Re: Re: [openssl.org #1521] bug report
Hi Dmitri, I guess you have raised this issue. I am also facing the same issue with the x86_64 Linux. Did your problem got resolved? If yes please let me know the solution for it. Thanks!! With Best Regards Rahul -- This message was sent on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] at openSubscriber.com http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/openssl-dev@openssl.org/6758716.html __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #1455] Solution (was: Re: Weird OpenSSL behaviour on connecting to W2k3-LDAPS [LONG])
Hello, George Heeres wrote: Thanks for getting back to me. I contacted another user that had responded to a similar problem and mentioned a patch. He presented me the following information: The problem is actually with Windows and not with OpenSSL libraries; the KB article is here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/910485/en-us 2k3 SP2 did actually fix the problem ... if you have premier support though I'm sure they'd send you a hotfix if you aren't able to move to SP2 right away. So essentially it looks like a Windows / Microsoft bug which has been addressed / fixed in Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2. So essentially the solution appears to be: Windows 2003 Servers - Install Service Pack 2 Windows 2000 Servers - Need to regenerate SSL key using 1024 bits instead of 4096 bits. Thanks for that Information - I (hopefully) added this reply to the Request-Tracker, so that maybe the Request can be closed, or others who encounter the problem will find this solution. bye Christian -- Christian Margmail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Dezernat 2 TU Clausthal web : http://www.tu-clausthal.de D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld fon : 05323/72-2107 Germany jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[PATCH] util/mk1mf.pl install target
Hi,
when trying to use the install target of a mk1mf generated Makefile foudn that
this breaks because there's a copy line which uses Unix syntax, and I would
like to ask two questions:
1) since mk1mf.pl is meant for Win32 usage only, why is there Unix shell syntax
used?
2) the line in question should only copy headers to the include folder, why are
C files specified too?
I would like to propose this patch:
--- util/mk1mf.pl.orig Wed Nov 28 00:45:40 2007
+++ util/mk1mf.pl Thu Nov 29 04:05:50 2007
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@
\$(MKDIR) \$(INSTALLTOP)${o}include
\$(MKDIR) \$(INSTALLTOP)${o}include${o}openssl
\$(MKDIR) \$(INSTALLTOP)${o}lib
- \$(CP) \$(INCO_D)${o}*.\[ch\] \$(INSTALLTOP)${o}include${o}openssl
+ \$(CP) \$(INCO_D)${o}*.h \$(INSTALLTOP)${o}include${o}openssl
\$(CP) \$(BIN_D)$o\$(E_EXE)$exep \$(INSTALLTOP)${o}bin
\$(CP) apps${o}openssl.cnf \$(INSTALLTOP)
$extra_install
thanks, Guenter.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
