I posted a similar question a few days ago without success/response but
since I have not found a solution anywhere I would
like to ask this again: how can I get properly enumerated equations using
`\mathcases'? this example does not work:
\starttext
bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla
bla bla bla bla bla bla
\placeformula
\startformula
E(f) = \frac {K_1(f)} {f}
\stopformula
\placeformula
\startformula
K_1 \rightarrow
\startmathcases
\NC f \NC for $f \ll PS$ (flow limited transport) \NR
\NC PS \NC for $f \gg PS$ (diffusion limited transport) \NR[+]
\stopmathcases
\stopformula
bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla
bla bla bla bla bla bla
\stoptext
since (as I now have "discovered" myself) the `\NR[+]' is here intended
for subcases enumeration (which are, thus not aligned with the right
margin0, rather than (like with \mathalign) for whole equation numbering.
but omitting the `[+]' does not help either since \placeformula simply
does not put an equation number at all.
so, simple question: how to get a properly numbered equation using
\mathcases?
thx,joerg
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
