediation, and came
out against the composition of the CNT.

Ultimately, Olson's claim for stopping the mediation
from moving forward was that traditional black
leadership needed to be at the table.  To eliminate
that argument we voted to invite the NAACP to sit at
the table to keep the process moving.  After being
given that invitation the NAACP has since backed away.
Why?  Is this really about change or is the real goal
to manipulate the outcome of this process?

Olson can't be allowed to manipulate the process.
The saddest part is that his dirty-work was done
through African-Americans, some of whom call
themselves leaders in our community.  This is pitiful,
and I am embarrassed.  I have yet to hear anything
from these so-called leaders about systemic change, or
the protection of the victims of police brutality.

The City of Minneapolis said they wanted federal
mediation, but apparently they meant only if we get
to pick the community team.

They passed a resolution agreeing to mediation, but
they won't force Olson to come to the table.  They
just won't let the process work.

We see federal mediation as a low-cost alternative to
a full-scale lawsuit.  But it has become clear that
the City will not change unless it is forced.  That
same small group of dedicated people is now gearing up
to file a multiple-class, class action lawsuit,
including a claim for declaratory judgment and
injunction.  That means we will ask the federal courts
to force change in the MPD.  We won't back down unless
the City makes clear that they will voluntarily agree
to systemic change.

Next week: How much police misconduct costs the city,
why litigation is more expensive than mediation, and
how class actions lawsuits have been successful in
other cities, at making systemic change.

Shawn Lewis, Field Neighborhood

-- 

[Mpls] Thoughts on LGA

2003-03-08 Thread Victoria Heller
Mark Snyder asks:

What if we stopped providing the services that we're being punished for
providing?  What if we stopped selling water to our suburban neighbors, for
example?

Vicky comments:

As nearly as I can tell from the Truth In Taxation 2203 budget forecast,
Minneapolis expects to make a PROFIT of almost $100 million from
water/sewer charges.

Projected Revenue:  $329,400,000 From Selling Services
Projected Expenditure:$231,800,000 Public Works


Vicky Heller
Cedar-Riverside and North Oaks


TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re:[Mpls] Nicollet/Lake Debacle

2003-03-08 Thread Fredric Markus
One hopes that neighborhood response to this benighted decision to pull
the plug on Sherman Associates will send a wake-up call to Cms Niziolek
and Lilligren - stunting this development will reverberate through the
west end of the Lake St. corridor and failing to open Nicollet will
perpetuate a long-standing traffic flow problem that will be made worse
in the event the 35W ramp goes forward. Why is city hall willing to see
these major hits to tax base growth potential? Why are the incumbent
council members rolling over for this? I surely see more credibility in
the Lake/Nicollet plans than in the financial black hole that the Sears
Tower has become. In the dark corridors of the city's bureaucracy, is
someone's professional reputation being salvaged at substantial
immediate expense to the Sherman Associates firm and formidable future
cost to the economic viability of scores of existing businesses in these
corridors? 

What chilling message does this send to the aspirations of other city
council members and their business and residential constituents in other
commercial corridors radiating out from the central business district?
Is this an example of a turf war that pits embattled big-ticket
development bureaucrats against the leaner, more supple, more manageable
products of local initiatives? 

We have a weak mayor system of government. Are we now to have a weak
City Council as well?

Fred Markus, Horn Terrace, Ward Ten, in the Lyndale Neighborhood

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.459 / Virus Database: 258 - Release Date: 2/25/2003
 


TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Protecting Our Backs

2003-03-08 Thread Craig Miller
Here Here! Jim is dead on the mark with this post.

Craig Miller
Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 I'm sure I'm not the first person to have this thought, but I thinkt he
city has to start seriously tying our core needs with our core revenues,
something an outside and hostile political grouping cannot deny us.  Of
course, that also means that extraordinary expenditures must be so
constructed as to weather temporary economic hard times.  A household would
think this way, and I think the time has come for the city to do so also.
We've heard some fretting about getting sued because we made lavish plans
when we thought the flow of money was insured.  That is a good point, but
not the way it was presented.  We have to consider the RISKS of these plans
and never create a legal exposure due to interruptions in income.  With
homes, that is guaranteed by protections built into our laws. But as a city,
we need to insure the protection on each contract we consider. If a
potential contractor will not settle on that, we should never HINT that we
would do business with them.  We have !
 a risk management department, but it has to start doing its job better.

 And candidates for city elective office have to be cornered on these
quesitons. We've been remiss as voters in considering that we elect charming
but careless people to office.


 --
 Jim Mork--Cooper



TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] SW Mpls Honda Thefts

2003-03-08 Thread Susan Maricle
--- Dooley, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 WCCO-TV reported this evening that 11 Hondas have
been stolen in Southwest Minneapolis over the last
three days. 

My sympathies to Bill and those who lost their cars.
Someone tried to steal my junker of a Mazda a few
years ago. I discovered it when I started the car,
reached to flip on the windshield wiper, and the wiper
signal wasn't there. Even in a north Mpls.
neighborhood, I had felt it was a safe neighborhood
and my car was junky enough to leave unlocked. 

It's unsettling when your safety zone changes. And I
suppose crimes like these will be low priority when
police cuts happen.

On another note:
Just turned on the Today show and Paul Magers was
anchoring! And it wasn't even the regional segment!
When did that happen??

Susan Maricle
Bruno MN
formerly of Folwell

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


RE: [Mpls] Thoughts on LGA

2003-03-08 Thread Terrell Brown
 Mark Snyder asks:
 
 What if we stopped providing the services that we're being 
 punished for providing?  What if we stopped selling water to 
 our suburban neighbors, for example?
 
 Vicky comments:
 
 As nearly as I can tell from the Truth In Taxation 2203 
 budget forecast, Minneapolis expects to make a PROFIT of 
 almost $100 million from water/sewer charges.
 
 Projected Revenue:  $329,400,000 From Selling Services
 Projected Expenditure:$231,800,000 Public Works


[TB]  How much of that $329 million comes from selling water outside the
city?  Do we sell to those cities at discounted rates?


Terrell Brown
Loring Park
 terrell at terrellbrown dot org



TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Cutting size of the City Council

2003-03-08 Thread Mark Snyder
On 3/6/03 5:33 PM, steven meldahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Spoken by a true tenant, probably.  We landlords are not in the
 babysitting business.  I have personally convinced a few Mpls Housing
 inspectors to send the orders for such things as:  mowing grass,
 shovelling sidewalks, picking up garbage, fixing damages caused by the
 tenant's kids, and other things that are obviously under the direction
 and control of the tenant directly to the tenant.  Guess what happens?
 
 I get a call from the tenant who asks why the man ie the City, is
 after them.  I tell them to clean up their act or they are gone, and
 surprise surprise they clean up their act.  It  changes their behavior
 and what is great about it, their kids see them maintaning the house and
 grounds better!!  Now I am not the Big Bad landlord picking on them and
 they become some of my best tenants.  I think this concept is called,
 being responsible for your own actions.  Quite a novel idea here in
 liberalville, USA.


I'm sorry, but I see this in a different light.  If you own a property,
you're responsible for it, whether you live there or not.

Steve refers to it as babysitting, but if your tenant is acting like a baby,
then either babysit or get a new tenant.  Steve says that being responsible
for your own actions is a novel concept in Minneapolis.  I say Steve is
trying to push off his responsibilities as a property owner on Minneapolis
Inspections by making them play the bad guy so he doesn't have to.

Let me add that I also serve as a landlord of sorts, since I am an officer
of my fraternity's alumni board, which owns three chapter houses in
Dinkytown.  As annoying as orders from Minneapolis housing inspectors can
sometimes be, I WANT Minneapolis to send that stuff to me and not just to
the tenant.  Since I also have a full-time job and other commitments, I
can't always get to the chapter on a weekly basis to make sure my tenants
are maintaining the property as they're supposed to.  Then I know when I
have to go and play the Big Bad landlord.  I don't like it, but it's part of
the job.  

If I just wait for the tenant to call me and complain about the man as
Steve apparently prefers to do, I may never get that call.  I'm sure I'm not
the only landlord whose tenants would ignore an order from Inspections since
most tenants probably know that it's the property owner who's going to be
penalized if nothing is done.  In my case, the tenants could really give a
fig what Minneapolis Inspections says but when I or one of our other alumni
officers stops by, they pay attention.

And by the way, I don't get paid for this, so any for-profit landlords who
are complaining about it should consider looking for another line of work
rather than whining about Minneapolis inspectors who are just trying to do
their jobs.

Mark Snyder
Windom Park


TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Re: Do Black Community Leaders Really Want Change?

2003-03-08 Thread V.L. Freeman
Do Black Community Leaders Really Want Change?

Praise Be!, Someone in the community is speaking out against this travesty! 
I thought the mediation talks were to help the residents and police build 
better communications? What happened to all those who said they were 
concerned, and those who said they would used their political powers to help 
get this monster that's here, in the communities of color; everyone sees 
it, hears, it and touches it, but, no one wants to speak about it, or 
resolve it. Only during election times, do we hear the promises, that seem 
to dangle so easily from the mouths, falling upon those who are desperate 
for anything, and falling for promises that will never come, or see the 
light of day.

How many times, do we as a people of color have to keep getting dogged out, 
by our own and others who serve us, before we realize, that our situations 
are constantly being exploited for someone else's gain. How many times, do 
important issues such as these have to put on hold, until we as a community 
is SOLD to the highest bidder. We really need to open our eyes, and take a 
look around. I mean really look around. We need to start holding these 
people accountable and showing up, in numbers to vote, and make our voices 
heard. Enough, is enough.

We need to use cable outlets, to inform and educate people of color, using a 
format that is not polically motivated, informing people on
major issues of importance.  We need to finish the community dialog,
that was started, long ago; most importantly, we need to hold those who
represent the community, accountable for their non-actions, or self
fulfilling actions.

We need fresh leaders with clear visions. A vision that is indicative of 
the community; not clouded by whom and what put them in their respective 
positions in the first place. It's rather kind of of sad, each time we think 
we have someone who speaks out for the community, they get more out of it 
than we in the community do.

You know, summer is coming very soon, and yet, we still have nothing in 
place. There will be more problems, and more hostilities, more justifiable 
beating's or shooting's. Nothing will to much happen unless and upon the 
time another innocent person is hurt, or another violent riot takes place. 
And even then, future politicians will come from within the ranks, and 
political arguments will be won or lost; communites will continue in their 
suffering.

My challenge, are to those, who wanted so much to make Minneapolis better, 
you can do so, before the cameras roll, before the violence starts, before 
the beating's and misuse of justice starts. Now! Is the best time, let's not 
underestimate the underline issues that still are just under the surface in 
our communities, that can, and have in the past erupted.

Vanessa Freeman
Hawthorne
Why wait, until there could be a possible shortage of police officer's, to 
start having talks

_
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] A Suggestion on Budget cuts, for City Council Members

2003-03-08 Thread V.L. Freeman


A couple of day's ago, I watched, who, I believe was Ron Edwards, addressing 
the city council. (If I am wrong about that, my apologize). He was asking 
the city council to look into the excessive amounts that were being paid to 
people who sit on the Civilian Review board. ($50 each day when a member 
attends one or more meetings or hearings).  I began to do a little search 
and found out there is a quite of few of these boards, or commissions that 
were providing stipends, or receiving compensated salaries. In efforts of 
cutting back and saving money, why doesn't the city council, just take all 
the compensation pay away, and provide lunch and validate parking. This 
could save a lot of money. If a person is using their own money for some 
expense toward, the commission or board, they would be reimbursed for 
expenses.

Why pay a person who has an interest in helping or serving the city in some 
capacity, a fee for doing what is in not only the interest of the city, but 
for all residents. I think, just being a part of process in city government, 
should be a learning, rewarding experience.

I would rather see this money gone then workers whose jobs are beneficial 
to the public, are lost.

Vanessa Freeman
Hawthorne
Have a good Weekend all :)

_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] City of Minneapolis Declares Snow Emergency

2003-03-08 Thread City of Minneapolis





Thank you for using the Minneapolis Snow Emergency e-Subscribe service.
Today is Saturday, March 08, 2003, and the City of Minneapolis has declared a Snow Emergency. Parking restrictions go into effect beginning at 9:00 p.m. tonight.
For complete parking details, follow this link:
http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/snow/snow-emergency/parking-info.asp
or call the Snow Emergency Hotline at (612) 348-SNOW (7669)
Please help the crews do a complete job of plowing by complying with the Snow Emergency Parking rules. Full width plowing can only be accomplished if people move their cars out of the way.
Alley plowing began at 11:00 a.m. Saturday, March 8, 2003 
For change in Subscriber Services:
If you want to make changes or unsubscribe from this list, follow this link:
http://www.govdocs.com/servlet/GovDocs/user

You can update or cancel your subscription at any time by clicking here. All you will need are your e-mail address and your password (if you have selected one).
This service is provided free of charge by: City of Minneapolis.
P.S. If you have any questions or problems please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.




[Mpls] Finance: Libraries and Cops

2003-03-08 Thread Jim Mork
A couple of issues:

First, as to the library, I think we have Highway 55-reroute all over again.  That is 
this has all been discussed before.  No it hasn't. Because whatever got discussed, 
it wasn't in the context of our huge shortfalls and our staggering debt.  That could 
have been IMAGINED, but until now it wasn't real.  Now that it IS real, it has to be 
considered. If I have a dream of a Mercedes and then find myself without a job in a 
competitive job market, it doesnt MATTER how I looked at buying the Mercedes before.  
Now, I'm dealing with survival and the conditions are radically different.  The thing 
about warehousing books is that it neednt BE a permanent solution. Of course, when you 
do it awhile, all these frightening concerns heard from the people who long for the 
glass palace may turn out to be empty concerns, in which case you make the warehouse a 
permanent solution. But unlike a hugely expensive glass palace, a warehouse can be 
sold to someone who needs it.  Whereas if the glass!
 palace fails, the likelihood of recovering the investment is minimal.

Once again, we are operating in the we're broke scenario.  I'd have to see the 
records to believe anyone planning the glass palace ever accounted for a we're broke 
scenario. But the time to do so is NOW.

Second issue: The police layoff
I hope people are thoughtful enough to realize we lose a LOT by forcing our trained 
police to find another home or a new career.  Some of them have decades of useful 
service ahead. Cut their jobs and their family responsibilities will necessitate them 
being no longer available to us.  There HAS to be a better way!  Can you IMAGINE the 
costly process of bringing the force to full complement again?  The academy can only 
train a small number at a time.  Can you IMAGINE what the malefactors will make of all 
this?  Home security systems aren't cheap, plus if you catch someone doing your home, 
who'll you call to collar them?  Cutting them is as close to insane as anything I've 
heard proposed in my four decades in Minneapolis.  I think it is time for R. T. to sit 
down with his buddies in the union to work out the best way for both the officers and 
the city. Rotating furloughs? Part time jobs? Whatever.  I have always considered 
managements that just let their trained workforce go l!
azy and stupid.  I hope I didn't elect a full complement of lazy, stupid managers into 
office.  

My signature:
The comment about buying bombs with money taken from education has NO relevance to my 
discussion of the library.  I'm not talking about maintaining the ability to aggress 
against foreign states, I'm talking about taking money from open-stack libraries to 
maintain a DEFENSIVE force against the criminals among us.  Whoever can't discern this 
difference has a need to refresh their own education.


--
Jim Mork--Cooper

Only a LUNATIC would cut schools in order to pay for more bombs.

We hold these truths to be self-evidentthat the just power of governments derives 
from the consent of the governed.  Declaration of Independence
Get your free Web-based E-mail at http://www.startribune.com/stribmail

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Re: HF67

2003-03-08 Thread Tim Bonham
Yes, indeed.  Judy Farmer said back then that a school-board-only election 
costs us 4 teachers!.  (Also an interesting look at her view of school 
finance.)

Tim Bonham, Ward 12, Standish-Ericsson

That, btw, is one of the reasons that the school board
changed their terms, . . .
Terrell Brown
Loring Park
Terrell at terrellbrown dot org


TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Creative Revenue Raising

2003-03-08 Thread Becker
I live in Longfellow Neighborhood and work in downtown St Paul.  Because of
timing issues, I usually end up driving to work.  This necessitates crossing
the Lake Street bridge into St Paul.

The bridge is signed at 30 mph but because it is has no cross traffic and
because the speed changes half a block off the bridge, virtually everyone
goes faster than 30 mph.  The City of St Paul has been raising revenues by
ticketing Minneapolis residents as they are crossing the bridge.  Note that
they have not been ticketing St Paul residents as they leave the City, nor
do they ticket at night when St Paul residents are coming back into the
City.  Just in the morning when the Minneapolis residents are coming across.

Now it would be fine if this was legal.  For everyone's info, the State of
Minnesota sets the speed on roads like Marshall Avenue and they have found
that the appropriate speed for Marshall Avenue, to the border of Ramsey
County, is 35 mph.  So the small part of Marshall Avenue that is signed at
30 mph is in fact signed incorrectly.   But the City has no incentive to
change this as they are making money from the deal by parking their cops on
the end of the bridge and ticketing people.

Now I called the City of St Paul to talk to them about changing this and
their response was that they have no interest in changing it and in fact,
they would like to see the speed limit even lower (imagine that).  Does
anyone have any experience in getting speed limit signs changed and if so
could they please e-mail me off - list about any advice they would have?

Carol Becker
Longfellow




TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Re: Protecting Our Backs

2003-03-08 Thread Tim Bonham
Sorry, Jim, but I can't see this being fair.

If you hire someone like an architect to design a custom building for you, 
you are obligated to pay him for the work he does.  You can't come to him 
after the design is nearly done and say oops, we've changed our mind, we 
don't want to build after all and expect him not to bill you for the work 
you hired him to do.  At least the part he has done so far.  And maybe even 
the whole thing, since it's likely that he turned down other jobs to work 
on your contract.

But as a city, we need to insure the protection on each contract we 
consider. If a potential contractor will not settle on that, we should 
never HINT that we would do business with them.  We have !
a risk management department, but it has to start doing its job better.
...
--
Jim Mork--Cooper


TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Fw: snow removal from carts at $25. per w/o notice on carts

2003-03-08 Thread mary lynch

- Original Message -
From: mary lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:24:06 -0500
Subject: snow removal from carts at $25. per w/o notice on carts

 Has anyone noticed that there are flat, flat areas around many, many garbage carts 
 in our alleys after our first and only snow emergency of this season.   I ask my 
 boyfriend in early Feb if he had shovelded around the cart at our house.  He said 
 no. My mind wondered could the city have created that flat flat yard area around my 
 cart.  My mind told me NO, no way.   I figured some snow blower neighbor lonely for 
 snow work had gotten buzy in the alley as many of my neighbor had flat flat perfect 
 yard areas that their carts were sitting on.  (you understand this is after the snow 
 plow had pushed our one time snow emergency snow down the alley and onto carts) This 
 being such a snowless winter I did not think anything more about it.  Until 
 yesterday that is.   I own a duplex.  My tenant called me yesterday and said a city 
 worker had just shoveled around the two carts at her home.  Now yesterday Feb 18 was 
 above freazing and what we maybe have 5 inches of snow left on the ground?   I 
 called the city.  I had not been hypervigilent this winter and yes the city on Feb 
 18, 2003 had shoveled out my two carts at my duplex from piles and drifts of snow 
 reaching up to oh maybe 4 to 5 inches of snow.   I called back the city and ask 
 about my home in Northrup neighborhood.  My cart had been shoveled out on Feb 7th 
 2003 from the snow the plow had pushed down the alley and put on the cart.   I had 
 body slammed the cart on or around that time, I remember doing it so that there 
 would not be a problemn with the cart being frozen in on my pick up day.I guess 
 after my body slamming it snowed again so then the snow emergency was called . 
 (remember we have only had one snow emergency called and only after the second 
 snowfall totaling 8,9 or 10 inches as I recall)  The city is charging $25.per cart 
 so now I owe the city $75.00 in extra taxes.   I thought we were trying to correct 
 the snow emergency issues only to create snow/cart issues?   For the record I was 
 informed by waste management that all city water payers were given a written notice 
 in their Nov 2002 water bills.   So my tenents were never notified and I never read 
 any notice stating that no longer would notices be put on carts, but just the city 
 would clear no matter when the snow had fallen etc. I have written too much. Sorry 
 for that.  I believe this non notice policy on carts needs to be re thought out and 
 maybe some news coverage of the new policy so we can all remain hyper vigilent about 
 snow removal even in a low snow year. May we forgive these 1st time offenders?  I 
 figure on my block 10 carts were cleared at $25.per that = $250. X 1000 blocks  that 
 equals $250,000 or a quarter million dollars.   Is my math right?  Check out your 
 block.   This is serious money and serious misinformantion to citizens.
 Mary LynchNorthrup-- 
 __
 Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
 http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
 

-- 
__
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup


TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] A Suggestion on Budget cuts, for City Council Members

2003-03-08 Thread WizardMarks
V.L. Freeman wrote:

 Ron Edwards, addressing the city council. (If I am wrong about that, 
my apologize).  asking the city council to look into the excessive 
amounts that were being paid to people who sit on the Civilian Review 
board. ($50 each day when a member attends one or more meetings or 
hearings).  I began to do a little search and found out there is a 
quite of few of these boards, or commissions that were providing 
stipends, or receiving compensated salaries.  
WM: There is a good side to the boards having honoraria or stipends: 
People who have to take off work or hire baby sitters so that they can 
attend can participate. It helped Charlotte Anderson, who sat on the 
library board for several years, be able to get compensation for time 
lost at work. Had I been elected last election (losing has turned out to 
be a blessing), that little bit of money would have allowed me to serve. 
The question is not why do they pay that sum, or that the sum is 
excessive, it usually ain't, but who is getting that fee and does that 
person have a positive or negative effect on getting anything accomplished.

Why pay a person who has an interest in helping or serving the city in 
some capacity, a fee for doing what is in not only the interest of the 
city, but for all residents. I think, just being a part of process in 
city government, should be a learning, rewarding experience. 
WM: This is the $64,000 question. When no compensation of any sort is 
offered, the only people who can attend are the feckless and the very 
powerful/wealthy. While both can make a contribution to any endeavor, 
having all the board members be on the opposite edges of the lives of 
most people may not provide the best range of intelligences. Though it 
could be rewarding, and it will certainly be a learning experience, odds 
are that it's mostly a pain in the butt which generates tons of paper 
and takes forever. Bureaucracies are designed to slow down processes to 
a wounded snail's pace.

WizardMarks, Central

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls



TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] What about a moratorium on bond interest payments?

2003-03-08 Thread Victoria Heller
The City could save $300+ million by simply delaying interest payments for
two years.  This would not be a default, just a legal, negotiated deferral.

It seems to me that the bondholders shouldn't mind too much since other
risk free investments pay less than 1%.  They will eventually get paid the
4%  5% that they are expecting.

In fact, the City could select CERTAIN bonds to defer - just enough to
balance cash shortfalls each year until the economy perks up.

Many years ago, the government issued IOUs to teachers and other government
employees in lieu of paychecks.  Why not modernize this idea and issue IOUs
to bondholders instead of cash?

This is just an idea - it certainly should not be used to avoid needed
spending cuts.

Vicky Heller
Cedar-Riverside and North Oaks


TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Park Board seat/City Council

2003-03-08 Thread Annie Young
Eva - you are not in the we on this one unless you have moved again very 
recently. The voters in this case would be those who vote in the 5th Park 
District which is the Southeast corner of the City including Minnehaha 
Park, a couple of lakes and a golf course for starters.
I would love to know offline how many folks from down in that neck of the 
woods would have wanted a Special Election. I like getting the input. Thanks.
Annie Young
citywide Park Commissioner



At 07:19 AM 3/8/03 -0600, Eva Young wrote:
$20 -$30 thousand would be a bargain if we get to vote on the person.

Eva

At 12:09 AM 03/08/2003 -0600, you wrote:
Thank you for your comment on this topic, Steve. Some of us on the Board
did think that because of the length of time still left in the term an
election would have been the appropriate action. However, legal counsel
continued to tell us we couldn't do it. We did some research though and I
believe the city attorney did note that an election might be possible but
that since the charter has no mechanism
other than the six-vote, fill the vacancy wording it would not be likely
this time around.  The elections director did give us an estimated cost of
$20,000-$30,000 to hold a Special Election assuming there would be a
primary and a general election.
With the pending budget cuts and layoffs paying out that kind of money just
really wasn't an option and we too want to see it much more clearly spelled
out in the Charter for future reference.
Annie Young
citywide Park Commissioner





TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Eva
Eva Young
Near North
Minneapolis
Blog is up:
http://lloydletta.blogspot.com
You do not have the right to never be offended.  This country is based on
freedom, and that means freedom for everyone - not just you!  You may leave
the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc., but the
world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.  --Article II of the
Bill of Non-Rights.


TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Give it up Phyllis

2003-03-08 Thread Valdis2001
Without trying to beat a dead horse - 

 I would hope that this issue would die.

The facts:

Phyllis ( a DFL rep.) introduced this motion. Cosponsored by a DFL colleague (Len Biernat). Supported by many (DFL and Republicans alike) and geared towards having Minneapolis and other cities adhere to a system of representation that has already been adopted by the majority of other cities. The proposal will fail as there is no sponsor in the senate (as it has in the past).

The argument;

This proposal is sound in the fact that we should not have to wait five years after a sensus to adjust our representation. The "ideal" here is to have an election just after the boundaries are redrawn to be fair to all. That makes sense.

The reality;

Phyllis is wasting our valuable time and money. This is not an issue for the state. Even if Phyllis were to pass this through the house and senate, like a kidney stone, with all of the moaning and crud, this still would not change a thing. The real problem (not DFL or Green Or Republican) is in our city's Charter. We would go through the same stuff in 2010-2003. If we changed the Charter to reflect redistricting and the timeliness of the elections then we would be achieving something.

But for now we sit and argue about a proposal that will only cost us more money than it is worth and accomplish nothing.

So drop it Phyllis. And let's get to task to make a real difference. CHANGE THE CHARTER.

Valdis Rozentals
SAW


[Mpls] car thefts

2003-03-08 Thread JeanJstad
  Hondas may be the target in one neighborhood. Here in Seward, we have equal opportunity thieves. Different makes and models have disappeared with 2 attempted thefts and 6 successful thefts in my immediate vicinity in the last several weeks. I suspect that there is an increase in car thefts and other crimes throughout the city. I have talked to neighbors who've had cars stolen from locked garages. Others have had them stolen when they'be been locked on the street. Still others have chased them down the street after they left them running when they returned to their home momentarily to retrieve something they'd forgotten. 
 According to tv reports, Kenwood residents suffered many burglaries this winter; businesses along Hennepin Ave. faced a rash of armed robberies, and that is also happening on the streets to individuals near Powderhorn.
 What I found interesting is that we citizens are supposed to install security devices and protective devices. I understand that no one should not leave a car warming up, but shouldn't having a vehicle locked be "reasonable" deterrence? 
 Where are these vehicles ending up? Are they being used for joy rides and turning up again? Or are same model thefts disappearing into a "chop" shop?
 The problem is far broader than these thefts.CODEFOR crime maps do show patterns. Unfortunately, a number of factors make me concerned that these problems will not lessen.
Jean Johnstad
Seward



[Mpls] Womens' Day Demonstration

2003-03-08 Thread Gypsycurse7
Does anyone know how the Peace March went today? I had to work.

Linda Mann

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Finance: Libraries and Cops

2003-03-08 Thread WizardMarks


Jim Mork wrote:

A couple of issues:

First, as to the library, I think we have Highway 55-reroute all over again.  That is this has all been discussed before.  No it hasn't. Because whatever got discussed, it wasn't in the context of our huge shortfalls and our staggering debt.  That could have been IMAGINED, but until now it wasn't real.  Now that it IS real, it has to be considered. If I have a dream of a Mercedes and then find myself without a job in a competitive job market, it doesnt MATTER how I looked at buying the Mercedes before. 

WM: This scenario does not compare like things. A library is not like an 
automobile. A library is a living organism and recorded history has been 
the central reason for its existence. Were it the case that MPL were a 
repository library, delaying the build might not matter. However, MPL is 
a hybrid, it is first and foremost, a public library, and only second, a 
research library.
Public libraries reach their peak usage during economic downturns or at 
periods of huge immigrations. Minneapolis is experiencing both those 
situations now. We have huge, mostly very new immigrant populations and 
we have an economic downturn.
Having the library temporarily housed in a building not suited to its 
tasks is blow enough to gravely injure the library, the budget cuts are 
a second blow, delaying replacing the central library any further could 
make the library unable to recover. It was not the healthiest library 
going into this situation. Hence a demand for a new director. The 
question becomes: do the people of Minneapolis support a Minneapolis 
Public Library at all?
Rescinding the referendum or refusing to issue bonds will not support 
MPL, but it could deal a blow from which it cannot recover.

Now, I'm dealing with survival and the conditions are radically different.  The thing about warehousing books is that it neednt BE a permanent solution. 

WM: A library in the 21st Century, (according to Library Journal, I 
think) will be a cultural center and meeting place for the people. 
People need to be able to go to the library and stay there for hours to 
work and learn. Mr. Mork's assumption is that the body politic will get 
used to using the library as sort of a free video rental joint if we 
stuff it into a warehouse till the good times roll. In truth, to 
accomplish a 21st Century library, staff and patrons need to interact on 
an even greater level than they do presently.

Of course, when you do it awhile, all these frightening concerns heard from the people who long for the glass palace may turn out to be empty concerns, in which case you make the warehouse a permanent solution. 

WM: Actually, I'm not personally 'longing for the glass palace'. I want 
a central library which has tons of fascinating and necessary material 
for me to use. I don't want a warehouse. I also don't think it's a fair 
way to treat the staff to try to stuff them into a warehouse. It's been 
bad enough that so many have had to hang out in the sub-basement turning 
into troglodytes since the sixties.
Frankly, the design, as far as I can envision it from the model, pretty 
much leaves me cold.

But unlike a hugely expensive glass palace, a warehouse can be sold to someone who 
needs it.  Whereas if the glass!
palace fails, the likelihood of recovering the investment is minimal.
WM: Just how does the public library fail in this sketchy scenario? This 
is the most democratic institution we, as a people, can lay claim to. 
How does it fail except that we do not cherish it for the institution it 
is and treat it with the respect it deserves? Would that it were a 
palace. I'm more afraid that so many corners will be cut that it will 
not fulfill our requirements for public library space.

Once again, we are operating in the we're broke scenario.  

WM: This may be the crux of the issue. I say we're broke let's go to the 
library nd figure a way out of this mess; you're saying, yeah, so let's 
further impoverish ourselves and make it more difficult to get back on 
our feet.

I'd have to see the records to believe anyone planning the glass palace ever accounted for a we're broke scenario. But the time to do so is NOW.

WM: One hundred ten million is not a palace. This is a statement that 
gives me heart palpitations to think, but it is true. If you look at the 
analysis of what various cities spend on their public libraries/member 
of their population, Minneapolis is shamefully low. We have spent less 
than half what comparable cities spend. Even the demand for a 10% across 
the board cut in operating expenses is unfair to the library since, 
having already started with a smaller than necessary budget, they are 
more affected by the cuts than better funded endeavors. The library was 
already too skinny, it didn't need a diet.

My signature:
The comment about buying bombs with money taken from education has NO relevance to my 
discussion of the library.  I'm not talking about maintaining the ability 

[Mpls] Library Budget Cuts -- Walker Community Library to Close

2003-03-08 Thread Steve Cross
All:

The Minneapolis Library is having some serious budget cuts along with
the city, county, and state.  But, unlike the other units of government,
it's apparently happening below everyone's radar.  One reason is probably
that the Library Administration is apparently doing it with minimal public
notice.  It was that they were announced at closing time on Friday and the
cuts are to be considered at next Wednesday's Library Board meeting.  To
read the official information about it, go to:

http://www.mpls.lib.mn.us/board_agenda.asp

When you get to that page, look at agenda item (8) (m) and then click on
Attachments 1 2 3 to read the staff recommendations.  They are in Acrobat
format.

The guts of the changes is the layoff of 45 to 50 staff, the reduction of
hours, and the elimination of some services.  What is probably the biggest
news, though, is that the Walker Community Library in Uptown is proposed for
total closing.  The interesting part of that is that the Walker Library is
one of the most heavily used community libraries rather than one of the
least used.  One would normally suspect that the least used facilities would
be the one considered for elimination for budget reasons.

The reason is due to structural repairs.  This is an apparent reference to
the surface parking lot at the site.  (For those who may not be aware of it,
the Walker Library is a relatively new building and is all underground --
under the parking lot to be exact.)  The parking lot leaks into the
building.  It was supposed to have been fixed years ago but somehow it never
happened.  The responsibility to fix the parking lot and building is the
city's responsibility not the library's.  But, as already known, the city
doesn't have money for the repairs.  So, it's like the for want of a
nail,... scenario.  Because the library parking lot wasn't fixed when it
should have been, and because there isn't the money to fix it now, the
building will be abandoned, the library closed, and the people in Uptown
will have to see where they want to go for library facilities.

It's also possible that the Franklin and Sumner libraries will close while
they are being reconstructed rather than keeping them open in temporary
facilities.

But read it all and weep -- particularly if you live in Uptown.  This is
what you get when no new taxes is the bill of goods that the governor has
sold to everyone.

Steve Cross
Prospect Park



TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Keep the ideas coming

2003-03-08 Thread Rybak, R.T.

There have been some very good budget items coming forward in the posts I've had a 
chance to read, and I want to encourage people to keep sending them.  We need all the 
ideas we can get.

As you do that, remember that we have two related, but separate challenges...Short 
term for 2003 and slightly longer term for 2004. 

The 2003 budget ideas we need are obviously those that can be implemented right away.  
Over the past year, as we've done the budget reforms, we've tried to think as long 
term and strategicly as possible.   We will still do that but right now we also need 
to look especially hard at ideas that can be put into place right away, don't require 
partnerships with other groups, etc.  

The 2004 budget challenges are greater, possibly double if the Governor's budget goes 
as proposed, but they also open the potential to be more strategic.  So here's where 
we can get into play some of the more reform minded ideas that have emerged.

Ideas in both camps are needed.

To update on how things are going so far:

We may not know the actual number that the state will cut until late spring, or even 
mid summerConsidering the controversy so far, and the scope of what the state is 
dealing with, it's anyone's guess when an agreement will be made.   But we can't wait 
to act:  If we get the news in July that we are getting a $26 million cut to our LGA, 
and we haven't cut spending, we will have to squeeze that money into the second half 
of the year so in many ways that $26 million cut becomes a $52 million cut. This is 
why you will hear the fire chief and the police chief talking about the need to make a 
decison as soon as possiblethe sooner we make cuts the more jobs and services we 
save long term.

For this reason, I've asked the council to take action Thursday that will allocate the 
budget cuts proposed in the Governor's 2003 budget.  This will give managers the power 
to do what they have to do. 

Between now and the end of the month department heads will be coming forward to 
present to me and the council how they will manage those cuts.  The fire chief already 
presented.  Friday Public Works and the City Coordinator.

Most of these meetings will take place the last week of March.

The most complicated will be the police department, where there are some real 
challenges.  I met this morning for a couple hours with the chief and his command 
staff. We made good progress and will continue to meet to make sure we come up with a 
plan that ensures public safety.

The cuts proposed by the Governor give us some very real, and extremely serious 
challenges.  We are also working on cutting spending in areas not effected, such as 
the MCDA where there were cuts announced Friday.

So keep sending ideas, short and long term...We can use your help.   


R.T. Rybak

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Finance: Libraries and Cops. WE NEED A LITTLE MORE CAKE AND A LOT LESS FROSTING

2003-03-08 Thread JIM GRAHAM
Jim Mork, you are absolutely correct about both the library and the police.

If we have to immediately have a large building to house the books of the
Minneapolis Library, lets look at the Sears building.  The City already owns
it.  Take one or two floors and have a huge library with historical context.
The City is clearly not interested in any real commercial use for the
building.  Retrofitting that building with new sprinklers and into nice
surroundings to read would cost a few million.  There will be plenty of
parking and more people will probably use it.  It also starts a commercial
utilization of the building, which will translate into other commercial
uses.  When the City is flush again, build the crystal palace if you still
want to and sell or lease, (at a profit), the retrofitted building for other
commercial uses.  Since this would take about a hundred million dollars from
someone's pocket, don't place any money on this option being considered.

As for Police, I seem to remember the suggestion that limiting the increase
in pay to 2% would mean no layoffs.  What happened to that idea? What
happened to make a couple of City Council Members preaching fiscal restraint
advocate a 6% raise?  What happened was bad management or political pay
back.  The reader can choose the answer, but neither speaks well for those
in decision-making positions.

Both of these situations point to poor management.  It's a bit like a
homeowner planning and contracting to build a three-season porch when the
roof is leaking and the furnace just went out.  Our political leadership
seems to be engaging in making the frosting without bothering with the
mundane chore of baking the cake.  All glitz and no substance.

This same leadership seems intent on spending $60,000 per unit subsidy for
each rental unit to keep a person poor.  It seems to prefer such a large
subsidy to escrowing a few thousand dollars on a guaranteed loan to make the
same poor person a homeowner.   A homeowner whose future might not need such
support.  Rather than creating truly sustainable affordable housing, some in
leadership positions seem to prefer to keep the minority and poor as a
permanent underclass.  One excuse for opposition to affordable homeownership
is that the poor family might later sell the house and no longer be poor.
Hmm, isn't that the idea?  Isn't the real reason for opposition an attempt
to protect the developer fees and consultant fees that come from large
rental projects?  What profit is there in poor people no longer being poor?
No profit, except maybe to the poor family that then would have a stable
life and future opportunities! What is our City's political leadership's
position on addressing affordable housing in a sustainable manner?  Like the
old lady said, Where's the beef?  Will it be all frosting without any
cake?

The Developers still would have access to 12 million dollars out of the 14
million dollars set aside for affordable housing, (for their Developer
 Fees).  So why are the supposed City leadership so furious about the NRP
Policy Board's decision to keep back, (not to spend), 2 million dollars to
guarantee affordable homeownership?  Exactly whose ox is being gored to
illicit such an unreasonable hissy fit on their part?

We, (the City), need safe sustainable affordable housing and home
ownership in safe crime free neighborhoods.  After that we need basic
services, and then if anything is left over the Mayor and Council can play.
Until then, how about a little less glitz and a little more substance, a
little more cake and a lot less frosting?

Jim Graham,
Ventura Village

The people are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.
We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt.
- Thomas Jefferson






TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Finance: Libraries and Cops. WE NEED A LITTLE MORE CAKE AND A LOT LESS FROSTING

2003-03-08 Thread HolleB

In a message dated 3/8/03 5:11:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 If we have to immediately have a large building to house the books of the

Minneapolis Library, lets look at the Sears building.  The City already owns

it.  Take one or two floors and have a huge library with historical context.



I love it.

In the spirit of increased fiscal conservativism, I have already pledged to 
limit my spring clothing purchases to bargain bin $12.99 depression-era-style 
dresses ... I have made a commitment to squeeze another couple years out of 
my 1988 Buick instead of buy a newer used car... 

I'd be thrilled to go to a great public library that reflects a little 
austerity and respect for history (and is practically in my neighborhood -- 
how radical is that!) Put the dang library where the people live. Enough with 
the glass palaces... this plan might even enable some of the branch libraries 
to stay open.

-- Holle Brian
Bancroft

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] library / budget

2003-03-08 Thread James E. Jacobsen
 Not building the library would not solve the budget problem, as the
library, like a stadium- would be funded with a bond issue.   Holding off on
library construction likely would save some out of pocket city expense which
would be helpful in short run, but building the library -like building a
stadium- would provide jobs and some razamataz for the city which would be
helpful in revenue gathering.
 Of course, the bond issue, added to already existing city debt
would not be helpful.  I think the city should hold off for one or two
years, by then should have the budget situation organized and then should
proceed with building the library.
 All these people, though, with hundred thousand plus
salaries, -even police types, -and not even high ranking- should be
considered, -including head of the library- getting $120,000.  those
salaries could and should be trimmed
 The idea of using the Sears building for a library has some merit
though there would be huge expense to make it work.  The whole building
would have to be renovated, etc., etc., They can't just abandon the
architectural work already done on the planned library, they already have
the library in the temp. location, best to leave it there.
 The Sears building will find a purpose, probably when light rail
comes through it will develop, could be a mix of commercial and office.
 James Jacobsen  //  Whittier











TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: Re:[Mpls] Nicollet/Lake Debacle

2003-03-08 Thread Lisa McDonald
Okay folks here's the real skinny. The Nicollet Lake deal is DOA due to money. Having to choose between this project and Sears, Sears made the cut. As to that bit about studying the area more, it's been done by the Task Force and the neighborhoods the last few years, andif CM Niziolek was concerned about that he's had over a year to work on further study.  Lisa McDonald East Harriet   - Original Message - From: Fredric Markus Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 7:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:[Mpls] Nicollet/Lake Debacle One hopes that neighborhood response to this benighted decision to pullthe plug on Sherman Associates will send a wake-up call to Cms Niziolekand Lilligren - stunting this development will reverberate through thewest end of the Lake St. corridor and failing to open Nicollet willperpetuate a long-standing traffic flow problem that will be made worsein the event the 35W ramp goes forward. Why is city hall willing to seethese major hits to tax base growth potential? Why are the incumbentcouncil members rolling over for this? I surely see more credibility inthe Lake/Nicollet plans than in the financial black hole that the SearsTower has become. In the dark corridors of the city's bureaucracy, issomeone's "professional" reputation being salvaged at substantialimmediate expense to the Sherman Associates firm and formidable futurecost to the economic viability of scores of existing businesses in thesecorridors? What chilling message does this send to the aspirations of other citycouncil members and their business and residential constituents in othercommercial corridors radiating out from the central business district?Is this an example of a turf war that pits embattled big-ticketdevelopment bureaucrats against the leaner, more supple, more manageableproducts of local initiatives? We have a weak mayor system of government. Are we now to have a weakCity Council as well?Fred Markus, Horn Terrace, Ward Ten, in the Lyndale Neighborhood ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.459 / Virus Database: 258 - Release Date: 2/25/2003TEMPORARY REMINDER:1. Send all posts in plain-text format.2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-DemocracyPost messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mplsGet more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


[Mpls] It's cold outside!

2003-03-08 Thread m1r3201
Pretty cold out today! Minnesota weather is particularly tough on people experiencing homelessness. And certainly our city of Minneapolis is cold both literally and in spirit towards our fellow humans out in the cold.
 In Philadelphia, the city requires that when the temp drops below a certain point, teams of social service workers, the police, other public servants go out to find and get people who are outside into a warm shelter until the temp rises.
 On those days no one can be refused shelter.
 This information comes not only from a friend of mine who works in Philadelphia with people who are homeless, it is also discussed in Real Change news a paper out of Seattle in their most recent edition, available on the web.
 To clarify, this is not about people being arrested off the streets, they are not charged with a crime.. the purpose is specifically designed as a humanity issue.
 This is also being done in other East Coast cities. Certainly, the City of Minneapolis should be following suit. Right now, we simply arrest people forced out into the street or harass them or beat them up, or tear down their encampments and steal all of their belongings.
 Steve Brandt in his article today referred to "..the affordable housing lobby, one of the city's noisiest interest groups." Well, you know, Steve, when immorality such as the above continues be allowed in this city there needs to be a whole lot of noise.
 
 What does it take for people to become outraged in this town to demand of our leaders that they take immediate steps to stop this suffering? It seems like a slam dunk that it is not ok for people to have to be forced into the streets.
 Margaret Hastings Minneapolis-Kingfield
 
 


RE: [Mpls] It's cold outside!

2003-03-08 Thread David Brauer
Margaret writes:

In Philadelphia, the city requires that when the temp drops below a
certain point, teams of social service workers, the police, other public
servants go out to find and get people who are outside into a warm shelter
until the temp rises.
On those days no one can be refused shelter.

My sincere question:

Are people in Minneapolis being refused/turned away from shelter tonight?

David Brauer
King Field


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 8:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Mpls] It's cold outside!

Pretty cold out today! Minnesota weather is particularly tough on people
experiencing homelessness. And certainly our city of Minneapolis is cold
both literally and in spirit towards our fellow humans out in the cold.
    In Philadelphia, the city requires that when the temp drops below a
certain point, teams of social service workers, the police, other public
servants go out to find and get people who are outside into a warm shelter
until the temp rises.
 


TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Libraries

2003-03-08 Thread Jim Mork
One thing about the plan that I'm hearing for the library is the implication that even 
books seldom EVER called for must be out on open racks.  Sorry, but I've NEVER seen 
something like that done. Only a fool would saddle themselves with handling archival 
material like that.  A book should be borrowed a certain minimum times per year to be 
out and available.  There is a common sense standard for that, too.  And some books 
are in such delicate condition that they should not be borrowed out at all.

Plus, there are books of which the library has ONE copy.   I know because I sold a 
book based on the fact it was in the library collection.  Years later, I wanted to 
borrow it and it had been taken out and never returned. And the book was out of print 
so now there was NO way to get it.  A book like that should be in the reserve 
collection for reading in a reading room at the library.  And NOT in the open shelves 
where someone can steal it!

Actually, the Gutenberg project was to put the content of the Library of Congress 
online. I think books that are likely never to be printed again should never be loaned 
OUT in hard copy again.

I am not one of those who crabs about taxes, but I do object to the people in 
government acting as if it doesn't matter if they manage wisely because they have 
access to an endless supply of cash.  That is how we get backed into things like 
Target Center, the Target office building, and the glass palace.  The supply of cash 
is NOT endless, and it really irks when there is a sudden shortage and then we find we 
CANNOT put show projects on hold and we MUST strip our police force.

If the people in elective office cannot figure out how the larger world protects 
itself against these contingencies, I think they should have the decency to vacate 
their office to someone who is willing to LEARN how it is done.  A rainy-day fund is a 
great idea if it can be done, but that certainly is not the limit to insuring oneself. 
 Options, escape-clauses, whatever.  A good contract lawyer can draw up the terms and 
then its just a matter of not being bamboozled by contractors with connections.  It is 
better NOT to contract for a library building than to contract under such terms that 
you are trapped by hard times.


--
Jim Mork--Cooper

Only a LUNATIC would cut schools in order to pay for more bombs.

We hold these truths to be self-evidentthat the just power of governments derives 
from the consent of the governed.  Declaration of Independence
Get your free Web-based E-mail at http://www.startribune.com/stribmail

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] It's cold outside!

2003-03-08 Thread Peter T Schmitz
David,  My sincere question:   Let's say if no homeless person was turned
away from the shelters tonight, would it be any less outrageous to turn
them away when it's fifteen, thirty or even seventy degrees above zero?  
Even in warm weather, homeless people turned away from shelters are at
the mercy of criminals and rogue cops, and because they're technically
breaking anti-camping ordinances and laws, there's no way they can
successfully file a grievance or a complaint, whether they've been
assaulted by a civilian or a cop.  This problem has been brought to the
attention of our local politicians often enough, but who among them has
had the compassion and integrity to respond?  Our community's growing
indifference to the plight of our most vulnerable citizens reminds me of
Hitler's Germany.  The coldness outside is nothing compared to the
coldness of our hearts. -- Peter Schmitz, CARAG

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.



Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls