Re: [Mypaint-discuss] layers re-positioning for adjustment

2010-10-03 Thread Martin Renold
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 09:24:57PM +0200, architetto francesco fantoni hva - 
hermanitos verdes architetti wrote:
 sorry, but I have to totally disagree: in my opinion if you have a layer
 system you should have at least the option to adjust a bit their
 relative position,

I used to think so, too, when layer support was new. But I don't really
think this is part of the painting process.  Managing layers is fiddling
around with the technical aspect of digital painting.  I think it is better
to keep the painter away from the temptation to use features that feel like
using a computer program rather than painting in the middle of the
creative process.  It can't be avoided for setup and finishing, of course,
and what is considered computer program struggle depends on the user.

 while I feel that scaling is not really necessary, and that is even more
 true with an infinite canvas paradigm,

Maybe I don't really understand what your use cases are, or at least not how
this would be related to the infinite canvas.

 Another example: if you use a background as reference (e.g in a
 storyboard, or as reference for a fixed image size), if you change it,
 then pan or zoom the canvas and re-enable the previous background, it
 will not coincide with the original position, so having the possibility
 to move the layers would give more flexibility.

This is a cumbersome workaround for a different bug which should be fixed
independently.  I think save/load is required to trigger this, not pan/zoom. 
I've added the case to https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?16741

 and actually you could have had the same attitude towards changing order
 of layers for example: you can do that in GIMP as well, so why do you have
 it implemented in MyPaint?

A good question. I have no clue why an user would want to change layer order
in MyPaint.  I guess it was just implemented because it seemed to fit in
without much difficulty.  Talking about the layer dialog, I am not using it
myself, it is only pain to me.  It would be pain to me even if it were as
fancy as the one in GIMP.  It is in MyPaint because Jon took the effort to
integrate it, and many users say that they need it.

 It's just a matter of balance between painting features and auxiliary
 features,

Exactly.

And one thing what sets MyPaint apart from other programs is that it
doesn't have too many auxiliary features.  Users do appreciate this:
http://mypaint.intilinux.com/?page_id=56

 but if you choose to have layers in my opinion they are supposed to have a
 minimum of features, I really think layer system still lacks a bit of
 functionality.

Yes it is lacking. But then, I'm not using it myself. The traditional
concept of layers just doesn't fit into my mind when painting.  I can cope
with two layers sometimes, but when I try to use more I start to struggle
with the layers every now and then, instead of painting.  You can probably
understand that I don't want to spend much of my time on improving it.

 I just thought it could be useful to others as it was to me, never mind.
 To be honest I must say I'm accustomed to a slightly more flexible
 attitude in other open-source projects towards possible new contributors
 and users' suggestions.

Well, it's true that bugfixes are always a bit more welcome than new
features in MyPaint, especially features from someone who did not do any
bugfixes and/or maintainance work yet.  Our first priority is to get the
program to work smoothly with the features it already has.  Adding more
features doesn't make this task easier.

I have only told you my opinion. There are two other MyPaint maintainers,
and I will trust them both if they have a different opinion and decide to
take care of your patch.  And my opinion about features has changed a few
times in the past, mainly based on the opinion of long-time MyPaint users.

 no problem, I will keep my hacks for myself

No reason to keep it to yourself just because of me. Push it into a branch
on gitorious, and tell users to try it, announce your work in the wiki and
IRC.  If it gets popular we will be more likely to integrate it.  There are
many features lying around like that, from myself and from others.

http://wiki.mypaint.info/Development/Developers

-- 
Martin Renold

___
Mypaint-discuss mailing list
Mypaint-discuss@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/mypaint-discuss


Re: [Mypaint-discuss] MyPaint 0.9 planning update

2010-10-03 Thread Martin Renold
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 09:06:03PM +0200, Jon Nordby wrote:
 4. bug #14875: ORA should not be the default file format
 Personally I think its fixed/not-a-bug, but I wont try to keep anyone
 from doing it.

I'm okay with that.

 Anything else?

A lot.

 Anything that is blocking a string freeze? 

Er... no. :-)

 If not, I propose string freeze next Sunday, 10 October.

Okay with me. I will try to squeeze in some string changes next weekend. 
Starting at 18.10., I'll have a bit more time, planning to do string-free
release polishing.  Even if I don't get anything done, I think we are in
good shape for the release.

I see only these two absolute must-have items before 0.9:

- Really really check that brushset import is working smoothly.
  I am going to stress-test this before the string freeze, too.

- Finish reducing the brush collection (no string change)
  and setup a nice webpage, probably wiki, to download brushes.
  Maybe we should even link to it inside MyPaint (string change!)

-- 
Martin Renold

___
Mypaint-discuss mailing list
Mypaint-discuss@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/mypaint-discuss


Re: [Mypaint-discuss] MyPaint 0.9 brush collection

2010-10-03 Thread Jon Nordby
On 2 October 2010 15:12, cont...@turnangel.com cont...@turnangel.com wrote:
 I think that in the next release my brushes set shouldn't be included
 because is too specialized and normal users don't need it at all. I myself
 don't use it anymore and I stay sticked with last Deevad  Ramòn pack. :D
 Imho icons should be draw by the same person for consistency and
 professional look. (Please, don't look at me I'm very bad to draw icons! :D
 ) Personally I prefer the Ramòn solution because I can say instantly how the
 brush works reading the labels below and above the icon image.Deevad icons
 are beautiful and pleasant to look but sometimes confuse me.
 These are my two cents... What do you think about?

Ok, thanks for your input. Tanda has sent me a updated brush set,
which I will commit to master soon. So it looks like we are all set as
far as artist brushsets goes!

For the non-artist brushsets it would be very nice if they also had a
nice, consistent look for the icons. That is one of the reasons why we
are interested in having a brushset maintainer.

-- 
Regards Jon Nordby - www.jonnor.com

___
Mypaint-discuss mailing list
Mypaint-discuss@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/mypaint-discuss