Re: [NTG-context] filter module's inline command and supressed spacing
Hi Piotr,
maybe you can try opening an issue in the code's repository:
https://github.com/adityam/filter/issues
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Piotr Kopszak kops...@gmail.com wrote:
P.S.
Silly of me not to check ConTeXt version first. Anyway, the problem
persists with most recent ConTeXt although different errors are
produced. The space is supressed
in 'Januszkiewicza)Notatki' and html entities are not interpreted
properly when using \inlinepandoc.
2014-12-30 10:00 GMT+01:00 Piotr Kopszak kops...@gmail.com:
Hello list,
It looks like a bug in the filter module, but maybe I'm doing
something wrong. Any help will be greatly appreciated. When using the
\inlinepandoc command in the first paragraph below the space at the
end of the paragraph in życiaA. Mickiewicza is supressed when it
should be życia A. Mickiewicza. This does not happen when using
pandoc environment. If you want to run the minimal example you have to
make sure you got the recent pandoc which supports twiki input format
and create the output subdirectory in your working directory.
Best
Piotr
\usemodule[filter]
\defineexternalfilter
[pandoc]
[
filter={pandoc -f \externalfilterparameter{format} -t context
-o \externalfilteroutputfile},
format=twiki,
directory=output,
]
\starttext
Inne tyt.: Wizyta pana Franciszka Grzymały, Exegi monumentum aere
perennius Powst. Paryż, na autografie podpis: Paryż, 12 marca
1833. Wiersze natchnione wizytą Fr. Grzymały. Pdr: {\it Czas} 1859
nr nr 118 s. 2. (\inlinepandoc{w artykule L#42;#42;#42; (E.
Januszkiewicza) Notatki wspomnień z życia A. Mickiewicza}).
\startpandoc
Inne tyt.: Wizyta pana Franciszka Grzymały, Exegi monumentum aere
perennius Powst. Paryż, na autografie podpis: Paryż, 12 marca
1833. Wiersze natchnione wizytą Fr. Grzymały. Pdr: {\it Czas} 1859
nr nr 118 s. 2. (w artykule L#42;#42;#42; (E. Januszkiewicza)
Notatki wspomnień z życia A. Mickiewicza).
\stoppandoc
\stoptext
-
--
http://okle.pl
--
http://okle.pl
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] vertical alignment of table of contents in makeup
Hi Pablo,
thanks for your clarifications. My thinking was that I didn't want my table
of contents page to have a page number, but I didn't realize that the ToC
head acts as a chapter head, so you can just get rid of the page number in
the way you suggest.
So just leaving out the makeup works fine, thanks!
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Pablo Rodriguez oi...@gmx.es wrote:
On 12/20/2014 03:13 AM, Mark Szepieniec wrote:
There is a trick mentioned on the wiki for top-aligning the contents of
a makeup page, namely adding top=,, which cancels the default value of
\vss, which is infinitely strechable space.
However, that doesn't seem to work when the first element in the makeup
page is \completecontent:
Hi Mark,
this is what it happens when you start a makeup page with a \chapter
command. \chapter inserts a page break before the heading.
[...]
Here, the table of contents and the section are both placed on the
makeup page, but they are centered vertically. If the \completecontent
line is commented out, the correct vertical alignment of the section
header is obtained. Is there a way to get top-alignment when a makeup
page starts with \completecontent? Is this a bug?
As far as I know, this isn’t a bug.
You can disable the page break before chapter with:
\setuphead[chapter][page=]
This way it works as you intend.
Or should I even be using makeup pages in my table of contents?
I wonder whether this makes sense at all.
Why do you want or why do you think you need the table of contents
wrapped in a makeup page?
A makeup page is fine for contents such as title pages, colophons or
similar ones. Their contents should fit in a single page, because the
contents won’t be split across pages.
Here you have a sample that shows why makeup pages shouldn’t be used for
table of contents:
\starttext
\startmakeup[standard][top=,]
\chapter{Contents}
\dorecurse{50}{\section{testsection}}
\stopmakeup
\stoptext
I hope it helps,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] setting margins in makeup
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 12/20/2014 11:55 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 12/19/2014 04:38 PM, Mark Szepieniec wrote: [...] Incidentally, what threw me off was the phrasing in the manual: 4.19 Makeup A document may have a titlepage, a colofon and some pages that are not directly related to the main part of the document. Mostly these pages are not numbered and can do without headers and footers. Because their layout needs extra attention we prefer the word makeup for defining their specific layout. Since my makeup pages indeed don't have page numbers, I presumed they wouldn't have headers either. I may have read too much into that, but perhaps that passage can be improved? Hi Mark, makeups don’t have either headers or footers, but have the document layout unless otherwise specified. You are right: makeups don’t have header or footer /texts/, although they don’t have the space for headers and footers removed. they have them but their state is empty (headerstate etc parameters) Hans Thanks for the clarification both of you, that was exactly what I was getting wrong. Best, Mark - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/ listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] vertical alignment of table of contents in makeup
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Pablo Rodriguez oi...@gmx.es wrote:
On 12/21/2014 09:01 PM, Mark Szepieniec wrote:
Hi Pablo,
thanks for your clarifications. My thinking was that I didn't want my
table of contents page to have a page number, but I didn't realize that
the ToC head acts as a chapter head, so you can just get rid of the page
number in the way you suggest.
So just leaving out the makeup works fine, thanks!
Hi Mark,
to get rid of page numbers in the table of contents,
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Table_of_Contents#Suppressing_page_numbering_for_the_ToC_pages
may help you.
Just in case it helps,
Pablo
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 12/20/2014 03:13 AM, Mark Szepieniec wrote:
There is a trick mentioned on the wiki for top-aligning the
contents of
a makeup page, namely adding top=,, which cancels the default
value of
\vss, which is infinitely strechable space.
However, that doesn't seem to work when the first element in the
makeup
page is \completecontent:
Hi Mark,
this is what it happens when you start a makeup page with a \chapter
command. \chapter inserts a page break before the heading.
[...]
Here, the table of contents and the section are both placed on the
makeup page, but they are centered vertically. If the
\completecontent
line is commented out, the correct vertical alignment of the
section
header is obtained. Is there a way to get top-alignment when a
makeup
page starts with \completecontent? Is this a bug?
As far as I know, this isn’t a bug.
You can disable the page break before chapter with:
\setuphead[chapter][page=]
This way it works as you intend.
Or should I even be using makeup pages in my table of contents?
I wonder whether this makes sense at all.
Why do you want or why do you think you need the table of contents
wrapped in a makeup page?
A makeup page is fine for contents such as title pages, colophons or
similar ones. Their contents should fit in a single page, because the
contents won’t be split across pages.
Here you have a sample that shows why makeup pages shouldn’t be used
for
table of contents:
\starttext
\startmakeup[standard][top=,]
\chapter{Contents}
\dorecurse{50}{\section{testsection}}
\stopmakeup
\stoptext
I hope it helps,
Pablo
Interesting, thanks!
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] setting margins in makeup
I'm having trouble resetting my margins in makeup pages. I want the makeup pages to have equal topspace, bottomspace, backspace and cutspace, regardless of the standard layout of the rest of the document. Following Wolfgang's recommendation ( http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2014/079409.html), I tried the following: \setuppapersize [A4][A4] % Standard page layout \setuplayout[width=middle, backspace=1.5in, cutspace=1.5in, height=middle, topspace=0.75in, bottomspace=0.75in] % Title page layout % \definemakeup defines a layout with the same name, which we alter. \definemakeup[titlepage] \setuplayout [titlepage][width=middle, backspace=20mm, height=middle, topspace=20mm] \starttext \startmakeup[titlepage][top=,] bla \stopmakeup But, on my system, this puts the bla too far from the top of the page, and it looks as though the topspace has not been set properly. (Backspace seems ok), Am I doing something wrong or is there a better way to achieve this? Also, the manual says I can use the command \showframe to display frames to help in debugging, but that doesn't seem to do anything for me? Thanks in advance, Mark ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] setting margins in makeup
Sorry for the noise, I've solved it, turns out makeup pages still have headers which you need to set to zero if you want uniform margins: % Title page layout % \definemakeup defines a layout with the same name, which we alter. \definemakeup[titlepage] \setuplayout [titlepage][width=middle, backspace=20mm, height=middle, topspace=20mm, header=0mm] did the trick for me. Incidentally, what threw me off was the phrasing in the manual: 4.19 Makeup A document may have a titlepage, a colofon and some pages that are not directly related to the main part of the document. Mostly these pages are not numbered and can do without headers and footers. Because their layout needs extra attention we prefer the word makeup for defining their specific layout. Since my makeup pages indeed don't have page numbers, I presumed they wouldn't have headers either. I may have read too much into that, but perhaps that passage can be improved? On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Mark Szepieniec mszep...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having trouble resetting my margins in makeup pages. I want the makeup pages to have equal topspace, bottomspace, backspace and cutspace, regardless of the standard layout of the rest of the document. Following Wolfgang's recommendation ( http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2014/079409.html), I tried the following: \setuppapersize [A4][A4] % Standard page layout \setuplayout[width=middle, backspace=1.5in, cutspace=1.5in, height=middle, topspace=0.75in, bottomspace=0.75in] % Title page layout % \definemakeup defines a layout with the same name, which we alter. \definemakeup[titlepage] \setuplayout [titlepage][width=middle, backspace=20mm, height=middle, topspace=20mm] \starttext \startmakeup[titlepage][top=,] bla \stopmakeup But, on my system, this puts the bla too far from the top of the page, and it looks as though the topspace has not been set properly. (Backspace seems ok), Am I doing something wrong or is there a better way to achieve this? Also, the manual says I can use the command \showframe to display frames to help in debugging, but that doesn't seem to do anything for me? Thanks in advance, Mark ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] vertical alignment of table of contents in makeup
There is a trick mentioned on the wiki for top-aligning the contents of a
makeup page, namely adding top=,, which cancels the default value of
\vss, which is infinitely strechable space.
However, that doesn't seem to work when the first element in the makeup
page is \completecontent:
\starttext
% top= here doesn't seem to be working...
\startmakeup[standard][top=,]
\completecontent
\section{testsection}
\stopmakeup
\stoptext
Here, the table of contents and the section are both placed on the makeup
page, but they are centered vertically. If the \completecontent line is
commented out, the correct vertical alignment of the section header is
obtained. Is there a way to get top-alignment when a makeup page starts
with \completecontent? Is this a bug?
Or should I even be using makeup pages in my table of contents?
Mark
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] How does \setupfloat work?
I'm trying to set a default width for figures with \setupfloat. However,
the command doesn't seem to be picking up the width specification, even
though the manual indicates it accepts a width= argument:
\setupfloat[figure][width=2cm]
\starttext
\placefigure{}{\externalfigure[picture.png]}
\stoptext
picture.png just gets inserted at its native size, rather than scaled to
have the specified width. What am I doing wrong? (setting minwidth and/or
maxwidth doesn't seem to work either)
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Mark
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] How does \setupfloat work?
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 11/29/2014 10:49 AM, Mark Szepieniec wrote:
I'm trying to set a default width for figures with \setupfloat. However,
the command doesn't seem to be picking up the width specification, even
though the manual indicates it accepts a width= argument:
\setupfloat[figure][width=2cm]
\starttext
\placefigure{}{\externalfigure[picture.png]}
\stoptext
just
\placefigure{}{\externalfigure[picture.png][width=2cm]}
picture.png just gets inserted at its native size, rather than scaled to
have the specified width. What am I doing wrong? (setting minwidth
and/or maxwidth doesn't seem to work either)
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Mark
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/
listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
--
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/
listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Sorry, I should have mentioned I was able to work around it by doing
exactly that, but I'd rather not have to edit all the \placefigure
instances if I decide to change the width.
Also I'd like to use a different default width for graphics, so
\setupexternalfigures[width=XXXcm] wouldn't work well either.
I realize I could define my own macros or something to solve this, but I'm
just puzzled that setting width in \setupfloat[figure] doesn't work. Am I
reading the manual wrong, or is is just not implemented yet or something?
(honest question)
Thanks for your response,
Mark
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] How does \setupfloat work?
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Christoph Reller
christoph.rel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 11/29/2014 10:49 AM, Mark Szepieniec wrote:
I'm trying to set a default width for figures with \setupfloat.
However,
the command doesn't seem to be picking up the width specification, even
though the manual indicates it accepts a width= argument:
\setupfloat[figure][width=2cm]
\starttext
\placefigure{}{\externalfigure[picture.png]}
\stoptext
just
\placefigure{}{\externalfigure[picture.png][width=2cm]}
picture.png just gets inserted at its native size, rather than scaled
to
have the specified width. What am I doing wrong? (setting minwidth
and/or maxwidth doesn't seem to work either)
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Mark
Sorry, I should have mentioned I was able to work around it by doing
exactly that, but I'd rather not have to edit all the \placefigure
instances if I decide to change the width.
Also I'd like to use a different default width for graphics, so
\setupexternalfigures[width=XXXcm] wouldn't work well either.
I realize I could define my own macros or something to solve this, but I'm
just puzzled that setting width in \setupfloat[figure] doesn't work. Am I
reading the manual wrong, or is is just not implemented yet or something?
(honest question)
Thanks for your response,
Mark
Hi Mark,
You can use \defineexternalfigure as in the following example.
\defineexternalfigure[whatever][width=2cm]
\starttext
\placefigure{}{\externalfigure[picture.png][whatever]}
\stoptext
See also http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Floating_Objects
Christoph
Thanks all for your responses.
\defineexternalfigure looks like it does something very close to what I
wanted. Googling it brought me to a mailing list thread where a question
similar to mine was asked, so for future reference:
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2012/069446.html.
So I guess my problem is resolved, but I'd still like to understand better
why my earlier solution of doing
\setupfloat[figure][width=2cm]
didn't set a default for later instances of \placefigure. I feel like I
might be missing some aspect of the ConTeXt philosophy, or I'm misreading
the manual, or it's just a bug...?
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] How does \setupfloat work?
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014, Mark Szepieniec wrote:
So I guess my problem is resolved, but I'd still like to understand better
why my earlier solution of doing
\setupfloat[figure][width=2cm]
didn't set a default for later instances of \placefigure. I feel like I
might be missing some aspect of the ConTeXt philosophy, or I'm misreading
the manual, or it's just a bug...?
\setupfloat[figure] sets the values of \startplacefigure (and
\placefigure), and not for \externalfigure. The width value for
startplacefigure is not used anywhere.
The default value of \setupfloats[width=...] is used when the float box is
empty. So, the only scenario where the value of \setupfloats[width=...]
will matter is the following:
\starttext
\setupfloats[width=2cm]
\placefloat{}{}
\setupfloats[width=10cm]
\placefloat{}{}
\stoptext
Aditya
Thanks Aditya, that's very helpful and things make more sense now. Is this
stuff documented somewhere or did you consult the source code?
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Permissible characters in ConTeXt reference labels
OK, thanks both of you, its looks like I need to sanitize all mentioned
characters, since the reference strings will generally originate from
formats other than ConTeXt, and we don't want ConTeXt to do any processing
on them, aside from comparisons to resolve references.
As for Aditya's examples, the first results in a compilation error on my
test file, while the second compiles without error, and gives the expected
result.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 9/18/2014 12:06 AM, Mark Szepieniec wrote:
Bump...
If it's not too much trouble, I would greatly appreciate some feedback
on this before I propose it to be merged into pandoc; even a looks good
to me from one of the ConTeXt gurus would be very helpful.
Thanks in advance,
Mark
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Mark Szepieniec mszep...@gmail.com
mailto:mszep...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to fix a problem in pandoc (see
https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/pull/1589) where it doesn't properly
sanitize the reference labels in ConTeXt output, causing errors
during compilation when a label contains '#' for example. Note that
this sanitizing is needed in addition to the regular backslash
escaping used for control characters: '\#' is still illegal in a
label for example.
(LaTeX label) = (ConTeXt reference). What Mark mean was references such as
\section[...]{...} or \startplacefigure[reference={...}].
In the sanitizer function I'm writing, I'd like to properly escape
all illegal characters, but I couldn't find an explicit list of
allowed or illegal characters. Based on some testing I've conducted
(see attached file), I've arrived at the following set:
\#[],{}%()|=
it depends on where these characters end up in
# : always tricky as it denotes an argument, so escape
[] : depends if it gets fed into a macro that uses [] as delimiters
{} : only an issue when not balanced
% : escaping needed as it's comment otherwise
() : depends on where it ends up, like []
| : is special in context so needs escaping
\ : of course that one needs escaping
1) Does this look like a reasonable set? Are there other characters
or sequences that should be included, or are worth testing?
keep in mind that escapes should end up unescaped at some point
2) I was told (see
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pandoc-discuss/tYpXMUkmbEY)
that if the characters and , didn't work, it would count as a
ConTeXt bug, is there any truth to that? Please let me know if any
further info is needed on my part.
well, define bug ... one can say the same of and in xml -)
Since I made that comment on the pandoc mailing list, let me explain.
Consider:
\section[some reference]{Title}
Given how behaves elsewhere in ConTeXt, a user would expect the above to
be a valid input. If it is not, then it is bug (or atleast, surprising).
The same goes for
\section[some, reference]{Title}
if the result ends up in a comma separated list then , can be an issue
but one can always wrap an argument in {} to hide that
3) Does anyone see issues with this general approach? I'm relatively
new to ConTeXt, so I might be missing either a huge problem, or an
obviously easier way to do this.
i don't know ... i never used pandoc input
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/
listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Permissible characters in ConTeXt reference labels
Bump...
If it's not too much trouble, I would greatly appreciate some feedback on
this before I propose it to be merged into pandoc; even a looks good to
me from one of the ConTeXt gurus would be very helpful.
Thanks in advance,
Mark
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Mark Szepieniec mszep...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to fix a problem in pandoc (see
https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/pull/1589) where it doesn't properly
sanitize the reference labels in ConTeXt output, causing errors during
compilation when a label contains '#' for example. Note that this
sanitizing is needed in addition to the regular backslash escaping used for
control characters: '\#' is still illegal in a label for example.
In the sanitizer function I'm writing, I'd like to properly escape all
illegal characters, but I couldn't find an explicit list of allowed or
illegal characters. Based on some testing I've conducted (see attached
file), I've arrived at the following set:
\#[],{}%()|=
1) Does this look like a reasonable set? Are there other characters or
sequences that should be included, or are worth testing?
2) I was told (see
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pandoc-discuss/tYpXMUkmbEY) that
if the characters and , didn't work, it would count as a ConTeXt bug, is
there any truth to that? Please let me know if any further info is needed
on my part.
3) Does anyone see issues with this general approach? I'm relatively new
to ConTeXt, so I might be missing either a huge problem, or an obviously
easier way to do this.
Thanks,
Mark
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] Permissible characters in ConTeXt reference labels
I'm trying to fix a problem in pandoc (see
https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/pull/1589) where it doesn't properly sanitize
the reference labels in ConTeXt output, causing errors during compilation
when a label contains '#' for example. Note that this sanitizing is needed
in addition to the regular backslash escaping used for control characters:
'\#' is still illegal in a label for example.
In the sanitizer function I'm writing, I'd like to properly escape all
illegal characters, but I couldn't find an explicit list of allowed or
illegal characters. Based on some testing I've conducted (see attached
file), I've arrived at the following set:
\#[],{}%()|=
1) Does this look like a reasonable set? Are there other characters or
sequences that should be included, or are worth testing?
2) I was told (see
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pandoc-discuss/tYpXMUkmbEY) that if
the characters and , didn't work, it would count as a ConTeXt bug, is
there any truth to that? Please let me know if any further info is needed
on my part.
3) Does anyone see issues with this general approach? I'm relatively new to
ConTeXt, so I might be missing either a huge problem, or an obviously
easier way to do this.
Thanks,
Mark
test.tex
Description: TeX document
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
