Proposal so far....
OSHCA Vision

OSCHA is a vehicle for people to meet face to face.

Mission??


Objectives???

Molly

p.s. Previously, OSHCA....

The Open Source Health Care Alliance is a collaborative forum to promote and facilitate open source software in human and veterinary healthcare.

OSHCA is a community of people in the health care and informatics industries that promotes the open source software concept in health care. OSHCA helps policy makers, commercial enterprises, and users take advantage of the benefits of open source.


Fred Trotter wrote:

I think that Will actually is proposing a vision, one which I
whole-heartedly agree. The vision is that OSCHA is a vehicle for people to
meet. This list is the best source of meeting of the minds I have found but
is nothing compared to face to face. That is really what we do not have...

Regards,
Fred Trotter


On 1/15/06, Dr Molly Cheah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Will,

When we're discussing resurrecting OSHCA, we're going beyond organising
conferences, which organisations like IMIA,AMIA or any organisations
advocating open source can do from time to time. We've also gone beyond
the debate on the need for incorporation; the issues, pros and cons are
in the discussion lists' archives. As pointed out by Christian, the
recent discussion had agreed to the idea of resurrecting OSHCA, I wanted
some help in refining the Vision and Mission Statements before moving to
the structure and governance issues relating to the incorporation
processes. Joseph is ahead of me on that score :). As I pointed out to
him privately on skype, an example of a successful organisation recently
incorporated to address the digital divide and to build a knowledge
society is GKP (http://www.globalknowledge.org). I'm not saying we
should copy their setup completely, but we can study their concept,
structure and governance framework. We can then adapt for OSHCA "after"
we have determined what OSHCA should be. If organising conferences is an
agreed activity, the "office bearers" will do the needful.

If the open source healthcare community wish to contribute and make an
impact on the WSIS Tunis commitments (http://www.itu.int/wsis/) and the
MDGs, three of which are direct health MDGs
(http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/), we need to look beyond organising
conferences. That's the reason I would like to discuss more widely
OSHCA's vision and mission statements (and objectives) first.

Molly
Will Ross wrote:

Christian, Molly & All,

I'm neutral on the issue of incorporation.   If it can help then I'm
for it.   But I don't want the discussion on incorporation to
distract us from the possibility of convening our next OSHCA conference.

I'm a strong advocate of having our next OSCHA Conference, with or
without incorporation.   I've started raising the question of support
for a conference with some of the organizations I work with.   Here's
how I describe it:

Can your organization host a three day conference for 150 people,
providing auditorium, break out rooms, technical support (wifi +
audio-visual facilities with staff), food (continental breakfast plus
full lunches) and facilities support (pre-conference planning,
attendee registration services, facility access and security, etc).
I explain that the conference underwriting has to be substantial
because international attendees will need to pay for travel and keep
their on site costs to lodging and incidental daily expenses.

Consider this post the discussion fork that poses the question:  What
month in 2006 is best for an OSCHA meeting?

I think it goes without saying that many of us will be in Brisbane in
August 2007

 http://www.medinfo2007.org/

But maybe we can also meet in 2006.   As it is still January, now is
a good time to focus on this question.

With best regards,

[wr]

- - - - - - -

On Jan 14, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Christian Heller wrote:



Hi Molly,

some weeks ago, about 22 of us mailing list members expressed their
support for incorporating OSHCA. I take the liberty to list those:
- Molly Cheah
- Brian Bray
- Adrian Midgley
- Fred Trotter
- Tim Cook
- Christian Heller
- Joseph Dal Molin
- David Chan
- Nandalal Gunaratne
- K.S. Bhaskar
- Thaddeus N. Albers
- Mike McCoy (indirectly through Joseph Dal Molin)
- Jubal John (interest in background of the key people involved)
- 7 further people who voted on the second mailing list-question
- Alric O'Connor
- Thomas Beale
(here I stopped counting)
--> about 22

This is not that many of far more than a hundred list readers.
However, it is not few either. It is a start.



... champion, promote, co-ordinate, collaborate etc open source
applications
in health care.
... "The Open Source Health Care Alliance is a collaborative forum to
... "OSHCA is a community of people in the health care and
informatics


Nevertheless, I was asking myself again for reasons to get OSHCA
incorporated: A website might suffice to promote OSHCA; a mailing list
to collaborate; coordination between projects may not necessarily be
needed as every project follows its own ideas/technologies anyway.

A common website could serve as portal providing lists and evaluations
of our projects -- what was lately asked for in this list again.
But there are already plenty of such portals (Debian-Med etc.).
Some of these portals just lack the necessary continuity and updates.

Most of us have their own project and invest considerable time into
it.
I for one do not have many resources and will to contribute much to
organisational/paper work for OSHCA, since concrete results will be
few.
It is my guess that many other project developers have similar
thoughts.

So let us look for more points speaking for an incorporated OSHCA!
A list of concrete reasons to incorporate OSHCA coming to my mind:
- organise conferences (seems to be easier for booking places etc.)
- get publicity (taken more seriously than a loose group of people)
- approach governments and large corporations
- ask for funding

If somebody sees more points, please add to this list!
It should, in my opinion, only contain points that *cannot* be
achieved with mailing list/ website/ loose group of people alone.
Once we have identified these points, they may become OSHCA's focus.

[..]


next steps to form the protem committee and get OSHCA
incorporated. We
also need to decide where OSHCA should be incorporated - developed or
developing country and then zoom into deciding the specific country.


Correct steps.

It doesn't matter much to me in which country OSHCA gets
incorporated, as
long as it is a democratic one, and without "ruling-the-world"
tendencies.
Perhaps a developing country is even better, since it may better know
what is really needed urgently.



My apologies for this "lengthy" e-mail. Just to make up for the lapse
.... :) I still have the list of volunteers for the protem
committee. In
between someone requested for a short write-up of each as well....


Such a write-up should also contain which open source software (OSS)
project or other organisation people represent, i.e. in which area
of OSS they are active.

Well done, Molly! ... and a quite short extract (as I like it).

Thanks,
Christian



Yahoo! Groups Links









[wr]

- - - - - - - -

will ross
mendocino informatics
216 west perkins street, suite 206
ukiah, california  95482  usa
707.272.7255 [voice]
707.462.5015 [fax]

- - - - - - - -





Yahoo! Groups Links












Yahoo! Groups Links









[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openhealth/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
   http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/






Reply via email to