Re: Asp.Net Core

[Tom Rutter]

Oops spoke too soon.
Thanks

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:00 PM, DotNet Dude  wrote:

> You must be using the 'empty' template
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Tom Rutter  wrote:
>
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> I assume some of you have at least played with asp.net core. Is it just
>> me or has Microsoft taken this "let's separate everything and let the dev
>> get whatever they as they need it" too far? Even serving static files isn't
>> baked in by default. C'mon! The VS web project templates should at least
>> have this on by default.
>>
>> Regards
>> Tom the new plumber
>>
>
>

Re: Asp.Net Core

[DotNet Dude]

You must be using the 'empty' template

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Tom Rutter  wrote:

> Hey folks,
>
> I assume some of you have at least played with asp.net core. Is it just
> me or has Microsoft taken this "let's separate everything and let the dev
> get whatever they as they need it" too far? Even serving static files isn't
> baked in by default. C'mon! The VS web project templates should at least
> have this on by default.
>
> Regards
> Tom the new plumber
>

Asp.Net Core

[Tom Rutter]

Hey folks,

I assume some of you have at least played with asp.net core. Is it just me
or has Microsoft taken this "let's separate everything and let the dev get
whatever they as they need it" too far? Even serving static files isn't
baked in by default. C'mon! The VS web project templates should at least
have this on by default.

Regards
Tom the new plumber

Re: [OT] node.js and express

[mike smith]

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Keogh  wrote:

> Totally agree Greg. About 80% of what we are currently building could be
>> done in 1/10 of the time using winforms or mvc.
>>
>
> So there are lots of crazy people in here ... Fabulous!
>
> I can also write Winforms or WPF apps in 1/10 (or far less) the time of
> equivalent JS code. I have also had Clickone working perfectly 10 years
> ago. I also really miss Silverlight.
>
> Writing anything in JS is the most tediously slow and frustrating
> experience of my career (trying to make Xamarin apps work is a close
> second, but that's another story). The crude IDEs, the immature language
> definition, the poor tooling, lack of conventions, too much choice and
> duplication, jumbled dependencies, etc, all drag you down and backwards.
> After 35 years of coding, I have a ache in my guts telling me that
> something is WRONG with JavaScript, it's the WRONG thing for the WRONG job,
> but it just won't friggin' die.
>
> I only found out about Electron several weeks ago when I wondered how they
> had written Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer 
> so it runs on Windows and OSX. By poking around in the files you will see
> clues that it's "Electron" ... which turns out to be a JS framework for
> writing desktop apps, holy sh*t. That also explains why it feels a bit
> weird to use.
>
> Oh well, back to C# and "real" development...
>
> *GK*
>

sed 's/c#/c++/'

FIFY

-- 
Meski

 http://courteous.ly/aAOZcv

"Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure,
you'll get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills