Re: [NTG-context] letfrozen?

2023-06-13 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context

On 6/13/2023 12:43 PM, Hans van der Meer via ntg-context wrote:

Of course. But without that \enabledirective I can redefine the frozen macro at 
will, as a simple test did show.
The crux, however, is that one wants to protect the frozen code always, 
irrespective of that directive setting.
there are several caregories, like primitive, permanent, instance, 
mutable, immutable and frozen


at some point we could deepfreeze them all but in the end that makes no 
sense because then we can't for instance run tikz


so in the end it's mostly about warnings and errors (one can actually 
distinguish between categories)


there's also \overloaded and \aliased and \enforced etc

of course you can at some point do

\newcount\overloadmode

but who can predict side effects (and one can argue that tex is 
progrmamable and that users get what they ask for) and keep in mind that 
all should also not hit performance too badly


there's quite a bit involved here .. pretty all context commands have 
some kind of flagging and protection (which also is handy for tracing)


You can spent hours playing with prefixes:

\frozen
\permanent
\immutable
\mutable
%primitive
\noaligned
\instance
\untraced
\global
\tolerant
\protected
\overloaded
\aliased
\immediate
\deferred
\semiprotected
\enforced
\inherited
\constant

if you're in the mood.

Hans

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
   tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] letfrozen?

2023-06-13 Thread Hans van der Meer via ntg-context
Of course. But without that \enabledirective I can redefine the frozen macro at 
will, as a simple test did show.
The crux, however, is that one wants to protect the frozen code always, 
irrespective of that directive setting.

dr. Hans van der Meer
> On 12 Jun 2023, at 19:47, Hans Hagen via ntg-context  
> wrote:
> 
> On 6/12/2023 12:32 PM, Hans van der Meer via ntg-context wrote:
>>> On 12 Jun 2023, at 11:12, Hans Hagen via ntg-context  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 6/12/2023 10:57 AM, Hans van der Meer via ntg-context wrote:
 The manual LMTX-primitives on page 21 tells me:
You can explicitly freeze an unfrozen macro.
...
A redefinition will now give: You can't redefine a frozen macro.
 But is this true? The following code seems to contradict this:
 \def\HOME{myhome}
 \writestatus{1}{\meaning\HOME}
 \letfrozen\HOME
 \writestatus{2}{\meaning\HOME}
 \def\HOME{other home}
 \writestatus{3}{\meaning\HOME}
 
 Is this mechanism broken? It looks so useful to prevent accidental 
 redefinition!
>>> 
>>> here i run with
>>> 
>>> \enabledirectives[overloadmode=error]
>>> 
>>> (you can do that in cont-sys.mkxl)
>>> 
>>> \enabledirectives[overloadmode=warning]
>>> Hans
>>> 
>> Pity. Now I get on loading the tex file:
>> "csname overload > fatal error, protection level 4, control sequence 'nbsp', 
>> properties 'immutable', file 't-hvdm-text.tex', line 63
>> while I had hoped that frozen would give me something like:
>> illegal attempt to redefine \HOME
>> Byproduct (not unwanted) the above illegal redefinition to be solved :-)
>> May I ask why obviously the frozen-mechanism seems (yet?) unimplemented?
> It's okay and has been around for quite a while now.
> 
> \enabledirectives[overloadmode=error]
> 
> \starttext
> 
>\frozen\def\HOME{}
> 
>\def\HOME{!}
> 
> \stoptext
> 
> 
> -
>  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
>  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
>   tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -
> 
> ___
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
> Wiki!
> 
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / 
> https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki : https://contextgarden.net
> ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] letfrozen?

2023-06-12 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context

On 6/12/2023 12:32 PM, Hans van der Meer via ntg-context wrote:

On 12 Jun 2023, at 11:12, Hans Hagen via ntg-context  wrote:

On 6/12/2023 10:57 AM, Hans van der Meer via ntg-context wrote:

The manual LMTX-primitives on page 21 tells me:
You can explicitly freeze an unfrozen macro.
...
A redefinition will now give: You can't redefine a frozen macro.
But is this true? The following code seems to contradict this:
\def\HOME{myhome}
\writestatus{1}{\meaning\HOME}
\letfrozen\HOME
\writestatus{2}{\meaning\HOME}
\def\HOME{other home}
\writestatus{3}{\meaning\HOME}

Is this mechanism broken? It looks so useful to prevent accidental redefinition!


here i run with

\enabledirectives[overloadmode=error]

(you can do that in cont-sys.mkxl)

\enabledirectives[overloadmode=warning]
Hans



Pity. Now I get on loading the tex file:
"csname overload > fatal error, protection level 4, control sequence 'nbsp', 
properties 'immutable', file 't-hvdm-text.tex', line 63

while I had hoped that frozen would give me something like:
illegal attempt to redefine \HOME

Byproduct (not unwanted) the above illegal redefinition to be solved :-)

May I ask why obviously the frozen-mechanism seems (yet?) unimplemented?

It's okay and has been around for quite a while now.

\enabledirectives[overloadmode=error]

\starttext

\frozen\def\HOME{}

\def\HOME{!}

\stoptext


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
   tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] letfrozen?

2023-06-12 Thread Hans van der Meer via ntg-context
> On 12 Jun 2023, at 11:12, Hans Hagen via ntg-context  
> wrote:
> 
> On 6/12/2023 10:57 AM, Hans van der Meer via ntg-context wrote:
>> The manual LMTX-primitives on page 21 tells me:
>>  You can explicitly freeze an unfrozen macro.
>>  ...
>>  A redefinition will now give: You can't redefine a frozen macro.
>> But is this true? The following code seems to contradict this:
>> \def\HOME{myhome}
>> \writestatus{1}{\meaning\HOME}
>> \letfrozen\HOME
>> \writestatus{2}{\meaning\HOME}
>> \def\HOME{other home}
>> \writestatus{3}{\meaning\HOME}
>> 
>> Is this mechanism broken? It looks so useful to prevent accidental 
>> redefinition!
> 
> here i run with
> 
> \enabledirectives[overloadmode=error]
> 
> (you can do that in cont-sys.mkxl)
> 
> \enabledirectives[overloadmode=warning]
> Hans
> 

Pity. Now I get on loading the tex file:
"csname overload > fatal error, protection level 4, control sequence 'nbsp', 
properties 'immutable', file 't-hvdm-text.tex', line 63

while I had hoped that frozen would give me something like:
illegal attempt to redefine \HOME

Byproduct (not unwanted) the above illegal redefinition to be solved :-)

May I ask why obviously the frozen-mechanism seems (yet?) unimplemented?

dr. Hans van der Meer

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] letfrozen?

2023-06-12 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context

On 6/12/2023 10:57 AM, Hans van der Meer via ntg-context wrote:

The manual LMTX-primitives on page 21 tells me:
You can explicitly freeze an unfrozen macro.
...
A redefinition will now give: You can't redefine a frozen macro.

But is this true? The following code seems to contradict this:

\def\HOME{myhome}
\writestatus{1}{\meaning\HOME}
\letfrozen\HOME
\writestatus{2}{\meaning\HOME}
\def\HOME{other home}
\writestatus{3}{\meaning\HOME}




Is this mechanism broken? It looks so useful to prevent accidental redefinition!


here i run with

\enabledirectives[overloadmode=error]

(you can do that in cont-sys.mkxl)

\enabledirectives[overloadmode=warning]
 Hans


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
   tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___