On 10 September 2010 08:22, Luka Čehovin <luka.ceho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > >> 3. Let a common library implement basic ORA support, and provide an >> interface to get the full image as a pixel buffer. >> >> My favorite option is number 3, mainly because: >> 1. results in redundant information in every new ORA file, as you >> point out. And it does not work for existing files. >> 2. results in fairly significant duplicate work for each >> implementation. Or the current state - no implementations at all. >> >> In addition having a library abstract the details away means that >> newer features could be added in a transparent way as the standard >> develops. >> > > These are exactly the reasons why I have started working on libora. At > the moment I still do not have time to continue the development ... > but since the code is on gitorious everyone is welcome to join. At the > moment I can only participate in some potential brainstormings and > help with some minor stuff. > Do you have time for a code review?
Also, would you please remove libora on gitorious in favour of the openraster/libora repo, like we discussed? -- Regards Jon Nordby - www.jonnor.com _______________________________________________ Mypaint-discuss mailing list Mypaint-discuss@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/mypaint-discuss
