[Openpbx-dev] more names
hi all after discussing the name suggestion 'gnupbx' on IRC, it was noted, correctly, that this should not be regarded an option, since openpbx is not part of FSF. It would be like naming the project AsteriskPBX or ApachePBX. I suggest we drop that name and let the voting go on with the other candidates best regards roy ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] more names
While you don't nessecarily have to be part of FSF for the GNU tag, the GNU trademark is arguably owned by the FSF, using that in a name such as GNUPBX w/out explicit permission of the FSF would probably be a bad thing. Also, there are other things to consider there, like what happens when the coders, are not directly involved w/ the entity that holds the TM to the name? (now I am *NOT* saying that would be a problem nessecarily w/ the FSF as I do Support the FSF, I am trying to say that there should be careful consideration on that area due to what we have seen with wireshark (formerly ethereal) and the like K From: Ariel Monaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: OpenPBX.org Developers Mailing List openpbx-dev@openpbx.org Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:14:57 -0300 To: OpenPBX.org Developers Mailing List openpbx-dev@openpbx.org Subject: Re: [Openpbx-dev] more names - Original Message - From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: OpenPBX.org Developers Mailing List openpbx-dev@openpbx.org; OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion openpbx-users@openpbx.org Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 7:01 AM Subject: [Openpbx-dev] more names hi all after discussing the name suggestion 'gnupbx' on IRC, it was noted, correctly, that this should not be regarded an option, since openpbx is not part of FSF. It would be like naming the project AsteriskPBX or ApachePBX. What do we need to be part of the FSF? Is this really relevant? I suggest we drop that name and let the voting go on with the other candidates Why drop a name people is voting? best regards roy ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] more names
Ariel Monaco wrote: - Original Message - From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: OpenPBX.org Developers Mailing List openpbx-dev@openpbx.org; OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion openpbx-users@openpbx.org Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 7:01 AM Subject: [Openpbx-dev] more names hi all after discussing the name suggestion 'gnupbx' on IRC, it was noted, correctly, that this should not be regarded an option, since openpbx is not part of FSF. It would be like naming the project AsteriskPBX or ApachePBX. What do we need to be part of the FSF? Is this really relevant? Highly relevant. Apart from any legal issues, like trademarks, its damned rude to just try to associate what you do with something successful, by choosing a related name. Secondly, if would want to put PBX in the name you are very myopic. So gnupbx is composed of two parts, neither of which is a good match for what we want. I suggest we drop that name and let the voting go on with the other candidates Why drop a name people is voting? They may be voting, but are they thinking? I think too many of those voting have no stake in choosing a good name. They are just drive by pollers. Talking to other serious contributors, we'll just walk away if something as poorly considered as gnupbx is chosen. Its that simple. Steve ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] openpbx-trunk 'make' fails @ Undefined symbols: _opbx_module_user_add
anyone? ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] openpbx-trunk 'make' fails @ Undefined symbols: _opbx_module_user_add
snowcrash+openpbx wrote: anyone? ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev compiling with mysql support? ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] openpbx-trunk 'make' fails @ Undefined symbols: _opbx_module_user_add
hi, compiling with mysql support? yes. correctly? well ... dunno about that :-/ here's what i'm doing (atm ...), % ./bootstrap.sh % setenv LDFLAGS -bind_at_load -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -L/usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient_r -L/usr/local/sqlite/lib -lsqlite3 -L. % setenv CPPFLAGS -I/usr/local/ssl/include -I/usr/local/mysql/include -I/usr/local/sqlite/include -I. % setenv CFLAGS `echo $CPPFLAGS` % ./configure \ --prefix=/usr/local/openpbx \ --disable-debug \ --with-openpbx-user=openpbx --with-openpbx-group=openpbx \ --enable-shared --disable-static \ --enable-ssl=yes \ --enable-optimization=yes \ --enable-jabber=no \ --enable-javascript=no \ --enable-odbc=no \ --enable-postgresql=no \ --enable-mysql=yes \ --enable-builtin-sqlite3=no \ --with-sqlite3=/usr/local/sqlite \ --with-sqlite3-incdir=/usr/local/sqlite/include \ --with-sqlite3-libdir=/usr/local/sqlite/lib \ --with-spandsp-includes=/usr/local/spandsp/include \ --with-spandsp-libs=/usr/local/spandsp/lib \ --enable-zaptel=no \ --with-cdr_odbc=no \ --with-cdr_manager=yes \ --with-cdr_mysql=yes \ --with-res_config_odbc=no \ --with-res_config_curl=yes \ --with-res_config_mysql=yes \ --with-res_jabber=no \ --with-res_js=no \ --with-res_odbc=no \ --with-res_sqlite=yes \ --with-man-pages=yes \ --with-readme=yes \ --with-license=yes \ --with-credits=no \ --with-sgml-docs=yes \ --enable-iax-trunking=yes \ --enable-t38=yes ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] more names
Steve, Did you need to be so rude? It was only a comment. I am truly sorry. You're right, remove GnuPBX from the poll, we'll vote your name. Let it be callweaver! Regards, Ariel - Original Message - From: Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: OpenPBX.org Developers Mailing List openpbx-dev@openpbx.org Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:03 PM Subject: Re: [Openpbx-dev] more names Ariel Monaco wrote: - Original Message - From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: OpenPBX.org Developers Mailing List openpbx-dev@openpbx.org; OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion openpbx-users@openpbx.org Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 7:01 AM Subject: [Openpbx-dev] more names hi all after discussing the name suggestion 'gnupbx' on IRC, it was noted, correctly, that this should not be regarded an option, since openpbx is not part of FSF. It would be like naming the project AsteriskPBX or ApachePBX. What do we need to be part of the FSF? Is this really relevant? Highly relevant. Apart from any legal issues, like trademarks, its damned rude to just try to associate what you do with something successful, by choosing a related name. Secondly, if would want to put PBX in the name you are very myopic. So gnupbx is composed of two parts, neither of which is a good match for what we want. I suggest we drop that name and let the voting go on with the other candidates Why drop a name people is voting? They may be voting, but are they thinking? I think too many of those voting have no stake in choosing a good name. They are just drive by pollers. Talking to other serious contributors, we'll just walk away if something as poorly considered as gnupbx is chosen. Its that simple. Steve ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
