Re: [Nagios-users] How to send text notification

2013-07-11 Thread Steve Jenkins
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:12 PM, , Roy rp...@njit.edu wrote:

 Hi,

  Anyone can help me to setup SMS notification from Nagios


I do it the easy way. I have Nagios send an email to my mobile carrier's
email-to-SMS address. An ATT you put your *10-digit wireless phone number*,
followed by*@txt.att.net. *For example: 5551234...@txt.att.net.

Just find the email to sms alias for your mobile provider and have Nagios
email you.

SteveJ
--
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] Flapping SMTP timeout, started after reboot

2013-06-04 Thread Steve Jenkins
I did a kernel update on my Nagios box, and after the reboot it keeps
reporting an SMTP timeout on one of our mail servers, then saying it's
fine, then reporting a problem again.

The nagios log shows:

SERVICE ALERT: Titanium;SMTP;CRITICAL;SOFT;1;CRITICAL - Socket timeout
after 10 seconds
SERVICE ALERT: Titanium;SMTP;CRITICAL;SOFT;2;CRITICAL - Socket timeout
after 10 seconds
SERVICE ALERT: Titanium;SMTP;CRITICAL;HARD;3;CRITICAL - Socket timeout
after 10 seconds

and then I get an alert. If I go into the web interface and force a check,
it will eventually come back OK.

Also, any time I run check_smtp -H hostname from the command line, it
works fine:

# /nagios/libexec/check_smtp -H titanium
SMTP OK - 0.060 sec. response time|time=0.060454s;;;0.00

The machine it's checking isn't busy, the response time is always fast like
above, and I'm not sure where to start looking for the issue. Anyone got
any ideas?

Thanks,

SteveJ
--
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
3. A single system of record for all IT processes
http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] Version Check Incorrect

2013-01-14 Thread Steve Jenkins
Just installed 3.4.4 and noticed this:

http://www.nagios.org/checkforupdates/?version=3.4.4product=nagioscore

SteveJ
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

Re: [Nagios-users] Version Check Incorrect

2013-01-14 Thread Steve Jenkins
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Mike Guthrie mguth...@nagios.com wrote:

  Should be fixed now, thanks!


No prob! Confirmed that it's fixed there, but on my Nagios install home
page I still get:

Nagios® Core™
Version 3.4.4
January 12, 2013
Check for 
updateshttp://www.nagios.org/checkforupdates/?version=3.4.4product=nagioscore
A new version of Nagios Core is available!
Visit nagios.org http://www.nagios.org/download/ to download Nagios 3.4.3.
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] New check_openmanage error after updating to OMSA 7.2.0-4

2013-01-10 Thread Steve Jenkins
Updated to OMSA 7.2.0.4 on a CentOS 6.3 x86_64 box today, and just got this
new error when trying to run the check_openmanage nagios plugin:

# /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_openmanage
Memory module 2 [DIMM3, 4096 MB]: Single-bit warning error rate exceeded,
Single-bit failure error rate exceeded
Cache Battery 0 in controller 0 is Learning (Active) [probably harmless]
INTERNAL ERROR: Use of uninitialized value in string ne at
/usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_openmanage line 1656.

I'm running check_openmanage 3.7.8 (installed via the repos).

I see the latest version is 3.7.9 on Trond's website. Any ideas if that
will fix the issue? Googling the error produced nothing.

Thanks,

SteveJ
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

Re: [Nagios-users] New check_openmanage error after updating to OMSA 7.2.0-4

2013-01-10 Thread Steve Jenkins
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Steve Jenkins stevejenk...@gmail.comwrote:

 I see the latest version is 3.7.9 on Trond's website. Any ideas if that
 will fix the issue? Googling the error produced nothing.


And... to answer my own question, yes - 3.7.9 does indeed fix this. New
version is probably already in the repos, waiting out the testing period.

But at least now this error message will be in the archives, so Google can
find it an help the next guy. :)

Thanks,

SteveJ
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

Re: [Nagios-users] New check_openmanage error after updating to OMSA 7.2.0-4

2013-01-10 Thread Steve Jenkins
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Trond Hasle Amundsen 
t.h.amund...@usit.uio.no wrote:

 Not sure which repos you're referring to, but I'll assume Fedora and/or
 Fedora EPEL.


Yep - those are the ones I was referring to. :)


 I didn't get around to submitting updates until today. They should
 arrive in the testing repos in a couple of days. The updates need to
 stay in testing for a week for Fedora and two weeks for EPEL before they
 can be pushed to stable. If you can't wait, you can download the RPMs
 via the Fedora build system, you'll find links here:

   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/nagios-plugins-openmanage

 When it has arrived in testing (and in your local mirror), you can
 install it with (example for EPEL):

   yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update nagios-plugins-openmanage


Thanks, Trond. I'm actually the Fedora packager for OpenDKIM (
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/opendkim) so I'm often
dealing with those same deadlines. :)

I'll keep an eye out for it to be pushed to testing! Thanks and keep up the
great work! :)

SteveJ
--
Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and
much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow -
350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts.
SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

Re: [Nagios-users] nagios 3.2.3 , which is better OS ?

2011-02-24 Thread Steve Jenkins
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Marco Borsani m.bors...@it.net wrote:
 Hi all

 I have to install , study and put on-line the last release.

 I’d like to install it on the better OS possible…

 What about Cent-OS 5 ?

 Actually I am managing Nagios 1.4.1. on a Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES 4

Hi, Marco. CentOS 5 is a great choice. We've been running Nagios
3.2.1, then 3.2.2, and now 3.2.3 on a CentOS 5 box since 2009 and it's
been totally stable for us (with in-place upgrades working
flawlessly).

I don't know if any of the popular CentOS/RHEL repos have a Nagios
package, but we prefer to download directly from the Nagios site and
follow the provided documentation for setup. There are a couple minor
issues I had with the documentation, and a few additional tricks I
discovered while setting things up, so I created a blog post for me to
refer to later when installing Nagios on a CentOS box:

http://stevejenkins.com/blog/2009/12/helpful-links-for-setting-up-nagios-and-nrpe-on-rhel-5-and-centos-5/

It's not written in the same How To style as some of my other blog
posts (this one is more of a list of notes to refresh my memory if I
ever need to re-install or set up another Nagios instance on a CentOS
server), but hopefully there's some helpful info there for you.

Best regards,

SteveJ

--
Free Software Download: Index, Search  Analyze Logs and other IT data in 
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data 
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business 
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev 
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


Re: [Nagios-users] Which GUI to configure Nagios 3 ?

2011-02-24 Thread Steve Jenkins
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Romain Le Merlus
rlemer...@merethis.com wrote:
 You can try Centreon (http://www.centreon.com).
 A powerful GPL monitoring software based on Nagios core.
 Here is a web demo: http://demo.centreon.com

Centreon looks interesting! I've tried NINJA in the past, but
documentation was a bit lacking. However, the Centreon software
requirements say:

If HTTPS is used to work in the admin, SSL certificate should be
valid. Self-signed SSL certificates are not supported

That's a deal-breaker for us because we self-sign our internal certs.
I wonder why Centreon requiresthat.

SteveJ

--
Free Software Download: Index, Search  Analyze Logs and other IT data in 
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data 
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business 
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev 
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


Re: [Nagios-users] check_openmanage showing 0 logical drives with OMSA 6.4 and PERC4

2011-01-25 Thread Steve Jenkins
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Trond Hasle Amundsen
t.h.amund...@usit.uio.no wrote:
 Interesting.. OMSA is obviously aware of the logical drives, but what
 does omreport actually say about them? Try running 'omreport storage
 vdisk controller=number'.

Hi Trond,

Looks like omreport sees the controller, but not the VDisk:

# omreport storage vdisk controller=0
No virtual disks found

# omreport storage controller
 Controller  PERC 4e/Si (Embedded)

Controllers
ID: 0
Status: Ok
Name  : PERC 4e/Si
Slot ID   : Embedded
State : Ready
Firmware Version  : 5B2D
Minimum Required Firmware Version : Not Applicable
Driver Version: Not Applicable
Minimum Required Driver Version   : Not Applicable
Storport Driver Version   : Not Applicable
Minimum Required Storport Driver Version  : Not Applicable
Number of Connectors  : 1
Rebuild Rate  : 30%
BGI Rate  : Not Applicable
Check Consistency Rate: Not Applicable
Reconstruct Rate  : Not Applicable
Alarm State   : Not Applicable
Cluster Mode  : Not Applicable
SCSI Initiator ID : 7
Cache Memory Size : 256 MB
Patrol Read Mode  : Auto
Patrol Read State : Active
Patrol Read Rate  : Not Applicable
Patrol Read Iterations: 787
Abort Check Consistency on Error  : Not Applicable
Allow Revertible Hot Spare and Replace Member : Not Applicable
Load Balance  : Not Applicable
Auto Replace Member on Predictive Failure : Not Applicable
Redundant Path view   : Not Applicable
CacheCade Capable : Not Applicable
Persistent Hot Spare  : Not Applicable
Encryption Capable: Not Applicable
Encryption Key Present: Not Applicable
Encryption Mode   : Not Applicable
Spin Down Unconfigured Drives : Not Applicable
Spin Down Hot Spares  : Not Applicable

Thanks,

SteveJ

--
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


[Nagios-users] check_openmanage showing 0 logical drives with OMSA 6.4 and PERC4

2011-01-24 Thread Steve Jenkins
I've been using Trond Amundsen's awesome check_openmanage script to
babysit a dozen or so full of various Dell PowerEdges - all the way
from x550s to x950s (thanks, Trond!)

After upgrading three of the 1850s to Dell OMSA 6.4 today, I noticed
something strange. The three of them now display in Nagios:

OK - System: 'PowerEdge 1850', SN: '', 3 GB ram (6 dimms), 0
logical drives, 2 physical drives

OK - System: 'PowerEdge 1850', SN: 'XXX', 12 GB ram (6 dimms), 0
logical drives, 2 physical drives

OK - System: 'PowerEdge 1850', SN: 'XXX', 4 GB ram (6 dimms), 0
logical drives, 2 physical drives

All three display 0 logical drives, even though they all have a
working RAID array.

All three of these boxes are running the 32-bit version of OMSA 6.4,
even though two of them are 64-bit CentOS systems. I had to run the
32-bit version of OMSA 6.4 because the 64-bit version won't see the
PERC 4 controller.

For comparison, I have a 2950 running OMSA 6.4 that's showing:

OK - System: 'PowerEdge 2950', SN: 'XXX', 16 GB ram (8 dimms), 1
logical drives, 2 physical drives

So I know that OMSA 6.4 is passing the appropriate info the
check_openmanage in that case.

The debug output on the 1850s shows :

# ./check_openmanage -d
   System:  PowerEdge 1850   OMSA version:6.4.0
   ServiceTag:  XXX  Plugin version:  3.6.4
   BIOS/date:   A07 04/25/2008   Checking mode:   local
-
   Storage Components
=
  STATE  |ID|  MESSAGE TEXT
-+--+
  OK |0 | Controller 0 [PERC 4e/Si] is Ready
  OK |0:0:0 | Physical Disk 0:0 [SCSI-HDD 37GB] on ctrl 0 is Online
  OK |0:0:1 | Physical Disk 0:1 [SCSI-HDD 36GB] on ctrl 0 is Online
  OK |  0:0 | Cache Battery 0 in controller 0 is Ready
  OK |  0:0 | Connector 0 [SCSI Channel RAID Mode] on
controller 0 is Ready
  OK |  0:0 | Enclosure 0:0 [Backplane] on controller 0 is Ready

Which is clearly missing the Logical Drive output that does appear
on the 2950 running OMSA 6.4, which is:

 OK |  0:0 | Logical Drive '/dev/sda' [RAID-1, 67.75 GB] is Ready

The strange part is that OMSA 6.4 on the 1850s is clearly aware that
there's a logical drive, because the GUI shows Virtual Disk 0 RAID-1
in the Storage Dashboard.

I'm pretty certain that all three of these 1850s used to report 1
logical drive under OMSA 6.3, so I'm thinking that some combination of
OMSA 6.4 and the PERC 4 isn't giving enough info to check_openmanage
for it to know that the logical drive is there. The OMSA 6.4 GUI is
getting the message somehow, but check_openmanage isn't.

I'm happy to provide any other output to help debug.

Thanks in advance for any assistance!

SteveJ

--
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null