Patch for nagios-plugins
Hi All,
on my system (Solaris 10 x86 64-bit), version 1.4.14 of the
nagios-plugins did not build successfully. It stopped with the following
library compatibility error:
/openpkg/bin/cc -m64 -O2 -pipe -m64 -o pst3 pst3-pst3.o -L/openpkg/lib
-L/openpkg/RPM/TMP/nagios-3.2.1/nagios-plugins-1.4.14/plugins-root
-lpthread -ldl -lssl -lcrypto
/openpkg/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /openpkg/lib/libssl.a when
searching for -lssl
/openpkg/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
/openpkg/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/4.2.4/../../../libssl.a when
searching for -lssl
/openpkg/bin/ld: cannot find -lssl
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [pst3] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
+ exit 2
I don't know if this issue is related to OpenSSL 1.0, but I don't think
so. Switching to 32-bit mode for this particular pst3 file (used by the
check_procs command) solved the problem, so I made the following
adjustments in the patch files of the Nagios package:
- nagios.patch was modified to only handle the basic Nagios package.
That means, the modifications concerning nagios-plugins were moved to
the nagios-plugins.patch file
- nagios-plugins.patch was created from scratch. The file contains the
modifications related to the nagios-plugins that were already part of
the package + my modifications to make it build under Solaris 10
Then, the nagios.spec file was modified for the following reasons:
- It had to take in account the new patch (nagios-plugins.patch)
- Because the package is created as user openpkg, the checks that
require root permissions are not installed per default. This can be
forced using the make install-root target
- The ownership of these root plugins has to be root:root, otherwise
they will refuse to run, so these settings have to be adjusted at the
end of the package creation
I hope these modifications are useful for some of you.
Best Regards,
Olivier
Index: base/logging.c
--- base/logging.c.orig 2007-10-29 00:21:29 +0100
+++ base/logging.c 2008-05-28 08:27:03 +0200
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@
/* write something to the syslog facility */
int write_to_syslog(char *buffer, unsigned long data_type){
+static int logopen = 0;
if(buffer==NULL)
return ERROR;
@@ -220,6 +221,12 @@
if(!(data_type syslog_options))
return OK;
+ /* OSSP fsl identification */
+ if (!logopen) {
+ openlog(nagios, LOG_NDELAY, LOG_USER);
+ logopen = 1;
+ }
+
/* write the buffer to the syslog facility */
syslog(LOG_USER|LOG_INFO,%s,buffer);
Index: base/utils.c
--- base/utils.c.orig 2008-03-10 21:58:33 +0100
+++ base/utils.c 2008-05-28 08:27:03 +0200
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@
/* report an error if we couldn't run the command */
if(fp==NULL){
- strncpy(buffer,(Error: Could not execute command)\n,sizeof(buffer)-1);
+ snprintf(buffer,sizeof(buffer)-1,(Error: Could not execute command \%s\), cmd);
buffer[sizeof(buffer)-1]='\x0';
/* write the error back to the parent process */
##
## nagios.spec -- OpenPKG RPM Package Specification
## Copyright (c) 2000-2010 OpenPKG Foundation e.V. http://openpkg.net/
##
## Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for
## any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that
## the above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all
## copies.
##
## THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED
## WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
## MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED.
## IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS AND COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND THEIR
## CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
## SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
## LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF
## USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND
## ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY,
## OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT
## OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
## SUCH DAMAGE.
##
# package versions
%define V_nagios 3.2.1
%define V_nagios_plugins 1.4.14
%define V_perl_nagios_plugin 0.34
%define V_perl_nagios_object 0.20
%define V_perl_nagios_cmd 0.05
# package information
Name: nagios
Summary: System and Network Monitoring
URL: http://www.nagios.org/
Vendor: Ethan Galstad et al.
Packager: OpenPKG Foundation e.V.
Distribution: OpenPKG Community
Class:PLUS
Group:Monitoring
License: GPL
Version: %{V_nagios}
Release: 20100416
# package options
%option with_perl yes
%option with_fslyes
# list of sources
Source0:
OpenPKG-4: problem compiling nail on Solaris 10 x86
Hi All, I have a problem compiling nail under Solaris 10 x86 (see log below). Is it related to the new version of OpenSSL ? How can I fix this issue? Thanks a lot in advance. Regards, Olivier /openpkg/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -I/openpkg/include -DMAILRC='/openpkg/etc/nail/nail.rc' -DMAILSPOOL='/var/mail' -DSENDMAIL='/openpkg/sbin/sendmail' -c openssl.c openssl.c:108: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'STACK' openssl.c: In function 'ssl_select_method': openssl.c:215: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type openssl.c:217: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type openssl.c:219: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type openssl.c:223: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type openssl.c:226: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type openssl.c: In function 'ssl_check_host': openssl.c:311: error: 'STACK' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:311: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once openssl.c:311: error: for each function it appears in.) openssl.c:311: error: 'gens' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c: At top level: openssl.c:499: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'STACK' openssl.c: In function 'smime_verify': openssl.c:508: error: 'STACK' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:508: error: 'certs' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:508: error: 'gens' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:555: error: 'chain' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c: In function 'cverify': openssl.c:617: error: 'STACK' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:617: error: 'chain' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:649: error: too many arguments to function 'smime_verify' openssl.c: In function 'smime_encrypt': openssl.c:690: error: 'STACK' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:690: error: 'certs' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c: In function 'smime_certsave': openssl.c:953: error: 'STACK' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:953: error: 'certs' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:955: error: 'chain' undeclared (first use in this function) make: *** [openssl.o] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /openpkg/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.7869 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /openpkg/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.7869 (%build) __ OpenPKG http://openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
Re: OpenPKG-4: problem compiling nail on Solaris 10 x86
X509_STORE *store; char*ca_dir, *ca_file; @@ -687,7 +710,11 @@ X509*cert; PKCS7 *pkcs7; BIO *bb, *yb; +#ifdef HAVE_STACK_OF +STACK_OF(X509) *certs; +#else STACK *certs; +#endif EVP_CIPHER *cipher; certfile = expand((char *)certfile); @@ -950,9 +977,14 @@ off_t size; BIO *fb, *pb; PKCS7 *pkcs7; +#ifdef HAVE_STACK_OF +STACK_OF(X509) *certs; +STACK_OF(X509) *chain = NULL; +#else STACK *certs; - X509*cert; STACK *chain = NULL; +#endif +X509*cert; enum okay ok = OKAY; message_number = n; Olivier Fournier wrote: Hi All, I have a problem compiling nail under Solaris 10 x86 (see log below). Is it related to the new version of OpenSSL ? How can I fix this issue? Thanks a lot in advance. Regards, Olivier /openpkg/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -I/openpkg/include -DMAILRC='/openpkg/etc/nail/nail.rc' -DMAILSPOOL='/var/mail' -DSENDMAIL='/openpkg/sbin/sendmail' -c openssl.c openssl.c:108: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'STACK' openssl.c: In function 'ssl_select_method': openssl.c:215: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type openssl.c:217: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type openssl.c:219: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type openssl.c:223: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type openssl.c:226: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type openssl.c: In function 'ssl_check_host': openssl.c:311: error: 'STACK' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:311: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once openssl.c:311: error: for each function it appears in.) openssl.c:311: error: 'gens' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c: At top level: openssl.c:499: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'STACK' openssl.c: In function 'smime_verify': openssl.c:508: error: 'STACK' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:508: error: 'certs' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:508: error: 'gens' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:555: error: 'chain' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c: In function 'cverify': openssl.c:617: error: 'STACK' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:617: error: 'chain' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:649: error: too many arguments to function 'smime_verify' openssl.c: In function 'smime_encrypt': openssl.c:690: error: 'STACK' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:690: error: 'certs' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c: In function 'smime_certsave': openssl.c:953: error: 'STACK' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:953: error: 'certs' undeclared (first use in this function) openssl.c:955: error: 'chain' undeclared (first use in this function) make: *** [openssl.o] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /openpkg/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.7869 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /openpkg/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.7869 (%build) __ OpenPKG http://openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
Re: Introducing OpenPKG 4.x
We are exactly in the same situation. Due to the lack of support and problem handling appearing with OpenPKG-4, we are now intensively looking for alternatives. We can not avoid waiting weeks and weeks for a problem to be handled and (eventually) solved. Hopefully it will get better in the future... __ OpenPKG http://openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
OpenPKG-4: why can't I retrieve packages through HTTP?
Hi all, I am trying to download packages and source packages from different remote HTTP repositories, but it doesn't work as expected... open...@lab$ openpkg -v OpenPKG-CURRENT (4.0.2) open...@lab$ openpkg rpm -Uvh http://download.openpkg.org/packages/current/source/BASE/adns-1.4-20080101.src.rpm = error: open of http://UID:UID.UID@ download.openpkg.org/packages/current/source/BASE/adns-1.4-20080101.src.rpmfailed: No such file or directory but... open...@lab$ openpkg curl http://download.openpkg.org/packages/current/source/BASE/adns-1.4-20080101.src.rpm = works like a charm Am I missing something / doing something wrong? With previous OpenPKG releases this feature was working as expected... Thanks a lot in advance for your answer, Olivier
Re: OpenPKG procedure: test-drive OpenPKG 4 from scratch
Thanks for you answer Jeff. But I also don't know RPM macros and Lua well enough to debug this issue. But anyway, am I the only one to have this kind of problems while bootstrapping all my servers? Olivier __ OpenPKG http://openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
Re: OpenPKG procedure: test-drive OpenPKG 4 from scratch
Hi all, actually, I could reproduce exactly the same error while bootstrapping OpenPKG-4 under Solaris 10 (amd64). So I decided to investigate a bit more, and here are my results: at the end of the compilation, just before the RPM files are created, I can see a lot of errors related to Lua. So my question: is it a bug or am I missing something on all my systems? If you need the complete bootstrap logs (for Debian and Solaris), feel free to ask. Thanks a lot in advance for your help, Olivier = Executing(%install): env -i OPENPKG_BOOT=1 /tmp/openpkg-4.0.1-20100104-buildroot/openpkg/lib/openpkg/bash --norc --noprofile --posix -e /tmp/rpm-tmp.23037 Processing files: openpkg-4.0.1-20100104 error: Lua script failed: /tmp/rpm.6:34: failed to resolve path via realpath(3): No such file or directory 4 (empty) 3 (empty) error: Macro %_rpmdir failed to expand error: Lua script failed: /tmp/rpm.6:34: failed to resolve path via realpath(3): No such file or directory 5 (empty) 4 (empty) error: Macro %_rpmdir failed to expand error: Lua script failed: /tmp/rpm.6:34: failed to resolve path via realpath(3): No such file or directory 6 (empty) 5 (empty) error: Macro %_rpmdir failed to expand error: Lua script failed: /tmp/rpm.6:34: failed to resolve path via realpath(3): No such file or directory 7 (empty) 6 (empty) error: Macro %_rpmdir failed to expand error: Lua script failed: /tmp/rpm.6:34: failed to resolve path via realpath(3): No such file or directory 8 (empty) 7 (empty) error: Macro %_rpmdir failed to expand error: Lua script failed: /tmp/rpm.6:34: failed to resolve path via realpath(3): No such file or directory 9 (empty) 8 (empty) error: Macro %_rpmdir failed to expand error: Lua script failed: /tmp/rpm.6:34: failed to resolve path via realpath(3): No such file or directory 10 (empty) 9 (empty) error: Macro %_rpmdir failed to expand error: Lua script failed: /tmp/rpm.6:34: failed to resolve path via realpath(3): No such file or directory 11 (empty) 10 (empty) error: Macro %_rpmdir failed to expand error: Lua script failed: /tmp/rpm.6:34: failed to resolve path via realpath(3): No such file or directory 12 (empty) 11 (empty) error: Macro %_rpmdir failed to expand error: Lua script failed: /tmp/rpm.6:34: failed to resolve path via realpath(3): No such file or directory 13 (empty) 12 (empty) error: Macro %_rpmdir failed to expand error: Lua script failed: /tmp/rpm.6:34: failed to resolve path via realpath(3): No such file or directory 14 (empty) 13 (empty) error: Macro %_rpmdir failed to expand error: Lua script failed: /tmp/rpm.6:34: failed to resolve path via realpath(3): No such file or directory 15 (empty) 14 (empty) error: Macro %_rpmdir failed to expand error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16) 15 (empty) 14 error: Macro %_rpmdir has unterminated body 14 (empty) error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16) 15 (empty) error: Macro %_rpmdir has unterminated body 15 (empty) error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16) error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16) error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16) 15 (empty) 14 (empty) 13 (empty) 12 (empty) 11 (empty) 10 (empty) 9 (empty) 8 (empty) 7 (empty) 6 (empty) 5 (empty) 4 (empty) 3 (empty) 2 (empty) 1 (empty) 0 (empty) error: Could not open : No such file or directory = __ OpenPKG http://openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
Re: OpenPKG procedure: test-drive OpenPKG 4 from scratch
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: I've done an installation under Debian 5.0 myself recently without problems. Interesting that it caused problems for you. My tests were done on two fresh-installed Debian 5.0.3 on the following architectures: * Linux debian-test 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 5 02:23:12 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux * Linux debian-test 2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 5 03:06:00 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux And the results were exactly the same = permissions problems. It should not. The warnings result because of the wrong ownerships on the files. Why the ownerships are wrong I don't know. Have you specified some strange --user or --group options during bootstrapping? Here is my bootstraping command: sh openpkg-4.0.1-20100104.src.sh \ --prefix=/openpkg --tag=openpkg \ --user=openpkg --group=openpkg so no strange user or group option. Also this is incorrect. There ownerships were not correctly set for you as it seems. I've to check this myself under Debian 5.0 again... Would be great if you could test again with an up to date Debian version. Thanks a lot in advance. Olivier __ OpenPKG http://openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
Re: OpenPKG procedure: test-drive OpenPKG 4 from scratch
Hi everyone, here are my results of the test-driving procedure on a fresh installed Debian Lenny. Can someone explain me the following things: - Why does OpenPKG need to be bootstrapped twice in order to get it to work without warnings? - Why do the permissions of the license file have to be manually adjusted in order to activate a license? - Why do so many files belong to root after a fresh installation? Thanks and Regards, Olivier - # system information r...@lab:/var/tmp# uname -a Linux lab.test 2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 5 03:06:00 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux r...@lab:/var/tmp# cat /etc/debian_version 5.0.3 # download latest OpenPKG framework bootstrap sources r...@lab:/var/tmp# curl -LO http://openpkg.org/go/download/openpkg.src.sh % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current Dload Upload Total SpentLeft Speed 2 43.6M2 949k0 0 262k 0 0:02:50 0:00:03 0:02:47 314k # bootstrap OpenPKG instance r...@lab:/var/tmp# sh openpkg.src.sh --prefix=/openpkg --tag=openpkg --user=openpkg --group=openpkg OpenPKG CURRENT Source Bootstrap Package, version 20100104 Building for prefix /openpkg on current platform ++ extracting OpenPKG source distribution ++ building OpenPKG binary distribution OpenPKG Bootstrap Procedure ++ bootstrap version: 4.0.1-20100104 ... # install newly produced package r...@lab:/var/tmp# sh openpkg-*-openpkg.sh OpenPKG CURRENT Binary Bootstrap Package, version package openpkg is not installed Built for prefix /openpkg on target platform ix86-debian5.0 ++ hooking OpenPKG instance into system environment ++ creating OpenPKG instance root directory /openpkg ++ extracting OpenPKG binary distribution ++ installing OpenPKG binary distribution ++ fixating OpenPKG instance filesystem hierarchy ++ post-processing OpenPKG bootstrap installation ... # switch to openpkg user = why these warnings? r...@lab:/var/tmp# su - openpkg openpkg:WARNING: invalid owner user id 0 (expected 1001) on configuration file /openpkg/etc/openpkg/managers -- ignoring file openpkg:WARNING: invalid owner user id 0 (expected 1001) on configuration file /openpkg/etc/openpkg/managers -- ignoring file open...@lab$ # rebuild openpkg = why is it needed? Don't I have already the latest version? r...@lab:/var/tmp# /openpkg/bin/openpkg build openpkg | sh openpkg:WARNING: invalid owner user id 0 (expected 1001) on configuration file /openpkg/etc/openpkg/managers -- ignoring file openpkg:WARNING: invalid owner user id 0 (expected 1001) on configuration file /openpkg/etc/openpkg/managers -- ignoring file openpkg:WARNING: invalid owner user id 0 (expected 1001) on configuration file /openpkg/etc/openpkg/managers -- ignoring file openpkg:WARNING: invalid owner user id 0 (expected 1001) on configuration file /openpkg/etc/openpkg/managers -- ignoring file openpkg:WARNING: invalid owner user id 0 (expected 1001) on configuration file /openpkg/etc/openpkg/managers -- ignoring file openpkg:WARNING: invalid owner user id 0 (expected 1001) on configuration file /openpkg/etc/openpkg/managers -- ignoring file openpkg:WARNING: invalid owner user id 0 (expected 1001) on configuration file /openpkg/etc/openpkg/managers -- ignoring file openpkg:WARNING: invalid owner user id 0 (expected 1001) on configuration file /openpkg/etc/openpkg/managers -- ignoring file openpkg:WARNING: invalid owner user id 0 (expected 1001) on configuration file /openpkg/etc/openpkg/managers -- ignoring file openpkg:WARNING: invalid owner user id 0 (expected 1001) on configuration file /openpkg/etc/openpkg/managers -- ignoring file http://download.openpkg.org/framework/release/source/openpkg-4.0.1-20100104.src.rpm openpkg:WARNING: invalid owner user id 0 (expected 1001) on configuration file /openpkg/etc/openpkg/managers -- ignoring file ## 3.7% ... # switch to openpkg user = OK, no more warning r...@lab:/var/tmp# su - openpkg open...@lab$ # activate community license = permission denied open...@lab$ openpkg license activate COMMUNITY /openpkg/libexec/openpkg/license: line 167: /openpkg/etc/openpkg/license: Permission denied openpkg:license:ERROR: failed to activate license under id COMMUNITY # change ownership of license file r...@lab:/var/tmp# chown -R openpkg:openpkg /openpkg/etc/openpkg/license # activate community license = OK open...@lab$ openpkg license activate COMMUNITY # files belonging to root. Is it normal? r...@lab:/var/tmp# find /openpkg/ -user root /openpkg/.bash_login /openpkg/etc/rc.conf /openpkg/etc/openpkg/register.tran /openpkg/etc/openpkg/managers.rpmorig /openpkg/etc/openpkg/rpmlua.rpmorig /openpkg/etc/openpkg/rpmpopt.rpmorig /openpkg/etc/openpkg/register.prep /openpkg/etc/openpkg/platform.rpmorig /openpkg/etc/openpkg/register.util
Service supervision within OpenPKG
Hello everyone I need your experience in service supervision. At the moment, we are using OpenPKG under both Solaris 10 and RHEL5. We are now looking for a standard way to supervise our daemons and services under these two platforms. Till now we had following approach: everytime we had to install and configure a new service, we chose a one-time solution for the service supervision... It means that, at the moment, we are fighting with at least tree different approaches: - Solaris Management Facility (SMF), only applicable under Solaris. To use this solution, we need to modify the OpenPKG rc scripts of the service to tell OpenPKG to not take care of this service anymore, which is not so clean - Daemontools, for specific services such as djbdns - Runit, for OpenVPN and other things My question is following: what kind of service supervision are you using in your infrastructure? I am aware that there is no perfect solution, but my goal is to define a standard approach for well known services. We will always find exceptions, but we will handle them separately. Thank you in advance for a small feedback. Best Regards Olivier _ Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Plus de moyens pour rester en contact. http://mail.yahoo.fr __ OpenPKG http://openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
RE : Problem by compiling inetutils on Solaris 10
Some news: I applied the patch I found here: http://osdir.com/ml/gnu.inetutils.bugs/2006-11/msg9.html ... but another problem happens (I could not determine if it happens before or after the old one) - make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/openpkg/RPM/TMP/inetutils-1.5/libinetutils' if /openpkg/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../headers -I../lib -I../lib -DPATH_TTY_PFX=\/dev/\ -DPATH_DEVNULL=\/dev/null\ -I/openpkg/include/ncurses -I/openpkg/include -D_REENTRANT -O2 -pipe -MT localhost.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/localhost.Tpo -c -o localhost.o localhost.c; \ then mv -f .deps/localhost.Tpo .deps/localhost.Po; else rm -f .deps/localhost.Tpo; exit 1; fi In file included from /usr/include/sys/socket.h:40, from localhost.c:36: /usr/include/sys/socket_impl.h:44: error: duplicate 'unsigned' /usr/include/sys/socket_impl.h:44: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers In file included from /usr/include/sys/socket.h:45, from localhost.c:36: /usr/include/netinet/in.h:54: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers make[2]: *** [localhost.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/openpkg/RPM/TMP/inetutils-1.5/libinetutils' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/openpkg/RPM/TMP/inetutils-1.5' make: *** [all] Error 2 - Any help will be appreciated. Regards Olivier --- Olivier Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Hi everyone, I try to compile inetutils on an OpenPKG instance running on Solaris 10, but I receive following error: - if /openpkg/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../headers -I../lib -I../lib -DPATH_TTY_PFX=\/dev/\ -DPATH_DEVNULL=\/dev/null\ -I/openpkg/include/ncurses -I/openpkg/include -D_REENTRANT -O2 -pipe -MT logwtmpko.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/logwtmpko.Tpo -c -o logwtmpko.o logwtmpko.c; then mv -f .deps/logwtmpko.Tpo .deps/logwtmpko.Po; else rm -f .deps/logwtmpko.Tpo; exit 1; fi In file included from logwtmpko.c:2: logwtmp.c: In function 'logwtmp_keep_open': logwtmp.c:115: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'bzero' if /openpkg/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../headers -I../lib -I../lib -DPATH_TTY_PFX=\/dev/\ -DPATH_DEVNULL=\/dev/null\ -I/openpkg/include/ncurses -I/openpkg/include -D_REENTRANT -O2 -pipe -MT setsig.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/setsig.Tpo -c -o setsig.o setsig.c; then mv -f .deps/setsig.Tpo .deps/setsig.Po; else rm -f .deps/setsig.Tpo; exit 1; fi setsig.c:34: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'setsig' make[2]: *** [setsig.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /openpkg/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.13342 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /openpkg/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.13342 (%build) - I was trying to install nagios on my machine. All the other dependencies compiled well but with this one I have a problem. Could anyone help me to solve this problem ? Thank you very much in advance Regards Olivier _ Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail __ OpenPKG http://openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org _ Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail __ OpenPKG http://openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
