Re: [NetBehaviour] Slurp

2009-02-18 Thread james of jwm-art net
I wondered who it was! I used to like Doomlord, I bought a reprint of the
strips from the Eagle, last year or so. I didn't fancy Doomlord tho,
just wanted his mind-control and vaporising powers.

On 17/2/2009, marc garrett marc.garr...@furtherfield.org wrote:

I'm sure that I used to fancy Captain Scarlet. I think I still do...

marc

 Action hero drowning in swap,
 can't reach [ctrl-c]
 caption:wikipedia art can't help me now.

 slurp.


 

 

 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


[NetBehaviour] Slurp

2009-02-17 Thread james of jwm-art net
Action hero drowning in swap,
can't reach [ctrl-c]
caption:wikipedia art can't help me now.

slurp.
attachment: slurp.jpg___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] Slurp

2009-02-17 Thread Rob Myers
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:29 PM, james of jwm-art net ja...@jwm-art.net wrote:
 Action hero drowning in swap,
 can't reach [ctrl-c]
 caption:wikipedia art can't help me now.

 slurp.

THIS IS THE VOICE OF THE DELETIONISTS.

WE KNOW THAT YOU CAN HEAR US.

OUR RETALIATION WILL BE SLOW, BUT NONETHELESS EFFECTIVE.

IT WILL MEAN THE ULTIMATE DESTRUCTION OF WIKIPEDIA.

IT WILL BE USELESS FOR YOU TO RESIST, FOR WE HAVE DISCOVERED THE
SECRET OF REVERSING EDITS, AS YOU HAVE JUST WITNESSED.

OUR FIRST ACT OF RETALIATION WILL BE TO PREVENT THE RESTORATION OF THE
WIKIPEDIA ART ENTRY.
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


[NetBehaviour] slurp++

2009-02-17 Thread james of jwm-art net
(wikipedia_art*)slurp++;

I find it difficult to understand the current wikipedia
assault regarding art, that people who are artists deserve
wikipedia, that people who are un-notable may loosen their
wikipedia page or have to tally support tickets for it.

I find the implications of freedom of speech, wearable.

There is little difference between wikipedia and being
bullied. Without ever going artistic in wikipedia edits,
I see wikipedia art as a sustained release phase, an
unintentional and repetitive sequential tedium: a set of
wikipedia edits which harm the wikipedia to the point where
art victimized the bullying and socially excluded wikipedians
into warrentless conversation about art. I seek to avoid
any art where wikipedia edits may occurr. This to me is truly
art and it completely negates any effects the edits of pages
within the wikipedia may have, for the worse or better.

The offense caused by a singular wikipedia edit is
something of a joke. Is art really altogether different and
much more complex to assess? We all laugh at art different
than our own.

We have jokes about art and the internet. We have jokes about
the wikipedia. We have jokes about physical objects. We have
jokes about wikipedians.

Where are the awful jokes which mock a single wikipedia page
and artist websites? Where are jokes for every single famous
artist, and the jokes for every single wikipedia sub-group of
mock-artists? So if it is offensive to make jokes about art,
and offensive to make jokes about the mentality of nature, and
of the deleted wikipedia page, other wikipedians, fat wikipedians,
thin wikipedians, art of a social nature, it should be valid to
make jokes about any aspect of human nature embodied by art and
the wikipedia stub of the forensic sciences.

There will be a wikipedian somewhere who is frustrated because
they have to live with art every day of their lives for better
or for worse.

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


Re: [NetBehaviour] Slurp

2009-02-17 Thread marc garrett
I'm sure that I used to fancy Captain Scarlet. I think I still do...

marc

 Action hero drowning in swap,
 can't reach [ctrl-c]
 caption:wikipedia art can't help me now.

 slurp.
   

 

 

 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour