Re: [NTG-context] Bug in ligature lookup

2014-04-15 Thread Hans Hagen

On 4/14/2014 8:10 AM, H. Özoguz wrote:

My question ist still unclear, I guess?

How to describe it better? Or, if understood, is that not solvable easily?

Thanks for help to make this font completely work with ConTeXt


a real minimal example with clear explanation is needed so that it can 
be traced (and we need to be sure the font is right)


Hans


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Bug in ligature lookup

2014-04-15 Thread H. Özoguz

a real minimal example with clear explanation is needed so that it can
be traced (and we need to be sure the font is right)


I have postet a minexample already here:

http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2014/077590.html

There is a link to the used font, too. If you have problem to see the 
unicode (like in my mailer), then you can copy the symbol from pure html 
here:


http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/attachments/20140402/d24030dc/attachment.html

You can see the outout, like it should be (screenshot from other 
programms outputs) here:

http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/attachments/20140402/d24030dc/attachment.png

It is a very small and clear minexample in my view :)

I do not know, if the font is valid, surely it may have some problems. 
But in this case other programs I tried (namely CorelDraw and MS Word) 
do not have any problems with this unicode-symbol. Help and fix would be 
great, as this symbol is the only one left in my list of hacks and 
workarounds to typeset the quran with ConTeXt. (Hacks etc. needed, 
because unfortunately there are no good arabic font, either free or 
commercial, which can be used for the massive needs of typesetting quran 
(thats why nearly all used qurans are still written by hand)).


But if I can make it clearer, I will definitely try, because it is an 
important question for typessting quran with ConTeXt.


Thanks!
Huseyin


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Bug in ligature lookup

2014-04-14 Thread H. Özoguz

My question ist still unclear, I guess?

How to describe it better? Or, if understood, is that not solvable easily?

Thanks for help to make this font completely work with ConTeXt
Huseyin
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Bug in ligature lookup

2014-04-07 Thread Hans Hagen

On 4/7/2014 7:37 AM, H. Özoguz wrote:

Just remembering. Is it possible to fix this bug?


it's not clear to me what the bug is

Hans

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Bug in ligature lookup

2014-04-07 Thread H. Özoguz

it's not clear to me what the bug is

Hans


Ok, the bug is, that, if you try my code with the mentioned font (you 
can take it from the html source code to be sure to get the right 
unicode char, here: 
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/attachments/20140403/22b89844/attachment-0001.html


than you will see unconnected letters, and not the correct ligature 
(which you can see in the unicode). And this is not a font-issue, as 
other programms (like Word or CorelDraw) print it correctly with the 
same unicode char.


Could I describe it?

Huseyin
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Bug in ligature lookup

2014-04-06 Thread H. Özoguz

Just remembering. Is it possible to fix this bug?

Thanks!
Huseyin
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Bug in ligature lookup

2014-04-03 Thread H. Özoguz

  
  
I do not know, why the mailing-list
  shows question-marks here, in my mailing programm this unicode
  symbol is correctly shown.
  
  To be sure, I attached an text-file with the word in it, s.t.
  everybody should be able to test this bug.
  
  Did that work now?
  
  Huseyin
  
  
  Am 02.04.2014 10:50, schrieb "H. Özoguz":


  
  Hi,
  
  used font: 
  http://fonts.qurancomplex.gov.sa/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/UthmanTN1-Ver10.zip
  
  Minexample:
  
  \definefont[uthm][file:UthmanTN1Ver10*arabic
  at 20pt]
  
  \starttext
  \uthm
  \setupalign[r2l]
  
  \stoptext
  
  You see, that the letters are not connected, it should be look
  like the attached image with this ligature.
  
  
  
  In the image you see the same font and the same above
  unicode-text, but rendered with CorelDraw instead. So it may or
  may not be a font-issue, but solvable in ConText?
  
  Thanks.
  Huseyin
  
  
  
  


  

كَلَّآ___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___