Re: What to do so the C implementation of sha1_block_data_order is taken.

2014-01-10 Thread Eric J. Van der Velden 
Dear Steve,

Thanks. It works. I also see how it works.

Eric J.


On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.orgwrote:

 On Thu, Jan 09, 2014, Eric J. Van der Velden wrote:

  There is a asm and a C implementation of sha1_block_data_order, in
  sha256-x86_64.s and in sha1dgst.c  When I do,
 
  $ gdb openssl
  (gdb) r dgst -sha1 data.txt
 
  I see that the asm implementation is taken. What do I have to do so the C
  implementation is taken?
 

 Configure OpenSSL with no-asm.

 Steve.
 --
 Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
 Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org
 __
 OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
 User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
 Automated List Manager   majord...@openssl.org

What to do so the C implementation of sha1_block_data_order is taken.

2014-01-09 Thread Eric J. Van der Velden 
There is a asm and a C implementation of sha1_block_data_order, in
sha256-x86_64.s and in sha1dgst.c  When I do,

$ gdb openssl
(gdb) r dgst -sha1 data.txt

I see that the asm implementation is taken. What do I have to do so the C
implementation is taken?

Thanks,

Eric J.