Re: [NTG-context] more nath patches

2004-10-27 Thread Maurice Diamantini
Le 27 oct. 04, à 05:50, David Arnold a écrit :
Is there a nath manual?
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/nath/
But it is for LaTeX only, and I'm am not sure of what is already
implemented in the m-nath module from Giuseppe Bilotta
...
Hum, I just see that this is already mention on the context portail
http://contextgarden.net/Math_with_nath
(So I just had the url)
-- Maurice
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] more nath patches

2004-10-27 Thread Hans Hagen
Maurice Diamantini wrote:
Hum, I just see that this is already mention on the context portail
http://contextgarden.net/Math_with_nath
(So I just had the url)
as far as i know most functionality is available
Hans
-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] more nath patches

2004-10-27 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Tuesday, October 26, 2004 Christopher Creutzig wrote:

 Salvete,

[snip]

Christopher,

thank you very much for the patches. I'll give them a better
look as soon as I have some more time.

-- 
Giuseppe Oblomov Bilotta

___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


[NTG-context] more nath patches

2004-10-26 Thread Christopher Creutzig
Salvete,
 I finally managed to make t-nath work with \eqalign and \eqalignno. (I 
assume I was not the only one having trouble there?)  As it appears, 
nath gets really confused when subformulas are enclosed in {} and 
contain some form of delimiters.  Therefore, the original definitions 
just don't work, but these modifications do, at least in some sense of 
work:

\def\eqalignno#1%
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   \tabskip\centering
   \vcenter{%
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 \halign to \displaywidth
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] {}##\stopnathdmath}\hfil\tabskip\centering
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@skip\crcr
   #1\crcr}}}
\def\eqalign#1%
  {\null
   \,%
   \vcenter
 {\openup
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \ialign
{\strut\hfil{\startnathdmath ##\stopnathdmath}%
  {\startnathdmath {}##\stopnathdmath}\hfil\crcr
 #1\crcr}}%
   \,}
 And I've got another snippet I'd like to share, which helps displaying 
continued fractions in a linear format, using the best way of doing so 
I've met so far:

\def\contfrac#1#2{%
  % To get the lines at the top right and bottom left
  % at the correct lengths, we need to know the final heights
  % of both top and bottom.  Since styles ``C-up'' and ``C-down''
  % are used only in generalized fractions, we need a trial
  % typesetting run for this.
  \begingroup
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] .7\mex\!!width 0pt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] #1}%
   \!!dimena=\ht\nathbox \advance\!!dimena-\ht\sizebox@
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%  \!!dimena=\dp\nathbox \advance\!!dimena .5ex \dp\nathbox=\!!dimena
   \global\!!dimend=\dp\nathbox
   \box\nathbox
  \above\fracrulethickness@
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2\mex\!!width 0pt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] #2}%
   \!!dimenb=\dp\nathbox \advance\!!dimenb-\dp\sizebox@
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%  \!!dimenb=\ht\nathbox \advance\!!dimenb .5ex \ht\nathbox=\!!dimenb
   \global\!!dimene=\ht\nathbox
   \box\nathbox
   }%
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%
%
  %% See the TeXbook, page 444 f., for what is happening here.
  \ifcase\mathcount@
\!!dimenf=\fontdimen8\textfont2
\!!dimeng=\fontdimen11\textfont2
\!!dimenh=3\fracrulethickness@
\!!dimeni=\fontdimen22\textfont2
  \or
\!!dimenf=\fontdimen9\scriptfont2
\!!dimeng=\fontdimen12\scriptfont2
\!!dimenh=\fracrulethickness@
\!!dimeni=\fontdimen22\scriptfont2
  \else
\!!dimenf=\fontdimen9\scriptscriptfont2
\!!dimeng=\fontdimen12\scriptscriptfont2
\!!dimenh=\fracrulethickness@
\!!dimeni=\fontdimen22\scriptscriptfont2
  \fi
%
  \!!dimenj=\dimexpr(\!!dimenf-\!!dimend)-
(\!!dimeni+0.5\fracrulethickness@)\relax
  \ifdim\!!dimenj\!!dimenh
\advance\!!dimenf by \dimexpr(\!!dimenh-\!!dimenj)\relax
  \fi
  \!!dimenj=\dimexpr(\!!dimeni-0.5\fracrulethickness@)-
(\!!dimene-\!!dimeng)\relax
  \ifdim\!!dimenj\!!dimenh
\advance\!!dimeng by \dimexpr(\!!dimenh-\!!dimenj)\relax
  \fi
%
  \advance\!!dimenf by\dimexpr(-\!!dimeni)\relax
  \advance\!!dimeng by\dimexpr(+\!!dimeni)\relax
%
  \setbox\!!boxa\hbox{%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] .7\mex\!!width 0pt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] #1}%
   \ifdim\ht\nathbox1.6ex
 \ht\nathbox=1.6ex
   \fi
   \!!dimena=\ht\nathbox \advance\!!dimena-\ht\sizebox@
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   \setbox\!!boxb\hbox{%
 \vrule
   \!!depth\!!dimenf
   \!!height\ht\nathbox
   \!!width\fracrulethickness@
   }%
   \dp\!!boxb=0pt
   \hfill\,
   \box\nathbox
   \,\hfill
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \above\fracrulethickness@
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2\mex\!!width 0pt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] #2}%
   \ifdim\dp\nathbox.4ex
 \dp\nathbox=.4ex
   \fi
   \!!dimenb=\dp\nathbox \advance\!!dimenb-\dp\sizebox@
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   \setbox\!!boxb\hbox{%
 \vrule
   \!!depth\dp\nathbox
   \!!height\!!dimeng
   \!!width\fracrulethickness@
   }%
   \ht\!!boxb=0pt
   \box\!!boxb\hskip\fracrulethickness@
   \hfill\,
   \box\nathbox
   \,\hfill
   }%
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 \setbox\nathbox\copy\!!boxa
 \iftoprestricted@ \else
   \!!dimenb=\ht\nathbox \advance\!!dimenb .4\mex \ht\nathbox=\!!dimenb
 \fi
 \ifbotrestricted@ \else
   \!!dimenb=\dp\nathbox \advance\!!dimenb .5\mex \dp\nathbox=\!!dimenb
 \fi
 \box\nathbox  % print
 \!!dimena=\ht\!!boxa \advance\!!dimena-\htdecrement@
 \ht\!!boxa=\!!dimena
 \!!dimena=\dp\!!boxa \advance\!!dimena-\dpdecrement@
 \dp\!!boxa=\!!dimena
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 \endgroup
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@}}
 I do assume the whole thing could be done with about half as many 
lines of code, but I was glad to finally understand how TeX typesets 
fractions and just ignored beautifying the code.  Also note that the 
snippet uses \fracrulethickness@ from t-nath.tex, while I honestly 
consider using \fontdimen8\textfont3 or whichever font size is in use 
for the fraction.  Well, work in progress.

regards,
Christopher Creutzig
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] more nath patches

2004-10-26 Thread Hans Hagen
Christopher Creutzig wrote:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2\mex\!!width 0pt
since you are going the fast and efficient way (\using \!!dimena etc), 
0pt can become \zeropoint (less space interference as well)

\!!dimenf=\fontdimen8\textfont2
\!!dimenf\fontdimen8\textfont\syfam
is more independent; maybe i should define symbolic names for the font 
dimens as well (no time to make a list now)

(\!!dimeni+0.5\fracrulethickness@)\relax
is \fracrulethickness@ a nath specific thing?
   \hfill\,
maybe you need a % after this line
 I do assume the whole thing could be done with about half as many lines 
of code, but I was glad to finally understand how TeX typesets fractions 
and just ignored beautifying the code.  Also note that the snippet uses 
it's not that bad, tricky code seldom looks nice
Hans
-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] more nath patches

2004-10-26 Thread Christopher Creutzig
Hans Hagen wrote:
\!!dimenf=\fontdimen8\textfont2

\!!dimenf\fontdimen8\textfont\syfam
 OK, I should look those names up.
is more independent; maybe i should define symbolic names for the font 
 Independent of what?  \textfont2 is exactly the font TeX would use, no?
(\!!dimeni+0.5\fracrulethickness@)\relax

is \fracrulethickness@ a nath specific thing?
 Yes.  As I said, I'm thinking of using the proper fontdimen of the 
correct font instead.

   \hfill\,

maybe you need a % after this line
 Should have one just for code cleanliness, yes.  But it's all in math 
mode, so the spce should not do anything.

Christopher
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] more nath patches

2004-10-26 Thread Hans Hagen
Christopher Creutzig wrote:

 Should have one just for code cleanliness, yes.  But it's all in math 
mode, so the spce should not do anything.
ah .. i'm not that math aware -)
if you make that fontdimen list i'll add the names to the kernel
also, i think that we need to sort out nath interference some day soon
is there a test suite? if not, maybe it's worth the effort to cook up a 
nice math example document (like the one with tables and chemistry)

Hans
-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] more nath patches

2004-10-26 Thread David Arnold
Is there a nath manual?

At 06:18 PM 10/26/04 +0200, you wrote:

Le 26 oct. 04, à 17:55, Hans Hagen a écrit :

 Christopher Creutzig wrote:

 also, i think that we need to sort out nath interference some day soon

 is there a test suite? if not, maybe it's worth the effort to cook up 
 a nice math example document (like the one with tables and chemistry)

Or perhaps the nath manual itself?

-- Maurice,

___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context