[osint] Leadership

2007-12-23 Thread Beowulf

 
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 10:27 AM
Subject: Fw: Leadership

 

Thought you might appreciate this. It is a tribute only a few could
understand and relate to. I sent this to you because I thought you should
get a glimpse in to the brotherhood of leadership, especially, and expressly
of the United States Army Rangers.

~

Dining-in speech at U.S. Military Academy 2003, by Lieutenant Colonel Guy
Lofaro...

 

Let me say before beginning, that it has been my pleasure to attend several
dinings-in here at West Point and hence, I have some basis for comparison.
You people have done a fine job and you ought to congratulate yourselves. In
fact, why don't we take this time to have the persons who were responsible
for this event, stand, so we can acknowledge them publicly. I guess I am
honored with these invitations because there exists this rumor that I can
tell a story. Cadets, who I have had in class, sometimes approach me
beforehand and request that, during my speech, I tell some of the stories
I've told them in class.For the longest time I have resisted this. I simply
didn't think this the right forum for story-telling, so I tried instead,
with varying degrees of success, to use this time to impart some higher
lesson - some thought that would perhaps stay with one or two of you a
little longer than the 10 or 15 minutes I will be standing here. I tried
this again last week at another dining-in and I bombed. Big time. Of course,
the cadets didn't say that. They said all the polite things - Thank you,
sir, for those inspiring words - You've provided us much food for thought -
We all certainly learned something from you tonight, sir. And I'm thinking
- yeah - you learned something all right. You learned never to invite that
SOB to be a dining-in speaker again. So in the interim, I've spent quite a
bit of time thinking about what I would say to you tonight. What can I say
that will stay with you? And as I reflected on this I turned it on myself -
what stays with me? What makes a mark on me? What do I remember, and why?
How have I learned the higher lessons I so desperately want to impart to
you? Well - I've learned those higher lessons through experience. And as I
thought further, I realized that there's only one way to relate experience -
that is to tell some stories. So I'm going to try something new here this
evening. I'm going to give you your stories and attempt to relate what I've
learned by living them. I'm going to let you crawl inside my eye-sockets and
see some of the things I've seen these past 18 years. 

 

Lesson One Imagine you are a brand new second lieutenant on a peacekeeping
mission in the Sinai Peninsula . You are less than a year out of West Point
, and only a few weeks out of the basic course. You are standing at a strict
position of attention in front of your battalion commander, a man you will
come to realize was one of the finest soldiers with whom you've ever served,
and you are being questioned about a mistake - a big mistake - that you've
made. You see, your platoon lost some live ammo. Oh sure, it was eventually
found, but for a few hours you had the entire battalion scrambling. Your
battalion commander is not yelling at you though, he's not demeaning you;
he's simply taking this opportunity to ensure you learn from the experience.
And you do - you learn that people make mistakes, that those mistakes do not
usually result in the end of the world, and that such occasions are valuable
opportunities to impart some higher lessons. Then, out of the corner of your
eye, you see your platoon sergeant emerge from behind a building. He's an
old soldier - a fine soldier though - whose knees have seen a few too many
airborne operations. He sees you and the colonel - and he takes off at a
run. You see him approaching from behind the colonel and the next thing you
see is the back of your platoon sergeant's head. He is now standing between
you and your battalion commander - the two are eyeball to eyeball. Your
platoon sergeant says, a touch of indignance in his voice, Leave my
lieutenant alone, sir. He didn't lose the ammo, I did. I was the one who
miscounted. You want someone's ass, you take mine. And you learn another
lesson - you learn about loyalty. 

 

Lesson Two It's a few months later, and you are one of two soldiers left on
a hot PZ on some Caribbean island. There's been another foul up - not yours
this time, but you're going to pay for it. It's you and your RTO, a
nineteen-year-old surfer from Florida who can quote Shakespeare, because his
Mom was a high school literature teacher, and who joined the Army because
his Dad was a World War II Ranger. The last UH-60 has taken off on an air
assault and someone is supposed to come back and get you guys. But the fire
is getting heavy, and you're not sure anything can get down there without
getting shot up. You're taking fire from some heavily forested hills. At
least two 

[osint] Leadership Disputes Plague Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb

2007-09-26 Thread Beowulf
Good, but these are personality not policy conflicts...won't matter in the
long run.
 
B

 

http://www.jamestow
http://www.jamestown.org/terrorism/news/article.php?articleid=2373676
n.org/terrorism/news/article.php?articleid=2373676
Leadership Disputes Plague Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb
By Andrew Mcgregor

A battle is underway for control of the leadership of Algeria's last
major armed Islamist group. A country exhausted by violence has used a
combination of amnesties and military action to reduce the once
powerful Salafist Group for Call and Combat (GSPC) to a few hundred
fighters. Under the leadership of Abu Mus'ab Abd al-Wadoud (also known
as Abdelmalek Droudkel), the commander since 2004, the GSPC has been
reorganized into Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). Droukdel's
decision to align the group with Osama bin Laden and adopt
al-Qaeda-style tactics has led to a further loss of personnel. There
are now reports that the GSPC leader has been deposed by a three-day
meeting of group leaders in the Lakhdaria region east of Algiers. GSPC
amirs loyal to Droukdel have already been replaced, but the congress
was unable to decide on a new leader (Liberté, September 18).

Several factors were involved in Droukdel's dismissal, including the
controversial transformation of the GSPC into a regional branch of
al-Qaeda without consultation with the rest of the movement (as
required), the inequitable distribution of funds from extortion and
kidnapping rackets, the adoption of suicide bombings and the
recruitment of teenagers to carry out such attacks (Terrorism Monitor;
September 13; Terrorism Focus, September 18).

Surprisingly, former GSPC leader Hassan Hattab is reported to have
taken part in the congress that ousted Droukdel. Hattab has been part
of the Islamist insurgency since it began in 1992. A former
paratrooper, Hattab joined the Armed Islamic Group (GIA) at its
inception, becoming the group's amir in the Kabylie mountains two
years later. Hattab formed the GSPC in 1998 in reaction to the brutal
violence and civilian massacres that characterized GIA operations.
Hattab conceived the movement as a guerrilla force that, unlike the
GIA, would avoid inflicting civilian casualties in favor of targeting
government and military personnel. Hattab was forced out of the GSPC
leadership in 2001 and has been inactive since 2004, other than a
recent public debate (via the internet and press interviews) with
Droukdel over insurgent methods. Despite numerous reports of his death
and a death sentence delivered in absentia earlier this year, the
ex-GSPC leader remains a fugitive in the Algerian mountains. Hattab
insists he is still the legitimate leader of the GSPC/AQIM and denies
reports from his rivals that he resigned from the organization
(Terrorism Focus, November 14, 2005).

In March 2006, Hattab urged AQIM members to take advantage of the
government amnesty offer, but did not do so himself. A month later,
Hattab denounced the AQIM suicide attacks in Algiers in an open letter
to President 'Abd al-Aziz Bouteflika, repeating his call for AQIM to
abandon the armed struggle. Hattab also suggested the Islamist
movement had begun to drift from its original goals (Magharebia,
April 17, May 10).

Further criticism of AQIM's jihad came last week from Dr. Yusuf
al-Qaradawi, an Egyptian Muslim Brother who has made himself an
influential figure in political Islam through his embrace of modern
communications technology, including internet and television
broadcasts from his base in Qatar. Known for views that frequently
conflict with those of Salafis, al-Qaradawi rebuked AQIM for its
extremism while receiving medical treatment in an Algerian military
hospital: You should follow in the footsteps of the Islamic group in
Egypt which has announced that they are shunning violence…Regret your
actions and join the Islamic mainstream (The Peninsula [Doha],
September 20).

On the same day, a call for greater violence in Algeria came from
al-Qaeda's number two, Ayman al-Zawahiri. In a statement, al-Zawahiri
urged the people of Algeria and other North African states to carry
out an ethnic cleansing of French and Spanish residents as part of the
effort to restore al-Andalus (Muslim rule in the Iberian peninsula)
(Reuters, September 20).

AQIM faces financial problems, has lost many of its leaders and is
opposed by most of the population, including many Algerian Islamists.
Operations are now largely restricted to six eastern provinces and two
provinces in the south after the GSPC sustained heavy losses in
government offensives. Most of the remaining units are infiltrated by
Algerian intelligence operatives who seek to inflame divisions within
the movement. Hattab has also complained of GIA extremists
infiltrating the GSPC, creating deviation from its goals and methods.
Since 1999, 8,000 militants have taken advantage of the amnesty, with
only 300 still in the field (al-Sharq al-Awsat, September 16). Many of
those who have accepted the 

[osint] Leadership in a Time of Crisis: How King Abdullah Guided Saudi Arabia Through the 9/11 Storm.

2007-09-19 Thread Beowulf

 
Leadership in a Time of Crisis: How King Abdullah Guided Saudi Arabia
Through the 9/11 Storm.

18/09/2007 
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=3
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=3id=10246 id=10246

By Khalil bin Abdullah Khalil*


 
Terrorist attacks, deception and sabotage have drained much of Saudi
Arabia's political assets and resulted in throwing the kingdom into a
historical crisis with the world's only superpower. 

This has pushed the kingdom to play an important role in controlling the
negative impacts of such attacks and restoring its prestige in the eyes of
the world. 


The fierce battle began on September 11, 2001, when 15 Saudis took part in
the terrorist attacks in New York that have been followed by numerous
statements and video recordings by leaders of the Al Qaeda network in which
they threatened the US with more attacks, declared war on the world, and
promised to liberate the Arab Peninsula from the polytheists and the
crusaders. 


Suddenly, Saudi Arabia; a country known for its political composure and
moderate positions, found itself forced to confront international events. 


Al Qaeda brought down the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York
City as well as the face of the US economy in particular and capitalism in
general. One plane hit the Pentagon [the headquarters of the US Department
of Defense] setting it ablaze and this was a violation of a strong source of
power in the US in particular and in the West in general. After witnessing
such events, what other economic landmarks and military strongholds can
America have confidence in? 


Suddenly, the spotlight was on Saudi Arabia for objective reasons as the
leadership of the enemy and the soldiers and followers of Al Qaeda were
linked to Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, most of the perpetrators of these
frenzied attacks were Saudi and the stated religious slogans were in line
with the Salafist jihadist trend. 


The media storm raged violently. Meanwhile, the US administration made the
decision to engage in battle. However, the enemies are wandering ghosts who
have no countries, armies or rules. 


In addition, armies and fleets were dispatched to strike Afghanistan and
topple the Taliban regime. The US achieved this target within 36 days as the
military strikes began on October 7, 2001. However, attention and debate in
the media, research centers and universities focused on Saudi Arabia as,
according to the prevailing opinion, it was considered the incubator of
terrorism, financer of terrorists, exporter of Wahhabism, protector of
Salafist Jihadi groups and exporter of the culture of hatred, in addition to
other ideas that have been put forward in earnest for discussion. For
example, American writer Maureen Dowd called for waging war in a Kingdom
that gives medieval a bad name in her article that was published in the New
York Times, August 28, 2002, and was republished the next day in the British
newspaper, the Guardian. 


The kingdom of Saudi Arabia was not ready for this encounter and took time
to recover from the shock of being embroiled in a historical confrontation,
in which it had no previous experience. Past confrontations that it has
experienced have been with Arab and Islamic countries such as Egypt, Yemen
and Iran. The scope of dispute was limited and confrontations were, in most
cases, on a media level with a few exceptions. Undoubtedly, the current
confrontations are with the world's superpower, namely, the United States,
with all its military, economic, political, media and scientific
potentialities, not only with the US administration. 


Over 6,000,000 Saudis over 50 years have lived in the US and have witnessed
distinguished bilateral relations. In addition, more than 40,000 Saudis bear
US citizenship. In the early 1980s, the number of scholarships given to
[Saudi] students numbered over 23,000. Universities and institutes in
western America were replete with Saudi students and tourists because of its
beauty and mild weather. Meanwhile, the Saudi embassy in Washington served
as a reference to Arabs and Muslims, where it supported and shared their
concerns and aspirations. Arab ambassadors believe that the reason Prince
Bandar bin Sultan was celebrated in Washington was due to the fact that he
understood US policy. He confidently and professionally used it to
consolidate Saudi-US relations and to serve his country and the issues of
Arabs and Muslims. 


Storms have raged in the aftermath of the disastrous events of the 9/11
terrorist attacks. Consequently, Saudi Arabia has been forced to confront
the US despite the close relations between the political leaderships of the
two countries, the distinguished relations during the Cold War, the
cooperation during the liberation of Kuwait, and the history of the distinct
fruitful relations for over 70 years. Saudi Arabia has been thrown into the
eye of the storm that weakened its diplomacy and subjected it to
investigation, pursuit, and