Re: CWS swbookmarkfixes01 rebasing and licensing
I'd suggest being even more patient. In my experience people don't give answers to general queries involving legal issues. A specific question, like please can we we have CWS foo since the community wishes to integrate it is more likely to get a response. The general case, as far as we are aware, remains the same. Oracle have, so far, never refused our requests when they have been specific and actionable. Ross On Jul 4, 2012 12:22 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On Jul 3, 2012, at 10:19 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote: --- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com ha scritto: ... On 3 Jul 2012, at 15:29, Pedro Giffuni wrote: --- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com ha scritto: ... Please can we have an update on that effort to get all the CWS made available then? It seems a perfectly reasonable request, one I and others have been making here since the inception of the project and one I am not able to go negotiate personally so need to keep asking about here. What effort? Mentioned in an e-mail linked from the OP, dated June 7, 2011 - those of us inside the project have been raising this topic from very early on, as you can see. Making it easy for outside developers to meet their needs is a great way to have them begin to join in and become insiders like you. The message is at http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3c4dee6c86.5070...@oracle.com%3E S. OK. I think that in that mail message we stands for Oracle, not for Apache, so you'd have to ask Andrew Rist with his Oracle hat. OK, thanks. Andrew, do you have an update on the outcome of your assertion We are trying to provide all of the Oracle owned content in the OOo repositories (this was in the context of the CWSs) please? Please do be patient when waiting for a response, tomorrow is a holiday you may remember - US Independence Day. It's on a Wednesday and many people are taking time off this week. While the weather in most of the US is atrociously hot, it is absolutely perfect here on the Pacific Coast. Regards, Dave Cheers! S.
Re: reset my password
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:11:06PM -0700: I believe an additional difficulty for Hongyun An is that he no longer has the use of the e-mail address that his hyan@ apache.org e-mail account forwards to. I know. This is why folks should always maintain their personal details using selfserve (id.apache.org) (I also note that mail I send to hongyun...@cs2c.com.cn always bounces.) - Dennis -Original Message- From: hongyun.an [mailto:hongyun...@cs2c.com.cn] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 19:27 To: Tony Stevenson Cc: root; ooo-dev Subject: Re: reset my password Dear Tony: I have carefully reviewed the people.apache.org.I have clicked the Managing Your Details. Following the instructions,I have made a FOAF file.However,I could not commit the FOAF file to the https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/info because I forget my password and have no access right. So I could not place a new file in my homedir. Could you please help me to solve the problem? Thank you very much. Best wishes. -- hongyun.an thanks,Tony. I am not sure that I get your meaning.I opened the people.apache.org,then went to the http://people.apache.org/foaf/index.html; and http://people.apache.org/foaf/foafamatic.html.I created a file named hyan.rdf,with the content: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#; xmlns:rdfs=http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#; xmlns:foaf=http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/; xmlns:geo=http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#; xmlns:pm=http://www.web-semantics.org/ns/pm#; xmlns:wot=http://xmlns.com/wot/0.1/; xmlns:rss=http://purl.org/rss/1.0/; xmlns:dc=http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/; xmlns:ical=http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical#; xmlns:doap=http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#; foaf:Person rdf:ID=hyan foaf:nameHong Yun An/foaf:name foaf:givennameHong Yun/foaf:givenname foaf:family_nameAn/foaf:family_name foaf:mbox rdf:resource=mailto:hongyun...@cs2c.com.cn/ foaf:mbox rdf:resource=mailto:an_hong...@hotmail.com/ /foaf:Person /rdf:RDF But I cound not creat a foat file. Could you please give me some direction? thank you very much. best wishes. -- hongyun.an Can you still login to people.apache.org ? If so can you place a new file in your homedir, with your new email address and then let us know what that is. hongyun.an wrote on Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 03:07:38PM +0800: Dear Tony: Unluckly it is.I have changed email address without updating my records. My ID id hyan.The invalid email address is anhong...@redoffice.com.cn. Could you tell me how to verify my identity in detail? Thank you very much. Best wishes. -- hongyun.an Hi, Please use httpsd://id.apache.org - If you have changed your email address without updating your records here, then you will not be able to complete the password reset steps. If this is the case, we will need to try and verify your identity another way. hongyun.an wrote on Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 09:42:20AM +0800: hello: I am the Apache committer,my ID is hyan.Now I have forgotten my password. Could you help me to reset the password? Now my email is :hongyun...@cs2c.com.cn thank you very much! best wishes. -- hongyun.an -- Cheers, Tony --- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com // pct...@apache.org // t...@caret.cam.ac.uk GPG: 1024D/51047D66 http://www.pc-tony.com --- -- Cheers, Tony --- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com // pct...@apache.org // t...@caret.cam.ac.uk GPG: 1024D/51047D66 http://www.pc-tony.com --- -- Cheers, Tony --- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com // pct...@apache.org // t...@caret.cam.ac.uk GPG: 1024D/51047D66 http://www.pc-tony.com --- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [QA AUTOMATION] Build Verification Test(BVT) test results
Hi, I updated Build Verification Test(BVT) Report wiki page[1]. I added the pass/skip/fail cases in to the report table. Hope the results more intuitive. [1] http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/BVT On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Linyi Li lilinyi921...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Yan Ji Thanks for your advice. I will update this wiki. And I will add some contents to make it more intuitive. On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Ji Yan yanji...@gmail.com wrote: Lin Yi, You can put the report in wiki page[1]. I just made a sample with your Mac platform report, you could continue post result for other platform [1]http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/BVT 2012/7/3 Linyi Li lilinyi921...@gmail.com Hi, I setup some machines to perform Build Verification Test(BVT). Here is the test result. - Platform: windows 8 mac 10.7.4 redhat 6.1 ubuntu 10.04 windows 7 x64 - Build version: trunk build r1355288. - Total cases: 41. - Found defects: 1. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120171 Liu Zhe helped me to put the detailed result to his spac. You can get them from here: http://people.apache.org/~liuzhe/test/ Thanks Zhe! About the test results. logs/Logs of BVT. Recording the executed test cases and error messages. report/ Summary of test results. How many test cases were executed. How many passed, how many failed. Execution time. You can click on the number in the page to see the relevant test cases. result/ A .xml file. Recording the whold test process. screenshot/ If any case is failed, there will be a screenshot to record failing scenario. Any comments are welcomed! -- Best wishes. Linyi Li -- Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji -- Best wishes. Linyi Li -- Best wishes. Linyi Li
Re: [TRANSLATION][3.4.1]: update Pootle server to include new string for a new warning box
Hi, sorry for my top post, but it is a reply to this complete thread. That is really cool what is happening here regarding translation. Jürgen sent out out a request and 8 hours later already a lot of the requested translations are done. I have to express how motivating such an experience is. Keep on going, I will try to follow such kind of behavior. Best regards, Oliver. On 03.07.2012 15:25, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, based on the discussion relating Windows 8 readiness etc. we have identified 5 critical issues. And we have already started to work on these issues and my plan is to have them all ready for a 3.4.1 that we can decide at any time later if we want to move forward with the W8 support when we have everything in place in time. For solving one of these issues we have to introduce a new warning box which means that we have to translate a new string for 3.4.1. I have updated the Pootle server already with the new string (17 words only) and I would like to ask our translators to focus on this new string as soon as possible (ideally this week). Most important are the languages that we want release: en-US ar cs de en-GB es fi fr gl hu it ja km nl ru sl pt-BR zh-CN zh-TW and potentially sk where I have to update Pootle with the latest available updates from Michal Hriň The new string is in desktop - source - app.po See for example for French desktop.src#STR_BOOTSTRAP_ERR_MULTISESSION.string.text https://translate.apache.org/fr/OOo_34/translate.html?unitstates=fuzzy,untranslated de will be covered by myself ;-) because there is currently a problem that I don't understand and that I have to solve. To simplify the update I would prefer if the string get translated on the Pootle server. Please send me a short note when an updated or better a translation of the string is available. I will take care of the integration. If anybody have problems doing it on Pootle please let me know. Juergen
[QA] Call for bug verification Bug 119332
There is bug 119332[1] which is 3.4.1 release blocker, the bug can be reproduced in Solaris only. Now it has been fixed but due to lack test environment, so I'm wondering if any volunteer who has Solaris environment could verify this bug. -- [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119332 Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji
Re: AOO 3.4 Impress not recognising Dual monitors?
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 23:55:49 -0300 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote: Hi Rory, On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: I'm not yet in a position to raise a formal bug, but I would appreciate input from other users who may have occasion to use AOO 3.4 to give a presentation. I have not been able to get AOO 3:4 Impress to successfully recognise the second monitor on later *ubuntu systems (say 11:10 and later). I have requested information from others on the Forum in thread http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10t=54875 I would welcome input from users from the Apache lists; I bring it to the attention of the ooo-dev list as some developer working on Impress may test this in passing. this is a known bug: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119327 Regards Thank you for the pointer, Ariel. I had made a quick bug search, but missed that one. I'll post the pointer to the Forum thread, for completeness. -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie
Re: VBA
Stefan , i use this code to open and run a report, the filter handling is included Sub Main ( sReportName ,sFilter, sBlancoFilter as string) on local error goto errh context = createUnoService(com.sun.star.sdb.DatabaseContext) oDataBase = context.getByName(mysql_native_PMG_reports) oDBDoc = oDataBase.DatabaseDocument aArguments() = oDBDoc.getArgs() For i=LBound(aArguments()) To UBound(aArguments() ) ' nodig om te beletten dat er gevraagd wordt de macro's uit te voeren If ( aArguments(i).Name = MacroExecutionMode ) Then aArguments(i).Value = com.sun.star.document.MacroExecMode.ALWAYS_EXECUTE End If Next i oDBDoc.attachResource( oDBDoc.URL, aArguments() ) oReports = oDBDoc.getReportDocuments() dim Arguments(2) as New com.sun.star.beans.PropertyValue Arguments(0).Name = OpenMode Arguments(0).Value = open 'openDesign Arguments(1).Name = ActiveConnection Arguments(1).Value = oDatabase.getConnection(sos,hooghte) Arguments(2).Name = Hidden Arguments(2).Value = true toclose = oReports.loadComponentFromURL(sReportName ,_blank,0,Arguments()) ' open en sluiten om bepaalde componenten in geheugen te laden wait 1000 toclose.close(true) oReport = oreports.getbyname(sReportName) oreportComponent = oreport.component oreportComponent.Filter = sFilter ' xray oreportCom oReport.open ' filter weer op niets te vinden zetten anders blijft hij de settings van vorige run onthouden oreportComponent.filter = sBlancoFilter ' xray oreportCom ' print stop exit sub ErrH: beep MsgBox Error err : error$ , 16 end sub hope it helps Fernand I want open a Report and change the filter dynamicly I found the Code to Open subdlg = getController().loadComponent(com.sun.star.sdb.application.DatabaseObject.REPORT,Ergebnisse,FALSE) but i dont know how i change the filter in the report mfg Stefan
Re: [QA AUTOMATION] Build Verification Test(BVT) test results
Lin Yi, thanks for your update. This report looks good to me. 2012/7/4 Linyi Li lilinyi921...@gmail.com Hi, I updated Build Verification Test(BVT) Report wiki page[1]. I added the pass/skip/fail cases in to the report table. Hope the results more intuitive. [1] http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/BVT On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Linyi Li lilinyi921...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Yan Ji Thanks for your advice. I will update this wiki. And I will add some contents to make it more intuitive. On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Ji Yan yanji...@gmail.com wrote: Lin Yi, You can put the report in wiki page[1]. I just made a sample with your Mac platform report, you could continue post result for other platform [1]http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/BVT 2012/7/3 Linyi Li lilinyi921...@gmail.com Hi, I setup some machines to perform Build Verification Test(BVT). Here is the test result. - Platform: windows 8 mac 10.7.4 redhat 6.1 ubuntu 10.04 windows 7 x64 - Build version: trunk build r1355288. - Total cases: 41. - Found defects: 1. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120171 Liu Zhe helped me to put the detailed result to his spac. You can get them from here: http://people.apache.org/~liuzhe/test/ Thanks Zhe! About the test results. logs/Logs of BVT. Recording the executed test cases and error messages. report/ Summary of test results. How many test cases were executed. How many passed, how many failed. Execution time. You can click on the number in the page to see the relevant test cases. result/ A .xml file. Recording the whold test process. screenshot/ If any case is failed, there will be a screenshot to record failing scenario. Any comments are welcomed! -- Best wishes. Linyi Li -- Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji -- Best wishes. Linyi Li -- Best wishes. Linyi Li -- Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji
3.4.1_release_blocker canceled: [Bug 119367] AOO 3.4 crash, if you stop by ESC animated presentation
Yan Ji yanji...@gmail.com has canceled r4zoli r4z...@apache.org's request for 3.4.1_release_blocker: Bug 119367: AOO 3.4 crash, if you stop by ESC animated presentation https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119367 --- Additional Comments from Yan Ji yanji...@gmail.com Remove release blocker request flag
Re: AOO 3.4 Impress not recognising Dual monitors?
Hi, in the moment I have just one question in mind when I read Ubuntu in this context: Does your system run X11 or Wayland ? Am 03.07.2012 20:47, schrieb Rory O'Farrell: I'm not yet in a position to raise a formal bug, but I would appreciate input from other users who may have occasion to use AOO 3.4 to give a presentation. I have not been able to get AOO 3:4 Impress to successfully recognise the second monitor on later *ubuntu systems (say 11:10 and later). I have requested information from others on the Forum in thread http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10t=54875 Kind regards, Joost
Re: AOO 3.4 Impress not recognising Dual monitors?
On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 10:18:16 +0200 Joost Andrae joost.and...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, in the moment I have just one question in mind when I read Ubuntu in this context: Does your system run X11 or Wayland ? Am 03.07.2012 20:47, schrieb Rory O'Farrell: I'm not yet in a position to raise a formal bug, but I would appreciate input from other users who may have occasion to use AOO 3.4 to give a presentation. I have not been able to get AOO 3:4 Impress to successfully recognise the second monitor on later *ubuntu systems (say 11:10 and later). I have requested information from others on the Forum in thread http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10t=54875 Kind regards, Joost All running X11. I'm an old fashioned User, coming from punched cards and tape (1965) via text based editors on home assembled computers (ah! the Z80...) to PCs, using them as tools, so I don't need any fancy screens and effects. -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie
Re: AOO 3.4 Impress not recognising Dual monitors?
Hi, All running X11. I'm an old fashioned User, coming from punched cards and tape (1965) via text based editors on home assembled computers (ah! the Z80...) to PCs, using them as tools, so I don't need any fancy screens and effects. besides issue 119327 using Wayland instead of X11 would have been a possible cause. I'm not sure if AOO already supports Wayland features or if there are plans to support it. Kind regards, Joost
Re: AOO 3.4 Impress not recognising Dual monitors?
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 10:42:44 +0800 Ji Yan yanji...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rory, Could you please tell us how did you set the two monitors? I test Windows XP and Mac on my laptop with projector connected, there is no problem and will try Ubuntu later. 2012/7/4 Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie I'm not yet in a position to raise a formal bug, but I would appreciate input from other users who may have occasion to use AOO 3.4 to give a presentation. I have not been able to get AOO 3:4 Impress to successfully recognise the second monitor on later *ubuntu systems (say 11:10 and later). I have requested information from others on the Forum in thread http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10t=54875 I would welcome input from users from the Apache lists; I bring it to the attention of the ooo-dev list as some developer working on Impress may test this in passing. -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie The fix in the bug report referred to by Ariel Constenla-Haile earlier in this thread, and incorporated into the current AOO 3.4.1 dev builds works. On Ubuntu I was able to hotplug a monitor/beamer and by selecting System Settings /Displays (/ Monitors on earlier Ubuntus) I could turn off mirror displays, then drag the two monitors to desired positions on the display space. In Lubuntu I hotplugged the monitor/beamer and ran arandr which had the same effect. arandr can save ones configuration (either single monitor or dual - perhaps multiple? - monitors) as a script file. Running the appropriate batch file sets Lubuntu up to recognise the dual monitor positioning; the script files can be linked to hotkeys (arandr gives instructions). All is now working well on my presentation netbook. Many disgruntled listeners may shorty be making little wax dolls labeled Ariel and sticking pins into them, so, if you don't feel well, Ariel, you know what is the cause :-) -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie
Re: [TRANSLATION][3.4.1]: update Pootle server to include new string for a new warning box
Hi, I would like to give a short update, I have accepted all suggestions where necessary. Update completed: de, it, fr, es, en-GB, gl, sk, hu ru, pt-BR, nl Open: zh-CN, zh-TW, ar, fi, cd, ja, km, sl That is very cool and thanks to all who did the translation so fast. I hope others can take a quick look on then open languages as well this week. I will work on the further integration... Juergen On 7/3/12 3:25 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, based on the discussion relating Windows 8 readiness etc. we have identified 5 critical issues. And we have already started to work on these issues and my plan is to have them all ready for a 3.4.1 that we can decide at any time later if we want to move forward with the W8 support when we have everything in place in time. For solving one of these issues we have to introduce a new warning box which means that we have to translate a new string for 3.4.1. I have updated the Pootle server already with the new string (17 words only) and I would like to ask our translators to focus on this new string as soon as possible (ideally this week). Most important are the languages that we want release: en-US ar cs de en-GB es fi fr gl hu it ja km nl ru sl pt-BR zh-CN zh-TW and potentially sk where I have to update Pootle with the latest available updates from Michal Hriň The new string is in desktop - source - app.po See for example for French desktop.src#STR_BOOTSTRAP_ERR_MULTISESSION.string.text https://translate.apache.org/fr/OOo_34/translate.html?unitstates=fuzzy,untranslated de will be covered by myself ;-) because there is currently a problem that I don't understand and that I have to solve. To simplify the update I would prefer if the string get translated on the Pootle server. Please send me a short note when an updated or better a translation of the string is available. I will take care of the integration. If anybody have problems doing it on Pootle please let me know. Juergen
Re: Terms of Service on Forums
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:09 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 20:11 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: @Rob, Yes, I am seeing what you are seeing. Concerning the ToU for the forums, it is the same as what was previously on the web site. While there is a license grant for non-code and other places where no other license is applied, the license is also to all Users. @Rob, @Drew, @Kay I created an issue that proposed a new terms of use that was consistent with the Oracle ones for ASF and would have not made this problem worse, as far as I can tell. That was long ago and it went nowhere. The JIRA issue is here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-104. Here's the connected issue on our Bugzilla: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118518. I came to our Bugzilla because LEGAL-104 can't have attachments. The attachment on the Bugzilla provides a red-lined transformation of the Oracle ToU into one that could work for the forums, wikis, and web pages now under ASF custodianship. It addresses some of the cases that Rob also mentions. I stand by my analysis. You might want to see how to carve out what you want from that, since it is at least a start and the places where further customization may be called for are all identified. - Dennis Hi Dennis, You did a good job on it then too. I just took the time to go back and read over the exchange on the legal JIRA entry and a quick read, again, of your markup to the original TOU text. For a TOU link in the website, wiki and forum footer I think it is a good think to just finish this up and use it. The website no longer offers account creation so with the new TOU and the current http://www.openoffice.org/privacy.html , I suppose it would be done (for today :) where one does still have a difference between registered and non-registered users: - the media wiki already has http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org_Wiki:Copyrights so I suppose that would be done (for today) also. - the forums, just add a requirement that everything new is ALv2 in http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/ucp.php?mode=terms (and it's translations) At least it seems this simple to me, does it really need to be thought out a lot further then that? If someone has a specific proposal, can they stick it on the Cwiki as a draft and we can work on it a bit? As simple as possible, but no simpler. -Rob //drew Some months ago it was discussed with the ASF Board whether a privacy condition and safe-harbor setup was desired. That apparently didn't get anywhere.
3.4.1_release_blocker granted: [Bug 120188] AOO 3.4.1 r1354891: german spreadsheet print dialog not completly localized
j...@apache.org has granted brinzing oliver.brinz...@gmx.de's request for 3.4.1_release_blocker: Bug 120188: AOO 3.4.1 r1354891: german spreadsheet print dialog not completly localized https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120188 --- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org set release blocker flag for 3.4.1
Re: For Volunteer to Solve the Table Row Truncation Issue of TableRowKeep Feature
Hi, On 15.06.2012 12:23, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 15.06.2012 10:26, chengjh wrote: There is an enhancement in OO 2.0.3, delivered with the name Compatibility option: Keep-with-next attribute for table rows. The details of the feature can be gotten from http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.0.3.html. A new (non-UI) compatibility option TableRowKeep has been added to Writer documents. If this option is enabled, a table row can be forced to keep together with the next row by setting the keep-with-next attribute to the first paragraph within the first cell of this row. If this row is the last row of a table, the last row tries to keep together with the next content behind the table. This compatibility option is disabled per default and enabled during ww8/rtf import. This enhancement try to provide the behavior and layout compatibility of MS Word's table,within which the first para of the cell has the Keep with next(Paragraph Dialog-Line and Page Breaks in MS Word).. This enhancement still has something to do in order to provide completed compatibility.The known cases provided by TableRowKeep Feature as followed: *a)*If the table is the first lower content of a page, the keep with next attribute of the first para of the first rowcolumn will works as normal, The first row will not be moved to new page..*But if the contents within the first row is enough to be beyond the height of the page,the row will not split, the part beyond page will be truncated in AOO..* *b)*If the table is the first lower content of a page, the keep with next attribute of the first para of the 1 column/ 2 row will make table from the second row, moved to new page..*But if the contents within the second row is enough to be beyond the height of the page,the row will not split, the part beyond page will be truncated **in AOO**..* *c)*If the table is the first lower content of a page, the keep with next attribute of the first para of the first rowcolumn and the 1 column/ 2 row will works as normal, not moved to new page in MS Word..In AOO,the table from the second row will be moved to new page..That's the difference..Moreover,* if the contents within the First or second row is enough to be beyond the height of the page,the row will not split, the part beyond page will be truncated** in AOO**..* This problem is related to the formatting of table and impact the table formatting procedure deeply.Anyone is interesting in it?Thanks. I am remembering the implemenation of this feature - a former colleague had implemented it. I will have a look at the corresponding code. Jianhong Cheng: Do you have a sample document already? Does there already exist a corresponding issue in AOO Bugzilla? I have attached a patch to the issue [1] which should solve the problem. Before I will apply this patch on trunk, I am asking for feedback/review. Thanks in advance. [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120016 Best regards, Oliver.
Re: Terms of Service on Forums
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: @Rob, Yes, I am seeing what you are seeing. Concerning the ToU for the forums, it is the same as what was previously on the web site. While there is a license grant for non-code and other places where no other license is applied, the license is also to all Users. @Rob, @Drew, @Kay I created an issue that proposed a new terms of use that was consistent with the Oracle ones for ASF and would have not made this problem worse, as far as I can tell. That was long ago and it went nowhere. The JIRA issue is here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-104. Here's the connected issue on our Bugzilla: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118518. I came to our Bugzilla because LEGAL-104 can't have attachments. The attachment on the Bugzilla provides a red-lined transformation of the Oracle ToU into one that could work for the forums, wikis, and web pages now under ASF custodianship. OK. I read that over. IMHO it is still too much. It is dressed up in chain mail armour, as befits a big corporation with the risk profile of a big corporation. Large corporations are a magnet for petty lawsuits. But the circumstances are different with the ASF. Our main concern is (or should be) clarity and helpfulness to the reader, not to protect our multi-billion dollar corporation. I''d also entirely separate the outgoing license question. This is not a ToU question. That can be covered separate by a license link on the various websites, which might be simple in some case (incubator site is 100% ALv2) and less so on some legacy sites. So a minimal approach might look something like this, which could be applied across all of our websites: -- Consolidated Terms of Use for Apache OpenOffice Websites The Apache Software Foundation hosts several websites on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice project: -- under openoffice.org - under incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg - under cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS - under issues.apache.org/ooo/ -- under blogs.apache.org/ooo/ By your use of these websites you acknowledge that you have read these Terms and agree to them. 1. Privacy Information about your use of the websites is collected using server access logs and a tracking cookie. The collected information consists of the following: The IP address from which you access the website; The type of browser and operating system you use to access our site; The date and time you access our site; The pages you visit; and The addresses of pages from where you followed a link to our site. Part of this information is gathered using a tracking cookie set by the Google Analytics service and handled by Google as described in their privacy policy . See your browser documentation for instructions on how to disable the cookie if you prefer not to share this data with Google. We use the gathered information to help us make our site more useful to visitors and to better understand how and when our site is used. Additionally, some of websites have a user registration systems that queries you for information such as name, password and email address. This information is collected, stored and used in order to provide you a unique login and to associate that login with your activity on the website. We endeavour keep this information private, but it may be revealed to a competent authority under a lawful order. By using this website, you consent to the collection of this data in the manner and for the purpose described above. 2. User submitted content By submitting content to the website, you agree that this content may be hosted on the website, for the benefit of other website users. Additionally, you agree that your submissions may be edited, modified, translated, copied, within the website. You warrant that you have sufficient rights to any content that you submit to the website necessary to grant the above license. If you wish to offer a broader license, to allow 3rd parties to reuse your content outside of this website, then you may do so, provided the license is compatible with the above requirements. Apache License 2.0 is especially recommended. Please mark the license prominently in your contribution. 3. Exclusions The websites at extensions.openoffice.org and templates.openoffice.org are not operated by the Apache Software Foundation and are not covered by this Terms. 4. Changes to these Terms We may change these Terms from time to time. When we make substantive changes we will also make an announcement on the ooo-announce mailing list. -- It addresses some of the cases that Rob also mentions. I stand by my analysis. You might want to see how to carve out what you want from that, since it is at least a start and
[Call-for-Review] Bug 120143(bullet size import error)
Hi, all I had a fix for bug 120143( https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120143 ) Could anyone help me to review the fix? Thank you!
Re: [Call-for-Review] Bug 120143(bullet size import error)
On 04.07.2012 16:29, ying sun wrote: I had a fix for bug 120143( https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120143 ) Could anyone help me to review the fix? Done. Thanks for finding it, for analyzing it and for providing the patch. It is always amazing to see such a little typo causing so much work and trouble. The fix is so low-risk and all-beneficial that I'd love to have it in our bugfix release AOO341 even though it certainly does not qualify for any of the blocker criteria. Herbert
Re: Terms of Service on Forums
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: @Rob, Yes, I am seeing what you are seeing. Concerning the ToU for the forums, it is the same as what was previously on the web site. While there is a license grant for non-code and other places where no other license is applied, the license is also to all Users. @Rob, @Drew, @Kay I created an issue that proposed a new terms of use that was consistent with the Oracle ones for ASF and would have not made this problem worse, as far as I can tell. That was long ago and it went nowhere. The JIRA issue is here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-104. Here's the connected issue on our Bugzilla: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118518. I came to our Bugzilla because LEGAL-104 can't have attachments. The attachment on the Bugzilla provides a red-lined transformation of the Oracle ToU into one that could work for the forums, wikis, and web pages now under ASF custodianship. OK. I read that over. IMHO it is still too much. It is dressed up in chain mail armour, as befits a big corporation with the risk profile of a big corporation. Large corporations are a magnet for petty lawsuits. But the circumstances are different with the ASF. Our main concern is (or should be) clarity and helpfulness to the reader, not to protect our multi-billion dollar corporation. I''d also entirely separate the outgoing license question. This is not a ToU question. That can be covered separate by a license link on the various websites, which might be simple in some case (incubator site is 100% ALv2) and less so on some legacy sites. So a minimal approach might look something like this, which could be applied across all of our websites: -- Consolidated Terms of Use for Apache OpenOffice Websites The Apache Software Foundation hosts several websites on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice project: -- under openoffice.org - under incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg - under cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS - under issues.apache.org/ooo/ -- under blogs.apache.org/ooo/ By your use of these websites you acknowledge that you have read these Terms and agree to them. 1. Privacy Information about your use of the websites is collected using server access logs and a tracking cookie. The collected information consists of the following: The IP address from which you access the website; The type of browser and operating system you use to access our site; The date and time you access our site; The pages you visit; and The addresses of pages from where you followed a link to our site. Part of this information is gathered using a tracking cookie set by the Google Analytics service and handled by Google as described in their privacy policy . See your browser documentation for instructions on how to disable the cookie if you prefer not to share this data with Google. We use the gathered information to help us make our site more useful to visitors and to better understand how and when our site is used. Additionally, some of websites have a user registration systems that queries you for information such as name, password and email address. This information is collected, stored and used in order to provide you a unique login and to associate that login with your activity on the website. We endeavour keep this information private, but it may be revealed to a competent authority under a lawful order. By using this website, you consent to the collection of this data in the manner and for the purpose described above. 2. User submitted content By submitting content to the website, you agree that this content may be hosted on the website, for the benefit of other website users. Additionally, you agree that your submissions may be edited, modified, translated, copied, within the website. You warrant that you have sufficient rights to any content that you submit to the website necessary to grant the above license. If you wish to offer a broader license, to allow 3rd parties to reuse your content outside of this website, then you may do so, provided the license is compatible with the above requirements. Apache License 2.0 is especially recommended. Please mark the license prominently in your contribution. 3. Exclusions The websites at extensions.openoffice.org and templates.openoffice.org are not operated by the Apache Software Foundation and are not covered by this Terms. 4. Changes to these Terms We may change these Terms from time to time. When we make substantive changes we will also make an announcement on the ooo-announce mailing list. -- It addresses some of the cases that Rob
Google Play [A]OO
Hi I was searching about the [A]OO, found this: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=at.tomtasche.reader Sent via Android Albino
Re: Google Play [A]OO
This app have been reported in the past as well as odfweb. I am not sure how does it stand in trademark issues but I am aware this has been reported. On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Albino B Neto bino...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I was searching about the [A]OO, found this: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=at.tomtasche.reader Sent via Android Albino
Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal to activate the update service for OOo 3.2 and OOo 3.2.1
On 27/06/2012 Rob Weir wrote: But one question: Has anyone actually tested the upgrade experience from OOo 3.2 to AOO 3.4? I asked on the mailing lists in Italian; several users upgraded 3.2.x-3.4, with the same experience as the 3.3 - 3.4 upgrade (no issues for a slightly customized installation, profile conversion problems if many extensions are installed or heavy customizations are present). Of course, advanced users who can customize OpenOffice significantly are also more likely to be able to deal with a corrupt profile; so, while it is clear (see links sent yesterday by Ariel) that the profile conversion fails in some cases, users who see it fail can probably handle it. But I would consider adding a remark to the 3.4.1 release notes on how to reset registrymodifications.xcu or the full profile. Regards, Andrea.
Re: Terms of Service on Forums
Le mer. 04 juil. 2012 04:44:19 CEST, drew d...@baseanswers.com a écrit : Yes - it goes to the page on the website - a page I tried to get people to look at for fixup months ago - but there was no interest in doing so at the time, and yes as it stands it is just wrong. Weird, after that discussion, I remember seeing the page being redirected to something like the wiki. It had definitively stopped pointing to the Oracle page. Hagar
RE: Google Play [A]OO
If I understand the Google Store page, this product predates any release from AOOi. The code is under GPL3+ and has not been touched on GitHub for 11 months. It is a front end to JOpenDocument (LGPL3+ since February, 2012). I wonder, in a case like this, whether there is more downside than upside to being fussy about Android's first OpenOffice and LibreOffice Document Reader! View your documents created using OpenOffice or LibreOffice on the go. It may be that this is more of an ODF Document Reader than an OpenOffice Document Reader. My sense is that the intention to support documents created by OpenOffice or LibreOffice is well-stated. It appears that the popular view of OpenOffice doesn't depend on awareness of ODF and it is all about product interoperability/compatibility. I don't see any evidence of passing off as work of the OpenOffice.org, LibreOffice, or Apache OpenOffice projects. - Dennis -Original Message- From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alexandro Colorado Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 11:10 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Google Play [A]OO This app have been reported in the past as well as odfweb. I am not sure how does it stand in trademark issues but I am aware this has been reported. On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Albino B Neto bino...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I was searching about the [A]OO, found this: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=at.tomtasche.reader Sent via Android Albino
Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal to activate the update service for OOo 3.2 and OOo 3.2.1
Le mer. 04 juil. 2012 05:29:19 CEST, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org a écrit : There is obviously a bug with the registrymodifications.xcu that should be fixed somehow. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120086 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120068 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119733 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119804 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120154 http://markmail.org/message/qcpwpb2yjisuiggx I'd like to remind everybody that renaming the rm.xcu can lead to the loss of macros and other customization (color palette for example). So backing up the whole profile is the first and safest step in case of problem during upgrade. Doing it before the upgrade insures that the downgrade (if needed) will be possible. It may not be the case if the new version wrecks some items. Hagar
Document import wizard and docx format
Today, a new user on the forum commented his/her surprise to see that while AOO opens whatever-x document formats, the import wizard do not recognize them. I found this old issue: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=95102 My knowledge on macro programming is almost non existent, but looking at the ImportWizard library you can find blocks of code for doc, xls, ppt/pps... but not for the latests formats docx, etc. Maybe this macro was written before OOo got support for these formats? Anyway, the devil is in the detail: I think it will be interesting to update the wizard. Regards Ricardo
Re: For Volunteer to Solve the Table Row Truncation Issue of TableRowKeep Feature
I will have a look.Thanks for the patch. On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 15.06.2012 12:23, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 15.06.2012 10:26, chengjh wrote: There is an enhancement in OO 2.0.3, delivered with the name Compatibility option: Keep-with-next attribute for table rows. The details of the feature can be gotten from http://www.openoffice.org/**development/releases/2.0.3.**htmlhttp://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.0.3.html. A new (non-UI) compatibility option TableRowKeep has been added to Writer documents. If this option is enabled, a table row can be forced to keep together with the next row by setting the keep-with-next attribute to the first paragraph within the first cell of this row. If this row is the last row of a table, the last row tries to keep together with the next content behind the table. This compatibility option is disabled per default and enabled during ww8/rtf import. This enhancement try to provide the behavior and layout compatibility of MS Word's table,within which the first para of the cell has the Keep with next(Paragraph Dialog-Line and Page Breaks in MS Word).. This enhancement still has something to do in order to provide completed compatibility.The known cases provided by TableRowKeep Feature as followed: *a)*If the table is the first lower content of a page, the keep with next attribute of the first para of the first rowcolumn will works as normal, The first row will not be moved to new page..*But if the contents within the first row is enough to be beyond the height of the page,the row will not split, the part beyond page will be truncated in AOO..* *b)*If the table is the first lower content of a page, the keep with next attribute of the first para of the 1 column/ 2 row will make table from the second row, moved to new page..*But if the contents within the second row is enough to be beyond the height of the page,the row will not split, the part beyond page will be truncated **in AOO**..* *c)*If the table is the first lower content of a page, the keep with next attribute of the first para of the first rowcolumn and the 1 column/ 2 row will works as normal, not moved to new page in MS Word..In AOO,the table from the second row will be moved to new page..That's the difference..Moreover,* if the contents within the First or second row is enough to be beyond the height of the page,the row will not split, the part beyond page will be truncated** in AOO**..* This problem is related to the formatting of table and impact the table formatting procedure deeply.Anyone is interesting in it?Thanks. I am remembering the implemenation of this feature - a former colleague had implemented it. I will have a look at the corresponding code. Jianhong Cheng: Do you have a sample document already? Does there already exist a corresponding issue in AOO Bugzilla? I have attached a patch to the issue [1] which should solve the problem. Before I will apply this patch on trunk, I am asking for feedback/review. Thanks in advance. [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=120016https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120016 Best regards, Oliver. -- Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng
Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal to activate the update service for OOo 3.2 and OOo 3.2.1
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 27/06/2012 Rob Weir wrote: But one question: Has anyone actually tested the upgrade experience from OOo 3.2 to AOO 3.4? I asked on the mailing lists in Italian; several users upgraded 3.2.x-3.4, with the same experience as the 3.3 - 3.4 upgrade (no issues for a slightly customized installation, profile conversion problems if many extensions are installed or heavy customizations are present). Of course, advanced users who can customize OpenOffice significantly are also more likely to be able to deal with a corrupt profile; so, while it is clear (see links sent yesterday by Ariel) that the profile conversion fails in some cases, users who see it fail can probably handle it. But I would consider adding a remark to the 3.4.1 release notes on how to reset registrymodifications.xcu or the full profile. Do we know if this is only a 3.3 - 3.4 issue? Or will there also be migration issues for 3.4 to 3.4.1? Ideally we will have some more detailed testing of the upgrade scenarios. Do we have any steps that can reproduce the bug? Something more specific than many extensions or heavy customizations? Do we think it is the volume of customizations in a given install? Or is there a specific setting causing the problem? Or could this be related to the removal of berkelydb and this fix: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118662 ?? -Rob Regards, Andrea.
Re: CMS anonymous user improvements
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: This weekend David Blevins and I worked on streamlining the anonymous user support in the CMS. Two major improvements are the introduction of Quick Mail and anonymous clones. Quick Mail is the analog of Quick Commit but for anonymous users- it is enabled by default and makes submitting patches to the mailing list much easier to execute. The mailout will contain a url for committers to use that permits a committer to clone the working copy of the anonymous user, so all you'd need to do is review the change in the CMS and commit it. Would be nice if Rob or someone created a video tutorial for this that's geared toward anon users and showed off these new features. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fvg1pfHLhE Hi Rob -- I couldn't read this one as clearly as your first. You used some sort of zoom mechanism on the first one I think, and also there seemed to be some text annotations on the first one with actual bookmarlet URL that this one doesn't have. I'm still learning the tool (Camtasia) It looks like if you do the original recording at a higher resolution than the output resolution then you can tell it to automatically zoom in to area where your mouse is. But in this case my recording resolution is the same as the output resolution, so no zooming is possible. But I can add text annotations, arrows, etc. -Rob Text annotations would help I think. This video is really quite a different experience for me than your first -- I can't say why. I enjoyed your humorous account of searching for CMS in wikipedia by the way. That Certificate in Master Safecracking might bear some research! :) Here is the amazing coincidence. I recorded that video back on June 24th. The joke about the CMS abbreviations was just random, based on what Wikipedia showed. One of them I showed in the tutorial was CMS == Compact Muon Solenoid. Well, what happened a week later? The CMS, part of CERN, announces that they think they've found the Higgs Boson, the long sought particle. But wait, there's more! Look at the CMS press releases here: http://cms.web.cern.ch/org/cms-presentations-public All the the press release translations are in PDF or DOC or DOCX format, except from the one in Finnish, which is in OpenOffice format (well, really ODF). And we're adding Finnish translation in our next release. So very strange, improbable coincidences. Or did Joe cause the Higgs Boson to be created by adding anonymous support to the Apache CMS? Hmmm... -Rob Thanks for shedding more light on this at any rate. I know folks will appreciate these. So good information, but difficult to see. Sorry. -- MzK I would rather have a donkey that takes me there than a horse that will not fare. -- Portuguese proverb -- MzK I would rather have a donkey that takes me there than a horse that will not fare. -- Portuguese proverb
[QA]When tester can close release blocker defect
Hi, all, I am verifying some resolved 3.4.1 release blocker defects. Some fixed on trunk, some fixed on branch, some fixed on both trunk and branch I usually verify defects on stream, which fixed code exist, then close it. But I think tester can close defect, that must fixed on trunk. I want to confirm when tester close release blocker defect, Do we need to ensure the defect fixed on trunk? or Tester can close defect after verified defect on branch, then need verfiy all release blocker defects on trunk before release? -- Best Wishes, LiFeng Wang
Re: [Calc][Discuss]Interoperability with Excel for SUMIF, COUNTIF, COUNTBLANK, DCOUNT, DSUM, ... with empty cells and and = empty string criteria.
@Dennis, I agree that conforming to ODFF is first goal. I add comments and attachment in https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=65221 From my understanding of ODFF, I give ODFF expect result for some formula related with empty cell in the attachment(xls). If there is any mistake, please comments. Open this file in AOO3.4/LO3.5, 16 cases fail. There are: Criterion in COUNTIF/SUMIF ODFF AOO3.4/LO3.5 criterion as = empty cellempty string cell criterion as not empty cellnot empty cell and not empty string cell criterion as 0any cell exceptany cell except 0, not including empty cell value 0, including empty cell Criterion in criteria for database formula, such as DSUM, DCOUNT ODFFAOO3.4/LO3.5 criterion is emptyvalue 0all cells cell criterion is emptyempty stringall cells string criterion as = empty cellempty cell and empty string cell criterion as not empty cellnot empty cell and not empty string cell Also AOO3.4/LO3.5 has self-consistent problem. The different result for same criterion between COUNTIF/SUMIF and database formulu(DCOUNT/DSUM). These criterion includes: criterion is empty cell, criterion is empty string, criterion is =, criterion is 0 While, open this file in Excel 2003, 8 cases fail. There are: Criterion in COUNTIF/SUMIF ODFF Excel 2003 criterion is empty string cellempty string cell and empty cell criterion is emptyempty string cellempty string cell and empty cell string Criterion in criteria for database formula, such as DSUM, DCOUNT ODFFAOO3.4/LO3.5 criterion is emptyvalue 0all cells cell Also Excel 2003 has self-consistent problem. The different result for same criterion between COUNTIF/SUMIF and database formulu(DCOUNT/DSUM). These criterion includes: criterion is empty cell, criterion is empty string It seems Excel has better conformance for these test cases. Conform to ODFF is very important. Compatible with Excel is also very important, especially for some common used Excel scenario, such as COUNTIF(refrange, ) to count all cells displayed as empty. Do we have any chance to modify ODFF to solve this Excel user problem? On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.orgwrote: @Andrew, See latest comments on https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=65221 I agree with orw that the first goal should be to align with OpenFormula, and that is specific about the use of Criteria in SUMIF, COUNTIF, etc., as you saw in section 4.11.8. In the case that there needs to be further clarification in OpenFormula, comments can be submitted to the ODF TC for Errata and/or improvements in the next edition, ODF 1.3. OpenFormula was developed with cross-format interoperability in mind and Microsoft participation was helpful for that. User Guide documentation on these cases is probably also important. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Andrew Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 07:39 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Calc][Discuss]Interoperability with Excel for SUMIF, COUNTIF, COUNTBLANK, DCOUNT, DSUM, ... with empty cells and and = empty string criteria. On 02.07.2012 04:50, Lei Wang wrote: Hi all, There is an old bug i65221( https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=65221). It is about interoperability with Excel for SUMIF, COUNTIF, COUNTBLANK, DCOUNT, DSUM, ... with empty cells and and = empty string criteria. [ ... ] I am surprised that the ODF standard does not dictate how this should be handled. I was under the impression that function behaviour in an ODF document was well defined. I believe that Robert Weir is far more aware of ODF type issues than I (since I have seen him mentioned by name on similar topics) - not that I intend to unfairly pull him into this discussion. In Version 1.2 of the part-2 for OpenFormula, I don't see it obviously spelled out, but I don't really have time to extensively pursue it. [ ... ] 4.7 Empty Cell An empty cell is neither zero nor the empty string, and an empty cell can be distinguished from cells containing values (including zero and the empty string). An empty cell is not the same as an Error, in particular, it is distinguishable from the Error #N/A (not available). Moving on to section 4.8 The definitions of specific operations and functions that allow references as operands and parameters stipulate any particular limitations there are on forms of references and how empty cells, when permitted, are interpreted. Now, on to 4.11.8, pretty clear here: 4.11.8 Criterion A criterion is a single cell Reference, Number or
Re: [QA]When tester can close release blocker defect
Technically, I think the release blocker defects should also be integrated to trunk stream except for those branch stream special issue, such as 119978. So as QA we should ensure the defect is fixed in both branch and trunk stream. 2012/7/5 Li Feng Wang phoenix.wan...@gmail.com Hi, all, I am verifying some resolved 3.4.1 release blocker defects. Some fixed on trunk, some fixed on branch, some fixed on both trunk and branch I usually verify defects on stream, which fixed code exist, then close it. But I think tester can close defect, that must fixed on trunk. I want to confirm when tester close release blocker defect, Do we need to ensure the defect fixed on trunk? or Tester can close defect after verified defect on branch, then need verfiy all release blocker defects on trunk before release? -- Best Wishes, LiFeng Wang -- Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji
