Re: Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG
I was talking more along the lines of disclosing personal information without permission Since when was re-pasting entries from the phonebook considered illegal? slander is another one as well... I suggest you read a legal dictionary, and turn to the definitions of slander and libel. One involves speech, the other involves print. And it's never slander or libel if it's all factually accurate. Unless, of course, you're disputing the accuracy of the phone book. Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger https://www.hushmail.com/services.php?subloc=messengerl=434 Promote security and make money with the Hushmail Affiliate Program: https://www.hushmail.com/about.php?subloc=affiliatel=427
Re: Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:36:00 EST, Joshua Brady said: I was talking more along the lines of disclosing personal information without permission, slander is another one as well... I'm coming up empty-handed on statutes for the disclosure issue. Asking around in the office found lots of rules that we as a university have to comply with (mostly having to do with the information's status as student records), and businesses often have privacy requirements (see HIPPA and similar, and California has it's very recent laws regarding notification of information disclosure due to hacking incidents), but I'm not finding any good cites for Joe User discloses Jim Random's info. Tacky? Yes. Illegal? I'll wait to hear a citation (federal would be somewhere in USC or CFR, state laws would be wherever your state keeps them - but making them apply to an Internet incident might be tricky...) pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG
- Original Message - From: Joshua Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 6:44 PM Subject: Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG rant Greg, Let me spell it out crystal clear so you can understand. Are you, or are you not, the Gregory Taylor referenced in the URL's I sent below? Even if he is, what you did and said was slanderous, beyond a normal NANOG flamewar. Albert P. (signing his real name so Susan won't remove him from the list) Oh please do Susan what he did was already illegal. Albert P. /rant Can you take this off-list so we don't have to hear a play school convo? Thanks, Josh
Re: Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:48:37 EST, Joshua Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Even if he is, what you did and said was slanderous, beyond a normal NANOG flamewar. Oh please do Susan what he did was already illegal. Contrary to the list charter, quite probably. Illegal? Unclear. It's bordering on the whole slander/libel thing, but in general, truth is an absolute defense against a slander or libel charge. What the actual truth of the matter is, I neither know, nor have any real desire to investigate. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG
I was talking more along the lines of disclosing personal information without permission, slander is another one as well... Josh - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Joshua Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 9:48 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG
