[Openslp-devel] OpenSLP 2.0 release?
Hi, Was wondering if there was a status on making a 2.0 release? Thank you -- Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and remains a good choice in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev___ Openslp-devel mailing list Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
Re: [Openslp-devel] What platforms are being tested?
Title: mail Once I get some free time I will test the latest tree on CentOS 5.5, Solaris 10 (sparc and intel), Windows and possibly AIX 5.3. Hopefully this will be done by the end of this week. Jim Nick Wagner wrote: I've discovered that my OS X setup at work isn't currently going to work for testing openslp. Before I try to set something up at home, I thought I'd check if anyone else was testing Mac? Is anyone hitting the Windows version? While it was great that the work Jim Marshall did spurred on this release, it would have been nice if this work was in place _before_ he did all of his testing. :) --Nick -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ Openslp-devel mailing list Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel -- Jim Marshall Sr. Software Engineer -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d___ Openslp-devel mailing list Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
Re: [Openslp-devel] slptool hangs on AIX?
Title: mail
Are there any other changes that are
being waited on? I've run our tests and they all work, so I would
like to propose we roll out 2.0.
Thanks
John Calcote wrote:
Fixed
in revision 1693 SLP atomics now return the correct (new)
value on AIX.
John
From:
John Calcote [mailto:john.calc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 12:14 PM
To: Jim Marshall
Cc: openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Openslp-devel] slptool hangs on
AIX?
Hi Jim,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Jim
Marshall jim.marsh...@wbemsolutions.com
wrote:
Hi,
Been testing the AIX build I have and the agent is
working fine but when I invoke slptool it basically
hangs. Stepping into the code we get to libslp_handle.c
line 66
if (SLPAtomicInc(s_OpenSLPHandleCount) == 1)
The SLPAtomicInc function does this on AIX:
return (intptr_t)fetch_and_add((atomic_p)pn, 1);
This is the cause of the hang, because fetch_and_add
"[...] returns the original value of the variable" (from
the man page), in this case '0'. When this happens the
code enters a while loop
Well, that's kind of useless, isn't
it?It should be replaced with:
return
(intptr_t)fetch_and_add((atomic_p)pn, 1) + 1;
The idea here is to atomically
increment the value stored at pn. If two threads try to
do it at once, then they could both read the value,
increment it and both write the same value back out. The
use of atomic_add should cause both threads to actually
increment the value, regardless of how in-sync they are
on their attempts to update the value.
It's only a side-effect (that we take
advantage of) that most atomic incs return the newly
updated value. Since the AIX version returns the
original value, and we're guaranteed to
read/update/write atomically when we add 1 to that
original value, then we can assume that the value we get
back PLUS ONE is our actual desired return value.
I'll fix it.
John
--
Jim Marshall
Sr. Software Engineer
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct___
Openslp-devel mailing list
Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
[Openslp-devel] slptool hangs on AIX?
Title: mail
Hi,
Been testing the AIX build I have and the agent is working fine but
when I invoke slptool it basically hangs. Stepping into the code we
get to libslp_handle.c line 66
if (SLPAtomicInc(s_OpenSLPHandleCount) == 1)
The SLPAtomicInc function does this on AIX:
return (intptr_t)fetch_and_add((atomic_p)pn, 1);
This is the cause of the hang, because fetch_and_add "[...] returns
the original value of the variable" (from the man page), in this
case '0'. When this happens the code enters a while loop
while (!s_HandlesInitialized)
sleep(0);
The only way I can work around this is to remove the "#define
USE_AIX_ATOMICS" (line 137 of slp_atomics.c).
This code has been in OpenSLP for a long time (Aug 2006), so I am
wondering if this is working for others? And if so, how?
Thank you
--
Jim Marshall
Sr. Software Engineer
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct___
Openslp-devel mailing list
Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
[Openslp-devel] AIX patches
Title: mail
Hi,
Got the build to work on AIX, turns out that the system was missing
a few required tools (like libtool and had older versions of
autoconf etc...).
I ran into a problem (which I had back in 2008??), on AIX 5.x IBM
did not have sockaddr_storage.ss_family instead they used
sockaddr_storage.__ss_family, however; it appears that in AIX 6.x
they have 'corrected' this so that 'ss_family' is used. So the build
failed because of this.
Attached is the svn diff for the changes I made. I made changes to 2
files
configure.ac
- Added a check for sockaddr_storage.ss_family and if present it
sets a define.
slp_net.h
- In the AIX specific portion of the code added a check for the
define set via the configure.ac, if not set it will use
'__ss_family'.
Jim
--
Jim Marshall
Sr. Software Engineer
Index: configure.ac
===
--- configure.ac(revision 1692)
+++ configure.ac(working copy)
@@ -54,6 +54,11 @@
#
# Checks for structure members
#
+AC_CHECK_MEMBER([struct sockaddr_storage.ss_family],
+ [AC_DEFINE(HAVE_SOCKADDR_STORAGE_SS_FAMILY,1,[whether sockaddr_storage
+has ss_family])],
+[], [#include sys/socket.h])
+
AC_CHECK_MEMBER([struct sockaddr_in.sin_len],
[AC_DEFINE(HAVE_SOCKADDR_IN_SIN_LEN,1,[whether sockaddr_in has
sin_len])],
[], [#include netinet/in.h])
Index: common/slp_net.h
===
--- common/slp_net.h(revision 1692)
+++ common/slp_net.h(working copy)
@@ -73,7 +73,10 @@
#ifdef _AIX
# define SLP_IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT{{{0,0,0,0}}}
# define SLP_IN6ADDR_LOOPBACK_INIT {{{0,0,0,1}}}
+#ifndef HAVE_SOCKADDR_STORAGE_SS_FAMILY
+// ss_family is not present, use __ss_family (AIX 5.?)
# define ss_family __ss_family
+#endif
#else
# define SLP_IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT{{{0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}}}
# define SLP_IN6ADDR_LOOPBACK_INIT {{{0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1}}}
--
The Windows 8 Center - In partnership with Sourceforge
Your idea - your app - 30 days.
Get started!
http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/
what-html-developers-need-to-know-about-coding-windows-8-metro-style-apps/___
Openslp-devel mailing list
Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
[Openslp-devel] Building issues on AIX
Has anyone built the current OpenSLP on AIX? If so what version? We have AIX 6.1 and the first issue we ran into was in common/slp_net.h line 75 # define ss_family __ss_family it appears with AIX 6 they have changed to use 'ss_family' so you get a compile error on __ss_family, easy enough fix tho. The major issue I am running into appears to be with the flex/bison stuff. Here is the output of the build gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DAIX -maix64 -Wall -O3 -MT slp_filter_l.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/slp_filter_l.Tpo -c slp_filter_l.c -DPIC -o .libs/slp_filter_l.o slp_filter_l.l: In function 'filter_close_lexer': slp_filter_l.l:174: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size slp_filter_l.l: In function 'slp_filter_init_lexer': slp_filter_l.l:181: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size /bin/sh ../ylwrap slp_attr_y.y y.tab.c slp_attr_y.c y.tab.h slp_attr_y.h y.output slp_attr_y.output -- bison -y -d /usr/bin/m4: Not a recognized flag: - Usage: m4 [-els] [-B Number] [-D Name[=Value]]... [-H Number] [-I Directory] [-S Number] [-T Number] [-U Name]... [File...] make[2]: *** [slp_attr_y.c] Error 1 we have the following installed: flex version 2.5.4 bison (GNU Bison) 2.6.2 m4 (GNU M4) 1.4.16 I don't seem to see the 'yywrap' call on Linux, so I am wondering if there is some tool I am missing? Thank you -- mail Jim Marshall -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct___ Openslp-devel mailing list Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
[Openslp-devel] Building on Solaris
Hi, We've got OpenSLP building and running on Sparc Solaris, we built it using GCC. My question revolves around the dependency of libgcc_s.so.1 when built this way, it would be preferable if we could build it so that it did not have that dependency. Just wondering if anyone out there may have some thoughts on if this is possible and if so how? I've tried various gcc and configure options (for example --static-libgcc, -nostdlib -lc, etc). Thanks -- mail Jim Marshall -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct___ Openslp-devel mailing list Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
[Openslp-devel] Code Freeze
Title: mail Hi, Per my earlier email (10/12/2012 12:15 PM) I would like to do a code freeze on the tree (svn version 1692). We've done testing on Centos 5.5 and Windows 7 and things appear to be working fine (mixing 32bit slpd and 64bit slptool and vice-versa, also using older 1.x slpd and slptool) I believe that the 'hijacking' issue was resolved and tested. We are having issues with building on Solaris at the moment (a gcc issue right now) but will test on that and AIX this week. Thank you -- Jim Marshall Sr. Software Engineer -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct___ Openslp-devel mailing list Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
[Openslp-devel] Solaris 10 sparn, issue with signal.h
We got our Sparc machine up and running but when we ran configure we got the following warning: checking signal.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: signal.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: signal.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: signal.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: signal.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled configure: WARNING: signal.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: signal.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence If you continue and try to run make you end up with an error message that is like this In file included from /usr/include/sys/signal.h:34, from /usr/include/signal.h:26, /usr/include/sys/siginfo.h:259: error: parse error before ctid_t /usr/include/sys/siginfo.h:292: error: parse error before '}' token /usr/include/sys/siginfo.h:294: error: parse error before '}' token We're using gcc 3.3.2 (I know, it's old) and the solution (after much googling) is pretty simple. What I read seems to imply it maybe specific to gcc 3.3.2 on Solaris. Here is the solution cd /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/3.3.2/install-tools ./mkheaders -- mail Jim Marshall -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct___ Openslp-devel mailing list Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
Re: [Openslp-devel] slptool displays multiple attributes when only 1 should be
What specifically do you want in terms of routing table? Below is the IPv4 table output from the 'route print' command. In terms of it being a SA or DA, I set net.slp.isDA = true in slp.conf. I stopped the SLP service and restarted it with the slp.conf and I see the same behavior. Jim IPv4 Route Table === Active Routes: Network DestinationNetmask Gateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.5.1192.168.5.101 10 127.0.0.0255.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1306 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1306 127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1306 169.254.0.0 255.255.0.0 On-link 169.254.37.23276 169.254.37.23 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.37.23276 169.254.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.37.23276 192.168.5.0255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.5.101266 192.168.5.101 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.5.101266 192.168.5.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.5.101266 192.168.19.0255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.19.1276 192.168.19.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.19.1276 192.168.19.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.19.1276 224.0.0.0240.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1306 224.0.0.0240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.5.101266 224.0.0.0240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.19.1276 224.0.0.0240.0.0.0 On-link 169.254.37.23276 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1306 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.5.101266 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.19.1276 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.37.23276 === Persistent Routes: None -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html ___ Openslp-devel mailing list Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
Re: [Openslp-devel] slptool displays multiple attributes when only 1 should be
Title: mail
Nick,
When I start slpd as follows the directory agent does not show up
with slptool
slpd -start -c .\slp.conf -l slp_dafail.txt
C:\Temp\openslp\win32\Win32\Debugslptool findsrvs
service:directory-agent
C:\Temp\openslp\win32\Win32\Debug
however; if I add the '-d' option to the command line it works.
In other words when starting slpd as follows results in the
directory agent showing up and then doing the attribute test works
as expected.
slpd -start -c .\slp.conf -d -l slp_daworked.txt
C:\Temp\openslp\win32\Win32\Debugslptool findsrvs
service:directory-agent
service:directory-agent://127.0.0.1,65535
service:directory-agent://192.168.5.101,65535
C:\Temp\openslp\win32\Win32\Debug
Jim
Nick Wagner wrote:
When you have it on, does slptool find directory
agents appropriately?
--Nick
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Jim
Marshall jim.marsh...@wbemsolutions.com
wrote:
What
specifically do you want in terms of routing table? Below is
the IPv4 table output from the 'route print' command.
In terms of it being a SA or DA, I set "net.slp.isDA = true"
in slp.conf. I stopped the SLP service and restarted it with
the slp.conf and I see the same behavior.
Jim
--
Jim Marshall
Sr. Software Engineer
Thu Sep 20 14:04:53 2012
SLPD daemon started
Command line = slpd
Using configuration file = .\slp.conf
Using registration file = C:\Windows\slp.reg
Listening on loopback TCP...
Listening on loopback UDP...
Listening on 192.168.5.101 ...
Multicast (IPv4) socket on 192.168.5.101 ready
SLPv1 DA Discovery Multicast socket on 192.168.5.101 ready
Unicast socket on 192.168.5.101 ready
Agent Interfaces = 192.168.5.101
Startup complete entering main run loop ...
Thu Sep 20 14:04:53 2012
MESSAGE - Trace message (IN)
Peer:
IP address: 192.168.5.101
Header:
version = 2
functionid = 1
length = 49
flags = 8192
extoffset = 0
xid = 25499
langtag = en
Message SRVRQST:
srvtype = service:directory-agent
scopelist = empty
predicate = empty
Thu Sep 20 14:04:53 2012
MESSAGE - Trace message (OUT)
Peer:
IP address: 192.168.5.101
Header:
version = 2
functionid = 8
length = 77
flags = 0
extoffset = 0
xid = 25499
langtag = en
Message DAADVERT:
scope = DEFAULT
url = service:directory-agent://192.168.5.101
attributes = empty
Thu Sep 20 14:04:53 2012
MESSAGE - Trace message (IN)
Peer:
IP address: 192.168.5.101
Header:
version = 2
functionid = 8
length = 77
flags = 0
extoffset = 0
xid = 25499
langtag = en
Message DAADVERT:
scope = DEFAULT
url = service:directory-agent://192.168.5.101
attributes = empty
Thu Sep 20 14:04:53 2012
KNOWNDA - Addition:
DA address = 192.168.5.101
directory-agent-url = service:directory-agent://192.168.5.101
bootstamp = 505b5ac5
scope = DEFAULT
attributes = empty
Thu Sep 20 14:04:55 2012
MESSAGE - Trace message (IN)
Peer:
IP address: 192.168.5.101
Header:
version = 2
functionid = 8
length = 77
flags = 8192
extoffset = 0
xid = 0
langtag = en
Message DAADVERT:
scope = DEFAULT
url = service:directory-agent://192.168.5.101
attributes = empty
Thu Sep 20 14:04:55 2012
MESSAGE - Trace message (IN)
Peer:
IP address: 192.168.5.101
Header:
version = 1
functionid = 8
length = 64
flags = 0
extoffset = 0
xid = 0
langtag = en
Message DAADVERT:
scope = invalid data!
url = invalid data!
attributes = invalid data!
Thu Sep 20 14:04:55 2012
MESSAGE - Trace message (IN)
Peer:
IP address: 192.168.5.101
Header:
version = 2
functionid = 1
length = 62
flags = 8192
extoffset = 0
xid = 25500
langtag = en
Message SRVRQST:
srvtype = service:directory-agent
scopelist = empty
predicate = empty
Thu Sep 20 14:04:55 2012
MESSAGE - Trace message (IN)
Peer:
IP address: 192.168.5.12
Header:
version = 2
functionid = 3
length = 239
flags = 16384
extoffset = 0
xid = 17729
langtag = en
Message SRVREG:
srvtype = service:management-software.IBM:platform-agent
scope = DEFAULT
url = service:management-software.IBM:platform-agent://192.168.5.12
attributes =
(vendor=IBM),(version=6.1.2),(uid=7F4BC4D3B2086B77),(ip-address=192.168.5.12),(hostname=RE-AIX6)
Thu Sep 20 14:04:55 2012
MESSAGE - Trace message (OUT)
Peer:
IP address: 192.168.5.12
Header:
version = 2
functionid = 5
length = 18
flags = 0
extoffset = 0
xid = 17729
langtag =
[Openslp-devel] Which linux do you use
Hi, its me again ;) What version of Linux are you using to build openslp? What versions of autoconf, automake, libtool, gcc are you using? I'm trying to build openslp on CentOS 5.5 and it is not going well. CentOS comes with autoconf 2.59, I upgraded to autoconf 2.63 but now when I do a make I get a compile error in slp_thread.c for pthread_mutexattr_settype not being declared and PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE being undefined. I see there was a discussion in the openslp list back in Dec 2010 and May 2011, the resolution was a patch to the code base. As such I'm kind of at a loss as to why I am seeing the error. Thanks -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html ___ Openslp-devel mailing list Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
[Openslp-devel] slptool displays multiple attributes when only 1 should be
Title: mail
Hi,
I am testing the trunk on Windows 7, code was built with Visual
Studio 11 (Beta of VS 2012). When doing a simple test to register a
service and then get its attributes I am getting back multiple
'entries' when only 1 such entry exists. This appears to be an issue
with the 2.0 slptool because if I use the older slptool 1.0.9.a on
the same registration I only get a single attribute back.
slptool example:
C:\Temp\openslp\win32\Win32\Debugslptool -v
slptool version = 2.0.0
libslp version = 2.0.0
libslp configuration file = (null)
C:\Temp\openslp\win32\Win32\Debugslptool.exe register service:myserv.x://myhost.com "(attr1=val1),(attr2=val2)"
C:\Temp\openslp\win32\Win32\Debugslptool findsrvs service:myserv.x
service:myserv.x://myhost.com,10785
C:\Temp\openslp\win32\Win32\Debugslptool findattrs service:myserv.x://myhost.com
(attr1=val1),(attr2=val2)
(attr1=val1),(attr2=val2)
(attr1=val1),(attr2=val2)
C:\Temp\openslp\win32\Win32\Debugslptool findattrs service:myserv.x://myhost.com attr1
(attr1=val1)
(attr1=val1)
(attr1=val1)
Server Info:
C:\Temp\openslp\win32\Win32\Debugslpd -v
slpd version: 2.0.0
compile options:
debugging: disabled
predicates: enabled
slpv1 compatability: enabled
slpv2 security: disabled
C:\Temp\linux64\openslp\win32\Win32\Debugslpd -stop
C:\Temp\linux64\openslp\win32\Win32\Debugslpd -start
--
Jim Marshall
Sr. Software Engineer
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Openslp-devel mailing list
Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
Re: [Openslp-devel] Building issue on Linux running on Windows
Title: mail
Ian Norton wrote:
slp.h:
SLP_NETWORK_TIMED_OUT
= -19
Are you running slpd of the right version?
Yes slpd 2.0 is running and as an aside the 1.x version runs fine
C:\Temp\openslp\win32\Win32\Debugslpd -install
Service Location Protocol installed.
C:\Temp\openslp\win32\Win32\Debugslpd.exe -version
slpd version: 2.0.0
compile options:
debugging: disabled
predicates: enabled
slpv1 compatability: enabled
slpv2 security: disabled
On 14 September 2012 17:55, Ian Norton
inor...@gmail.com
wrote:
I seem to recall that -19 means that you couldnt contact the
slpd process.
On 14 September 2012 16:56, Jim
Marshall jim.marsh...@wbemsolutions.com
wrote:
Hi,
We've written a test script to test the basic
functionality of OpenSLP
(basic sanity check stuff), it works fine with the
older SLP (1.0.9a). I
grabbed the trunk and built it on Windows 7 (with VS
2011 Beta), it
builds fine and slpd installs and runs. using
slptool to perfrom a
findsrvs operation works, however; when I try to
manually register a
service with slptool I get error "-19":
C:\Temp\openslp\win32\Win32\Debugslptool
register
service:myserv.x://myhost.com
"(attr1=val1),(attr2=val2)"
errorcode: -19
What am I doing wrong?
Additionally I brought the svn tree to a Linux
(CentOS 5.5, 64bit)
machine, it will not build. I run autogen.sh and it
spits out an error
regarding AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS but the configure
script is
generated. When I run the configure script I get the
following error:
./configure --prefix=/home/jmars/trees/openslp/
configure: error: cannot find install-sh or
install.sh in . ./.. ./../..
autoconf version: 2.59
automake version: 1.96
libtool version: 1.5.22
GNU Make version: 3.81
any thoughts on what I am doing wrong here?
Thank you
--
mail
Jim Marshall
Sr. Software Engineer
WS http://ws-inc.com/
--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app
looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics
Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
___
Openslp-devel mailing list
Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
--
Jim Marshall
Sr. Software Engineer
--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html___
Openslp-devel mailing list
Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
