Re: Ultimate solution

2007-03-28 Thread JT
Is it really that difficult to test if active content is disabled?
The Tor software should not work(i.e. the start tor button should not
be clickable) if the user hasn't deactivated Javascript, Flash, Java,
etc.
Is this difficult do implement? There are not too many browsers.
-- 
  JT
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and
  love email again



Please don't recommend Tor Button!

2007-03-28 Thread JT
Hi,

recommending the Tor Button is a security/anonymity hazard. Clicking on
the Tor button will automatically remove the ftp and gopher proxy in
firefox for example. (Would the author of Tor button also set the other
protocols to use Tor if we asked him?) A better way is to create two
different OS users and leave the Tor user account with all browser proxy
settings permanently. This also solves the cookie problem as anonymous
and non-anonymous surfing isn't mixed.

Also please advise the user to make www.whatismyip.com as the homepage
of the browser in the Tor OS account. So he can see what is active
before he starts  surfing.
-- 
  JT
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an
  unladen european swallow



Please RTM!...Re: Please don't recommend Tor Button!

2007-03-28 Thread light zoo

--- JT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 recommending the Tor Button is a security/anonymity
 hazard. Clicking on
 the Tor button will automatically remove the ftp
 and gopher proxy in firefox for example. 

These are not used with Tor and that is why the port
is zero.  TorButton is a great extension, it is
configured correctly and the Tor devs. recommend it,
as do I.

Please read up on Tor before sending emails to the
list, it can confuse people.

Regards


 

We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love 
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265 


Re: Please RTM!...Re: Please don't recommend Tor Button!

2007-03-28 Thread light zoo

--- Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Could you post a pointer to the part of the Tor
 documentation that you're referring to?

If I have time today, yes. There is a wiki entry
stating those need to be set to break. 

I was referring to the fact it is suggested is set
those so they'll break, I wasn't specifically
referring to TorButton.  

 The relevant parts of the documentation that
 I'm aware of recommend to set the gopher and
 ftp proxy settings to Privoxy, to make sure
 those requests fail instead of bypassing Tor:

Maybe I was overly harsh then, I can see where the
confusion may came from if someone read these
sections.  If one thought you _had_ to follow the old
directions above then yes, it would seem like
TorButton is mis-configured.

 If the Tor button extension would indeed
 remove these settings permanently, I'd consider
 JT's concerns valid.

TorButton handles these correctly and does not route
them into Privoxy, it just breaks them with a zero
port...which is what was recommended by the Tor devs.
when Scott Squires when building TorButton (as far I
as remember).  

There is no need set those up to go into Privoxy if
the port is zero.

Regards




 

Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 


Update Tor doc [Was:Re: Please don't recommend Tor Button!]

2007-03-28 Thread light zoo

--- light zoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Maybe I was overly harsh then, I can see where the
 confusion may came from if someone read these
 sections.  If one thought you _had_ to follow the
 old directions above then yes, it would seem like
 TorButton is mis-configured.

So maybe http://tor.eff.org/docs/tor-doc-web.html.en
should be updated to refelect the TorButton settings
to prevent this type of confusion in the future?

Regards,



 

Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 


Re: Re[2]: Ultimate solution

2007-03-28 Thread Michael_google gmail_Gersten

2. Where will this be displayed, and who is going to read it? (Simple usage 
instructions)


On the download page. On the Configure Privacy page. When you get
By default, all scripting is blocked. Click here to configure safety
level of scripting on the second or third web page you go to.


3. Why keep any cookies at all after a session? (Common cookies for the 
tracking sites)


After a session? How long do your sessions last? Mine last days.


6. I especially like #6, now how to we get the tor network to route this
as an exit node?


It's my understanding that if you want a connection to x.y.z.t:p, and
x.y.z.t is running a tor node that permits exit on p, then you are
guaranteed to use x.y.z.t as your exit node.

What about Even if I'm just a middleman node? Does it still permit
local exit? (I don't know).

What about a trivial setup for Allow anything to exit on my node. Or
even just Allow web / ftp / SSH / secure mail (or whatever other
checkboxes are wanted) to exit on my node, without any bandwidth
sharing for the network (litterally, just an exit-only configuration
to help others who are using tor. 100% secure, encrypted communication
without having to purchase an SSL certificate for your web site, or
having to deal with the Do I need to translate this address to
add/remove www. at the beginning, all to keep their browser from
complaining, and redo that every year?.


Re: Please don't recommend Tor Button!

2007-03-28 Thread Michael_google gmail_Gersten

On 3/28/07, H D Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

If they use the decloak portal instead, I can add tests for Gopher and FTP
as well:

http://metasploit.com/research/misc/decloak/index.html


What is this page supposed to return/tell me? I went there, hit Start
test, got my Java console, saw some java activity, and then nothing
more. No web page popped up with my results, nothing.


Re: Please RTM!...Re: Please don't recommend Tor Button!

2007-03-28 Thread Fabian Keil
light zoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  If the Tor button extension would indeed
  remove these settings permanently, I'd consider
  JT's concerns valid.
 
 TorButton handles these correctly and does not route
 them into Privoxy, it just breaks them with a zero
 port...which is what was recommended by the Tor devs.
 when Scott Squires when building TorButton (as far I
 as remember).  
 
 There is no need set those up to go into Privoxy if
 the port is zero.

Is that a guess or did you actually verify that?
If you did, which Firefox version were you using?

At least for:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070306 
Firefox/2.0.0.2
proxy port 0 means ignore the proxy IP and use a direct
connection. I would be very surprised if the behaviour
would be platform-dependent.

Fabian


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Please don't recommend Tor Button!

2007-03-28 Thread Jason Edwards
Ummm... So do I need to change to Torbutton preferences from the default 
settings?


Jay


--- Roger Dingledine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Torbutton automatically sets that, so now when 
things default to your socks proxy, it's still

 safe.



Yes, TorButton's configuration is ok...and a little
more background info for those who are interested:

FF conciders a port set to zero to be an un-proxies
protocol and direct connects to the Internet.
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.proxy.(protocol)_port

When the Socks address:proxy is set it routes other
non-proxied protocols into Socks settings.
http://www.mozilla.org/quality/networking/docs/netprefs.html

So because TorButton sets FF ftp and gopher to port
zero it allows the Socks proxy to route and break
ftp/gopher against Tor.

Can't ever by straight forward, ;-)



 


Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121

  




GPG Preferences

2007-03-28 Thread Jason Edwards

Hey guys...

I use GPGPreference to tweak Mac GNU Privacy Guard. Under the Key Server 
tab there is a text box which says:

Use the following HTTP proxy to access the key server

I took a guess and filled in http://127.0.0.1:8118/ and when I search 
for keys it seems to work. Did I configure this correctly? Is that 
program even meant to be used with Tor?


Jay


Re: Please don't recommend Tor Button!

2007-03-28 Thread light zoo

--- Jason Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ummm... So do I need to change to Torbutton
 preferences from the default 
 settings?
 
 Jay

If your using FF 1.5 or newer then, no, you don't need
to change the default TorButton settings.

Regards


 

Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. 
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html