Re: [NTG-context] Change in \vec behavior
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 9:21 AM Jean-Philippe Rey via ntg-context wrote: > > Hello, > > Does anyone have some insight on this issue? > > Thanks, > > > Le 18 déc. 2022 à 19:37, Jean-Philippe Rey via ntg-context > a écrit : > > Hello, > > As I usually do at the end of each year, I upgraded my ConTeXt installation. > I noticed a change in \vec behavior which doesn't extend the arrow anymore. > Here is my example: > > \starttext > Engine: \texenginename\ \texengineversion > > \ConTeXt: \contextversionnumber > > \type{$\vec{AB}$} : $\vec{AB}$ > \stoptext > > The result with the latest ConTeXt version: > > > > and with the version from a year ago: > > > > I am aware that I could use \overrightarrow, but I prefer the shape and > position of the \vec arrow, especially with single letters. > > > What is the rationale for the change in \vec? Is there a way to get the > previous behavior back? > > Thanks, There was a similar thread the other day. \definemathtopaccent[top:stretch][vec]["20D7] seems to work as a temporary solution. Does it give what you expect? I think there will be an update in the next few days. /Mikael ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Change in \vec behavior
Hello,Does anyone have some insight on this issue?Thanks,Le 18 déc. 2022 à 19:37, Jean-Philippe Rey via ntg-contexta écrit :Hello,As I usually do at the end of each year, I upgraded my ConTeXt installation. I noticed a change in \vec behavior which doesn't extend the arrow anymore. Here is my example:\starttextEngine: \texenginename\ \texengineversion\ConTeXt: \contextversionnumber\type{$\vec{AB}$} : $\vec{AB}$\stoptextThe result with the latest ConTeXt version: GraphiqueCollé-1.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document and with the version from a year ago: GraphiqueCollé-2.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document I am aware that I could use \overrightarrow, but I prefer the shape and position of the \vec arrow, especially with single letters. GraphiqueCollé-3.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document GraphiqueCollé-4.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document What is the rationale for the change in \vec? Is there a way to get the previous behavior back?Thanks, -- Jean-Philippe Reyjean-philippe@centralesupelec.fr91192 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex - FranceEmpreinte PGP : 807A 5B2C 69E4 D4B5 783A 428A 1B5E E83E 261B BF51 ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Change in \vec behavior
On Sun, 18 Dec 2022 19:37:17 +0100 Jean-Philippe Rey via ntg-context wrote: > What is the rationale for the change in \vec? Is there a way to get > the previous behavior back? I certainly hope that this is a bug (and not a "design choice"). Alan ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] Change in \vec behavior
Hello, As I usually do at the end of each year, I upgraded my ConTeXt installation. I noticed a change in \vec behavior which doesn't extend the arrow anymore. Here is my example: \starttext Engine: \texenginename\ \texengineversion \ConTeXt: \contextversionnumber \type{$\vec{AB}$} : $\vec{AB}$ \stoptext The result with the latest ConTeXt version: GraphiqueCollé-1.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document and with the version from a year ago: GraphiqueCollé-2.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document I am aware that I could use \overrightarrow, but I prefer the shape and position of the \vec arrow, especially with single letters. GraphiqueCollé-3.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document GraphiqueCollé-4.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document What is the rationale for the change in \vec? Is there a way to get the previous behavior back? Thanks, -- Jean-Philippe Rey jean-philippe@centralesupelec.fr 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex - France Empreinte PGP : 807A 5B2C 69E4 D4B5 783A 428A 1B5E E83E 261B BF51 ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___