Automated dialing

2000-11-06 Thread Steve Minn

Many thanks to Mr. Pierson for posting the statute regarding automated 
dialing, but a correction is necessary regarding illegality.

The statute is primarily intended for commercial marketing purposes, not
restriction of free speech expression.  I doubt the statute meets a
constitutional test on the free speech doctrine, let alone the
jurisdictional question for President. US Senate or Congress.  He may have a
point for state races, but then again, there's that nagging free speech
doctrine. Most candidates who were warned about this have decided to go
ahead anyway, primarily because of this basic constitutional protection.

In any event, I have done this type of calling myself in past campaigns, and
it is very cost effective.  It is particularly good if run during the day,
when people are not home.  The recorded message left on voice mail or
answering machines can not be discerned as anything less than an actual
call.

Interestingly, though it was the DFL party and DFL Atty. General Mike Hatch
who complained to the Foley (4th CD) Campaign about the Ventura calls a few
weeks ago, it is the DFL that is making calls from "President Clinton" and
"Al Gore" throughout the Metro and in particular, Minneapolis.

Steve Minn

--
From: "Darren Pierson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Jessie knows my number!
Date: Mon, Nov 6, 2000, 12:55 PM


 These automated dialing calls are against the law.  I think many campaigns
 have been advised to cease this activity, but obviously it's continuing with
 others.  Here is the statute number and web site to view the actual
 language...

 Be advised, if your campaign is taking part in this activity, they are
 breaking the law...

 325E.27

 http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/325E/27.html

 Cheers!

 Darren Pierson
 St. Paul-Ward 1




From: "R.T.Rybak" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Jessie knows my number!
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 11:39:43 -0600

I just got a call from Jesse Ventura.  Well, actually it was a RECORDED
call...on behalf of the Independence legislative candidate in my area. I
found it interesting that the Indepdence Party is working harder in this
race, it seems, than the Republicans.

I also saw evidence of that this weekend when I was leafleting for Neva
Walker, and found lots of Independence literature on doorsteps...but none
for Republicans.

It is list-appropriate to ask what other tactics people are seeing to turn
out city voters?

R.T. Rybak
East Harriet.


 _
 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

 Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
 http://profiles.msn.com.
 



Re: Automated dialing

2000-11-06 Thread Steve Minn

One legal scholar close to a federal case on this point,indicated that the
typical voice mail/answering machine message:  "please leave a message at
the tone..." constitutes permission to do so by the automated calling
device. In any event...for federal office, the MN Sp.Ct. does not apply.

Steve Minn

--
From: "Darren Pierson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Automated dialing
Date: Mon, Nov 6, 2000, 2:05 PM


 All list members, and especially Minneapolis voters that receive these calls
 (In an effort to keep this Mpls specific, List-Manager) need to know that
 the Minnesota State Supreme Court upheld the ruling that even for political
 purposes, there has to be a live person on the line before the tape-recorded
 voice message starts to play.

 In no way is it an attepmt to restrict free-speech, it simply gives the
 person answering the call the opportunity to deny it.  It's more of a choice
 issue than a freem speech issue.

 Personally, it's lazy campaigning...

 Cheers!

 Darren Pierson
 St. Paul-Ward 1


From: "Steve Minn" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] , Multiple recipients of list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Automated dialing
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 13:51:48 -0600

Many thanks to Mr. Pierson for posting the statute regarding automated
dialing, but a correction is necessary regarding illegality.

The statute is primarily intended for commercial marketing purposes, not
restriction of free speech expression.  I doubt the statute meets a
constitutional test on the free speech doctrine, let alone the
jurisdictional question for President. US Senate or Congress.  He may have
a
point for state races, but then again, there's that nagging free speech
doctrine. Most candidates who were warned about this have decided to go
ahead anyway, primarily because of this basic constitutional protection.

In any event, I have done this type of calling myself in past campaigns,
and
it is very cost effective.  It is particularly good if run during the day,
when people are not home.  The recorded message left on voice mail or
answering machines can not be discerned as anything less than an actual
call.

Interestingly, though it was the DFL party and DFL Atty. General Mike Hatch
who complained to the Foley (4th CD) Campaign about the Ventura calls a few
weeks ago, it is the DFL that is making calls from "President Clinton" and
"Al Gore" throughout the Metro and in particular, Minneapolis.

Steve Minn

--
 From: "Darren Pierson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Multiple recipients of list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Jessie knows my number!
 Date: Mon, Nov 6, 2000, 12:55 PM
 

  These automated dialing calls are against the law.  I think many
campaigns
  have been advised to cease this activity, but obviously it's continuing
with
  others.  Here is the statute number and web site to view the actual
  language...
 
  Be advised, if your campaign is taking part in this activity, they are
  breaking the law...
 
  325E.27
 
  http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/325E/27.html
 
  Cheers!
 
  Darren Pierson
  St. Paul-Ward 1
 
 
 
 
 From: "R.T.Rybak" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Multiple recipients of list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Jessie knows my number!
 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 11:39:43 -0600
 
 I just got a call from Jesse Ventura.  Well, actually it was a RECORDED
 call...on behalf of the Independence legislative candidate in my area. I
 found it interesting that the Indepdence Party is working harder in this
 race, it seems, than the Republicans.
 
 I also saw evidence of that this weekend when I was leafleting for Neva
 Walker, and found lots of Independence literature on doorsteps...but
none
 for Republicans.
 
 It is list-appropriate to ask what other tactics people are seeing to
turn
 out city voters?
 
 R.T. Rybak
 East Harriet.
 
 
 
_
  Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.
 
  Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
  http://profiles.msn.com.
 

 _
 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

 Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
 http://profiles.msn.com.
 



RE: Automated dialing

2000-11-06 Thread Jonna Connelly

"The recorded message left on voice mail or
answering machines can not be discerned as anything less than an actual
call."

 Whatever else you can say about it, this hasn't been my experience.  I got
calls from the DFL, AFSCME, and VP Al Gore himself over the past week.  The
Gore one was the best quality, though obviously recorded.  Even given that
my answering machine isn't the best around, the other 2 were unintelligible,
mostly because the speaker spoke fast and quietly.  Truly a waste of time
and, if these were paid workers, of money.




RE: Automated dialing

2000-11-06 Thread Young, Susan A

I "received" TWO calls from Barbara Bush last night!!!   Maybe it's just
outside the City limits phones that get that call!

-Original Message-
From: Steve Minn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 1:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Automated dialing


Many thanks to Mr. Pierson for posting the statute regarding automated 
dialing, but a correction is necessary regarding illegality.

The statute is primarily intended for commercial marketing purposes, not
restriction of free speech expression.  I doubt the statute meets a
constitutional test on the free speech doctrine, let alone the
jurisdictional question for President. US Senate or Congress.  He may have a
point for state races, but then again, there's that nagging free speech
doctrine. Most candidates who were warned about this have decided to go
ahead anyway, primarily because of this basic constitutional protection.

In any event, I have done this type of calling myself in past campaigns, and
it is very cost effective.  It is particularly good if run during the day,
when people are not home.  The recorded message left on voice mail or
answering machines can not be discerned as anything less than an actual
call.

Interestingly, though it was the DFL party and DFL Atty. General Mike Hatch
who complained to the Foley (4th CD) Campaign about the Ventura calls a few
weeks ago, it is the DFL that is making calls from "President Clinton" and
"Al Gore" throughout the Metro and in particular, Minneapolis.

Steve Minn

--
From: "Darren Pierson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Jessie knows my number!
Date: Mon, Nov 6, 2000, 12:55 PM


 These automated dialing calls are against the law.  I think many campaigns
 have been advised to cease this activity, but obviously it's continuing
with
 others.  Here is the statute number and web site to view the actual
 language...

 Be advised, if your campaign is taking part in this activity, they are
 breaking the law...

 325E.27

 http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/325E/27.html

 Cheers!

 Darren Pierson
 St. Paul-Ward 1




From: "R.T.Rybak" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Jessie knows my number!
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 11:39:43 -0600

I just got a call from Jesse Ventura.  Well, actually it was a RECORDED
call...on behalf of the Independence legislative candidate in my area. I
found it interesting that the Indepdence Party is working harder in this
race, it seems, than the Republicans.

I also saw evidence of that this weekend when I was leafleting for Neva
Walker, and found lots of Independence literature on doorsteps...but none
for Republicans.

It is list-appropriate to ask what other tactics people are seeing to turn
out city voters?

R.T. Rybak
East Harriet.


 _
 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

 Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
 http://profiles.msn.com.