Re: [osol-discuss] New update of Solaris 11, how is it?
as far as I know, noone promised anything, at least not publicly On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Michael Kerpan mjker...@kerpan.com wrote: Now that the full version of S11 is beginning to ship, will we finally see the long=promised code drop of new kernel code or has Oracle decided to permanently close off public access to post-Sun kernel developments? ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Dropped my PC, S11e behaves strange??? Help!
if you inserted the disk that has the rpool in a different sata port, you might have problems, yes On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Orvar Korvar knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote: PS. I removed the hard disk when I fastened the cpu cooler again, and then inserted the SATA cable - but this should not affect Solaris 11 Express, right? If I insert the disk into another SATA port on the motherboard, no problems should arise, right? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] eSATA works fine?
SATA does need an driver, the same eSATA uses actually USB 3.0 also needs a driver which i dont think is available yet, at least for solaris On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Orvar Korvar knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote: eSATA is a physical connector and electrical standard for SATA. So you are implying that eSATA does not need any drivers? It is like an ordinary SATA controller, those dont need drivers either? So what is the difference between eSATA and USB3.0? Why does USB3 need a driver, isnt it a physical connector as well? Is there a simple rule of thumb to tell which connections need a driver, and which dont need a driver? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] System hangs with mirrored root drive
you cannot use the whole disk for a zfs boot disk. the bios of the pc understands only partitions and knows how to boot only from them On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Mike DeMarco mikej...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Mike, I would check that your hardware is functioning correctly by using these commands: # fmdump -eV # iostat -En # more /var/adm/messages Thanks, Cindy Yes all hardware is working, as a single disk drive the OS has no probelms. System only hangs when it is mirroring two drives to the rpool. System has 8 drives in with multiple partitions on each. Both drives that mirror to the rpool have Solaris2 partition type and both have the active partition set. Years ago it was recommended that zpool be built only with the whole device and not with a slice from the device. I am at a loss as to why the install builds the rpool from a slice rather than the entire drive. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] etc folder: file system and hosts file
opensolaris and solaris express use ZFS by default fstab is a linux thing, in solaris its vfstab check the AllowUsers option in sshd_config check the man page of hosts_access to get tcpwrappers working in solaris On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:21 PM, ann kok oiyan...@yahoo.ca wrote: Hello How can I know what is the file system in my box? What file in the file system stored? There is no fstab under /etc folder I can't get the file hosts.allow and hosts.deny How do I restrict the ssh logon from the dedicated ip? Thank you ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How to check the processor_id of the running threads inside an application?
have you checked ps(1) ? On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:43 AM, dengning dunning2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi gurus, I wrote a multithread application by pthread and bind the threads with specific cpu cores by processor_bind(), now I am wanting to confirm if the binding is effective. I wonder if there is a system call to return the current core_id of a certain thread? I failed to get the answer by going through some solaris documentations. Thank you for your attention. I feel sorry if the question is previously addressed. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] What is the default root password for the latest builds
what do you need the root password for? the user created during the install has a primary administrator profile which means he can use pfexec to run everything as root On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Mike DeMarco mikej...@yahoo.com wrote: I have installed the latest build but do not know the root password? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris cancelled, to be replaced with Solaris 11 Express
Those news are 7 years old! things have changed since then On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Orvar Korvar knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote: IBM has publicly said that they are phasing out AIX in favour of Linux. AIX will be killed. IBM has said that officially. Here is links that confirm my claim. Just google a bit and you will see. http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/application-development/2003/01/29/ibm-linux-will-replace-aix-2129537/ http://news.cnet.com/2100-1001-982512.html -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] @Oracle employees: OpenSolaris updates up to Solaris 11
Solaris 11 express is not even official. Oracle employees are very likely not allowed to share details, sun's days where they could talk about what was next are over On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Stephan Ferraro step...@ferraro.net wrote: I'm curious to know how the migration from OpenSolaris snv_134 to Solaris 11 Express will happen. The simplest solution would be to run simply pkg image-update on global and local zones. I hope it would not be required to have two separate physical servers to do the migration (it would explode the costs at hosting services). I hope too that the kernel will be still open source in Solaris 11. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] honeypot
http://blogs.sun.com/albertw/entry/ipfilter_logging 2010/8/18 Günther Schmidt gue.schm...@web.de: Hi all, I'd like to see what kind of network connection attempts are being made to my box, what's the easiest way to do that? Günther ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris cancelled, to be replaced with Solaris 11 Express
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 8/16/2010 10:34 AM, Paul Gress wrote: On 08/16/10 03:36 AM, Nikola M. wrote: On 08/14/10 03:41 PM, Orvar Korvar wrote: All source code will be available after binary update of Solaris 11 Express have been released. Then Illumos will have a chance to catch up and synchronize. As FreeBSD. I would like it to be that way, but.. ..they clearly indicate that code releases will happen Only after full releases of our enterprise Solaris that means Solaris 11, NOT Solaris Express, that is only in binary form. If releases will follow Solaris Express releases, that would be preferable and allow of open source user and developer community to spread (and contribute), beside closed Solaris users crowd. they own the code, they are not bound by CDDL I see it they will release source after a binary release. They cannot release a binary without releasing the source per CDDL. They would have to fork the code to a new license to do that. We will distribute updates to approved CDDL or other open source- licensed code following full releases of our enterprise Solaris operating system. In this manner, new technology innovations will show up in our releases before anywhere else. We will no longer distribute source code for the entirety of the Solaris operating system in real-time while it is developed, on a nightly basis. Anyway, anyone who will continue to use Solaris Express after migrating from Opensolaris, should not be fooled to use open source OS and will get proprietary system in binary form instead. And Solaris 11 as full proprietary will, MAYBE, have CDDL source releases for already-licensed and changed source code, but only what they want to release and with no obligation to do so. **Internal memo that is leaked is hardly an official statement, neither willing obligation to release code indefinitely). ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAkxpQ0wACgkQyH1sakKOL4wkYwEAjWPQj3OMyrCfXjHLcjiPn14U 5ZYLZeUoqXvwNB+Cq5cA/ilmQNBptZk61jhuFuHvrfWKv97SxgTiD2SonB+lytfb =pwA0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle sues Google over Java!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 8/16/2010 12:14 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: From: Edward Ned Harvey [mailto:sh...@nedharvey.com] http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100815110101756 The points I'm taking away are: * Google clearly understood they were entering questionable territory. Or else they wouldn't have bothered with the clean-room, and wouldn't have bothered entering negotiations with Sun. * Sun clearly had the intent to sue, or else they wouldn't have bothered filing all those patents, and wouldn't have bothered entering negotiations with Google. you don't seem to understand how this game is played. there is a very enlightening blog by james gosling explaining why you have to patent stuff: you have to play the patent game if you don't want to be sued to death. And if Sun thought Google was violating their copyright, then they had to sue else they risked being sued by their shareholders in turn. Come to think about it, I really don't understand why none of them actually sued. * Although java grants everyone the license to develop applications using java for free, and distribute them etc... Java does not grant developers the right to modify or reverse engineer java itself. You have to pay Sun/Oracle for priority influence over the future of java, and for special releases that are customized to your requirements. Put simply: Google wanted java. They wanted to customize and modify java itself. They didn't want to pay. They chose to get in a fight over it. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAkxpWjkACgkQyH1sakKOL4w8sQD9ED3xLx7hwxaw9oS+Xyhf8IAx YYb43OwgE/fnCVnZ6nwA/j2itFwlJVU8SuTpgFHD9N5qpvi+4cZB+EzZsaY6r7BQ =9Or+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle sues Google over Java!
have you read the suit? if oracle's lawers think android is somehow unlawfully affecting its java assets, they have to sue, they have an obligation to their shareholders, they paid quite a few billions for that after all Sun would have had to do the same thing had their lawyers reached the same conclusion On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Jussi Nieminen jussiniemin...@gmail.com wrote: Oracle sues Google over Java! Un-believable! Now it is proven what Oracle's intentions are! Is Java free??? What is the future of Java now??? So much for pro-open source attitude! It doesn't exist -maybe it never did after Oracle acquired Sun. Will anyone trust Oracle any more? Too bad. Too bad I had to witness this. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] upcoming web event:strategy for Oracle's Sun Servers, Storage and solaris
if your file landed in opensolaris, then you signed an SCA which means you gave sun and now oracle rights akin ownership. On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Richard L. Hamilton rlha...@smart.net wrote: On Aug 13, 2010, at 16:39, Paul Gress wrote: On 08/13/10 06:35 AM, andrew wrote: I don't expect to ever see binaries for the OpenSolaris distribution again. The most I think we can expect is a preview of Solaris 11 along the lines of the old Solaris Express programme. I hope I will be proved wrong though. I agree, and also I expect the source code to remain stagnant as far as new innovations are concerned (similar to dtrace and zfs). Oracle will develop new technology in a closed source fashion. They will keep the current source up to date, as the CDDL says they have to contribute back, just nothing new. As the copyright holder Oracle is not bound by the CDDL and has no compulsion to contribute back. AFAIK, CDDL is per-source-file. If a CDDL source file has other copyrights on it as well, maybe they do. Unfortunately, few if any of them probably do have other copyrights on them (at least explicitly). Not that I recall anything about copyright assignment by contributors. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] module ip due to a NULL pointer dereference
can you reliably reproduce it? can you do it in a more recent build such as b134? (its the latest /dev build) On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Peter koa...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi all, We are running on snv_111b, got crash Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 ^Mpanic[cpu3]/thread=ff050a94b540: Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 335743 kern.notice] BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page fault) rp=ff0020f64c80 addr=8 occurred in module ip due to a NULL pointer dereference Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 10 kern.notice] Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 839527 kern.notice] java: Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 753105 kern.notice] #pf Page fault Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 532287 kern.notice] Bad kernel fault at addr=0x8 Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 243837 kern.notice] pid=17665, pc=0xf7b5daaa, sp=0xff0020f64d78, eflags=0x10202 Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 211416 kern.notice] cr0: 8005003bpg,wp,ne,et,ts,mp,pe cr4: 6f8xmme,fxsr,pge,mce,pae,pse,de Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 624947 kern.notice] cr2: 8 Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 625075 kern.notice] cr3: 42f811000 Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 625715 kern.notice] cr8: c Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 10 kern.notice] Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice] rdi: ff05077b6a80 rsi: ff10c3519b10 rdx: ff0020f64e6c Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice] rcx: ff04f5dcd6e8 r8: 0 r9: 0 Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice] rax: 6 rbx: ff04fd87f888 rbp: ff0020f64d90 Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice] r10: fb84b168 r11: 0 r12: ff04f5dcd6e8 Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice] r13: ff0020f64e6c r14: ff10c3519b10 r15: ff04fd87f870 Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice] fsb: 0 gsb: ff04ea2acb00 ds: 4b Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice] es: 4b fs: 0 gs: 1c3 Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice] trp: e err: 0 rip: f7b5daaa Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice] cs: 30 rfl: 10202 rsp: ff0020f64d78 Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 266532 kern.notice] ss: 38 Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 10 kern.notice] Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff0020f64b60 unix:die+dd () Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff0020f64c70 unix:trap+1752 () Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff0020f64c80 unix:cmntrap+e9 () Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff0020f64d90 ip:tcp_do_getsockname+ea () Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff0020f64dc0 ip:tcp_getsockname+21 () Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff0020f64e20 sockfs:so_getsockname+67 () Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff0020f64e50 sockfs:socket_getsockname+22 () Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff0020f64ec0 sockfs:getsockname+9c () Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff0020f64f10 unix:brand_sys_syscall32+197 () Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 unix: [ID 10 kern.notice] Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 672855 kern.notice] syncing file systems... Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 904073 kern.notice] done Jul 23 16:23:54 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 111219 kern.notice] dumping to /dev/zvol/dsk/rpool/dump, offset 65536, content: kernel Jul 23 16:24:12 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 409368 kern.notice] ^M100% done: 396503 pages dumped, compression ratio 3.56, Jul 23 16:24:12 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 851671 kern.notice] dump succeeded Jul 23 16:26:27 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 540533 kern.notice] ^MSunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_111b 64-bit Jul 23 16:26:27 IRBOX341 genunix: [ID 943908 kern.notice] Copyright 1983-2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. Jul 23 16:26:27 IRBOX341 Use is subject to license terms. Is there any patch available? Thanks, Peter -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] module ip due to a NULL pointer dereference
I don' t know. I'm certain there isnt without paying oracle for support. On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Peter koa...@hotmail.com wrote: Yeah, actually I had another one server has the same crash, is there any patch for this only? not a whole build? I did some search, that it's noticed as a bug. Thanks, Peter -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Wacom Pressure Sensitivity in VirtualBox
it does http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/cdrecord.html On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:58 PM, valrh...@gmail.com valrh...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, then, do tell me: does CDRecord support BluRay? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Community distro
fully gpl compliant? what do you mean? If the driver being dropped is open source, you can always take the source code and keep updating it outside ON. Several people already do this On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:21 PM, russell str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk wrote: With a community distro would it be possible to capture drivers that are being dropped by Oracle from future editions of OpenSolaris? If these drivers can be captured to maintain the existing hardware support, then going forward if the community edition is fully GPL compliant then porting GPL drivers would provide a broader set of hardware. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [distribution-discuss] Community distro
Why should sun have consulted the community about their business decisions?. Opensolaris was their distro, their product, the code is in their repository. The most we could have done is clone the opensolaris respository outside sun's firewalls and prevent the relevant changes to avoid deleting the srv4 stuff. On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote: I still use SVR4 packages that get released from Blastwave and those work for the most part. To hell with that issue at the moment. Then your distro will be forked from the Oracle released sources and you'll have created an extra hurdle for yourself to jump in recreating SVR4 package prototypes since those are no longer present in the ON X gates, and will be removed from more of the source gates as more consolidations transition. The problem is that Sun/Oracle did already fork and changed things without asking the comunity whether this to be accepted by the community. These changes cause incompatibilities with Solaris 10 and SXCE. There is a big chance that going a different path than Sun/Oracle may reduce the effort at users side. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] VXFS to ZFS Quota
if you're using the latest solaris 10 or opensolaris, you can use userquotas http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461/gigaz?a=view nacho On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Sendil sendil@gmail.com wrote: Hi Currently I have 400+ users with quota set to 500MB limit. Currently the file system is using veritas file system. I am planning to migrate all these home directory to a new server with ZFS. How can i migrate the quotas. I can create 400+ file system for each users, but will this affect my system performance during the system boot up? Is this recommanded or any alternate is available for this issue. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] arabic domain in BIND DNS
Francis, the thing is that you can register utf8 domains (which include arabic ones) by registering their punnycode equivalent. Your browser will do the translation On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote: On 06/18/10 02:22 PM, Francis Lucero wrote: I tried man -s 1 idn but nothing is displayed. Nothing? What OpenSolaris release are you running? -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] arabic domain in BIND DNS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punycode On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Francis Lucero francisluc...@yahoo.com wrote: Anyone knows hoa to register arabic domain in BIND DNS? Thanks -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Sun Software Product Map- opensolaris not included
Opensolaris next is frozen, it doesn't matter how many fasttracks were approved. And perhaps, those fasttracks were actually fasttracks to begin with... On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:05 PM, russell str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk wrote: Looking through http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/ there appear to a large number of items which are being fast tracked. Is Oracle pushing for the next release of OpenSolaris to include more updates before release? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] where does opensolaris store its network related configurations? any file or something like that?
there is stuff in /etc/nwam/ nwam is the new way in which solaris configures networking On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Sarah kho sarah@gmail.com wrote: hi, can you please let me know where does opensolaris keep network configurations, is there some configuration file for them? thanks. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Opensolaris
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:36 PM, bsd mascotgr...@yahoo.com wrote: I'll wait for the hate messages after I post this. I personally don't get the Solaris/OpenSolaris distributions. Sure, I understand when Sun said that OpenSolaris was open source (although most of it is released under binary license agreements), and that OpenSolaris is supposed to be the RHEL/Fedora model for Solaris 10 development. you're confusing opensolaris with opensolaris the distribution. opensolaris is a set of consolidations and communities around them. most of the code in those consolidations is indeed opensource check for example the ON consolidation http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+onnv/ or the X consolidation http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+x-cons/ Opensolaris the distribution is a sun project and while it is the result of project indiana inside the opensolaris community, most of it was driven by sun's business need. Finally, lets say youre right and both opensolaris the community and opensolaris the distribution were a merketing stunt from sun. so what? what's the problem with that? i think that not only was it a perfectly valid move but has benefited a lot of us greatly. we can not see the guts of the best os in the planet. Solaris 10 was before opensolaris was released and it is of no concern to the opensolaris community However, I personally see OpenSolaris as a marketing gimmick. For one, see open binary licenses in place of source code. Two, what is even the need for a development model like RHEL/Fedora? OpenBSD and FreeBSD don't offer a OpenBSD-Open or FreeBSD-Open. They simply have current, stable, and release. It would have been much simpler, in my opinion, to have a Solaris 10-release, Solaris 10-stable, and Solaris 10-current. Sun released Solaris 10 for free so there wasn't any reason they couldn't have followed the current, stable, release model. Instead they opted for a marketing gimmick which is not going as planned. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Using ZFS snapshot to revert back to initial installation
the tool you should have used is Live Upgrade (LU) On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Johanna Kidwell johanna_kidw...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I have a box with Solaris 10 TX 10/09 installed with ZFS for the root file system. I have another pool called zones mounted at /zone where I install my Solaris zones. After completing the installation and configuration of the OS software and pools, I created a recursive snapshot of rpool and a snapshot of zone. My goal is to use these for application software installation testing. After doing my application software installs I thought I could use zfs rollback and revert back to the initial just-installed state of my box and try my application install scripts again... However, I found that my box was not truly in the same state as when I started. I used the rollback command for each snapshot. I had trouble with the rpool/dump snapshot, it said cannot remove device links for 'rpool/dump': dataset is busy. I was hoping that I don't care about that, but maybe I am wrong. So after doing the rollbacks if I do a zfs list -t snapshot is shows: NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT rp...@install 0 -- 94K - rpool/r...@install 0 -- 18K - rpool/ROOT/s10s_u7wos...@install 0 -- 4.52G - rpool/d...@install 16K -- 1.50G - rpool/exp...@install 0 -- 20K - rpool/export/h...@install 0 -- 18K - rpool/s...@install 0 -- 16K - z...@install 0 - 18K - So I thought I was back to the initial state, however, when I did my application install again I found errors: 1) some of the NICs where still plumbed from before, ifconfig -a didn't have the same results as it did when I took the snapshot. 2)import of an application service failed b/c it was already there 3)the zone I had created earlier was still there in zoneadm list -cv Please let me know if there is a way to use snapshots in the manner I desire. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Bug reporting
bugs.opensolaris.org is the old bug tracking system used by sun back in the day solaris was not opensource defects.opensolaris.org is a new system that was releases when opensolaris the binary distribution was released. I'm assuming migrating the bugs from the old system to the new system is not a trivial task for various reasons besides technical ones. this is an example: the bug description could contain customer confidential data. Since this database was closed, it was reasonable to have this data there but customers would be less than happy if sun then or oracle now opens that. If you're using opensolaris, you should be filling bugs in defect.opensolaris.org, if the engineer responsible of the bug thinks it should be in the old tracking system, he will migrate it and change its status accordingly On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Giovanni Tirloni gtirl...@sysdroid.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Spencer Tom Tafadzwa Chirume schir...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Upon evaluation of of bug and defect tracking facilities it would be useful to note having bugs automatically picked up and submitted for the developers to deal with on them as they come for users willing to participate - similar to harvesting hardware and usage statistics, only the user need not submit each bug manually . If users are persistent in their use of the software it should help the project get past a number of bugs, why not? It would it would be logical just as an automated package porting system helps with porting packages easily for the opensolaris project and in my humble opinion to have a automated bug reporter can help with the task of gathering bugs hey :) I'm a bit confused about our two bug tracking systems. --- * from http://defect.opensolaris.org: This site hosts a public Bugzilla database. Many projects being developed on opensolaris.org use this database, and users of Sun's OpenSolaris distribution are encouraged to use this database. If you would like to file a bug against one of Sun's Solaris releases, please use bugs.opensolaris.org. * from http://bugs.opensolaris.org: You can use this form to report a bug in OpenSolaris. Just enter the information below and click Send. Before submitting a new bug, please search the bug database to ensure that the bug doesn't already exist. Please Note: If you wish to view or file bugs against any OpenSolaris distribution, please use defect.opensolaris.org. --- From what I can tell from reading the mailing lists is that defect.opensolaris.org is for the community-reported bugs and bugs.opensolaris.org for bugs that need the atttention of Sun/Oracle employees (question: couldn't they use the first?). IMHO, there shouldn't be a distinction between the community and paid employees working for Oracle. There should be a single bug tracking system used by both for everything related to OpenSolaris. If Oracle/Sun needs to keep track of bugs affecting the paid *Solaris* OS, it can use its own internal bug tracking system as part of their testing/integration/enhancement efforts. If I'm missing something here, someone please let me know. There must be reasons for the way things are, I just don't know them. -- Giovanni ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Bug reporting
2010/3/21 Giovanni Tirloni gtirl...@sysdroid.com: Hello Ignacio, 2010/3/21 Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com bugs.opensolaris.org is the old bug tracking system used by sun back in the day solaris was not opensource Bugs reported to defects.opensolaris.org sometimes get migrated to bugs.opensolaris.org. There are many comments in the Bugzilla similar to: In order to get the attention of the Solaris engineers, I've opened a bug in the Sun Bugster database, and am closing this one as TRACKEDINBUGSTER. or Marking as potential blocker for 2010.03, though will need to be moved to bugster to get a fix into ON. Not all the solaris engineers are keeping an eye on defect.opensolaris.org defect.opensolaris.org is mostly taken care by the desktop and IPS teams. The engineers working in ON are mostly aware of bugster, bugs.opensolaris.org so naturally the related bugs in defect.opensolaris.org are moved to bugster. These things happen in these kind of transitions. defects.opensolaris.org is a new system that was releases when opensolaris the binary distribution was released. I'm assuming migrating the bugs from the old system to the new system is not a trivial task for various reasons besides technical ones. this is an example: the bug description could contain customer confidential data. Since this database was closed, it was reasonable to have this data there but customers would be less than happy if sun then or oracle now opens that. It's my understanding, and I could be wrong, that the open source OpenSolaris project has no customers. Perhaps you're talking about companies that have contracted support from Oracle/Sun for their Solaris and OpenSolaris installations. In the case of Oracle's OpenSolaris customers, their relationship with the OpenSolaris project would be proxied by Oracle/Sun, right ? s/customer/user/ anyone can fill a bug If you're using opensolaris, you should be filling bugs in defect.opensolaris.org, if the engineer responsible of the bug thinks it should be in the old tracking system, he will migrate it and change its status accordingly I fail to see why it should be migrated, unless Oracle/Sun uses the public Bugzilla as the entry point for their own customers and those bugs contain private data. In that case why not make the bug private in Bugzilla ? Even though the private argument makes sense, on a quick search through defects.opensolaris.org I couldn't find anything related to that. Most of the comments seem to imply that bugs need to be migrated to bugs.opensolaris.org so get the attention of a Sun/Oracle engineer and will make its way to ON. If that's the case, why not keep in the community on the loop and add comments to the Bugzilla bugs ? see above for an explanation, you're reading a lot more than there is to read Thanks, -- Giovanni ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 - no longer free
There are no free patches for solaris 10 On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Aidan Lawn aidanl...@gmail.com wrote: I just found this out, I don't know if it was announced or not but its news to me. The official license can be read here: http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/popup.jsp?info=17 The key bit is: Please remember, your right to use Solaris acquired as a download is limited to a trial of 90 days, unless you acquire a service contract for the downloaded Software. Does anyone know when this changed? I just deployed two Solaris 10 servers with the plan of only applying the free patches. I'm now planning to rebuild when opensolaris 2010.03 is released as this project was scoped with no license costs. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Problem with creating logical using in OpenSolaris 2009.06
you probably need to restart the server after installing the storage-server package in order for some of the relevant kernel modules to load. have you done that? nacho On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Jeff Freeman freeman.jeff...@verizon.net wrote: I've just finished installing storage-server and so now I am at the step to 'Create a ligical unit using the volume' command: sbdadm create-lu /dev/zvol/rdsk/pool_1/vol_1 I keep getting Unable to open device. Is the driver attached? I've never see this message before. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Reasons to use OpenSolaris
if you're running opensolaris 2009.06, i'd day you're running a very old version of opensolaris. In a month time, in march, a new version will be released, in the mean time, you can check what it should be like by running the dev version of opensolaris. The procedure to upgrade to dev is documented in [1] One of the many things you will get when you update to the dev version of opensolaris is a new sound subsystem which is much better than what you have now and more support. If you're not happy with the packages that exist in the dev opensolaris.org repository, there are others with more software available, as an example, you have the contrib repository [2] [1] http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/en/index.shtml [2] http://pkg.opensolaris.org/contrib/en/index.shtml On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:02 PM, George Silviu Enea premamot...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi there to all, dear friends! I`m new to OpenSolaris, and in the last 2 years I left Windows and tried several Linux distributions. At the moment I`m using openSUSE 11.3 and I love it, but... something`s missing... I didn`t found the perfect OS... yet... Came to know about OpenSolaris... I installed it, but everything seems to be hard... the sound does not work.. cannot find any new updates... I used OpenSolaris 2009.06 But the reason I`m opening this thread is to ask which are the reasons for using OpenSolaris, and what OpenSolaris offers for a everyday desktop user that Linux or Windows does not offer... I enjoy OpenSolaris... but everything seems to be so difficult for me to do (install programs for example). I really want to know all the benefits it is offering, and if there is a reason to pass all this difficulties... Please give me some reason, and I`ll use OpenSolaris, I`ll learn how works and I`ll spread the word about it here in my country. Thank you so so much!!! Greatly appreciate it! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] What mean rge and urtw ?
check http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5177/rge-7d?a=view http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2254/urtw-7d?a=view On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:43 PM, M. Gomez opensola...@redinem.com wrote: What mean rge and urtw ? the rtw is realtekwireless i guess? but why the u? and rge what is r, g and e? let me know please... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] What mean rge and urtw ?
it's a mailing list, not a bug tracking system, you do not mark anything here On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:59 PM, M. Gomez opensola...@redinem.com wrote: another one thing... how can i mark this thread as SOLVED? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Can 32 bit device driver run on 64 bit machine?
there is not a separate solaris for 32 bit machines. just boot a 32 bit kernel http://blogs.sun.com/alta/entry/boot_into_32_bit_kernel On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Tom Chen chento...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello, I need to test my 32 bit GLDv3 network driver. I have already tested the 64 bit one. But I only have 64 bit servers. Is it possible to run 32 bit driver on 64 servers? Should I install a 32 bit Solaris OS on these servers first? but when I install Solaris10 or OpenSolris, I do not have the option to select 64 bit or 32 bit OS, isn't it? Tom -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Using OpenSolaris as a security gateway
check http://blogs.sun.com/gfaden/entry/trusted_extensions_in_opensolaris_2000 There are other relevant parts of the blog too you might want to read. specially if you're willing to run the dev branch On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Karel Gardas karel.gar...@centrum.cz wrote: Another powerful security feature that Solaris 10 has that OpenBSD doesn't have is trusted extensions: ttp://osug.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/screensho t.png If you look at the link above you can see that the different windows and documents are classified at different levels of security and it's not possible to copy and paste from a more secret / classified window into a less secret / classified window. AFAIK, OpenBSD does not have this capability built in in a default install. Hello, do you know if MAC is also available in the OpenSolaris 2009.06? I.e. I assume this is mandatory access control implementation from trusted solaris edition, right? Thanks, Karel -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] UnionFS for Solaris
this has to be in solaris 10 or opensolaris? i dont know how advanced ai is in opensolaris, but i think it can be easily solved in solaris 10 want clustering? use sun cluster software want rapid server deployment, use jumpstart want each server with it's own data? use an automounter and a central nfs repo where all the data will be want configuration replication? use flar want configuration rollback? use zfs snapshots On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Alexander a...@rsu.ru wrote: I'm not so sure. The problem is much more complex. This is a problem of managing configuration files, updating system, installing new software and testing. All this problems are connected. - All services should be clustered if it is possible - We need an ability to add new node to cluster fast /delete old node from cluster transparently - We need an ability to update base OS version for a cluster - We need an ability to have custom configs on each node and to propagate changes to each node in a cluster (e.g. after base OS update changes in configs should be propagated to each node) - We need an ability to create alternative test environment and update it/install new soft ther, test and switch to it after testing without loosing applications data - We need an ability to restore each node to its previous state - We need to know who of admins, when and why changed configs We investigate the following approach now: 1) The root fs of each server is not persistent (doesn't store changes), so to create new node we need to connect new blade to this disk and make customizations in /etc, may be /usr/local/etc or some other places. /etc, /usr/local/etc mounted rw from separate place 2) Now we need an ability to propagate changes to /etc. SVN merge seems a good candidate... So we may quickly clone a disk (e.g. on storage system), update system (or soft) and create test environment. Configs in svn allow you to rollback and view changes to them... However, we are only in early stages of planning and investigate different approaches. This sounds like something CFengine would be a good solution for. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] X hangs on snv130
beadm mount bename /mnt 2009/12/26 Thommy M. Malmström thommy.m.malmst...@gmail.com: Copying back drm + i915 kernel modules from snv129 helped for me to make X work again. I suppose you mount snv129 to a temporary place when you do this copying? I always forget how to do this, can you state the steps, please? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] star [was: Some Why?-Questions]
perhaps you should integrate smake into jucr first and then have the spec file for star BuildRequire it? and while you're at it, you can place it in /usr where it should be? nacho On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: ken mays maybird1...@yahoo.com wrote: Ref: http://jucr.opensolaris.org/files/3117/7545/specs/star.spec It is most unlikely that this will create a useful result. Sun make does not support constructs like: make CC=something or similar as it does not forward command line macros to sub-makes. If it did, the line: CC=cc CXX=CC make CC=$CC CCCDLFLAGS=%picflags OPTIMIZE=%optflags LD=$CC would pass incorrect parameters to tbe build process. The next question would be what install location to use. It seems that the system does not support to change the install base using the official way with e.g.: smake INS_BASE=/usr Note that programs like SCCS that compile search paths into the binaries need to be compiled for the right install base. Well, congrats on getting it into the SourceJuicer system and I think it is passing. Do we want star v1.5.1 version to review as the final spec?? Recent versions of the makefile system support a root insbase and thus allow to specify to use the files /etc/default/star and /etc/default/rmt There are a lot of small bug-fixes in 1.5.1 Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] star [was: Some Why?-Questions]
there is a part of the spec file where you can specify which packages are required to compile your package it's called buildrequires. what else do you need? you can even use the spec file you were given as an example. what's wrong with just /usr/bin/star ? nacho On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote: perhaps you should integrate smake into jucr first and then have the spec file for star BuildRequire it? and while you're at it, you can place it in /usr where it should be? Well, smake compiles without the need for a make program as it first creates a boostrap smake using shell scripts and then uses this to make a standard compile. The question would be how to call a just compiled smake later in the autmated build process from another package. BTW: this is one of the reasons why I provide ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily/ it contains everything and thus it includes smake. And for star in /usr, we would need to avoid tar and only use the suntar link as this is the CLI emulation for the Sun tar implementation. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris hard disk hot plug?
it's not how it works, read the related manual in docs.sun.com http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-3814/6mjcp0qp9?a=view here is a hint, you'll need cfgadm On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Xavier Callejas xav...@wflogistics.com wrote: Hi, I have a Sun Fire X2270, I have enabled hot plug option in BIOS configuration. I have running the server with OpenSolaris 2009.06, when I insert into the SATA slot 1 a new hard disk I expect that a char device to appear in /dev/rdsk/ but nothing happens. How can I enable hot plug in OpenSolaris or how this works? Thank you. xavier. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Some Why?-Questions
pkg(5) seems to use a set of actions to define what and how to do things, and they seem to be similar to plugins in that you just drop the action file in a directory and things work. check http://opensolaris.org/sc/src/pkg/gate/src/modules/actions/ does the plugin list get updated every action that is taken? cant i install a package that delivers an action and set a have a package depend on that one? is there any predefined order in whch those actions run? nacho On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote: UNIX admin wrote: The full list of publication tools are: pkgdepend(1) pkgdiff(1) -- build 130+ pkgmogrify(1) pkgrecv(1) pkgsend(1) Please note that pkgsend will allow you to import an existing SVR4 package (minus class action scripts), directory, or tarball as the basis for a new package. The man page explains all of this. Yeah, so what happens if my SVR4 package doesn't deliver any files, but does all the work in those scripts instead? Then you'll have to re-create your package. I still disagree about two main things, and those are that 1. there should be no pre- and postinstall scripts, i.e. only files should be delivered That's fine, we'll just have to disagree. See this blog entry for more information: http://blogs.sun.com/sch/entry/pkg_1_a_no_scripting Except, it isn't quite correct say that pkg(5) only expects files to be delivered. It also allows for groups, users, drivers, SMF related items, and legacy SVR4 information. 2. that SMF should be *ABUSED* as a backdoor for executing those. You view usage of SMF as an abuse, but I view it as a change of execution context. pkg(5) doesn't say that you can't have scripting, it just says that you can't have scripting as part of the package execution context. The fundamental problem is that the IPS packaging team believes that the definition of a PACKAGE is ONLY that of *FILES*, while customers (aforementioned military, banks, insurance companies, and fortune 100 companies in general) believe that a *PACKAGE* is a UNIT OF CONSISTENTLY REPEATABLE, ENCAPSULATED *WORK*. Every packaging system has a different definition of what a package can/should consist of. pkg(5), like other systems, has chosen a different definition or view of things. There is nothing stopping you from continuing to encapsulate the set of repeatable work you desire to, but you will have to do so in a different way than you used to. If you must cause pain, how about developing some sort of method to automatically migrate pre- and postinstall and pre- and postremove scripts to one or more one-time SMF methods? There are no plans to do so at this time, although that might be possible in the future. Given that most of those scripts didn't work reliably in the past in all execution contexts, I doubt the conversion would be as useful as you might imagine. With that said, there has been a discussion of how to simplify delivery of these scripts to ease transition. Cheers, -- Shawn Walker ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Some Why?-Questions
you do not think the current state of the patching system in solaris is just broken at the moment? I feel your pain though, and i mostly agree with what you say. but i think IPS can be improved to a point where it makes my and your life easier. On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:30 PM, UNIX admin tripivc...@hotmail.com wrote: From talking to both Solaris sysadmins and Linux users that like to change, it seems that the indiana way is not expected/wanted from either party. That's what gets me in this whole circus, something is being decided for us, and we're told it's good for us, but in the end the product tries to please everybody and fails to satisfy either side. The only people clapping at how great OpenSolaris is are end-users, which do not have the capacity to comprehend the issues. And that's unfair to everybody involved. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2009.06 ZFS - COMSTAR iSCSI - NFS Reboot Issue
is there a kernwl dump in /var/crash/${hostname}
if there is that. try running the following command
mdb -k unix.n vmcore.n
where n is a number
after that run, in the prompt of mdb, run
$C
That should tell you where the kernel crashed and will give someone
more skilled than i am more information to know why it happened :)
nacho
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Amos Deering a...@unitedcts.com wrote:
I have recently become aware of the capabilities of OpenSolaris, and am
attempting to setup a Storage Box to give a combination of CIFS and iSCSI
and/or NFS.
I have seemingly succsessfully been able to configure a zfs iscsi share via
iscsitgt, yet the performance is just not up to par, so I decided to move on
to trying out comstar without to much testing of the configuration.
I setup comstar with tpg to limit iscsi traffic to my dedicated storage
network nics. I initally was attempting connection with my Citrix Xenserver 5
server. When I would attempt to write data to the LUN it would reboot my
OpenSolaris storage server.
Then I removed the tpg from the target and was able to transfer 30GB or so of
a VM to the LUN with great performance. I ran that VM for 2 days, then
decided to transfer another VM to the LUN. It started to transfer then it
rebooted my OpenSolaris storage server again. I disconnected the Xenserver
and destroyed the Xenserver SR. I then connected my MS initiator on my
windows box, and attempted to transfer 40GB of data and it also rebooted my
OpenSolaris storage server.
Under the assumption that maybe comstar was the issue, I decided to try NFS.
I setup a small 5GB NFS vol. I was not able to establish a connection. So I
anon=0 the NFS vol. Then I was able to attach it to my Xenserver. I attempted
to copy a VM and it started to write then the OpenSolaris storage server
rebooted.
Does anyone have any insight, knowledge of a useful system log. As of now I
have not had the OpenSolaris server reboot when transferring data to the CIFS
share.
here is the info from Kdmesg
Sat Dec 5 09:53:48 PST 2009
Dec 4 22:57:18 oss scsi: [ID 583861 kern.info] sd11 at marvell88sx0: target
7 lun 0
Dec 4 22:57:18 oss genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] sd11 is
/p...@0,0/pci10de,3...@a/pci1033,1...@0/pci11ab,1...@4/d...@7,0
Dec 4 22:57:18 oss genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info]
/p...@0,0/pci10de,3...@a/pci1033,1...@0/pci11ab,1...@4/d...@7,0 (sd11) online
Dec 4 22:57:19 oss genunix: [ID 308332 kern.info] root on
rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-3 fstype zfs
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss unix: [ID 190185 kern.info] SMBIOS v2.4 loaded (3583
bytes)
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss unix: [ID 517869 kern.info] NOTICE: cpu_acpi: _PSS
package not found.
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss unix: [ID 388705 kern.warning] WARNING: cpu_acpi: error
parsing _PSS for CPU 0
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss unix: [ID 196753 kern.warning] WARNING: cpupm_init:
processor 0: unable to initialize P-state support
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /cpus (cpunex0) online
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: dld0
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] dld0 is /pseudo/d...@0
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss npe: [ID 236367 kern.info] PCI Express-device:
pci10de,3...@6, pci_pci0
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] pci_pci0 is
/p...@0,0/pci10de,3...@6
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ21 is being shared
by drivers with different interrupt levels.
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss This may result in reduced system performance.
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss npe: [ID 236367 kern.info] PCI Express-device:
pci10de,c...@2,1, ehci0
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] ehci0 is
/p...@0,0/pci10de,c...@2,1
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ22 is being shared
by drivers with different interrupt levels.
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss This may result in reduced system performance.
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss npe: [ID 236367 kern.info] PCI Express-device:
pci15d9,1...@2, ohci0
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] ohci0 is
/p...@0,0/pci15d9,1...@2
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu0: x86 (chipid 0x0
AuthenticAMD 100F42 family 16 model 4 step 2 clock 2211 MHz)
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu0: Quad-Core AMD
Opteron(tm) Processor 2374 HE
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu1: x86 (chipid 0x0
AuthenticAMD 100F42 family 16 model 4 step 2 clock 2211 MHz)
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu1: Quad-Core AMD
Opteron(tm) Processor 2374 HE
Dec 4 22:57:23 oss unix: [ID 517869 kern.info] NOTICE: cpu_acpi: _PSS
package not found.
Dec 4 22:57:23 oss unix: [ID 388705 kern.warning] WARNING: cpu_acpi: error
parsing _PSS for CPU 1
Dec 4 22:57:23 oss unix: [ID 196753 kern.warning] WARNING: cpupm_init:
processor 1: unable to initialize P-state support
Dec 4 22:57:23 oss unix: [ID 557827 kern.info] cpu1 initialization complete
- online
Dec 4 22:57:23
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2009.06 ZFS - COMSTAR iSCSI - NFS Reboot Issue
oh, one more thing, try upgrading to /dev before filling any bugs, i'm
sure a great many things were fixed since that opensolaris was
released.
To switch to the /dev repository
pfexec pkg set-publisher -O http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev
opensolaris.org pfexec pkg refresh --full pfexec pkg install
SUNWipkg pfexec pkg image-update -v
Then wait. Don't forget to read the release notes before starting out.
2009/12/6 Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com:
is there a kernwl dump in /var/crash/${hostname}
if there is that. try running the following command
mdb -k unix.n vmcore.n
where n is a number
after that run, in the prompt of mdb, run
$C
That should tell you where the kernel crashed and will give someone
more skilled than i am more information to know why it happened :)
nacho
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Amos Deering a...@unitedcts.com wrote:
I have recently become aware of the capabilities of OpenSolaris, and am
attempting to setup a Storage Box to give a combination of CIFS and iSCSI
and/or NFS.
I have seemingly succsessfully been able to configure a zfs iscsi share via
iscsitgt, yet the performance is just not up to par, so I decided to move on
to trying out comstar without to much testing of the configuration.
I setup comstar with tpg to limit iscsi traffic to my dedicated storage
network nics. I initally was attempting connection with my Citrix Xenserver
5 server. When I would attempt to write data to the LUN it would reboot my
OpenSolaris storage server.
Then I removed the tpg from the target and was able to transfer 30GB or so
of a VM to the LUN with great performance. I ran that VM for 2 days, then
decided to transfer another VM to the LUN. It started to transfer then it
rebooted my OpenSolaris storage server again. I disconnected the Xenserver
and destroyed the Xenserver SR. I then connected my MS initiator on my
windows box, and attempted to transfer 40GB of data and it also rebooted my
OpenSolaris storage server.
Under the assumption that maybe comstar was the issue, I decided to try NFS.
I setup a small 5GB NFS vol. I was not able to establish a connection. So I
anon=0 the NFS vol. Then I was able to attach it to my Xenserver. I
attempted to copy a VM and it started to write then the OpenSolaris storage
server rebooted.
Does anyone have any insight, knowledge of a useful system log. As of now I
have not had the OpenSolaris server reboot when transferring data to the
CIFS share.
here is the info from Kdmesg
Sat Dec 5 09:53:48 PST 2009
Dec 4 22:57:18 oss scsi: [ID 583861 kern.info] sd11 at marvell88sx0: target
7 lun 0
Dec 4 22:57:18 oss genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] sd11 is
/p...@0,0/pci10de,3...@a/pci1033,1...@0/pci11ab,1...@4/d...@7,0
Dec 4 22:57:18 oss genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info]
/p...@0,0/pci10de,3...@a/pci1033,1...@0/pci11ab,1...@4/d...@7,0 (sd11) online
Dec 4 22:57:19 oss genunix: [ID 308332 kern.info] root on
rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-3 fstype zfs
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss unix: [ID 190185 kern.info] SMBIOS v2.4 loaded (3583
bytes)
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss unix: [ID 517869 kern.info] NOTICE: cpu_acpi: _PSS
package not found.
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss unix: [ID 388705 kern.warning] WARNING: cpu_acpi: error
parsing _PSS for CPU 0
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss unix: [ID 196753 kern.warning] WARNING: cpupm_init:
processor 0: unable to initialize P-state support
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /cpus (cpunex0) online
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: dld0
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] dld0 is /pseudo/d...@0
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss npe: [ID 236367 kern.info] PCI Express-device:
pci10de,3...@6, pci_pci0
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] pci_pci0 is
/p...@0,0/pci10de,3...@6
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ21 is being
shared by drivers with different interrupt levels.
Dec 4 22:57:20 oss This may result in reduced system performance.
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss npe: [ID 236367 kern.info] PCI Express-device:
pci10de,c...@2,1, ehci0
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] ehci0 is
/p...@0,0/pci10de,c...@2,1
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ22 is being
shared by drivers with different interrupt levels.
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss This may result in reduced system performance.
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss npe: [ID 236367 kern.info] PCI Express-device:
pci15d9,1...@2, ohci0
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] ohci0 is
/p...@0,0/pci15d9,1...@2
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu0: x86 (chipid 0x0
AuthenticAMD 100F42 family 16 model 4 step 2 clock 2211 MHz)
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu0: Quad-Core AMD
Opteron(tm) Processor 2374 HE
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu1: x86 (chipid 0x0
AuthenticAMD 100F42 family 16 model 4 step 2 clock 2211 MHz)
Dec 4 22:57:22 oss unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu1
Re: [osol-discuss] Fishworks Appliance Kit with OpenSolaris
Where did you find that? fishworks is the internal name of the Sun storage 7000 family of products http://www.sun.com/storage/disk_systems/unified_storage/ it has not and probably will never be opensource nacho On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Henri Maddox hendri.mad...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi There, I found an older (about 1 1/2 year) german article about OpenSolaris as Storage solution. There was namend the Fishworks Appliance Kit with OpenSolaris and that this is a free Sun-Project for building a fileserver. But I cant find any informations about this in the web. Could someone help me out? Thanx Henri -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] snv_129 /kernel/drv/sparcv9/ifp: undefined symbol 'lbolt64'
it is known http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/on-discuss/2009-November/001376.html On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote: Is this already a well know item or have I spotted a new creature crawling? Executing last command: boot Boot device: disk2:a File and args: SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_129 64-bit Copyright 1983-2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license terms. DEBUG enabled misc/forthdebug (471653 bytes) loaded /kernel/drv/sparcv9/ifp: undefined symbol 'lbolt64' WARNING: mod_load: cannot load module 'ifp' /kernel/drv/sparcv9/ifp: undefined symbol 'lbolt64' WARNING: mod_load: cannot load module 'ifp' Hostname: europa Reading ZFS config: done. europa console login: -- Dennis ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] CIFS vs NFS performance
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Yannis Schoinas yan...@schoinas.net wrote: Setup: Linux client (Atom 330, 1GB d...@533) connects to Solaris server (Atom 330, 2GB d...@533) Network connectivity through 100 Mbps MOCA link (3 msecs latency each way)Solaris server exports the same filesystem through cifs and nfs Operation: dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16384 count=512 Results: (CIFS) porta-deb:/safe/storage# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16384 count=512 8388608 bytes (8.4 MB) copied, 1.7191 s, 4.9 MB/s (NFS) porta-deb:/safe-nfs/storage# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16384 count=512 8388608 bytes (8.4 MB) copied, 0.852603 s, 9.8 MB/s what's the problem? what is the expected result? what caught your attention? cifs and nfs are very different protocols, so it's perfectly reasonable for them to differ performance wise. Also dd is hardly a benchmarking tool Any ideas? Yannis -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] CIFS vs NFS performance
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Yannis Schoinas yan...@schoinas.net wrote: I would expect both protocols to saturate the network. What are your performance expectations for cifs? CIFS performance is not limited by network BW or CPU performance (at this BW level). Something else is causing the degradation to 50% of available network BW. Do you have any ideas? What's wrong with dd? What would you use to test sequential write performance? use filebench, it has a cifs plugin I think how are you measuring network bandwidth? both cifs and nfs have some protocol related overhead. Also, you might want to ask cifs related questions in cifs-discuss nacho ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] installing opensolaris without grub
i dont think that's possible, solaris needs grub, and it needs solaris grub, because it's the only one that understand zfs On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Emanuele Fontana geol...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, this is a very newbie question, but I'd need a hint. My Hard Disk is partitioned as following: /dev/sda1 -- boot [primary] /dev/sda2 -- [extended] /dev/sda5 -- swap [logic] /dev/sda6 -- debian [logic] /dev/sda3 -- empty [primary] I'd like to install opensolaris (osol) in /dev/sda3. I know that osol uses grub to identify other OSs, but I have grub2 now and I would not return to the old grub. I was wondering if I can install osol without installing grub, and hence, without touching my boot partition (/dev/sda1). If it is possible I will just have to add a script in /etc/grub.d/ of my debian release to make osol bootable. So can I avoid to install grub during the osol install procedure? Is it easy to perform? Thanks, sorry for the English I use...it is not my language. Cheers. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Display CPU temprature
be careful with that dennis, read the original mail that script came from
http://archive.netbsd.se/?ml=opensolaris-codea=2007-12t=5919840
do they sell opensolaris stuff with jurgen's signature? :)
2009/10/4 Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org:
have you tried with dtrace?
http://www.mail-archive.com/dtrace-disc...@opensolaris.org/msg03086/tzmon.d
Let's have a look at that :
#!/usr/sbin/dtrace -s
#pragma D option quiet
sdt:tzmon:tzmon_eval_zone:tz-temp
{
printf(temp %d.%1uM-0K/%d.%1uM-0C,
arg0 / 10, arg0 % 10,
(arg0 - 2732) / 10, (arg0 - 2732) % 10);
}
sdt:tzmon:tzmon_eval_zone:tz-temp
/(int)arg1 0/
{
printf(, crit hot %d.%1uM-0K/%d.%1uM-0C,
arg1 / 10, arg1 % 10,
(arg1 - 2732) / 10, (arg1 - 2732) % 10);
}
sdt:tzmon:tzmon_eval_zone:tz-temp
/(int)arg2 0/
{
printf(, hot %d.%1uM-0K/%d.%1uM-0C,
arg2 / 10, arg2 % 10,
(arg2 - 2732) / 10, (arg2 - 2732) % 10);
}
sdt:tzmon:tzmon_eval_zone:tz-temp
{
printf(, %s\n, stringof(arg3));
}
Lots of argX - 2732 and even modulo 10. 10 secs perhaps.
How very obscure :-)
$ su -
Password:
Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_121 November 2008
# cd /export/home/dclarke
# dtrace -l -s tzmon.d
ID PROVIDER MODULE FUNCTION NAME
18305 sdt tzmon tzmon_eval_zone tz-temp
18305 sdt tzmon tzmon_eval_zone tz-temp
18305 sdt tzmon tzmon_eval_zone tz-temp
18305 sdt tzmon tzmon_eval_zone tz-temp
# dtrace -s tzmon.d
temp 313.2°K/40.0°C, crit hot 400.2°K/127.0°C, \_TZ_.THRM
temp 313.2°K/40.0°C, crit hot 400.2°K/127.0°C, \_TZ_.THRM
temp 313.2°K/40.0°C, crit hot 400.2°K/127.0°C, \_TZ_.THRM
temp 313.2°K/40.0°C, crit hot 400.2°K/127.0°C, \_TZ_.THRM
temp 313.2°K/40.0°C, crit hot 400.2°K/127.0°C, \_TZ_.THRM
temp 313.2°K/40.0°C, crit hot 400.2°K/127.0°C, \_TZ_.THRM
^C
#
awesome ... yet again DTrace is as useful as a Swiss Army Knife and yet as
obscure as quantum physics.
would be cool to make an object file and link the functionality into a
tiny C program and then .. done. We have the temperature data that we
could not get before.
Getting an object/header file is easy.
# dtrace -`/usr/bin/isainfo -b` -h -o tzmon.h -H -s tzmon.d
# ls -lap tzmon.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 184 Oct 4 22:30 tzmon.h
# /bin/cat -n tzmon.h
1 /*
2 * Generated by dtrace(1M).
3 */
4
5 #ifndef _TZMON_H
6 #define _TZMON_H
7
8 #include unistd.h
9
10 #ifdef __cplusplus
11 extern C {
12 #endif
13
14
15 #ifdef __cplusplus
16 }
17 #endif
18
19 #endif /* _TZMON_H */
# dtrace -`/usr/bin/isainfo -b` -G -o tzmon.o -H -s tzmon.d
# ls -lap tzmon.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11912 Oct 4 22:34 tzmon.o
# file tzmon.o
tzmon.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable 80386 Version 1
# /usr/ccs/bin/mcs -p tzmon.o
tzmon.o:
@(#)SunOS 5.11 snv_121 November 2008
from here on .. it gets very murky. As clear as mud or quantum physics.
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca - Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org - Email related to open source for Solaris
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] priblemas de instalacion
es raro, te fijaste que tu maquina arranque del disco rigido virtual una vez que instalaste el opensolaris? 2009/9/27 claudio de jesus alberto...@hotmail.com: estoy instalando en virtual vox todo pasa bien el problema es que cuando reinicio la maquina virtual tengo que instalar el Sistema operativo de nuevo aoç¡unque se guardan todas mis configuraciones pero siempre pide lo mismo como si no se ubiera instalado el S.O yo baje de esta pagina la vercion 2009-06 -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SNV_124: Worth the Wait!!!
will we follow the trend and migrate from pidgin to what gnome uses these days? On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Calum Benson calum.ben...@sun.com wrote: On 24 Sep 2009, at 19:12, Cyril Plisko wrote: 2009/9/24 Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com: why is that? WAG: Gnome 2.28 Hmm. That would hardly be a 'surprise' (given that new GNOME releases are always integrated as soon as possible), and there isn't much in 2.28 that wasn't in 2.26. (Ironically, you're more likely to notice things that have gone in 2.28, rather than anything new...) Cheeri, Calum. -- CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland mailto:calum.ben...@sun.com OpenSolaris Desktop Team http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SNV_124: Worth the Wait!!!
why is that? On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:20 PM, ken mays maybird1...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, For our OpenSolaris distributors, this release may be worth the wait. I think we are in for a big suprise... ~ Ken Mays ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Adding new application to Indiana
check http://jucr.opensolaris.org/home/ On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Nischal nischal@sun.com wrote: Hi, I have created a GUI application that is used to configure PPPoE connection. Currently the project resides on the java.net website. Now I would like to see this application in future releases of OpenSolaris (naturally people would prefer this application to be on their CD, because they can't access Internet because their PPPoE connection has not been configured yet). I am new to contributing to OpenSolaris and I don't know anything about getting my application as a part of OpenSolaris release. I would really appreciate it if somebody could guide me through the process. regards, Nischal E Rao PS: the project can be found at: https://adsl-modem.dev.java.net/ -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Running 64 bit version of the OpenSolaris
uname doesnt report 32 bits because the output of uname is irrelevant for this this is not linux, there are no separate 64 and 32 bit versions, there is just one version, and the stuff that does not offer significant benefits compiled in 64 bit mode is left as a 32 bit application On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Husam Senussi hu...@senussi.com wrote: Hi, I have installed OpenSolaris in machine with Xeon E5450 which 64 bit, the kernel seems to be running as 64 bit is showing below but all the installed application are 32 bit. --- CPU info r...@core:~# psrinfo -vp The physical processor has 4 virtual processors (0 2 4 6) x86 (GenuineIntel 10676 family 6 model 23 step 6 clock 3000 MHz) Intel(r) Xeon(r) CPU E5450 @ 3.00GHz The physical processor has 4 virtual processors (1 3 5 7) x86 (GenuineIntel 10676 family 6 model 23 step 6 clock 3000 MHz) Intel(r) Xeon(r) CPU E5450 @ 3.00GHz -- Kernal info r...@core:~# isainfo -vk 64-bit amd64 kernel modules --- Application samples. r...@core:~# file /usr/bin/gcc /usr/bin/gcc: ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1 [FPU], dynamically linked, stripped r...@core:~# file /bin/sh /bin/sh: ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1 [FPU], dynamically linked, not stripped, no debugging information available So my question is shouldn't the installer install 64 bit version of the application, I also notices the uname report showing 32 bit. r...@core:~# uname -a SunOS core 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris I used this image for the installation osol-0906-x86.iso Thanks ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Recovering X server to a supported resolution
did you try removing the Xorg.conf file? X should autodetect most settings these days On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Guruprasad lgp171...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I wrongly changed the screen resolution in OpenSolaris 2009.06 to an unsupported one. Since then I have been unable to recover it. I tried stopping GDM and doing a Xorg -configure and then restarting GDM, but that doesn't help either. How do I go about correcting this? I know there must be an easy way to do this, but I can't figure it out. Thank you. Regards, Guruprasad. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How to delete files as dos 'del *.java /s' on command line
check man find, it is explained there
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Davidedavide.castell...@yahoo.it wrote:
thank you,
can you tell me what does it mean {} + ?
can you suggest me a tutorial or an online manual for beginners?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] j2ee
opensolaris has 2 application servers, tomcat and glassfish, eclipse and netbeans are available as IDEs On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:18 PM, philo neophilippe.poncebl...@orange.fr wrote: how inplementer j2ee in osol, which is the waiter d' application: tomcat, jrun,… are what eclipe exists with osol? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] I'm new to OpenSolaris and UNIX...
too early to tell On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:24 PM, John Jensenbsduse...@gmail.com wrote: What is the future of OpenSolaris now that Oracle is taking over Sun? Is it too early to tell yet? I've been looking at alternative to MS OSs and am using OpenSolaris Live CD right now. I must say I really like it and it seems to me to be the most responsive Live CD I've tried yet. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Unable to boot : No space left on device
boot with the livecd, import your pool and follow the workaround in here http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6664765 nacho On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:09 PM, vhizvahu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am in a bit of a situation. I am running OpenSolaris 2008.11 on an Intel machine. When I ran filebench (benchmark program), I got the error screen, saying that there were no resources remaining to create the files that filebench was trying to. I had to reboot the machine, and now it is failing because the disk is full. Filebench has this problem where it cannot detect this and stop. What can I do to get my system up and running? Thank you. Vish -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] access cifs share on open solaris machine with authentication from windows
i'm not sure how cifs deals with roles, and root is a role in opensolaris, can you try with another user? On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:56 AM, rudrorudro.chatter...@tcs.com wrote: I am unable to share cifs share on open solaris with authentication from windows machine. I followed the following steps # svcadm enable -r smb/server # zfs create tank/cifs0 # zfs set sharesmb=on tank/cifs # sharemgr show -vp default nfs=() zfs zfs/tank/cifs0 smb=() tank_cifs0=/tank/cifs0 r...@isv-x4500b # zfs set sharesmb=name=cifs0 tank/cifs0 r...@isv-x4500b # sharemgr show -vp default nfs=() zfs zfs/tank/cifs0 smb=() cifs0=/tank/cifs0 Set the name of the Workgroup. # smbadm join -w solcifs Successfully joined workgroup 'solcifs' Install the SMB PAM module Add the below line to the end of /etc/pam.conf: other password required pam_smb_passwd.so.1 nowarn In this whole process, this is the only time I have to edit a file, and this is a one off. Set/Change the Passwords for any Solaris User That Will be Used to Authenticate when Connecting to a CIFS share I will user root, but I could use any Solaris user the server knows about. # passwd root New Password: Re-enter new Password: passwd: password successfully changed for root With the SMB PAM module installed, this generates passwords that can be used by Windows as well as Solaris. This is a required step. From Windows, Map the Share From windows, the share is accessed via its UNC path: \\192.168.161.23\cifs0 -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle 10g on OpenSolaris (Solaris 5.11)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Robert Milkowskimi...@task.gda.pl wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Fredrich Maney wrote: 2009/8/12 Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com: -LU is now dead I hadn't heard this. Is this just a temporary issue due to IPS not supporting it? Or is this actually on the longterm roadmap? If so, what is the intended replacement for this functionality? se man beadm [...] -jumpstart is dead -no text based installer Both of these are very bad, and will prevent me from using OpenSolaris on any of my machines as none of them have a framebuffer/video card/keyboard/mouse and are all installed over the network. Text installer is in development. There is an Automated Installer in development which is suppose to replace jumpstart. -- I'm not interested in bashing opensolaris the distribution, I'm more interested in detailing the differences so we know what to expect. I know a lot of things are in the works, but none of them went through arc afaik last time I forgot about: - dtterm which is not available in opensolaris - sparse zones which are also not available in opensolaris nacho ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle 10g on OpenSolaris (Solaris 5.11)
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Glenn Lagasseglenn.laga...@sun.com wrote: * Anon Y Mous (music_anal...@yahoo.com) wrote: Did you try installing it on an Solaris Express Community Edition (SXCE)? I suspect Oracle products run better on Solaris Express than they do on OpenSolaris Indiana because Solaris Express has a user-land that is more traditional, like Solaris 10. The advantage of using SXCE over Solaris 10 is that SXCE has most of the same new cutting features that OpenSolaris Indiana has (Crossbow, etc.) while maintaining better backwards compatibility with Solaris 10 than OpenSolaris Indiana does: Please don't spread FUD. OpenSolaris ships with the exact same userland as Solaris Express (with some exceptions such as technologies which are being replaced, live upgrade for one). The only difference is the inclusion of GNU tools prepended to the default user's path. SXCE as previously communicated is going away. That isn't going to change. So, steering people towards using it at this time is a disservice imho. Why people think OpenSolaris is so much different from Solaris Express boggles my mind. The changes between the two (outside of Installation and packaging) are so minute as to be almost unmeasurable. people keep saying there are few changes, but nonne said which are those i can name only a few -/bin/sh is no longer solaris' sh -/bin/ksh is now ksh93 -the default shell for users is now bash (I'm not sure about this one) -the default PATH now includes the gnu tools on top (please, please, we need a switch in the installer for this, we cannot have a set of tools that do not support zfs acls and zfs) -the default crypto algorithm for password changed (it was still __unix__ last time i used SXCE which was a long time ago) -the default tool to manage packages is now pkg(5) -LU is now dead -some closed source drivers are not included -jumpstart is dead -no text based installer what else? nacho ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE end-of-life plans
is there a summary of the changes in indiana that have to go through arc? On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Che Kristoc...@opensolaris.org wrote: I assume by the security issue you are reffering to http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1945 http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4885 My understanding is that a fix for 4885 is targeted for indiana.next to get rid of the XP style admin by default On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: Glynn Foster glynn.fos...@sun.com wrote: Sun is announcing the intent to discontinue production of the Solaris Express Community Edition (SXCE) by the end of October time-frame. As we intend to continue on a bi-weekly build schedule, consolidations will move towards producing native Image Packaging System (IPS) packages alongside SVR4 packages and then phase out the latter completely. Technologies such as IPS, Automated Install, Snap Upgrade and the Distribution Constructor will be integrating into a consolidation after following through the established processes including architectural (ARC) review. I propose not to do this before there was a correct ARC review for all deviations in Indiana and not before there was a fix for all security problems that have been introduced with Indiana. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Ksplice equivalent?
There is always the solaris cluster if you want true high availability http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ha-clusters/ohac/ On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Jason Kingja...@ansipunx.net wrote: On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Brandon Barkerbrandon.bar...@gmail.com wrote: Brandon Barker Phone: (607) 262-6009 brandon.bar...@gmail.com http://brandon.barker.googlepages.com/home On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Alan Coopersmithalan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote: Or those that involve a change of the defined arguments to a function call, or similar ABI changes. I believe the cases for individual code changes to Solaris would be similar. Where this really breaks down is the patch model - what Linux kernel developers think of as a patch is a diff to the kernel sources to fix an issue - something you apply with the patch (or on Solaris gpatch) commands and then rebuild. Solaris kernel patches on the other hand are distributed as a set of all the binaries that changed since the last baseline (either the release of the OS, such as Solaris 10 in 2005, or the last rejuvenation round, when a kernel patch series was declared frozen, and a new one started that required you have the last one from the old series installed first as your baseline). If 12% of kernel changes require hand-tuning, and every Solaris kernel patch before long ends up with a hundred or more kernel changes, then you've got at least 12 kernel changes in each patch that require hand-tuning, and you've got a variety of previous versions that they could be patching up from, so you end up with 100% of Solaris kernel patches requiring hand-tuning to support hot patching, plus a complex test matrix to verify it correctly patches in from the various states you could patch from, resulting in longer, slower, more expensive test cycles before customers can get their fixes. Thanks for the clarification. Seeing as the kernel is open source now, I suppose the model for patch distribution could be changed in the future, though that might be a lot of work. Having the option of doing a hot-patch versus a reboot may be one route (and I suppose this is how linux currently works for ksplice enabled systems), but as you said this would still involve the same increase in testing. Its not really something I need, and I guess if there isn't demand for it, it remains one of those cool but unnecessary technologies that is just too much work to be practical. In the end, Sun found in practice that using Live Upgrade to install patches to another boot environment and limiting downtime to just long enough to reboot into that, was good enough, and a good deal less risky, for most customers. (Less risky, since not only do you avoid changing the running kernel, but you have the old boot environment to rollback if something goes wrong, without having to double the effort by having hot-unpatching, and know that if there is a need to reboot/power failure/panic/etc., you'll be running the same code/state without wondering if the installed image exactly matches the hot-patched in every single way.) I think this is a good argument for server usage, and it is almost always a better strategy for desktop users. In any case, at least I don't have to reboot after I install an update to adobe reader (cough cough, windows xp) ;-) Also, remember that now with fast reboot, the outage window is even shorter. I think between the two, you're going to have a solution that's 'good enough' while far less complex. -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering Brandon Barker wrote: Nice, I hadn't seen that in my quick google searches. My understanding was that 88% of the tested patches in linux could be applied without additional code being written; only those that require a change in data structures or boot-time initiliazation code would require code. Brandon Barker Phone: (607) 262-6009 brandon.bar...@gmail.com http://brandon.barker.googlepages.com/home On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Alan Coopersmithalan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote: Brandon Barker wrote: Is there a Solaris equivalent to ksplice in linux? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ksplice Sun developed similar technology years ago, but it never got deployed, since it required hand crafted kernel bits for each deployment to ensure you got bits that were compatible with the alreadyloaded kernel modules. http://blogs.sun.com/jimmo/entry/the_fate_of_hot_patching is the best public description I see of it. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Re: [osol-discuss] firefox 3.5 for OpenSolaris, where can i get them?
the dev branch of opensolaris has 3.5 i think On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Louis de Silvalouis.desi...@team.telstra.com wrote: hi all, i'm looking for FireFox 3.5 for OpenSolaris. Could not find them on the repository. Where can I find it and replace the one that comes with OSOL? Currently on OSOL, it is 3.1 Beta 3. Thanks. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] System will not suspend
try reboot -f dryrun after that check dmesg, that should tell you what driver has problems On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Gordongfreem...@gmail.com wrote: I'm running svn_111b and my system will not enter suspend mode. Mobo is an ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe, CPU is an AMD Athlon 64 and the video card is a GeForce 6600GT. When I press Suspend, the video display turns off and I think I can hear atleast one hard drive go into standby, but the system still stays up, fans don't slow at all so it's not fully suspending. It will not recover from this state either, the system needs a full reset to bring the display up again. I've disable the few devices that did not have drivers in the BIOS, and Device Driver Utility displays no problems. prtdiag and prtconf -D output is attached. # cat /etc/power.conf device-dependency-property removable-media /dev/fb S3-support enable autopm default autoS3 default cpu-threshold 1s # Auto-Shutdown Idle(min) Start/Finish(hh:mm) Behavior autoshutdown 30 9:00 9:00 noshutdown cpupm enable /var/adm/messages just displays System is being suspeded, no warnings or errors. Seems like this would have to be a driver issue somewhere? Perhaps one does not support suspending? It's pretty standard desktop hardware (if a little old) so I would have thought it would work fine. Anyone have an idea what the problem could be? Thanks in advance for any help here. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Network monitor display data throughput
with crossbow, i belive we have flowstat if flows were configured On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Harry Putnamrea...@newsguy.com wrote: Sivakumar Shanmugasundaram sivaku...@sun.com writes: Harry Putnam wrote: What do we have for opensolaris that can display the amount of data going through a network connection. I don't care if cmdline or gui but want to be able to see how many mb passes down the pipe in some time frame like minute or hour. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org 'netstat -i' does not help? It displays the number in packets though. exactly... and I'm not sure how to translate packets into mb. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] System will not suspend
Actually, that command checks whether the driver implements quiesce() which is needed to suspend and resume as well as fast reboot, it should tell you what drivers have problems, uadmin 3 22 worked in my laptop but suspend and resume didn't the problem was in masa's bfe driver which i no longer use, the new bfe driver doesnt work for me either and i filled a bug for it On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Jürgen Keiljrgn.k...@googlemail.com wrote: Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Gordongfreem...@gmail.com wrote: I'm running svn_111b and my system will not enter suspend mode. try reboot -f dryrun after that check dmesg, that should tell you what driver has problems Nope, that reboot command tests if the system is able to do a fast-reboot. To test suspend without entering ACPI S3 state you can use the uadmin 3 22 command. E.g. with a shell script like this (this also enables some extra suspend/resume debug output): # cat /usr/tmp/test-suspend #!/bin/sh /usr/sbin/pmconfig /usr/sbin/modload -p misc/cpr ( echo 'cpr_debug/W 3;' echo 'pm_debug/W 0x8000;' ) | mdb -wk /usr/sbin/sync; /usr/sbin/sync; /usr/sbin/sync /usr/sbin/uadmin 3 22 -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] System will not suspend
i stand corrected, i dont know why i thought it was required, i just checked quiesce(9E) and it only talks about fast reboot 2009/7/15 John Martin john.m.mar...@sun.com: Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote: Actually, that command checks whether the driver implements quiesce() which is needed to suspend and resume as well as fast reboot, quiesce() has nothing to do with S3 suspend/resume. A driver can support S3 s/r without implementing quiesce(). ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Trouble repairing boot-archive
have you tried booting from the live cd, importing the pool and recreating the archive there? nacho On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Benjamin Feuchterbenjamin.feuch...@gmx.de wrote: Hi all, my OpenSolaris 2009.06 file server had an power outage this morning. Now on restart I always get the message that boot-archive files don't match and that I should repair the archive with the svcadm command. I'd love to do that, but I can't login to system maintenance. Whether I boot in single-user mode or just boot up with the normal, I always end up with the prompt: Enter user name for system maintenance (control-d to bypass). And whatever user, root, or password I enter, I get the respond Login incorrect or user xyz not authorized. Anyone knows, what I'm doing wrong or what else I can try to repair the boot archive? Thanks, Ben -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] installation
yes, a lot of us run solaris in dell, ibm and even whitebox servers. if the hardware is more or less current, you should not have problems. On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:14 PM, mattiasm...@mjw.se wrote: i plan maybe to install solaris on a non solaris computer are it possible ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] /var/pkg/download
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Viktor Cemaskocema...@fibermail.hu wrote: Greetings, On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:39:01 +0200, Tony Curtis tony_curti...@yahoo.com wrote: Is it possible to clean up in there? Yep, you can delete all directories with hexadecimal names under /var/pkg/download IF you take in consideration: many, if not most, of the blocks will be consumed for older snapshots/BEs. You'll have to remove the snapshots, too -- beadm destroy would be the correct way to do that. *** If so, is there a correct way to do it e.g. through the pkg command? As I know, no. You can manually add the attribute to the section in /var/pkg/cfg_cache: flush-content-cache-on-success = True It will cause the client to cleanup the download cache directory (/var/pkg/download) upon successful completion of install and image-update operations. You can also change the flush-content-cache-on-success property from command line, so that after successful packaging operations, the cache will be purged: pfexec pkg set-property flush-content-cache-on-success True why is this not the default behaviour of the command? nacho Have a nice day! -- Üdvözlettel, http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/ Cemasko Viktor. http://www.opera.com/browser/ ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] grub //menu.lst
you might want to learn about pfexec and RBAC in solaris, it is both more powerful and better integrated than sudo in opensolaris On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:27 AM, philo neophilippe.poncebl...@orange.fr wrote: yes i have /rpool/boot/grub/menu.lst --- j' have to install the order sudo to change the rights of menu.lst but I am on a traditional user admin, the sudo t' has; it of the parrametres? i try sudo chmod 666 menu.lst i write my password and i have this message : admin is not in the sudoers file. this incident will be reported SY philo -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] ZFS snapshots versus Netapp snapshots
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Edward Ned Harvey sola...@nedharvey.com wrote: I wonder if this is just something people design for and live with? Or if perhaps there’s a better way to config my system, that somebody would care to suggest? I have the following ZFS filesystems: /share /share/users /share/users/eharvey (and a bunch of others) I shared /share via Samba. I mounted it from my windows laptop, and I’m browsing around working on stuff. I screw up some file, and I want to restore from snapshot. · In netapp: o I would just type in “.snapshot” in any subdirectory to access the snapshots for that directory · In zfs: o You go into the “.zfs” subdirectory, but you can’t do this from any old subdirectory. The “.zfs” subdirectory only exists as the direct child of the mountpoint. o I cannot restore my files by going to /share/.zfs because that filesystem doesn’t contain “eharvey” … That is, /share/.zfs only contains an empty subdirectory mountpoint “users” and the same is true for users. The directory /share/users/.zfs only contains the empty subdirectory “eharvey” o Given the above two points, the only correct way for me to access my snapshots is precisely /share/users/eharvey/.zfs The only correct answer is to browse to the hidden “.zfs” subdirectory of the deepest level subdirectory mountpoint in the path. o If you’re on a terminal and you know what you’re doing, you can figure out where the correct location is for the “.zfs” subdirectory. But if you’re just browsing via CIFS, there’s no way to know. You have to guess and check, starting with the deepest level and working your way upward until you find it. Is this the same behavior you guys have? Are you doing something smarter in your architecture than what I have done already? Thanks for your help… I believe samba has shadow copy support when the backing filesystem is ZFS[1] Also, solaris cifs server has support for shadow copies since build 106[2] That is the way to go with CIFS if you're using Windows clients imho. nacho [1] http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=267579 [2] http://204.152.191.100/wiki/index.php/What%27s_New_With_Solaris_CIFS ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] ZFS snapshots versus Netapp snapshots
2009/5/24 Edward Ned Harvey sola...@nedharvey.com: I believe samba has shadow copy support when the backing filesystem is ZFS[1] Also, solaris cifs server has support for shadow copies since build 106[2] That is the way to go with CIFS if you're using Windows clients imho. That would be cool - but it's not showing on my system - I am using samba, not sun cifs. Do you have to do anything special to enable it? Or perhaps it's just available in a later version (opensolaris) and not available in solaris 10u6 (solaris 10 10/08)? I haven't put any effort into finding these answers myself yet. Just thought you might know from the top of your head before I look around... I had already sent a link with an example, here is another one http://www.edplese.com/samba-with-zfs.html I believe it's just an extra samba module, so it should work in solaris 10 as well. nacho ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Sharinh ZFS/CIFS resources as guest or without password
you cannot do that yet i think, but there is a related ARC case to add the feature http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/164/ nacho On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Iban Nieto iban.ni...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all How I can share ZFS/CIFS resources without password, with 'guest' in the clients? I am using built-in CIFS that comes with OSOL, not the samba package. Thank you -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] pkg fix cannot fix pkg:/SUNWcsl
it seems like half my system was broken after this many upgrades (from osol beta 2 to the latest dev) and yes, i did hit the Warning: package may contain bobcat! (http://xkcd.com/325/) message :) nice guys na...@saturn:/opt$ pfexec pkg fix [..] Created ZFS snapshot: 2009-04-23-04:41:23 . // Repairing: pkg:/SUNWPython-extra Repairing: pkg:/SUNWad810 Repairing: pkg:/SUNWadixp Repairing: pkg:/SUNWafe Repairing: pkg:/SUNWapch Repairing: pkg:/SUNWckr Repairing: pkg:/SUNWcs Repairing: pkg:/SUNWcsd Repairing: pkg:/SUNWcsl Repairing: pkg:/SUNWcups Repairing: pkg:/SUNWgnome-vfs Repairing: pkg:/SUNWgnu-coreutils Repairing: pkg:/SUNWgrub Repairing: pkg:/SUNWintgige Repairing: pkg:/SUNWipkg-gui Repairing: pkg:/SUNWntp Repairing: pkg:/SUNWpc Repairing: pkg:/SUNWpm Repairing: pkg:/SUNWpsdcr Repairing: pkg:/SUNWpython-pyopenssl Repairing: pkg:/SUNWsfman Repairing: pkg:/SUNWusb Repairing: pkg:/SUNWvia823x Repairing: pkg:/SUNWxvm Repairing: pkg:/SUNWzfs-auto-snapshot Repairing: pkg://opensolaris.org/glassfishv2 DOWNLOADPKGS FILES XFER (MB) Completed 26/26 664/664 1.68/1.68 PHASEACTIONS Update Phase 73/678 Action upgrade failed for 'lib/libc.so.1' (pkg:/SUNWcsl): OSError: [Errno 16] Device busy Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/pkg, line 2475, in ? __ret = main_func() File /usr/bin/pkg, line 2438, in main_func return fix_image(img, pargs) File /usr/bin/pkg, line 375, in fix_image success = img.repair(repairs, progresstracker) File /usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py, line 751, in repair ip.execute() File /usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py, line 735, in execute p.execute_update(src, dest) File /usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py, line 265, in execute_update dest.install(self, src) File /usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py, line 197, in install portable.rename(temp, final_path) File /usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/portable/os_unix.py, line 197, in rename os.rename(src, dst) OSError: [Errno 16] Device busy pkg: This is an internal error. Please let the developers know about this problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the above traceback and this message. The version of pkg(5) is '05eb4fbadc69'. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] pkgadd
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Hanma dante...@mail.ru wrote: what kind of package there must be? please, read a solaris manual. SXCE packages are in SVR4 format, read pkgadd(1M), pkgrm(1M) for more information opensolaris 2008.11 are in pkg format, read pkg(5) for more information -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] uname -a ... 32bit vs 64bit
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Edward Ned Harvey sola...@nedharvey.com wrote: When I run uname -a it says: SunOS hostname 5.10 Generic_137138-09 i86pc i386 i86pc In the past, I've seen the system say x86_64 when you're 64bit. And I've also seen it say 32bit when you're 32bit. But now it says nothing, so I'm left confused. How can I know if my system is 64bit or 32bit anymore? isainfo -k uname -a in linux does say x86_64 or whatever ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] pkg(5) was Re: Possible IBM aquisition of Sun
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote: Moinak Ghosh wrote: On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Lurie y...@gmx.co.uk wrote: So modern Linux package managers do not have any of these qualities ? Some of them ? Of course. All of them ? No. Just a few points: 1. They usually upgrade a live system (and while it's possible for some to do a non-live upgrade, the live upgrade is exactly how pretty much all of them operate by default). Yes. But the separate boot environment pieces is what is delivered by ZFS + Caiman Installer, not a package manager feature per-se. Yes, but without integration with the package management system, they would be rather cumbersome to use. beadm is not hard to use even outside pkg(5), i've used it in the past to for example have an alternate BE that is xen able Relative. If one wants to benefit from open-sourcing then in the longer run, for some stuff, it is better to work with the community and try to utilize synergies with community run projects rather than doing everything in own way. The pkg(5) team has worked with the OpenSolaris community directly and invites any members that want to participate in its development to do so. The source code has been hosted on opensolaris.org publicly for a long time, and almost all discussions surrounding its design occur on the public pkg-discuss mailing list. Your primary gripe about IPS seems to be why didn't they just enhance another packaging system. You could ask that same question about thousands of other open source projects. There's a saying, when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. You seem to be looking at things the same way... Cheers, -Shawn ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] What is the OpenSolairs equivalent of...
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Chip D. Panarchy forumanar...@gmail.com wrote: Hello I am, some only recently, quite proficient with Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008, Windows 7, OpenSuSE, Fedora 10 and Ubuntu. I have all of the above Operating Systems (minus XP OpenSuSE) installed already, on my One-TB hard-drive. I am about to install both Solaris and OpenSolaris on my remaining partitions (as well as FreeBSD). So my questions to this forum is; [b]What are the Solaris/OpenSolaris equivalents to; - Apt-Get (or YUM) - Build-Essential (package for Ubuntu/Debian) - Audio/Music Players (with playlist) - MP3 codecs - SAMBA (pretty sure I can just install/compile this, right?) - Nautilus/Konquerer - GParted (for ZFS)[/b] I'd be grateful if you could answer any [or all] of my above questions. i'll assume that by opensolaris you mean opensolaris 2008.11 pkg is opensolaris' equivalent to apt or yum There is no real equivalent to the build-essential metapackage for opensolaris but you can install the gcc-dev package which provides the gcc and g++ compilers, cvs, gmake and a few other tools or the sunstudioexpress package which contains the sun studio compilers The mp3 plugins can be downloaded from fluendo for free, I think there is something called codenia that does part of the work for you but i've never used it myself Opensolaris provides both samba in the SUNWsmba package or a native, in-kernel cifs server in the SUNWsmbs and SUNWsmbskr packages Opensolaris has a 2.24 gnome with firefox as it's default browser and there is nothing like gparted for zfs As for music players, you have songbird which is one of the best there is nacho ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2008.11 and OpenGroup
http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/brand3493.htm On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:53 AM, M. Oliver Ghingold mega...@gmail.com wrote: According to OpenGroup's website, Solaris 10 for x86_64 systems was never registered with the OpenGroup for Unix 03 certification. No version of OpenSolaris has been registered, either. Has Sun broken compliance with some of the terms of the Single Unix Specification during the transition to x86_64? If so, are they being addressed? If not, why hasn't OpenSolaris been registered with the OpenGroup? Thanks. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] useradd
Authorizations are part of the RBAC framework in solaris, you might want to start reading there On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Hanma dante...@mail.ru wrote: I can't understand what to do to authorise the user. I can't understand this -A authorization One or more comma separated authorizations defined in auth_attr(4). Only a user or role who has grant rights to the authorization can assign it to an account. what I must to write after -A? Please give me an example. I searched everywhere, but i can't find what to write. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] useradd
if your user is called hanma you need to write passwd hanma you should really start thinking about getting a basic unix manual all these things are covered there On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Hanma dante...@mail.ru wrote: can you write me an example? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Ldom general info request
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:00 AM, MD mapoubell...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hi all, I saw that Sun is providing to Hypervisors : - xVM (not released, in beta, a fork from Xen on Solaris 10) - Ldom : But I can't find clear informations about it : Does Ldom runs on x86 and Sparc CPU ? Does Ldom only supported on Sun Hardware ? What are the supported guest OS on x86 ? What are the supported guest OS on sparc ? What are the functionnalities of LDOM (like Vmotion, load balancing , ) What are the public prices ? If Ldom runs of x86, what are the advantages vs xVM ? Thanks Regards -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org here is the documentation http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/coll/ldom1.1?l=en it runs only on the coolthreads servers (sparc t1/t2/t2+) i think only solaris and maybe linux are the supported guests nacho ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [ksh93-integration-discuss] [on-discuss] Emergency project to rescue Opensolaris from IBM (was: Re: Possible IBM aquisition of Sun)
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: Glenn Fowler g...@research.att.com wrote: J?rg, I don't recall if you were at the 1986 Denver usenix discussions that yielded pax, but the rancor of the tar/cpio discussions up to that point made it clear that a single tar or single cpio only solution would be impossible -- basically a hung jury I was judging from reading the POSIX drats from 1986 and 1987 and the final 1988 one. the pax interface was forged at a dinner atop some denver restaurant with thunder storms circling about the whole evening (probably some kind of daemonic omen) Today, pax is still only a standard but not loved by users. that next week I had the initial att research pax working for both the proposed standard cpio and tar formats (recall the standard initialily had both) unfortunately at that time it there was no opensource equivalent at att and a surprisingly narrow corridor between bell labs research and the commercial att unix organization -- I think the only major items to pass that way (after unix itself) were ksh and streams so the first public pax was Mark Colburn's Colburne's pax implementation is well known, I heard from the AST pax implemenation after I implemented POSIX.1-2001 extensions for star. I'm sure the venn diagram of star + att pax has many interesting properties with benefits for both implementations and the opensource community e.g., I'm sure that star handles some format implementations missed by att pax and vice versa -- that's no problem for att pax because at worse it would mean just another plugin, with no change to the main code (or possibility of interference with the already tested formats implemented by the other plugins) The last time I looked at AST pax, the only interesting feature was support for some more archive formats. The goal of star is different. The goal of star is to support intersting features and best performance for standard UNIX archive formats. AST pax misses all the features I use with star on a daily base. It may be that there are people that use the features from AST pax, but we would need to make a proper comparison in order to judge on the scope. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org why are we having this argument? I believe it leads nowhere. Any open source tool aiming to replace the closed bits should just go through formal review like the rest of the changes do. These discussions are a waste of time and bandwidth nacho ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [ksh93-integration-discuss] [on-discuss] Emergency project to rescue Opensolaris from IBM (was: Re: Possible IBM aquisition of Sun)
And what happened after the review was aprobed exactly? were test packages provided? someone at sun checked them for compliance and code review? why? why not? On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote: why are we having this argument? I believe it leads nowhere. Any open source tool aiming to replace the closed bits should just go through formal review like the rest of the changes do. These discussions are a waste of time and bandwidth star did pass such a review in 2004 already. Let us implement the star integration. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [ksh93-integration-discuss] [on-discuss] Emergency project to rescue Opensolaris from IBM (was: Re: Possible IBM aquisition of Sun)
This isnt very constructive either, it is also not true, wasnt he the one that created the first opensolaris distribution with schillix? i'd say that ia a fairly big contribution because i'm sure others built from that work. 2009/3/25 Jennifer Pioch piochjenni...@googlemail.com: On 3/25/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote: And what happened after the review was aprobed exactly? were test packages provided? someone at sun checked them for compliance and code review? why? why not? Jörg is only interested in trolling and vaporware announcements. He's never contributed code to opensolaris and I don't expect that he will ever contribute more than his FUD emails. Jenny -- Jennifer Pioch, Uni Frankfurt ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SMC smcwebserver @ OpenSolaris
SMC and smcwebserver were eoled if i recall corectly On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 1:43 PM, mike m...@mercuryrising.net wrote: Is there a reason these packages are only included on the DVD image, and not through one of the dev/release repositories? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] ZFS root filesystem / rollback on a running system!
you're not supposed to roll back like that, when you upgrade from one build to the next, the process creates a new boot environment (BE) and updates that instead, if you need to go back to how the things were before updating just reboot into the old BE. You can create BEs outside the update process with beadm(1M) On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Stephan Ferraro step...@ferraro.net wrote: I just needed to rollback my / partition on my running OpenSolaris system snv108. I was not sure if it would work because my / partition was mounted in read-write. When I executed zfs rollback -r mysnapshot, the system loaded a while and then hanged. I just saw with the virtual console switching an I/O error message. I pressed the RESET button on my PC and then I was able to start my old snapshot without any kind of problem! I found only a core file of the zfs command in /. There was written Bus error. I can try to reproduce this if somebody is interessted what is written in the core. OpenSolaris is a very powerful operating system. I did not know that it was so simple to rollback a running root-filesystem without any kind of dataloss! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] ZFS root filesystem / rollback on a running system!
beadm does all the cloning for you, it even adds an entry to grub On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:18 PM, stephan.ferraro stephan.ferr...@trashmail.net wrote: Am 10.03.2009 um 23:02 schrieb Ignacio Marambio Catán: you're not supposed to roll back like that, when you upgrade from one build to the next, the process creates a new boot environment (BE) and updates that instead, if you need to go back to how the things were before updating just reboot into the old BE. You can create BEs outside the update process with beadm(1M) I did not an official update. I damaged my root filesystem with a special script. However with beadm I can't add a snapshot, because its read-only. I suppose in this case I would need to clone the snapshot into a read-write filesystem and then add it with beadm? -- Best regards, Stephan FERRARO ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] Poor interactive performance under heavy system load
VM2.0? it's not the first time i've heard something like that, is there any information about it? On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Bart Smaalders bart.smaald...@sun.com wrote: Marion Hakanson wrote: erva...@gmail.com said: When the system is largly idle the gnome desktop feels fast and snappy, and interaction is very immediate. However, when I start a heavy background process (for instance a maven build of a large Java application), CPU utilization shoots to 100% on both CPU cores (which is good!), but my whole desktop becomes sluggish, even mouse movement becomes erratic. It's not necessarily CPU contention that's making things slow. My systems behave this way when RAM is short; Xorg or window-manager get paged out, and things get jerky/erratic. Our original prototype for the IA class back in the early 90s (!) did influence memory allocation, but this wasn't really tenable in a scheduling class. It did work very well, however. http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/cinci93/full_papers/evans.txt True control of RAM given to various processes awaits the VM2.0 project, which is currently underway. Attempts to correctly schedule memory use w/ the current VM system have been unsuccessful despite rather valiant efforts. - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance ba...@cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] Poor interactive performance under heavy system load
Those were the rumors i was talking about On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Bart Smaalders bart.smaald...@sun.com wrote: Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote: VM2.0? it's not the first time i've heard something like that, is there any information about it? http://osdir.com/ml/os.solaris.opensolaris.performance/2008-01/msg00024.html - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance ba...@cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] powertop
i'll ask before filling a bug, has anyone seen powertop return something like na...@saturn:~$ pfexec powertop OpenSolaris PowerTOP version 1.1 (C) 2008 Intel Corporation powertop: ../cpufreq.c : cpu-change-speed probe unavailable Collecting data for 5.00 second(s) After that all i see is OpenSolaris PowerTOP version 1.1 Cn Avg residency P-states (frequencies) C0 (cpu running)(32.4%) 1000 Mhz-NaN% C1 0.6ms (67.6%) 1333 Mhz-NaN% 1833 Mhz-NaN% Wakeups-from-idle per second: 1109.7interval: 5.2s Power usage (ACPI estimate): 0.001W (running on AC power, fully charged) Top causes for wakeups: 20.0% (222.1) kernel : genunix`cv_wakeup 9.6% (106.7)interrupt : i8042#0 9.0% (100.0) kernel : genunix`clock 5.3% ( 58.9) sched : cross calls 2.3% ( 25.7)interrupt : wpi#0 1.4% ( 15.2) kernel : uhci`uhci_handle_root_hub_status_change 0.9% ( 10.1) kernel : ata`ghd_timeout 0.9% ( 10.1) kernel : genunix`delay_wakeup 0.9% ( 10.1) kernel : bfe`gem_mii_link_watcher which is not really informative It was working properly till i decided it was time to update some drivers which included the bios and the dvd drive firmware nacho ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Nexenta's CEO blogging about 2009, OpenStorage, GPL, CDDL, etc
Sun owns the CDDL code you're talking about. They do not have the obligation to distribute the code even if it changes the CDDL's code they own On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Robert Milkowski mi...@task.gda.pl wrote: Hello Brian, Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 4:34:22 PM, you wrote: BU So, Evan Powell thinks that the CDDL says that all modifications must BU be contributed back to the original source of covered software. I BU would like someone to point to me where it says that. It does say that BU modifications of covered software must be made available in source BU code format, but I don't see anything about a requirement to resubmit BU the mods to the community from whence it came. BU I don't see the problem here. Eric says that most of the changes will BU be integrated into the gate. Evan seems to be reasonable about the BU time required and only is complaining about the fact that it isn't all BU the changes. Okay, given that Fishworks is a specific product, I think BU that some of the changes probably involve tuning, streamlining, and BU modifications to make the OS a better storage server at the expense of BU other features. In short, changes that are good for Fishworks in BU particular but would be bad for OpenSolaris in general. You wouldn't BU want those changes in OpenSolaris, would you? BU As long as the changes that are good for OpenSolaris are integrated, BU and the changes that are not good are made available in source form, BU then the Fishworks project has gone beyond the requirements of the BU CDDL and done the right thing. Of course, non-covered software has no BU such requirement at all. That makes sense. But I wonder - since Fishworks is being distributed by Sun where is all the source code available for all the changes to CDDL covered software? Except for the code which has already been integrated into ON. -- Best regards, Robert http://milek.blogspot.com ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] why gnu chmod in os2008.11?
How exactly? by modifying the gnu tools? including some gnu and some solaris tools where the later do not challenge the familiarity? or modifying solaris' tools? On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:51 PM, david.co...@sun.com wrote: i'm surprised that gnu chmod is installed, what are the advantages comparing to solaris chmod? It's very annoying when using ACLs. The default environment at the moment is to prefer the GNU tools as that is the more familiar environment for most developers and end-users; over time, the plan is to provide a unified set of tools, where possible, that is both familiar and fully supports OpenSolaris specific features. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] directory missing in rpool
check whether the zfs filesystem that has your /opt is mounted, I'm sure it isnt On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Dieter Kluenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have upgraded to OpenSolaris 2008.11 snv_101b_rc2 X86 Now my /opt directory is empty, that is, the mountpoint /opt is available but with 0 entries. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ll /opt total 0 If I call beadm mount opensolaris-3 /mnt all entries are available: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ll /mnt/opt total 50870 drwxr-xr-x 12 root bin 15 2008-09-04 09:41 csw drwxr-xr-x 31 root bin 50 2008-09-03 17:58 DTT drwxr-xr-x 9 root sys 17 2008-09-03 19:22 netbeans-6.0ss drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 8 2008-09-04 16:42 SunOpenDS_SE1.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52021705 2008-09-04 16:40 SunOpenDS_SE1.0.zip drwxr-xr-x 13 root sys 15 2008-09-03 19:23 SunStudioExpress drwxr-xr-x 8 root other 15 2008-09-04 10:47 SUNWjavadb drwxr-xr-x 4 root bin 5 2008-09-03 17:58 SUNWmlib zpool shows no errors [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ zpool status -x Pool: rpool Status: ONLINE scrub: Keine erforderlich config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 c3d0s0ONLINE 0 0 0 Fehler: Keine bekannten Datenfehler How ca I recover the /opt directory? -Dieter -- Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung http://dkluenter.de ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] directory missing in rpool
whats the output of zfs getprop rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-5/opt ? On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Dieter Kluenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dieter Kluenter wrote: Hi, I have upgraded to OpenSolaris 2008.11 snv_101b_rc2 X86 Now my /opt directory is empty, that is, the mountpoint /opt is available but with 0 entries. What does zfs list show? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT rpool 19,6G 51,3G62K /rpool rpool/ROOT19,2G 51,3G18K legacy rpool/ROOT/opensolaris15,6M 51,3G 4,67G legacy rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-1 559M 51,3G 4,65G /mnt rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-1/opt34K 51,3G 1,08G /mnt/opt rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-2 26,9M 51,3G 5,05G legacy rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-2/opt 209K 51,3G 1,08G /opt rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-3 70,9M 51,3G 6,71G /mnt rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-3/opt 153K 51,3G 1,08G /mnt/opt rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-4 1,63G 51,3G 5,88G legacy rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-4/opt 220K 51,3G 1,08G /opt rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-5 84,2M 51,3G 9,40G legacy rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-5/opt 220K 51,3G 1,19G /opt rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-6 16,8G 51,3G 9,70G /mnt rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-6/opt 1,77G 51,3G 1,19G /mnt/opt rpool/ROOT/opensolaris/opt 143K 51,3G 1,08G /opt rpool/export 399M 51,3G19K /export rpool/export/home 399M 51,3G 399M /export/home opensolaris-help would have been a better place to ask. OK, will do. -Dieter -- Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung http://dkluenter.de ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] directory missing in rpool
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Dieter Kluenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ignacio Marambio Catán [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: whats the output of zfs getprop rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-5/opt ? I love top quoting :-( But still [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ zfs getprop rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-5/opt Unbekannter Befehl 'getprop' That is, unknown command getprop sorry :) here we go again zfs get all rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-5/opt ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
