[NTG-context] csname not applicable?

2013-04-21 Thread Meer, H. van der 
Why doesn't it seem possible to have the following macro
  \def\docall#1{\csname xmlprocess#1\encsname{}{}}
and use it with \docall{buffer}?
How then accomplish this?

Runaway argument?
\def \sourcenode {exam::15}\edef \currentsource {\xmlattdef {exam::15\ETC.
! File ended while scanning use of \buff_gobble.
...
\luat_start_lua_code_indeed ...nd \directlua {#1}}

Hans van der Meer



___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] csname not applicable?

2013-04-21 Thread Sietse Brouwer 
 Why doesn't it seem possible to have the following macro
   \def\docall#1{\csname xmlprocess#1\encsname{}{}}
 and use it with \docall{buffer}?
 How then accomplish this?

encsname -- endcsname might do the trick.

Cheers,
Sietse
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___