The Greatest Porn on the New : White girls
The Greatest Porn on the New : White girls blonde blue eyes Pink #1 http://www.newmember.com/cgi-bin/sexbucks/sexbucks.cgi?5013279 We promise you wont be sorry __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Greatest Porn on the New : White girls
The Greatest Porn on the New : White girls blonde blue eyes Pink #1 http://www.newmember.com/cgi-bin/sexbucks/sexbucks.cgi?5013279 We promise you wont be sorry __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] OpenSSL 0.9.6 for Mac OS X
I think that I've successfully ported OpenSSL 0.9.6 to Mac OS X. The libraries for version 0.9 of OpenSSL are installed in Mac OS X by default, but they do not include header files or source code. This patch will allow you to perform a complete install of OpenSSL that you can use to build other applications. Note that Apple's version of OpenSSL is built as a pair of dynamic shared libraries, and because Apple's linker prefers dynamic libraries to static ones, this means that you basically have to build the new version of OpenSSL as a dynamic shared library. It also means that you must install the new dynamic shared libraries before you can test your installation. My recommendation is to install OpenSSL into /usr/local/lib, which falls earlier in the default Mac OS X search path than the /usr/lib that Apple uses. This allows you to use your own build of OpenSSL without removing Apple's version. I haven't automated the installation of the dynamic shared libraries yet, so the installation sequence looks like this: ./config --prefix=/usr/local --openssldir=/usr/local/ssl shared threads make sudo make install sudo cp -R *.dylib /usr/local/lib make test With a little more work, I'm sure that the installation process could be better automated, but I haven't had time to figure out the Makefile enough to do this without breaking other platforms. Please send any comments or questions on this patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. --Stuart A. Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Llamagraphics, Inc. Creators of Life Balance software for Palm OS http://www.llamagraphics.com/ macosx.patch
You have recieved a instant kiss from Amy 3
You have recieved a instant kiss from Amy 3 click here to recieve it www.xooma.cjb.net Your Instant Kiss Password is "pup1" __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have recieved a instant kiss from Amy 3
You have recieved a instant kiss from Amy 3 click here to recieve it www.xooma.cjb.net Your Instant Kiss Password is "pup1" __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have recieved a instant kiss from Amy 3
You have recieved a instant kiss from Amy 3 click here to recieve it www.xooma.cjb.net Your Instant Kiss Password is "pup1" __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have recieved a instant kiss from Amy 3
You have recieved a instant kiss from Amy 3 click here to recieve it www.xooma.cjb.net Your Instant Kiss Password is "pup1" __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have recieved a instant kiss from Amy 3
You have recieved a instant kiss from Amy 3 click here to recieve it www.xooma.cjb.net Your Instant Kiss Password is "pup1" __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[STATUS] OpenSSL (Sun 18-Mar-2001)
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at __ $Date: 2001/02/22 15:10:11 $ DEVELOPMENT STATE o OpenSSL 0.9.7: Under development... o OpenSSL 0.9.6a: Bugfix release -- under development... o OpenSSL 0.9.6: Released on September 24th, 2000 o OpenSSL 0.9.5a: Released on April 1st, 2000 o OpenSSL 0.9.5: Released on February 28th, 2000 o OpenSSL 0.9.4: Released on August09th, 1999 o OpenSSL 0.9.3a: Released on May 29th, 1999 o OpenSSL 0.9.3: Released on May 25th, 1999 o OpenSSL 0.9.2b: Released on March 22th, 1999 o OpenSSL 0.9.1c: Released on December 23th, 1998 RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS o AVAILABLE PATCHES o IN PROGRESS o Steve is currently working on (in no particular order): ASN1 code redesign, butchery, replacement. OCSP EVP cipher enhancement. Enhanced certificate chain verification. Private key, certificate and CRL API and implementation. Developing and bugfixing PKCS#7 (S/MIME code). Various X509 issues: character sets, certificate request extensions. o Geoff and Richard are currently working on: ENGINE (the new code that gives hardware support among others). o Richard is currently working on: UTIL (a new set of library functions to support some higher level functionality that is currently missing). Shared library support for VMS. OCSP Kerberos 5 authentication Constification NEEDS PATCH o apps/ca.c: "Sign the certificate?" - "n" creates empty certificate file o OpenSSL_0_9_6-stable: #include openssl/e_os.h in exported header files is illegal since e_os.h is suitable only for library-internal use. o Whenever strncpy is used, make sure the resulting string is NULL-terminated or an error is reported OPEN ISSUES o crypto/ex_data.c is not really thread-safe and so must be used with care (e.g., extra locking where necessary, or don't call CRYPTO_get_ex_new_index once multiple threads exist). The current API is not suitable for everything that it pretends to offer. o The Makefile hierarchy and build mechanism is still not a round thing: 1. The config vs. Configure scripts It's the same nasty situation as for Apache with APACI vs. src/Configure. It confuses. Suggestion: Merge Configure and config into a single configure script with a Autoconf style interface ;-) and remove Configure and config. Or even let us use GNU Autoconf itself. Then we can avoid a lot of those platform checks which are currently in Configure. o Support for Shared Libraries has to be added at least for the major Unix platforms. The details we can rip from the stuff Ralf has done for the Apache src/Configure script. Ben wants the solution to be really simple. Status: Ralf will look how we can easily incorporate the compiler PIC and linker DSO flags from Apache into the OpenSSL Configure script. Ulf: +1 for using GNU autoconf and libtool (but not automake, which apparently is not flexible enough to generate libcrypto) o The perl/ stuff needs a major overhaul. Currently it's totally obsolete. Either we clean it up and enhance it to be up-to-date with the C code or we also could replace it with the really nice Net::SSLeay package we can find under http://www.neuronio.pt/SSLeay.pm.html. Ralf uses this package for a longer time and it works fine and is a nice Perl module. Best would be to convince the author to work for the OpenSSL project and create a Net::OpenSSL or Crypt::OpenSSL package out of it and maintains it for us. Status: Ralf thinks we should both contact the author of Net::SSLeay and look how much effort it is to bring Eric's perl/ stuff up to date. Paul +1 WISHES o __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 0.9.6 for Mac OS X
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: Could you take a look at ftp://ftp.openssl.org/snapshot/openssl-SNAP-2001031?.tar.gz? There were some darwin patches inserted there some time ago. I just downloaded openssl-SNAP-200103117.tar.gz and tried the Darwin support in it. Unfortunately, it doesn't build cleanly under Mac OS X release candidate. The link of openssl dies with about 50 undefined symbols. Based on what I'm seeing in the Configure file, I'm guessing that Brad Dominy (who wrote the Darwin support in the SNAP) was using raw Darwin rather than full Mac OS X. In the long run, it may be necessary to distinguish between the two platforms, although I'd guess that very soon now (like on March 24) the Mac OS X support is going to become more important than the raw Darwin support. I'll contact Brad Dominy by email. Perhaps the two of us can hash out the differences and come up with a unified Darwin configuration that works for everybody -- or at least a way of distinguishing the two cases so that config selects the right one automatically. Thanks, --Stuart A. Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RSA Key Generation and Entropy
Title: RSA Key Generation and Entropy This email is to be read subject to the disclaimer below. Hi, I'm having trouble generating unique pairs of RSA keys. It seems that no matter how many times and with what kind of data I add using RAND_add, the same keys get generated over and over again. If I generate a particular key set, then 2 or 3 key sets later a memcmp confirms it and the original match. I currently generate a large number of GUIDs and add them with RAND_add. Every call to RAND_status returns 1 (indicating enough entropy) then I call RSA_generate_key and compare the private key to previous only to find they match. What order of function calls should be made to generate unique keys? Also, what is the best way to ensure enough entropy on a win32 machine without the /dev/random? Any help or sample key generation code would be extremely helpful. David The contents of this message are the views of the Author and do not necessarily reflect the views of PARKERS' EDGE PTY LIMITED. __ Unencrypted electronic mail is not secure and may not be authentic. If you have any doubts as to the contents please telephone to confirm. This electronic transmission is intended only for those to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is confidential, privileged or exempt from disclosure by law. Any claim to privilege is not waived or lost by reason of mistaken transmission of this information. If you are not the intended recipient you must not distribute or copy this transmission and should please notify the sender. Your costs for doing this will be reimbursed by the sender. Parkers' Edge +61 2 9249 8900 __
Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 0.9.6 for Mac OS X
From: "Stuart A. Malone" [EMAIL PROTECTED] samalone I'll contact Brad Dominy by email. Perhaps the two of us samalone can hash out the differences and come up with a unified samalone Darwin configuration that works for everybody -- or at least samalone a way of distinguishing the two cases so that config selects samalone the right one automatically. That would be really great. Thank you. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvgen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/ for more info. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[OFF TOPIC]Data compression
Hello you all, Sorry for the noise, but I'm currently planning a brief explanation of SSL/TLS for my Master cryto course and I have a very specific question to ask you, as I don't want to say anything wrong. I know that OpenSSL implements data compression, and I figure it's done before any cryptographic operation (compressing mostly noise leads to almost nothing). My question is : does compression occurs before MAC is computed or later on both data-chunks and their MAC ? I'l try to find some time to go to the sources, but having this answered quickly would save me a lot of time. Again, sorry for the noise and thank you for your time, Sincerly, Franois __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
