If one wants to vote for a minor party, like the Greens, for example,
one is told that this is wasting a vote. Hence there is no way within
the party structures to extend the spectrum so that, for example, the
decision to take U.S. troops out of Iraq immediately, would be part of
the public discussion during an election campaign. Thus the campaigns
are dominated by the two major parties misrepresenting each other's
programs so as to avoid debating any real issues.
A third-party vote IS mostly throwing it away, and zero-sum games of
mutual rhetorical destruction ARE ensured, until they change the rules
of the game. But most of the suggested rules changes involve runoff elec-
tions and/or party lists, both of which Americans seem dead-set against.
So ... how about STV ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_Transferable_Vote
FBaube
Helsinki
--
F.Baube
fbaube#saunalahti.fi
gsm +358 41 536 8192
wmd 60°11'10.8N 24°57'36.9E
# distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
# nettime is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and info nettime-l in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net