Re: [NTG-context] Change in \vec behavior

2023-01-22 Thread Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 9:21 AM Jean-Philippe Rey via ntg-context
 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone have some insight on this issue?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Le 18 déc. 2022 à 19:37, Jean-Philippe Rey via ntg-context 
>  a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> As I usually do at the end of each year, I upgraded my ConTeXt installation. 
> I noticed a change in \vec behavior which doesn't extend the arrow anymore. 
> Here is my example:
>
> \starttext
> Engine: \texenginename\ \texengineversion
>
> \ConTeXt: \contextversionnumber
>
> \type{$\vec{AB}$} : $\vec{AB}$
> \stoptext
>
> The result with the latest ConTeXt version:
>
>
>
> and with the version from a year ago:
>
>
>
> I am aware that I could use \overrightarrow, but I prefer the shape and 
> position of the \vec arrow, especially with single letters.
>
>
> What is the rationale for the change in \vec? Is there a way to get the 
> previous behavior back?
>
> Thanks,

There was a similar thread the other day.

\definemathtopaccent[top:stretch][vec]["20D7]

seems to work as a temporary solution. Does it give what you expect?

I think there will be an update in the next few days.

/Mikael
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Change in \vec behavior

2023-01-22 Thread Jean-Philippe Rey via ntg-context
Hello,Does anyone have some insight on this issue?Thanks,Le 18 déc. 2022 à 19:37, Jean-Philippe Rey via ntg-context  a écrit :Hello,As I usually do at the end of each year, I upgraded my ConTeXt installation. I noticed a change in \vec behavior which doesn't extend the arrow anymore. Here is my example:\starttextEngine: \texenginename\ \texengineversion\ConTeXt: \contextversionnumber\type{$\vec{AB}$} : $\vec{AB}$\stoptextThe result with the latest ConTeXt version:

GraphiqueCollé-1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
and with the version from a year ago:

GraphiqueCollé-2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
I am aware that I could use \overrightarrow, but I prefer the shape and position of the \vec arrow, especially with single letters.

GraphiqueCollé-3.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


GraphiqueCollé-4.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
What is the rationale for the change in \vec? Is there a way to get the previous behavior back?Thanks,
-- Jean-Philippe Reyjean-philippe@centralesupelec.fr91192 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex - FranceEmpreinte PGP : 807A 5B2C 69E4 D4B5 783A 428A 1B5E E83E 261B BF51

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Change in \vec behavior

2022-12-18 Thread Alan Braslau via ntg-context
On Sun, 18 Dec 2022 19:37:17 +0100
Jean-Philippe Rey via ntg-context  wrote:

> What is the rationale for the change in \vec? Is there a way to get
> the previous behavior back?

I certainly hope that this is a bug (and not a "design choice").

Alan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] Change in \vec behavior

2022-12-18 Thread Jean-Philippe Rey via ntg-context
Hello,

As I usually do at the end of each year, I upgraded my ConTeXt installation. I 
noticed a change in \vec behavior which doesn't extend the arrow anymore. Here 
is my example:

\starttext
Engine: \texenginename\ \texengineversion

\ConTeXt: \contextversionnumber

\type{$\vec{AB}$} : $\vec{AB}$
\stoptext

The result with the latest ConTeXt version:



GraphiqueCollé-1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


and with the version from a year ago:



GraphiqueCollé-2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


I am aware that I could use \overrightarrow, but I prefer the shape and 
position of the \vec arrow, especially with single letters.



GraphiqueCollé-3.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
  

GraphiqueCollé-4.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

What is the rationale for the change in \vec? Is there a way to get the 
previous behavior back?

Thanks,

-- 
Jean-Philippe Rey
jean-philippe@centralesupelec.fr
91192 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex - France
Empreinte PGP : 807A 5B2C 69E4 D4B5 783A 428A 1B5E E83E 261B BF51

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___