Re: [Openpbx-dev] more names - why?

2007-03-08 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi David,

David Sugar wrote:
 Steve,

 perhaps you could explain for me why they would wish to change one
 already confusing and contested moniker for another...

 While I have not followed it closely, and I certainly have no issue with
 any of the work the ?formerly? openpbx (the one that is not the
 voicetronix openpbx) project does, I fail to see how it would further
 serve their purpose to be confused instead with GNU Telephony, our PBX
 work, etc.  I only very recently heard about this, but I was hoping you
 could explain this to me and how this could happen.

 We are quite happy working in freedom on free telephony software,
 services, and component libraries in GNU Telephony, many of which are
 maintained as official GNU packages.  While we certainly do not wish to
 involve ourselves in other projects uninvited, when some group chooses
 or appears to confusingly represent themselves as us, I feel I must
 respond to that in some manner.  At the very least, it would seem to me
 to be simple common courtesy to have asked how we might feel about it first.
   
I'm sorry this has happened. Names were supposed to be vetted for basic 
suitability before being put forward for voting - e.g. a web search for 
who else might be using the name. The gnu in gnupbx clearly makes this 
unacceptable, without any need for a web search, and it should never 
have reached this stage.

Steve

___
Openpbx-dev mailing list
Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev


Re: [Openpbx-dev] more names - why?

2007-03-08 Thread Max CtRiX
Steve Underwood wrote:
 Hi David,
 
 David Sugar wrote:
 Steve,

 perhaps you could explain for me why they would wish to change one
 already confusing and contested moniker for another...

 I'm sorry this has happened.  ...

I'm sorry too.
And i agree with Steve.

Max
___
Openpbx-dev mailing list
Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev


Re: [Openpbx-dev] more names - why?

2007-03-08 Thread Nathan C. Smith
  
  David Sugar wrote:
  Steve,
 
  perhaps you could explain for me why they would wish to change one
  already confusing and contested moniker for another...
 
  I'm sorry this has happened.  ...
 
 I'm sorry too.
 And i agree with Steve.
 
 Max


The name will be withdrawn.

-Nate
___
Openpbx-dev mailing list
Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev