RE: [RFC PATCH 2/5 v2] cell-info: Header file for cell-info atom
Hi Waldo,
On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 10:54 -0800, ext Bastian, Waldo wrote:
+struct gsm {
+ int lac;
+ int ci;
+ int ta;
+ int no_cells;
+ struct geran_neigh_cell{
+ int arfcn;
+ int bsic;
+ int rxlev;
+
+ } nmr[OFONO_MAX_NMR_COUNT];
+};
What about the frequency of the serving cell? I was under the impression that
there was a need for that one as well.
Even though the serving cell may be included already in the nmr, do you see a
need
to explicitly provide the arfcn, bsic and rxlev of the serving cell as well?
Serving cell frequency is, or should be, included in the nmr list in the
arfcn variable. I believe the arfcn, bsic and rxlev are needed for all
cells since this information is used for location determination.
What about LAC and CI for the neighbouring cells?
As far as I know, the neighbor cell info in the above-mentioned form is
used for location specific purposes. Hence, bsic suffices to identify
base station and rxlev gives the unscaled distance from it.
If there is a reason for including LAC and CI for neighboring cells, we
can add them to the list. In that case we should probably modify the
DBUS method list to include one method for requesting location data and
another method for general identity data.
Best Regards,
Antti
___
ofono mailing list
ofono@ofono.org
http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
n900 not recongnized by ofono?
Hi, It appears that after commit 374dd32812026c3d728f2a14f78357463f12a3f8 ofono is no longer registering n900 properly. At least 'list-modems' shows empty list even if two commit earlier [isigen0] is there as it should. Has the functionality changed or is this regression? Best Regards, Antti ___ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
Happy holidays to everyone
Hello everyone, and once more we have the Christmas release of oFono behind us. This year it was version 0.37 and I like to thank you guys for your constant contributions. The statistics of the project are impressive. We have 67 individual contributors with 4278 commits. If you compare this to last year, then we have 39 new contributors and 2814 new commits. The line count for C source files increased from 44816 to 107039. Language Files CodeComment Comment % Blank Total - - - - - - c 280 107039 9554 8.2% 26478 143071 python 66 2083 75 3.5%769 2927 automake 1438 0 0.0%100538 cpp 1376 36 8.7% 36448 html 1374 0 0.0% 12386 autoconf 1170 1 0.6% 37208 shell 3 30 3 9.1% 8 41 - - - - - - Total 353 110510 9669 8.0% 27440 147619 When looking at the changed lines of code, we have to give a big thank you to Denis for his constant contributions. And also a big thank you to Andrew and Yang for their work on SIM Toolkit support. Developers with the most changed lines -- Denis Kenzior 80016 (34.2%) Andrzej Zaborowski27962 (11.9%) Yang Gu 25203 (10.8%) Marcel Holtmann 24574 (10.5%) Aki Niemi 19997 (8.5%) Looking from a corporate perspective, then it shows us ProFusion, ST-Ericsson and Elektrobit as additional major contributors. Big thank you for the interest in this project. Top lines changed by employer - Intel 182365 (77.9%) Nokia38583 (16.5%) ProFUSION 5347 (2.3%) ST-Ericsson 3094 (1.3%) Elektrobit1662 (0.7%) So enjoy your vacation and a Happy New Year :) Regards Marcel ___ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
Re: n900 not recongnized by ofono?
Hi Antti, It appears that after commit 374dd32812026c3d728f2a14f78357463f12a3f8 ofono is no longer registering n900 properly. At least 'list-modems' shows empty list even if two commit earlier [isigen0] is there as it should. Has the functionality changed or is this regression? the ofono.rules udev file changed. Have you installed the new one? Regards Marcel ___ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
