Re: [NTG-context] currently supported platforms
Zitat von Alan Braslau : On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 14:21:40 +0200 Mojca Miklavec wrote: > In the wiki it says kfreebsd would be still supported via Debian - > is this still true? No clue. Probably nobody ever tested for ages. I'm gnu-less... Thank you, I updated the page again, removed the kfreebsd hint and re-added OpenBSD 6.4, even if it’s still missing in http://minimals.contextgarden.net/setup/ Greetlings, Hraban --- https://www.fiee.net http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.dreiviertelhaus.de GPG Key ID 1C9B22FD ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] currently supported platforms
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 14:21:40 +0200 Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > In the wiki it says kfreebsd would be still supported via Debian - > > is this still true? > > No clue. Probably nobody ever tested for ages. I'm gnu-less... From https://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/ "Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is not an officially supported architecture. It has been released with Debian 6.0 (Squeeze) and 7.0 (Wheezy) as a technology preview and the first non-Linux port. Since Debian 8 (Jessie) it is though no more included in official releases." The situation is, despite its exploration into non-linux kernels, Debian remains a GNU-anchored system and this diverges from a GNU-independent base or core that freeBSD represents. Alan ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] currently supported platforms
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 12:51, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > > I.e., I replaced OpenBSD 6.3 and 6.4 with 6.5 and added CygWin and Linux MUSL. I have no idea why 6.4 is not on the list (binaries are being built). Cygwin is not really supported, it's just a hack that uses the regular windows binaries. > Is "Alpine" correct for MUSL? Maybe. > There are additional versions win32 and win64 - what’s the difference > to mswin? Are those also from W32TeX? win32 = mswin (I was probably hoping to convince Hans one day to change the name) > In the wiki it says kfreebsd would be still supported via Debian - is > this still true? No clue. Probably nobody ever tested for ages. > BTW is there any chance to get "first-setup.sh --context=date" back? It has never been removed, but in the past Hans would put a new current online every few days. We need to officially switch to git-based solution to support that. Mojca ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] currently supported platforms
Hi, I just checked the list of supported platforms in the wiki (https://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Standalone#Supported_platforms) and in the setup folder (http://minimals.contextgarden.net/setup/); there were several differences. I tried to update, this is now in the wiki: Supported platforms PlatformShort name Notes Windows mswinfrom W32TeX Windows/CygWin cygwin Linux, 32-bit linuxDebian 8 Linux, 64-bit linux-64 Debian 8 Linux, ARM (low end.) linux-arm Raspbian 8 Linux, musl linuxmusl-64 Alpine Mac OS X, Intel (64-bit) osx-64 Mac OS X 10.6 FreeBSD, 32-bit freebsd FreeBSD, 64-bit freebsd-amd64 OpenBSD 6.5, 32-bit openbsd6.5 OpenBSD 6.5, 64-bit openbsd6.5-amd64 Solaris, Intel solaris-intelSolaris 10 on OpenCSW Solaris, Sparc solaris-sparcSolaris 10 on OpenCSW I.e., I replaced OpenBSD 6.3 and 6.4 with 6.5 and added CygWin and Linux MUSL. Is "Alpine" correct for MUSL? There are additional versions win32 and win64 - what’s the difference to mswin? Are those also from W32TeX? In the wiki it says kfreebsd would be still supported via Debian - is this still true? BTW is there any chance to get "first-setup.sh --context=date" back? Greetlings, Hraban --- https://www.fiee.net http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.dreiviertelhaus.de GPG Key ID 1C9B22FD ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
