Re: [NTG-context] Beta bib module release

2005-09-29 Thread Taco Hoekwater


Hi Thomas,

Thomas A.Schmitz wrote:

Taco,

just so you don't think nobody is interested in your new beta: I  dlded 
it today and played with it, but had to revert to the old  version 
because it somehow did not honor the modifications I made to  
\setuppublicationlayout (I was getting some default instead of my own  
version, and there were spurious periods and colons in all the  
entries). 


I saw those in my (very small) example file as well, but that is
from a database that is known to have flaws so I didn't investigate
any further and just assumed that they were caused by broken input.
I will check again.

I will test it again within the next few days. By the way:  I 
spent one hour last weekend and, by judiciously sprinkling some  
\unskip's in my definitions, had gotten rid of the extra spaces. I  
actually wanted to write to you about it this week...


Don't you hate it when that happens?

Meanwhile, the one thing that I find really disturbing is the messed  up 
vertical spacing. I'm doing my first real-life book project with  
Context and your bib module. It won't be finished before sometime  next 
year, but expect me to come knockin' on your door often. My  
bibliography is long (371 items), but fairly regular, so I think  
everything else is working just fine, but I can't give a pdf to the  
publisher where the lines are so irregular. Any chance of you looking  
into that soon?


The vertical spacing in my example looks ok, so perhaps it
something in your setup that messes it up hard (or something in
my setup that masks the problem). Can you send me an excerpt for
testing maybe?

Cheers, Taco


___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] Beta bib module release

2005-09-29 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz

Hi Taco,

disregard most of what I wrote yesterday: most of your new module is  
working fine, thanks so much! Haven't tested the new features yet,  
but will very soon. I'm especially thrilled by the \cite[right=]  
command and hope it works!


One major (but probably easy-to-fix) problem is that your wonderfully  
clear syntax {before}{after}{instead} isn't working anymore.  
Here's an example. I have this line in my setup for books:

\insertseries{ (}{), }{, }%
which used to work: if the entry has information about the series,  
put it in parentheses and append a comma, if it doesn't, just put the  
comma. With the new module, I get an extra (), after every title, and  
the same is true for other constructs.


One question: in the parsed bbl file, the bibtex field address is  
translated into city, publisher into pubname, and year into  
pubyear. Is there a reason for this? I found it a bit confusing  
because you have a macro \insertpublisher which inserts city,  
pubname; coming from the names in the database, I couldn't figure  
out what was happening until I looked at the source. Would it be  
possible to just keep the fieldnames as bibtex has them?


As for  the vertical spacing problem: depending on the font and the  
settings for interlinespace, it is more or less visible. To see a  
really clear case, try setting the interlinespace to something really  
big like 5ex, then you can see that space within the entries is  
regular while space between entries is somewhat smaller.


Again, thanks a lot for your wonderful work, and tot ziens!

Thomas

On Sep 29, 2005, at 8:57 AM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:



Hi Thomas,

Thomas A.Schmitz wrote:


Taco,
just so you don't think nobody is interested in your new beta: I   
dlded it today and played with it, but had to revert to the old   
version because it somehow did not honor the modifications I made  
to  \setuppublicationlayout (I was getting some default instead of  
my own  version, and there were spurious periods and colons in all  
the  entries).




I saw those in my (very small) example file as well, but that is
from a database that is known to have flaws so I didn't investigate
any further and just assumed that they were caused by broken input.
I will check again.


I will test it again within the next few days. By the way:  I  
spent one hour last weekend and, by judiciously sprinkling some   
\unskip's in my definitions, had gotten rid of the extra spaces.  
I  actually wanted to write to you about it this week...




Don't you hate it when that happens?


Meanwhile, the one thing that I find really disturbing is the  
messed  up vertical spacing. I'm doing my first real-life book  
project with  Context and your bib module. It won't be finished  
before sometime  next year, but expect me to come knockin' on your  
door often. My  bibliography is long (371 items), but fairly  
regular, so I think  everything else is working just fine, but I  
can't give a pdf to the  publisher where the lines are so  
irregular. Any chance of you looking  into that soon?




The vertical spacing in my example looks ok, so perhaps it
something in your setup that messes it up hard (or something in
my setup that masks the problem). Can you send me an excerpt for
testing maybe?

Cheers, Taco


___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context



___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] Beta bib module release

2005-09-29 Thread Taco Hoekwater



Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:

Hi Taco,

disregard most of what I wrote yesterday: most of your new module is  
working fine, thanks so much! Haven't tested the new features yet,  but 
will very soon. I'm especially thrilled by the \cite[right=]  command 
and hope it works!


One major (but probably easy-to-fix) problem is that your wonderfully  
clear syntax {before}{after}{instead} isn't working anymore.  
Here's an example. I have this line in my setup for books:

\insertseries{ (}{), }{, }%
which used to work: if the entry has information about the series,  put 
it in parentheses and append a comma, if it doesn't, just put the  
comma. With the new module, I get an extra (), after every title, and  
the same is true for other constructs.


I have found this bug, and uploaded a new beta:

  http://tex.aanhet.net/bib/m-bib-beta-20050929.zip

The output here looks a whole lot better now.

One question: in the parsed bbl file, the bibtex field address is  
translated into city, publisher into pubname, and year into  
pubyear. Is there a reason for this? I found it a bit confusing  
because you have a macro \insertpublisher which inserts city,  
pubname; coming from the names in the database, I couldn't figure  out 
what was happening until I looked at the source. Would it be  possible 
to just keep the fieldnames as bibtex has them?


I did this originally to be compatible with the old context
publications macros as well as the base tex definition of \year,
and I guess it is no longer safe to change the names now. I bit
of a mistake, in hindsight. :-(


As for  the vertical spacing problem: depending on the font and the  
settings for interlinespace, it is more or less visible. To see a  
really clear case, try setting the interlinespace to something really  
big like 5ex, then you can see that space within the entries is  regular 
while space between entries is somewhat smaller.


Not over here. with \showgrid on, everything is precisely lined up.
That's why I really need an example of what you are doing.

Cheers, Taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] Problems with \setupindenting in the new ConTeXt version

2005-09-29 Thread Idris Samawi Hamid
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:46:12 -0700 (PDT), Marcus Vinicius Mesquita de So 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I downloaded today the ConTeXt version,
and updated it, but the command \setupindenting
stopped to function...


A known bug, declare it twice and it should work.

Best
Idris
--
Professor Idris Samawi Hamid
Department of Philosophy
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523

___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] Problems with \setupindenting in the new ConTeXt version

2005-09-29 Thread Marcus Vinicius Mesquita de So
Yes, it works. Thank you.

Marcus Vinicius

--- Idris Samawi Hamid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:46:12 -0700 (PDT), Marcus
 Vinicius Mesquita de So 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I downloaded today the ConTeXt version,
  and updated it, but the command \setupindenting
  stopped to function...
 
 A known bug, declare it twice and it should work.
 
 Best
 Idris
 -- 
 Professor Idris Samawi Hamid
 Department of Philosophy
 Colorado State University
 Fort Collins, CO 80523
 
 ___
 ntg-context mailing list
 ntg-context@ntg.nl
 http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 




__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context