Re: [PATCH 1/9] Ignore rild modem devices.
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 16:20 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: > From: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre> > Gbp-Pq: Name Ignore-rild-modem-devices.patch > --- > src/nm-manager.c | 8 > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/nm-manager.c b/src/nm-manager.c > index 10aa3d7..c2ed1da 100644 > --- a/src/nm-manager.c > +++ b/src/nm-manager.c > @@ -2089,6 +2089,14 @@ platform_link_added (NMManager *self, > gboolean ignore = FALSE; > gs_free_error GError *error = NULL; > > + /* Ignore rild modem devices, which will be handled > by their modem parent */ > + if (g_strstr_len (plink->name, NM_STRLEN ("rmnet"), > "rmnet") || > + g_strstr_len (plink->name, NM_STRLEN > ("rev_rmnet"), "rev_rmnet") || > + g_strstr_len (plink->name, NM_STRLEN > ("ccmni"), "ccmni")) { > + _LOGW (LOGD_HW, "Ignoring rild modem device: > %s", plink->name); > + return; > + } > + > device = nm_device_factory_create_device (factory, > plink->name, plink, NULL, , ); > if (!device) { > if (!ignore) { g_strstr_len (plink->name, NM_STRLEN ("rmnet"), "rmnet") is identical to g_str_has_prefix (plink->name, "rmnet") or strncmp (plink->name, "rmnet", NM_STRLEN ("rmnet")) == 0 isn't it? g_str_has_prefix() seems easier to understand in this case. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: [PATCH 1/9] Ignore rild modem devices.
On 06/08/2016 05:37 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 16:20 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: From: Mathieu Trudel-LapierreGbp-Pq: Name Ignore-rild-modem-devices.patch --- src/nm-manager.c | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/nm-manager.c b/src/nm-manager.c index 10aa3d7..c2ed1da 100644 --- a/src/nm-manager.c +++ b/src/nm-manager.c @@ -2089,6 +2089,14 @@ platform_link_added (NMManager *self, gboolean ignore = FALSE; gs_free_error GError *error = NULL; + /* Ignore rild modem devices, which will be handled by their modem parent */ + if (g_strstr_len (plink->name, NM_STRLEN ("rmnet"), "rmnet") || + g_strstr_len (plink->name, NM_STRLEN ("rev_rmnet"), "rev_rmnet") || + g_strstr_len (plink->name, NM_STRLEN ("ccmni"), "ccmni")) { + _LOGW (LOGD_HW, "Ignoring rild modem device: %s", plink->name); + return; + } I'd actually put this into the WWAN factory, see just below: device = nm_device_factory_create_device (factory, plink->name, plink, NULL, , ); if (!device) { if (!ignore) { where is; the factory can indicate to the manager that it wants certain devices ignored through that variable. So you'd toss this into src/devices/wwan/nm-wwan-factory.c::create_device() instead. The one area of concern I have is whether or not these devices are reported as the proper type, otherwise they won't get passed to the wwan factory. If this isn't a problem for us, then this seems like a reasonable approach... except for the fact that we've hard-coded these device matching expressions. Over time this won't scale. Any thoughts about how this could be made runtime configurable? I'd love to get rid of one more source patch. ;) /tony ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: [PATCH 1/9] Ignore rild modem devices.
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 16:20 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: > From: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre> > Gbp-Pq: Name Ignore-rild-modem-devices.patch > --- > src/nm-manager.c | 8 > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/nm-manager.c b/src/nm-manager.c > index 10aa3d7..c2ed1da 100644 > --- a/src/nm-manager.c > +++ b/src/nm-manager.c > @@ -2089,6 +2089,14 @@ platform_link_added (NMManager *self, > gboolean ignore = FALSE; > gs_free_error GError *error = NULL; > > + /* Ignore rild modem devices, which will be handled > by their modem parent */ > + if (g_strstr_len (plink->name, NM_STRLEN ("rmnet"), > "rmnet") || > + g_strstr_len (plink->name, NM_STRLEN > ("rev_rmnet"), "rev_rmnet") || > + g_strstr_len (plink->name, NM_STRLEN > ("ccmni"), "ccmni")) { > + _LOGW (LOGD_HW, "Ignoring rild modem device: > %s", plink->name); > + return; > + } I'd actually put this into the WWAN factory, see just below: > device = nm_device_factory_create_device (factory, > plink->name, plink, NULL, , ); > if (!device) { > if (!ignore) { where is; the factory can indicate to the manager that it wants certain devices ignored through that variable. So you'd toss this into src/devices/wwan/nm-wwan-factory.c::create_device() instead. Dan ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list