Re: [NTG-context] vim module: modify line wrapping

2015-05-14 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Wed, 13 May 2015, Andreas Schneider wrote:


Here is an example:


\usemodule[vim]
\definevimtyping[JSON][syntax=javascript, lines=split, strip=yes]


Add `option=hyphenated`.


\starttext
The example:

\startJSON
{
	sample_parameter: 
http://some/url/with/a/lot/of/path/elements?and=somevariables=too;

}
\stopJSON

\stoptext


Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

[NTG-context] Weird position of equation numbers for long equations

2015-05-14 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Hi,

I suspect that the equation numbering in attachment
(eq-with-chapter.png) is wrong. Shouldnt't the number be positioned on
the right (not on the left)? And in case that this positioning on the
left is intentional: is there any way or setting to force the equation
number to be moved to the right?

In any case I suspect that the equation in question could somehow be
squeezed into the available space in one line. What's the best trick
to squeeze the equation into a single line? Some kind of \hbox to
0pt{\hss [content] \hss} trickery or does there exist something
better?

Minimum problematic example:

\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\dorecurse{28}{a+}
\stopformula
\stoptext

Thank you,
Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] vim module: modify line wrapping

2015-05-14 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Thu, 14 May 2015, Aditya Mahajan wrote:


On Wed, 13 May 2015, Andreas Schneider wrote:


Here is an example:





\usemodule[vim]
\definevimtyping[JSON][syntax=javascript, lines=split, strip=yes]


Add `option=hyphenated`.


I just released a newer version to t-vim where the `option=hypenated` is 
documented. It is also possible to hyphenate words by using


\definevimtyping[...][..., option={packed,hyphenated}, align=hyphenated, 
]


Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

[NTG-context] \placeongrid command

2015-05-14 Thread Csikos Bela
Hello list members:

Based on co-pagedesign.pdf document I'm experimenting with grids.

I followed the examples mentioned on page 9-10 (Section 1.5) and used the code 
below:

%begin code
\setuplayout[grid=yes]
\showgrid

\starttext

This is a line.

This is another line in another paragraph.

Third line, new paragraph again.

\placeongrid{\framed{This is a framed line placed on grid, default setup.}}

Some text.

\placeongrid[bottom]{\framed{This is a framed line placed on grid bottom.}}

Some text.

\placeongrid[top]{\framed{This is a framed line placed on grid top.}}

Some text.

\placeongrid[both]{\framed{This is a framed line placed on grid both.}}

Some text.

\stoptext
%end code

All \placeongrid commands with different options give the same output.
See the attached pdf file.
What do I do wrong?

I have context ConTeXt
ver: 2014.01.03 00:40 MKIV current fmt: 2015.4.1 int: english/english

I have another question related to grids. When grids are shown in the pdf
file (as a result of \showgrid), Adobe Reader 9.5 (linux version) always gives
the following error message when opening the file:

An error exists on this page. Acrobat may not display the page correctly. 
Please
contact the person who created the PDF document to correct the problem.

Despite of the message the file is shown correctly.

Why is this message shown?

Thanks,

bcsikos

placeongrid.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Weird position of equation numbers for long equations

2015-05-14 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Thu, 14 May 2015, luigi scarso wrote:


On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:


On Thu, 14 May 2015, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

 Hi,


I suspect that the equation numbering in attachment
(eq-with-chapter.png) is wrong. Shouldnt't the number be positioned on
the right (not on the left)? And in case that this positioning on the
left is intentional: is there any way or setting to force the equation
number to be moved to the right?



This is a bug in luatex:

http://tracker.luatex.org/view.php?id=807

Aditya



isn't the the formula  simply too long ?


Yes. In tex and pdftex, when the formula is too long \eqno is placed on 
the next line, shifted to the right. In luatex, the equation number is not 
shifted.


Compare the output of

\hsize=2cm
$$a^2+b^2=c^2\eqno(1)$$
\bye

for pdftex and luatex.

Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Weird position of equation numbers for long equations

2015-05-14 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:

 On Thu, 14 May 2015, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

  Hi,

 I suspect that the equation numbering in attachment
 (eq-with-chapter.png) is wrong. Shouldnt't the number be positioned on
 the right (not on the left)? And in case that this positioning on the
 left is intentional: is there any way or setting to force the equation
 number to be moved to the right?


 This is a bug in luatex:

 http://tracker.luatex.org/view.php?id=807

 Aditya


isn't the the formula  simply too long ?

\starttext

\placeformula
\startformula
0\dorecurse{24}{+a}
\stopformula


\placeformula
\startformula
0\dorecurse{25}{+a}
\stopformula

\placeformula
\startformula
0\dorecurse{35}{+a}
\stopformula



-- 
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Weird position of equation numbers for long equations

2015-05-14 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:

 On Thu, 14 May 2015, luigi scarso wrote:

  On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu
 wrote:

  On Thu, 14 May 2015, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

  Hi,


 I suspect that the equation numbering in attachment
 (eq-with-chapter.png) is wrong. Shouldnt't the number be positioned on
 the right (not on the left)? And in case that this positioning on the
 left is intentional: is there any way or setting to force the equation
 number to be moved to the right?


 This is a bug in luatex:

 http://tracker.luatex.org/view.php?id=807

 Aditya


  isn't the the formula  simply too long ?


 Yes. In tex and pdftex, when the formula is too long \eqno is placed on
 the next line, shifted to the right. In luatex, the equation number is not
 shifted.

 Compare the output of

 \hsize=2cm
 $$a^2+b^2=c^2\eqno(1)$$
 \bye

 for pdftex and luatex.


 Ah ok
Following the link above for the tracker 807, I have made the patch

if ((eqno_box != null)  (eqno_w == 0)  !l) {
tail_append(new_penalty(inf_penalty));
shift_amount(eqno_box) = line_s + line_w - eqno_w;
append_to_vlist(eqno_box);
g2 = 0;

and now I have the pdf in attachment
-- 
luigi


test.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Weird position of equation numbers for long equations

2015-05-14 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Thu, 14 May 2015 18:44:53 +0200
Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
  On Thu, 14 May 2015, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  I suspect that the equation numbering in attachment
  (eq-with-chapter.png) is wrong. Shouldnt't the number be
  positioned on the right (not on the left)? And in case that this
  positioning on the left is intentional: is there any way or
  setting to force the equation number to be moved to the right?
 
  This is a bug in luatex:
 
  http://tracker.luatex.org/view.php?id=807
 
 Thanks.
 
 I'll just put \cite[luatex_807] next to the equation then to make my
 supervisor happy ;)
 
 @BUGREPORT{luatex_807,
 title = Bad position equation number Lualatex,
 journal = LuaTeX bug tracker,
 number = 807,
 year = 2013,
 month = feb,
 url = http://tracker.luatex.org/view.php?id=807;,
 }
 
 Mojca

\setupbtx [default:list:bugreport]
[style=bold,color=red
-- 
Alan Braslau
CEA DSM-IRAMIS-SPEC
CNRS URA 2464
Orme des Merisiers
91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex FRANCE
tel: +33 1 69 08 73 15
fax: +33 1 69 08 87 86
mailto:alan.bras...@cea.fr

Alan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

[NTG-context] Setup narrower body text for sections

2015-05-14 Thread Kate F
Hi,

I'm typesetting unix manpages, where I want each section heading to be
outset slightly relative to the body text of that section. In other
words, I want the body text to have a left margin which is narrower
than the page width.

I know I can do this with something like:

\startsection[title=Synopsis]
\startnarrower
blah blah blah
\stopnarrower
\stopsection

But I'd much rather set the left margin (or achieving the effect of
\startnarrower by some other means) using the setups for \startsection
instead. That way I won't need to have \startnarrower .. \stopnarrower
all over my document.

I tried \setuphead[section][margin=3cm] but the margin applies to the
heading, not to the body text of the section. Of course I could set
margin=-3cm and make the entire page narrower, but then I'd also need
to adjust the headers and footers to match.

I thought I could perhaps use before= and after=, but those are of
course before and after the heading, not before and after the body
text.

Is there a setup to wrap some commands around the body text?
Or must I define my own \startxyz .. \stopxyz thingy, or is there a better way?

Thanks,

-- 
Kate
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Weird position of equation numbers for long equations

2015-05-14 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
 On Thu, 14 May 2015, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

 Hi,

 I suspect that the equation numbering in attachment
 (eq-with-chapter.png) is wrong. Shouldnt't the number be positioned on
 the right (not on the left)? And in case that this positioning on the
 left is intentional: is there any way or setting to force the equation
 number to be moved to the right?

 This is a bug in luatex:

 http://tracker.luatex.org/view.php?id=807

Thanks.

I'll just put \cite[luatex_807] next to the equation then to make my
supervisor happy ;)

@BUGREPORT{luatex_807,
title = Bad position equation number Lualatex,
journal = LuaTeX bug tracker,
number = 807,
year = 2013,
month = feb,
url = http://tracker.luatex.org/view.php?id=807;,
}

Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Weird position of equation numbers for long equations

2015-05-14 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Thu, 14 May 2015, Mojca Miklavec wrote:


Hi,

I suspect that the equation numbering in attachment
(eq-with-chapter.png) is wrong. Shouldnt't the number be positioned on
the right (not on the left)? And in case that this positioning on the
left is intentional: is there any way or setting to force the equation
number to be moved to the right?


This is a bug in luatex:

http://tracker.luatex.org/view.php?id=807

Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Weird position of equation numbers for long equations

2015-05-14 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Thu, 14 May 2015 15:54:16 +0200
Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I suspect that the equation numbering in attachment
 (eq-with-chapter.png) is wrong. Shouldnt't the number be positioned on
 the right (not on the left)? And in case that this positioning on the
 left is intentional: is there any way or setting to force the equation
 number to be moved to the right?
 
 In any case I suspect that the equation in question could somehow be
 squeezed into the available space in one line. What's the best trick
 to squeeze the equation into a single line? Some kind of \hbox to
 0pt{\hss [content] \hss} trickery or does there exist something
 better?

Make a small angle approximation and express your angles in radians.
This simplifies the equation significantly... ;-)

(I know that this does not help much, but I couldn't resist!)

Alan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Setup narrower body text for sections

2015-05-14 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 05/14/2015 06:16 PM, Kate F wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm typesetting unix manpages, where I want each section heading to be
 outset slightly relative to the body text of that section. In other
 words, I want the body text to have a left margin which is narrower
 than the page width.

Hi Kate,

a quick reply:

%~ \setuphead[section][margin=-1cm]
\setuphead[section][alternative=inmargin]
\starttext
\startsection[title=Synopsis]
\input zapf
\stopsection
\stoptext

Doesn’t any option suit your needs?

I hope it may help,


Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

[NTG-context] bug in latest beta?

2015-05-14 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
Hans,

after upgrading to beta from 2015.05.13 23:52, the compilation of most
of my documents crashes.

I get two different errors depending on the document:

error: .../ctxbeta/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/typo-itc.lua:148:
attempt to call global 'setfield' (a nil value)

error: .../ctxbeta/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/typo-itc.lua:159:
attempt to call global 'setfield' (a nil value)

I cannot provide a minimal sample now. I wonder whether the error itself
might be enough to fix the issue.

Many thanks for your help,


Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Setup narrower body text for sections

2015-05-14 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Thu, 14 May 2015, Kate F wrote:


Hi,

I'm typesetting unix manpages, where I want each section heading to be
outset slightly relative to the body text of that section. In other
words, I want the body text to have a left margin which is narrower
than the page width.

I know I can do this with something like:

   \startsection[title=Synopsis]
   \startnarrower
   blah blah blah
   \stopnarrower
   \stopsection

But I'd much rather set the left margin (or achieving the effect of
\startnarrower by some other means) using the setups for \startsection
instead. That way I won't need to have \startnarrower .. \stopnarrower
all over my document.


\setuphead[section][after={\startnarrower}, aftersection={\stopnarrower}]

Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Setup narrower body text for sections

2015-05-14 Thread Kate F
On 14 May 2015 at 21:33, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
 On Thu, 14 May 2015, Kate F wrote:

 Hi,

 I'm typesetting unix manpages, where I want each section heading to be
 outset slightly relative to the body text of that section. In other
 words, I want the body text to have a left margin which is narrower
 than the page width.

 I know I can do this with something like:

\startsection[title=Synopsis]
\startnarrower
blah blah blah
\stopnarrower
\stopsection

 But I'd much rather set the left margin (or achieving the effect of
 \startnarrower by some other means) using the setups for \startsection
 instead. That way I won't need to have \startnarrower .. \stopnarrower
 all over my document.


 \setuphead[section][after={\startnarrower}, aftersection={\stopnarrower}]

 Aditya


Thank you! That's exactly what I was hoping for!

aftersection= doesn't appear to be documented in cont-enp.pdf :)

-- 
Kate
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Weird position of equation numbers for long equations

2015-05-14 Thread Hans Hagen

On 5/14/2015 7:56 PM, luigi scarso wrote:

Ah ok
Following the link above for the tracker 807, I have made the patch

if ((eqno_box != null)  (eqno_w == 0)  !l) {
 tail_append(new_penalty(inf_penalty));
 shift_amount(eqno_box) = line_s + line_w - eqno_w;
 append_to_vlist(eqno_box);
 g2 = 0;

and now I have the pdf in attachment


it will take a bit more work so no quick patch as we also need to check 
what happens in r2l mode (the code is similar to pdftex but luatex has a 
whole bunch of extra code related to directions)


Hans

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] bug in latest beta?

2015-05-14 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 05/14/2015 10:46 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
 Hans,
 
 after upgrading to beta from 2015.05.13 23:52, the compilation of most
 of my documents crashes.
 
 I get two different errors depending on the document:
 
 error: .../ctxbeta/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/typo-itc.lua:148:
 attempt to call global 'setfield' (a nil value)

Hans,

here you have a sample that triggers the error in that line:

\definefontfeature
[default]
[default]
[script=latn,
 itlc=yes]

\setupitaliccorrection
[always]

\definefontfamily
[mainface]
[serif]
[TeX Gyre Pagella]

\starttext
\it a
\stoptext

Many thanks for your help,


Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt-defined colours broken in TikZ in MkIV with latest betas

2015-05-14 Thread Christian Prim
Thanks Hans

with context-version 2015.05.13 23:52 it finally works on my side! Thanks
for the fix!

Christian

2015-04-25 23:18 GMT+02:00 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:

 On 4/24/2015 3:05 PM, Christian Prim wrote:

 Hi Hans

 I don't know if the latest beta already has the new code. But I can
 confirm, that there is still a difference between tikz-colors and
 context/metafun colors.

 TikZ translates c=1,m=1 in (native) RGB, that is b=1, which is in some
 way correct.
 ConTeXt translates c=1,m=1 in something I couldn't really define
 (perhaps sRGB or some other color profile) r=0.183... g=0.191...
 b=0.574... or in Web-Hex: #2e3092

 or back to cmyk: c=.68, m=.67,k=.43 (which is blue with some key-value
 compared to TikZ with k=0)

 So I think that TikZ and ConTeXt don't use the same color profile

 Hope it could help somewhat to solve my problem.


 your example works ok here (with the tikz def file i made last week)

 i also made

 \setupcolors[cmyk=no]
 \setupcolors[rgb=no]
 \setupcolors[cmyk=no,rgb=no]
 \setupcolors[state=stop]

 working (nothing needed in tikz as the code that interfaces to it does
 that) which will be in the next beta


 Hans


 -
   Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
   Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
  | www.pragma-pod.nl
 -

 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
 the Wiki!

 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
 http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net

 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___