[NTG-context] Indent after formula in enumeration
Hi,
I have
\setupformulae[indentnext=auto]
but when I put a \startformula \stopformula in demo environment it does not
indent.
Why? What can I do for getting that?
My environment is:
\defineenumeration[demo][text={Demostració.\space},
number=no,location=serried,width=fit,headstyle=italic,
indentnext=yes,between=\blank,textdistance=.5em,closesymbol={\mathematics{\Box}},style=normal]
Thanks a lot,
Xan.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Indent after formula in enumeration
On Sat, 30 May 2009, Xan wrote:
Hi,
I have
\setupformulae[indentnext=auto]
but when I put a \startformula \stopformula in demo environment it does not
indent.
Why? What can I do for getting that?
My environment is:
\defineenumeration[demo][text={Demostració.\space},
number=no,location=serried,width=fit,headstyle=italic,
indentnext=yes,between=\blank,textdistance=.5em,closesymbol={\mathematics{\Box}},style=normal]
indenting=yes
Aditya___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Indent after formula in enumeration
Thanks Aditya, but it does not work what it should?
With:
\defineenumeration[demo][text={Demostració.\space},number=no,
location=serried,width=fit,headstyle=italic,indentnext=yes,
between=\blank,textdistance=.5em,closesymbol={\mathematics{\Box}},
style=normal,indenting=yes]
and
\starttext
\startdemo Si $\text{area}(u) = N$ i $\text{area}(v) = M$, aleshores
\startformula
\startmathalignment
\NC u \NC = \prod_{i=1}^N x_i^{-1} r_i x_i, \NR[+]
\NC v \NC = \prod_{j=1}^M y_j^{-1} s_j y_j, \NR[+]
\stopmathalignment
\stopformula%
per a alguns $x_i, y_j \in F(A)$, $r_i, s_j \in R$, on aquestes
igualtats són dins el grup lliure $F(A)$. Com que $w = u v$ també dins
el grup lliure, tenim que
\placeformula[-] \startformula \startsplit
\NC w = u v \NC = \bigl( \prod_{i = 1}^N x_i^{-1} r_i x_i \bigr) \cdot
\bigl( \prod_{j=1}^M y_j^{-1} s_j y_j \bigr) \NR
\NC \NC = (x_1^{-1} r_1 x_1)\cdots (x_N^{-1} r_N x_N) \cdot (y_1^{-1}
s_1 y_1) \cdots (y_M^{-1} s_M y_M) \NR
\NC \NC = \prod_{k=1}^{M+N} z_k^{-1} t_k z_k
\stopsplit \stopformula
on
\startformula
z_k = \startcases
\NC x_k\MC 1 \leq k \leq N \NR
\NC y_{k-N} \MC N+1 \leq k \leq N+M, \NR
\stopcases t_k = \startcases
\NC r_k\MC 1 \leq k \leq N \NR
\NC s_{k-N} \MC N+1 \leq k \leq N+M. \NR
\stopcases
\stopformula
Llavors, per definició, $\text{area}(w) \leq N+M = \text{area}(u) +
\text{area}(v)$.
\stopdemo
\stoptext
I have that per a alguns is indenting but on is not.
Why?
Xan.
PS: Please, CCme
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Indent after formula in enumeration
En/na Xan ha escrit:
Thanks Aditya, but it does not work what it should?
With:
\defineenumeration[demo][text={Demostració.\space},number=no,
location=serried,width=fit,headstyle=italic,indentnext=yes,
between=\blank,textdistance=.5em,closesymbol={\mathematics{\Box}},
style=normal,indenting=yes]
and
\starttext
\startdemo Si $\text{area}(u) = N$ i $\text{area}(v) = M$, aleshores
\startformula
\startmathalignment
\NC u \NC = \prod_{i=1}^N x_i^{-1} r_i x_i, \NR[+]
\NC v \NC = \prod_{j=1}^M y_j^{-1} s_j y_j, \NR[+]
\stopmathalignment
\stopformula%
per a alguns $x_i, y_j \in F(A)$, $r_i, s_j \in R$, on aquestes
igualtats són dins el grup lliure $F(A)$. Com que $w = u v$ també dins
el grup lliure, tenim que
\placeformula[-] \startformula \startsplit
\NC w = u v \NC = \bigl( \prod_{i = 1}^N x_i^{-1} r_i x_i \bigr)
\cdot \bigl( \prod_{j=1}^M y_j^{-1} s_j y_j \bigr) \NR
\NC \NC = (x_1^{-1} r_1 x_1)\cdots (x_N^{-1} r_N x_N) \cdot (y_1^{-1}
s_1 y_1) \cdots (y_M^{-1} s_M y_M) \NR
\NC \NC = \prod_{k=1}^{M+N} z_k^{-1} t_k z_k
\stopsplit \stopformula
on
\startformula
z_k = \startcases
\NC x_k\MC 1 \leq k \leq N \NR
\NC y_{k-N} \MC N+1 \leq k \leq N+M, \NR
\stopcases t_k = \startcases
\NC r_k\MC 1 \leq k \leq N \NR
\NC s_{k-N} \MC N+1 \leq k \leq N+M. \NR
\stopcases
\stopformula
Llavors, per definició, $\text{area}(w) \leq N+M = \text{area}(u) +
\text{area}(v)$.
\stopdemo
\stoptext
I have that per a alguns is indenting but on is not.
Why?
Xan.
PS: Please, CCme
I have
%Indentation
\setupheads[indentnext=yes]
\setupindenting[yes,small,first]
\setupformulae[indentnext=yes]
in headers.
if I put setupformulae[identnext=yes] and ident=yes for enumerations
_always_ have indenting after formula even if the text is following.
Xan.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
