Re: [Mpls] Guthrie Land Sale: More fun with numbers.....

2002-10-06 Thread kaforbes

Quoting Craig Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 The Minneapolis Rubes are getting taken again. In the real estate world we
 call vacant or buildable land dirt. 'How much is the dirt?'  Well, out
 here in the sticks, dirt that had corn on it last year and houses built
 upon
 it next year goes for about 120,000 per acre or $3.00 per sq ft. That's if
 it has a street, gutter, and municipal water/sewer.
 
 So thirty miles away from downtown it's three bucks. And the city is giving
 it away for $5-7.
 
 Listmembers, this land along the river could go for $30-50 per sq ft if you
 want to. Just think what we could fund with $1.3-2.1 Million dollars. MPS
 could hire 100 teachers for a year. MPB could hire 300+ park supervisors
 for
 one summer. I have no idea how many ESL specialists could be hired to teach
 english to new hard working immigrants.
 
 The city has to stop selling such valuable land for so little money.
 
 Craig Miller
 Former Fultonite
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
Oh hey, how about a planatarium?

Karen Forbes
Central 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
 Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
 http://e-democracy.org/mpls
 


___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



[Mpls] Guthrie Land Sale: More fun with numbers.....

2002-10-05 Thread Victoria Heller

One acre of land contains 43,560 square feet.

Last fall, Steve Cramer (then executive director of the MCDA) said that the
land sale to the Guthrie involved no subsidies - it was a fair market
value deal.  10 acres of the City's BEST RIVERFRONT LAND for $3 million.
That was $6.79 per sq. ft.

Now we ponder selling two parcels:

Seven acres to the Guthrie for $4 million = $7.62 per square foot.
Three acres to ? for $2.3 million = $5.68 per square foot.

A Few Questions for Council Members (MCDA Commissioners):

Minneapolis paid $50.00 per square foot for Target Store land.  Why is
Riverfront land so cheap?

Why is there a discrepancy between the two prices:  $7.62 vs. $5.68?  The
parcels are adjacent.

How much did the City pay to acquire the land, and how long have we been
holding it (off the tax rolls?)  In other words, what was our COST - so we
can calculate our LOSS.

Lots of investors would LOVE to buy riverfront land at those prices:  Where
do we submit our bids?  How will you choose the WINNERS?

Eagerly awaiting a reply,

Vicky Heller
North Oaks and
Cedar-Riverside (a stone's throw away from the site in question)





___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



RE: [Mpls] Guthrie Land Sale: More fun with numbers.....

2002-10-05 Thread Walt Cygan

I think your calculations are a little off:

10 acres = 435,600 sqft
$3 million / 435,600 = $6.89 / sqft

7 acres = 304,920 sqft
$4 million / 304,920 = $13.12 / sqft

3 acres = 130,680 sqft
$2.3 million / 130,680 = $17.60 / sqft

Your points about the difference vis-a-vis Target, the difference
between the parcels, and particularly how long the 10 acres have been
off the tax rolls are still interesting.

Walt Cygan 
Keewaydin

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Victoria Heller
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2002 9:32 AM
To: Mpls Forum
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Mpls] Guthrie Land Sale: More fun with numbers.

One acre of land contains 43,560 square feet.

Last fall, Steve Cramer (then executive director of the MCDA) said that
the
land sale to the Guthrie involved no subsidies - it was a fair market
value deal.  10 acres of the City's BEST RIVERFRONT LAND for $3
million.
That was $6.79 per sq. ft.

Now we ponder selling two parcels:

Seven acres to the Guthrie for $4 million = $7.62 per square foot.
Three acres to ? for $2.3 million = $5.68 per square foot.

A Few Questions for Council Members (MCDA Commissioners):

Minneapolis paid $50.00 per square foot for Target Store land.  Why is
Riverfront land so cheap?

Why is there a discrepancy between the two prices:  $7.62 vs. $5.68?
The
parcels are adjacent.

How much did the City pay to acquire the land, and how long have we been
holding it (off the tax rolls?)  In other words, what was our COST - so
we
can calculate our LOSS.

Lots of investors would LOVE to buy riverfront land at those prices:
Where
do we submit our bids?  How will you choose the WINNERS?

Eagerly awaiting a reply,

Vicky Heller
North Oaks and
Cedar-Riverside (a stone's throw away from the site in question)





___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] Guthrie Land Sale: More fun with numbers.....

2002-10-05 Thread JIM GRAHAM

Land on East Franklin Avenue between Portland and the freeway has sold for
between $23.00 and $29.00 per square foot (within the last two years ).  Is
the view of a freeway and the Minneapolis Convention Center across the same
freeway more valuable than downtown riverfront?  How much would we have
saved if Sharon, Jackie and their cronies had not sold out the City and
allowed Opus to buy and develop the Target site?

Vicki I am willing to partner with you to offer $10.00 per square foot for
the same land.  Perhaps we could start the MPLS List Development and Trust
Company, LLC.   If this is indeed not a subsidy then our offer should be
accepted.  You know Vicki we could build Affordable  mixed use on the
site,  Condo everything for home ownership and individual business
ownership, and still do all right, buying the land that cheap.

You know Vicki you are fighting unfairly.  Like Foghorn Leghorn says, You
can argue with me but you can't argue with mathematics.

Jim Graham,
Ventura Village  (and wondering why I don't ever get deals like that)

- Original Message -
From: Victoria Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mpls Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 9:32 AM
Subject: [Mpls] Guthrie Land Sale: More fun with numbers.


 One acre of land contains 43,560 square feet.

 Last fall, Steve Cramer (then executive director of the MCDA) said that
the
 land sale to the Guthrie involved no subsidies - it was a fair market
 value deal.  10 acres of the City's BEST RIVERFRONT LAND for $3 million.
 That was $6.79 per sq. ft.

 Now we ponder selling two parcels:

 Seven acres to the Guthrie for $4 million = $7.62 per square foot.
 Three acres to ? for $2.3 million = $5.68 per square foot.

 A Few Questions for Council Members (MCDA Commissioners):

 Minneapolis paid $50.00 per square foot for Target Store land.  Why is
 Riverfront land so cheap?

 Why is there a discrepancy between the two prices:  $7.62 vs. $5.68?  The
 parcels are adjacent.

 How much did the City pay to acquire the land, and how long have we been
 holding it (off the tax rolls?)  In other words, what was our COST - so we
 can calculate our LOSS.

 Lots of investors would LOVE to buy riverfront land at those prices:
Where
 do we submit our bids?  How will you choose the WINNERS?

 Eagerly awaiting a reply,

 Vicky Heller
 North Oaks and
 Cedar-Riverside (a stone's throw away from the site in question)





 ___
 Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
 Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
 http://e-democracy.org/mpls


___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



Re: [Mpls] Guthrie Land Sale: More fun with numbers.....

2002-10-05 Thread Craig Miller

The Minneapolis Rubes are getting taken again. In the real estate world we
call vacant or buildable land dirt. 'How much is the dirt?'  Well, out
here in the sticks, dirt that had corn on it last year and houses built upon
it next year goes for about 120,000 per acre or $3.00 per sq ft. That's if
it has a street, gutter, and municipal water/sewer.

So thirty miles away from downtown it's three bucks. And the city is giving
it away for $5-7.

Listmembers, this land along the river could go for $30-50 per sq ft if you
want to. Just think what we could fund with $1.3-2.1 Million dollars. MPS
could hire 100 teachers for a year. MPB could hire 300+ park supervisors for
one summer. I have no idea how many ESL specialists could be hired to teach
english to new hard working immigrants.

The city has to stop selling such valuable land for so little money.

Craig Miller
Former Fultonite
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





 One acre of land contains 43,560 square feet.

 Last fall, Steve Cramer (then executive director of the MCDA) said that
the
 land sale to the Guthrie involved no subsidies - it was a fair market
 value deal.  10 acres of the City's BEST RIVERFRONT LAND for $3 million.
 That was $6.79 per sq. ft.

 Now we ponder selling two parcels:

 Seven acres to the Guthrie for $4 million = $7.62 per square foot.
 Three acres to ? for $2.3 million = $5.68 per square foot.

 A Few Questions for Council Members (MCDA Commissioners):

 Minneapolis paid $50.00 per square foot for Target Store land.  Why is
 Riverfront land so cheap?

 Why is there a discrepancy between the two prices:  $7.62 vs. $5.68?  The
 parcels are adjacent.

 How much did the City pay to acquire the land, and how long have we been
 holding it (off the tax rolls?)  In other words, what was our COST - so we
 can calculate our LOSS.

 Lots of investors would LOVE to buy riverfront land at those prices:
Where
 do we submit our bids?  How will you choose the WINNERS?

 Eagerly awaiting a reply,

 Vicky Heller
 North Oaks and
 Cedar-Riverside (a stone's throw away from the site in question)





 ___
 Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
 Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
 http://e-democracy.org/mpls



___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls