Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting time.

2015-03-17 Thread Cindy Pallares

+1 for consistent time and a slightly higher preference for 1500 UTC

On 03/17/2015 02:15 AM, Koniszewski, Pawel wrote:

+1 for consistent time (I prefer 1400UTC)

*From:*Fei Long Wang [mailto:feil...@catalyst.net.nz]
*Sent:* Sunday, March 15, 2015 9:00 PM
*To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance
meeting time.

+1 for consistent time

On 14/03/15 10:11, Nikhil Komawar wrote:

Here's what it looks like so far:-

1400UTC: 3 votes (all core reviewers)

1500UTC: 5 votes (one core reviewer)

Both: 4 votes (all core reviewers)

Let's wait another couple days to see if more people respond.

I have a feeling that the weight is slightly tilted towards 1400UTC
based on a few assumptions about the past activity of those
participants, their cross project inputs, etc.

Thanks,
-Nikhil



*From:*Mikhail Fedosin mfedo...@mirantis.com
mailto:mfedo...@mirantis.com
*Sent:* Friday, March 13, 2015 3:07 PM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance
meeting time.

Both options are good, it's a little better at 1500 UTC.

+1 consistent time.

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Steve Lewis
steve.le...@rackspace.com mailto:steve.le...@rackspace.com wrote:

+1 consistent time

+1 for 1500 UTC since that has come up.

On 09/03/15 09:07, Nikhil Komawar wrote:

So, the new proposal is:
Glance meetings [1] to be conducted
weekly on
Thursdays at 1400UTC [2] on
#openstack-meeting-4


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




__

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Unsubscribe:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe  
mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



--

Cheers  Best regards,

Fei Long Wang (王飞龙)

--

Senior Cloud Software Engineer

Tel: +64-48032246

Email:flw...@catalyst.net.nz  mailto:flw...@catalyst.net.nz

Catalyst IT Limited

Level 6, Catalyst House, 150 Willis Street, Wellington

--



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

2015-01-05 Thread Cindy Pallares

Hi all,

I would like to re-open the discussion on IRC logging for the glance 
channel. It was discussed on a meeting back in November[1], but it 
didn't seem to have a lot of input from the community and it was not 
discussed in the mailing list. A lot of information is exchanged through 
the channel and it isn't accessible for people who occasionally come 
into our channel from other projects, new contributors, and people who 
don't want to be reached off-hours or don't have bouncers. Logging our 
channel would  increase our community's transparency and make our 
development discussions publicly accessible to contributors in all 
time-zones and from other projects. It is very useful to look back on 
the logs for previous discussions or as well as to refer people to 
discussions or questions previously answered.



--Cindy

[1] 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2014/glance.2014-11-13-20.03.log.html


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

2015-01-05 Thread Cindy Pallares

I've made a patch, we can vote on it there.

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145025/


On 01/05/2015 11:15 AM, Amrith Kumar wrote:

I think logging the channel is a benefit even if, as Nikhil points out, it is 
not an official meeting. Trove logs both the #openstack-trove channel and the 
meetings when they occur. I have also had some conversations with other ATC's 
on #openstack-oslo and #openstack-security and have found that the eavesdrop 
logs at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/ to be invaluable in either bug 
comments or code review comments.

The IRC channel is an integral part of communicating within the OpenStack 
community. The use of foul language and other inappropriate behavior should be 
monitored not by admins but by other members of the community and called out 
just as one would call out similar behavior in a non-virtual work environment. 
I submit to you that profanity and inappropriate conduct in an IRC channel 
constitutes a hostile work environment just as much as it does in a non-virtual 
environment.

Therefore I submit to you that there is no place for such behavior on an IRC 
channel irrespective of whether it is logged or not.

Thanks,

-amrith

| -Original Message-
| From: Morgan Fainberg [mailto:morgan.fainb...@gmail.com]
| Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 11:58 AM
| To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
| Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging
|
|
|
|  On Jan 5, 2015, at 08:07, Nikhil Komawar nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com
| wrote:
| 
|  Based on the feedback received, we would like to avoid logging on the
| project channel. My take from the discussion was that it gives many a
| folks a feeling of informal platform to express their ideas freely in
| contrast to the meeting channels.
| 
|  However, at the same time I would like to point out that using foul
| language in the open freenode channels is a bad practice. There are no
| admins monitoring our project channels however, those channels that are
| monitored have people kicked out on misbehavior.  The point being, no
| logging means freedom of thought for only the creative purposes; please
| do not take me any other way.
| 
|  Thanks,
|  -Nikhil
| 
|
| I just want to point out that keystone has logging enabled for our channel
| and I do not see it as a hamper to creative discussion / open discussion.
| The logging is definitely of value. Also a lot of people will locally log
| a given irc channel, which largely nets the same result.
|
| It is still not an official meeting, and we have heated debates at times,
| the logging let's us check back on things discussed outside of the
| official meetings. I do admit it is used less frequently than the meeting
| logs.
|
| --Morgan
|
| Sent via mobile
|  
|  From: Anita Kuno [ante...@anteaya.info]
|  Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 10:42 AM
|  To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
|  Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging
| 
|  On 01/05/2015 06:42 AM, Cindy Pallares wrote:
|  Hi all,
| 
|  I would like to re-open the discussion on IRC logging for the glance
|  channel. It was discussed on a meeting back in November[1], but it
|  didn't seem to have a lot of input from the community and it was not
|  discussed in the mailing list. A lot of information is exchanged
|  through the channel and it isn't accessible for people who
|  occasionally come into our channel from other projects, new
|  contributors, and people who don't want to be reached off-hours or
|  don't have bouncers. Logging our channel would  increase our
|  community's transparency and make our development discussions
|  publicly accessible to contributors in all time-zones and from other
|  projects. It is very useful to look back on the logs for previous
|  discussions or as well as to refer people to discussions or questions
| previously answered.
| 
| 
|  --Cindy
| 
|  [1]
|  http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2014/glance.2014-11-13
|  -20.03.log.html
| 
| 
|  ___
|  OpenStack-dev mailing list
|  OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
|  http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
|  Hi Cindy:
| 
|  You might want to consider offering a patch (you can use this one as
|  an
|  example: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138965/2) and anyone with a
|  strong perspective can express themselves with a vote and comment.
| 
|  Thanks,
|  Anita.
| 
|  ___
|  OpenStack-dev mailing list
|  OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
|  http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
| 
|  ___
|  OpenStack-dev mailing list
|  OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
|  http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
|
| ___
| OpenStack-dev mailing list
| OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
| http

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Triage Bug Day Today!

2014-09-11 Thread Cindy Pallares

Hi Folks!

Glance is having its bug triage day today! Please help out if you can. 
You can check out the tasks here:


http://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glancebugday

Also here are some handy links to the untriaged bugs in glance and the 
client:


https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bugs?field.searchtext=orderby=-importancesearch=Searchfield.status%3Alist=NEWassignee_option=anyfield.assignee=field.bug_reporter=field.bug_commenter=field.subscriber=field.structural_subscriber=field.tag=field.tags_combinator=ANYfield.has_cve.used=field.omit_dupes.used=field.omit_dupes=onfield.affects_me.used=field.has_patch.used=field.has_branches.used=field.has_branches=onfield.has_no_branches.used=field.has_no_branches=onfield.has_blueprints.used=field.has_blueprints=onfield.has_no_blueprints.used=field.has_no_blueprints=on

https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/+bugs?field.searchtext=orderby=-importancesearch=Searchfield.status%3Alist=NEWassignee_option=anyfield.assignee=field.bug_reporter=field.bug_commenter=field.subscriber=field.structural_subscriber=field.tag=field.tags_combinator=ANYfield.has_cve.used=field.omit_dupes.used=field.omit_dupes=onfield.affects_me.used=field.has_patch.used=field.has_branches.used=field.has_branches=onfield.has_no_branches.used=field.has_no_branches=onfield.has_blueprints.used=field.has_blueprints=onfield.has_no_blueprints.used=field.has_no_blueprints=on



-Cindy

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Glance] Triage Bug Day on Thursday Sept 11

2014-09-04 Thread Cindy Pallares

Hi Folks!

Glance is going to have a bug day on Thursday, 9/11. During that day we 
are asking people to take a break from feature work and help fix and/or 
review glance and glanceclient bugs for the day. As of today, glance has 
109 unconfirmed (marked new) bugs out of 157 open bugs. It would be 
great to bring those numbers down and close down some old bugs. As 
usual, we will be hanging out on #openstack-glance.


I've created an etherpad with tasks and links to the launchpad bugs that 
need to be updated. You can add your IRC name to the etherpad if you'd 
like to participate in our bug day.


http://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glancebugday

We can check our progress afterwards on http://status.openstack.org/bugday


--Cindy Pallares


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Mentor program?

2014-07-23 Thread Cindy Pallares

On 07/23/2014 01:02 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
 On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com
 wrote:

 Hi all,

 I was reading over a IMHO insightful hacker news thread last night:

 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8068547

 Labeled/titled: 'I made a patch for Mozilla, and you can do it too'

 It made me wonder what kind of mentoring support are we as a community
 offering to newbies (a random google search for 'openstack mentoring' shows
 mentors for GSoC, mentors for interns, outreach for women... but no mention
 of mentors as a way for everyone to get involved)?

 Looking at the comments in that hacker news thread, the article itself it
 seems like mentoring is stressed over and over as the way to get involved.

 Has there been ongoing efforts to establish such a program (I know there
 is training work that has been worked on, but that's not exactly the same).

 Thoughts, comments...?

 I'll let Stefano answer further, but yes, we've discussed a centralized
 mentoring program for a year or so. I'm not sure we have enough mentors
 available, there are certainly plenty of people seeking and needing
 mentoring. So he can elaborate more on our current thinking of how we'd
 overcome the imbalance and get more centralized coordination in this area.

 Thanks,
 Anne

Mozilla also has mentored bugs system which provide a mentor who
commits to helping a newbie get a single bug fixed. It would be nice to
have that in OpenStack. It would also be a great way for people to get
their feet wet in mentoring or who don't want to commit themselves too
much.

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [marconi] Proposal to add Fei Long Wang (flwang) as a core reviewer

2014-03-03 Thread Cindy Pallares
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Kurt Griffiths 
kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi folks, I’d like to propose adding Fei Long Wang (flwang) as a 
core reviewer on the Marconi team. He has been contributing regularly 
over the past couple of months, and has proven to be a careful 
reviewer with good judgment.


All Marconi ATC’s, please respond with a +1 or –1.

Cheers,
Kurt G. | @kgriffs | Marconi PTL



+1
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev